New Model for Evaluation of FRP Debonding Strain for Russian Design Code

Table 3

Results of statistical modeling of 𝑥₂.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov and; Lilliefors tests	Shapiro-Wilk’s; 𝑊 test	Mean,; theor/exp	Standard; deviation	Probability of; exceedance	Reference
K-S 𝑑=0.086, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃<0.20	𝑊=0.969,; 𝑃=0.055	0.989	0.278	48%	[7]
K-S𝑑=0.069, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.9707,; 𝑃=0.066	0.766	0.196	11%	[8]
K-S 𝑑=0.083, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.970,; 𝑃=0.074	0.437	0.085	0%	[11]
—	—	—	—	—	[12]
K-S 𝑑=0.069, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.984,; 𝑃=0.421	0.910	0.232	35%	[13]
K-S 𝑑=0.075, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.971,; 𝑃=0.076	0.899	0.170	27%	[14]
K-S 𝑑=0.067, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.979,; 𝑃=0.2368	1.445	0.357	89%	[16–19]
K-S 𝑑=0.074, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.971,; 𝑃=0.096	1.232	0.314	77%	[20]
K-S 𝑑=0.107, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.15	𝑊=0.970,; 𝑃=0.078	1.161	0.339	68%	[21]
K-S 𝑑=0.081, 𝑃>0.20; Lilliefors 𝑃>0.20	𝑊=0.987,; 𝑃=0.648	1.381	0.321	88%	[15]