New Model for Evaluation of FRP Debonding Strain for Russian Design Code

Table 2

Results of statistical modeling of 𝑥₁.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Lilliefors tests	Shapiro-Wilk’s 𝑊 test	Mean,; theor/exp	Standard; deviation	Probability of exceedance	Reference
K-S 𝑑=0.0878, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃<0.15	𝑊=0.971,; 𝑃=0.059	1.171	0.324	70%	[7]
K-S 𝑑=0.069, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.971,; 𝑃=0.066	1.126	0.287	67%	[8]
—	—	—	—	—	[11]
K-S 𝑑=0.093, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.963,; 𝑃=0.089	0.467	0.061	0%	[12]
—	—	—	—	—	[13]
—	—	—	—	—	[14]
K-S 𝑑=0.075, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.979,; 𝑃=0.228	1.494	0.380	90%	[16–19]
K-S 𝑑=0.096, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃<0.10	𝑊=0.974,; 𝑃=0.107	1.362	0.375	83%	[20]
K-S 𝑑=0.083, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃<0.20	𝑊=0.972,; 𝑃=0.078	1.082	0.314	60%	[21]
K-S 𝑑=0.082, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.983,; 𝑃=0.374	1.479	0.358	91%	[15]