Modelling the Shear-Tension Coupling of Woven Engineering Fabrics

<table>Comparison between the experimental [<a href="/journals/amse/2013/786769/#B10">10</a>] and the predicted results using non-normalized <svg height="16.450001" id="M55" style="vertical-align:-3.3907pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 41.775002 16.450001" width="41.775002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M599 650l-18 -160l-30 -2q-2 70 -11 94q-5 16 -26 24t-75 8h-94q-27 0 -33.5 -6.5t-12.5 -32.5l-43 -226h108q52 0 72.5 5t31 18t28.5 52h28l-40 -200h-28q-1 42 -6 56.5t-24.5 21t-70.5 6.5h-108l-32 -177q-13 -65 1 -80.5t88 -22.5l-8 -28h-279l6 28q61 5 77.5 20.5
t29.5 81.5l72 387l7.5 40.5t1 26.5t-4 18t-15.5 10t-24 6t-37 4l8 28h461z" id="x1D439"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,10.637,16.25)"><path d="M352 391q0 -31 -27 -44q-14 -7 -24 6q-39 48 -84 48q-23 0 -39.5 -15t-16.5 -40q0 -43 73 -90q49 -32 70 -58t21 -57q0 -58 -62 -105.5t-129 -47.5q-40 0 -75.5 25t-35.5 52q0 28 32 46q7 4 15 3t11 -6q19 -31 48.5 -50.5t54.5 -19.5q34 0 54 19.5t20 42.5q0 43 -65 81
q-97 56 -97 123q0 50 51 96q19 17 58 32.5t62 15.5q37 0 61 -18t24 -39z" id="x1D460"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,19.5,12.162)"><path d="M535 230h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x2212"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,33.252,12.162)"><path d="M475 507q0 -83 -20 -172t-56 -167.5t-93.5 -129t-125.5 -50.5q-157 0 -157 227q0 78 21.5 164t59 161t96.5 123.5t126 48.5q79 0 114 -58t35 -147zM391 522q0 155 -81 155q-62 0 -111 -82.5t-73 -200.5h253q12 81 12 128zM373 346h-255q-12 -91 -12 -150q0 -72 20 -123
t63 -51q34 0 64 28.5t52.5 77t39 103t28.5 115.5z" id="x1D703"></path></g>
</svg> of BBE in the coupling NOCM.</table>

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Modelling the Shear-Tension Coupling of Woven Engineering Fabrics

Figure 5