About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 857465, 6 pages
Research Article

Electric and Magnetic Properties of Sputter Deposited BiFeO3 Films

1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
2Department of Medical Physics, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
3Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
4Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Vassilika Vouton, 711 10 Heraklion, Greece
5Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece

Received 4 October 2013; Accepted 17 October 2013

Academic Editor: Tung-Ming Pan

Copyright © 2013 N. Siadou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Polycrystalline BiFeO3 films have been magnetron sputter deposited at room temperature and subsequently heat-treated ex situ at temperatures between 400 and 700°C. The deposition was done in pure Ar atmosphere, as the use of oxygen-argon mixture was found to lead to nonstoichiometric films due to resputtering effects. At a target-to-substrate distance the BiFeO3 structure can be obtained in larger range process gas pressures (2–7 mTorr) but the films do not show a specific texture. At codeposition from BiFeO3 and Bi2O3 has been used. Films sputtered at low rate tend to grow with the (001) texture of the pseudo-cubic BiFeO3 structure. As the film structure does not depend on epitaxy similar results are obtained on different substrates. A result of the volatility of Bi, Bi rich oxide phases occur after heat treatment at high temperatures. A Bi2SiO5 impurity phase forms on the substrate side, and does not affect the properties of the main phase. Despite the deposition on amorphous silicon oxide substrate weak ferromagnetism phenomena and displaced loops have been observed at low temperatures showing that their origin is not strain. Ba, La, Ca, and Sr doping suppress the formation of impurity phases and leakage currents.

1. Introduction

Recently there is a revival of the interest in magnetoelectric materials for novel multifunctional devices [1] and spintronic [2] applications. BiFeO3 (BFO) is both ferroelectric (  K) and antiferromagnetic (  K) at room temperature, and thus it is very promising for such applications [3]. Pulsed laser deposition [46] and sputtering [710] are standard methods to deposit BFO films. Magnetron sputtering is a very reproducible and easily controlled deposition technique that can be used to prepare heterostructures combining different types of layers. However, when magnetrons are used to prepare binary oxide materials, severe resputtering of the film during deposition can alter its composition [11]. In order to find the conditions which lead to formation of the crystalline BFO phase sputtering at different substrate-to-target distances and process gas pressures have been tested. Here, we present a study of magnetron sputtered deposition of polycrystalline BiFeO3 films in view of their use as exchange-biasing layers.

2. Experimental

Polycrystalline BFO and iron oxide films have been magnetron sputter deposited at room temperature using a MANTIS deposition system from a commercial BiFeO3 ( and ), Bi2O3 ( ), and Fe3O4 ( ) targets of Kurt J. Lesker. The substrates are placed opposite to the sputtering targets (on axis). Pure (5N) Ar was used as a process gas. Three different methods have been applied: (i) deposition from a BFO at a substrate-to-target distance of , (ii) low rate deposition from a BFO at a substrate-to-target distance of , and (iii) codeposition from a BFO ( ) and Bi2O3 ( ) targets at a distance of . In order to achieve doping by elements as Ba, La, Sr, and Ca, corresponding oxide powders have been added either on the BiFeO3 or on the Bi2O3 target for heavy or low doping, respectively. The BFO films have been sputter deposited and subsequently heat-treated ex situ at temperatures between 400 and 700°C. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) diagrams were collected with a Bruker D8 Advance Diffractometer. The magnetic measurements were performed with a Lake Shore vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) and Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer. The microstructure was investigated with a JEOL JSM-5600 Scanning Electron Microscope. The leakage currents have been measured by a RT66B test system of Radiant technologies.

3. Optimization of the Deposition Conditions

In Figure 1, the XRD patterns of films deposited under different sputtering gas pressures at a distance are presented. The applied power is 100 W RF. In all cases, BiFeO3 is the main phase, and the stoichiometry (determined by EDX) does not vary considerably, but it is close to Bi47Fe53Ox. More specifically, the atomic percent of Bi was determined to be 46.2, 47.5, and 47.1, for 2, 3.5, and 7 mTorr of Ar gas, respectively.

Figure 1: XRD patterns of bismuth ferrite films deposited under different sputtering gas pressures at a distance .

There is presence of bismuth oxide, mainly at higher Ar pressure, and Bi2SiO5 at lower Ar pressures. The former is a result of the volatility of Bi and the decomposition of the bismuth ferrite phase. If additional oxygen is used as a reactive gas, then the films are severely Bi deficient (EDX shows Bi40Fe60Ox) and the BiFeO3 phase does not form. This may be attributed to resputtering as a result of oxygen anions bombardment of the substrate [11]. The Bi2SiO5 phase forms on the substrate side, as suggested by the presence of Si, and does not affect the properties of the main phase.

This can be proven by examining grazing incidence XRD patterns acquired at different incidence angles. The Bi2SiO5 peak intensity increases with the angle of incidence (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Grazing incidence XRD patterns of BFO films measured under different incidence angles. BiFeO3 peaks are indicated by crosses, those of Bi2SiO5 by lines, and those of Bi2O3 by stars.

In Figure 3 the XRD patterns of 20 nm thick heat-treated films deposited at at Ar pressure of 5 mTorr with deposition rate 0.03 nm/min. Similar results are obtained for films deposited at Ar pressure of 2 mTorr (0.25 nm/min). After ex situ heat treatment at 500°C, the BiFeO3 phase with (100) texture of the pseudocubic unit cell appears. This corresponds to the (012) of rhombohedral phase (space group R3c) which is the bulk unit cell, resulting from the symmetry reduction due to the ferroelectric and accompanying distortions. The optimum heat-treatment temperature is 600°C while heat treatment at higher temperatures leads to the formation of the undesired phases as silicate, bismuth oxide, and in some cases other ferrites as Bi2Fe4O9.

Figure 3: XRD patterns of bismuth ferrite films deposited Ar gas pressure  mTorr at a distance on oxidized Si wafers. The films show (100) texture of the pseudocubic unit cell which corresponds to the (012) of R3c.

The degree of texture was estimated by profile refinement of the XRD patterns using the WinPLOTR package (Figure 4). The March preferred orientation function was used. The March parameter estimated to 0.22 which gives an average grain misalignment consistent with the rocking curves around the (001) pseudocubic reflection. In general, it was found that, under these conditions, the stoichiometry and BiFeO3 formation thereof was very sensitive to target usage partially due to magnetic field limitations of the source. Therefore, we have chosen to use a BiFeO3 and enhance Bi content by codepositing from Bi2O3 target. The rates were 1.38 nm/min and 0.25 nm/min, respectively. This small stoichiometry correction is crucial in reproducibly achieving the BiFeO3 phase. In thicker films (260 nm) prepared under the same conditions, there is a strong presence of the cubic Bi25FeO40 phase. The impurity phases can be leached by 10% diluted HNO3 for 30 minutes.

Figure 4: Rietveld fit of an XRD pattern of bismuth ferrite films deposited Ar gas pressure  mTorr at a distance and heat-treated at 500°C. The line at the bottom shows the difference between the theoretical and the experimental line. The inset shows a rocking curve around the (001) reflection.

4. Microstructure and Domains

SEM studies have been performed to heat-treated BFO films which have been field cooled under 2 kOe from above the Néel temperature. Thus the formation of the ferroelectric domains is expected to be influenced by the coupling to the existing AF domains, due to the multiferroic nature of BFO that implies coupling between the two types of order [12]. The ferroelectric domain structure can be revealed by SEM using the brightness contrast between antiparallel ferroelectric domains on an unmetalized polar crystal surface [1315]. Low accelerating voltage (down to 2 kV) and small beam current are used, in order to avoid severe charge accumulation on the insulating surface of the sample.

In BFO, the ferroelectric polarization can point along any of the eight directions defined by the four diagonals of the pseudocubic perovskite unit cell (with two antiparallel polarities for each direction). Between these eight possible different polar domains in BiFeO3 there are three possible types of ferroelectric domain walls 71°, 109°, and 180° degrees typical of rhombohedral crystals. Different types of domains can be favored on the growth conditions [16]. These domains are stripe-like, and their width scales with film thickness. Very different irregular domain morphology has been observed in thin epitaxial films [13]. In our case, the use of Si wafers covered with amorphous Si oxide layers excludes the possibility of strain appearance as relaxation mechanism in the morphology of domains. On the contrary, the polycrystalline nature and grain boundaries create complex multidomain structures.

SEM images of 125 nm thick films prepared at show that the films consist of large 20–100 μm island-like grains (Figure 5). The domain patterns are cloud-like irregular with size 3–7 μm. This complex domain structure may be attributed to the fact that, due to the existence of isolated islands, a unique global minimum cannot be achieved. Films prepared at look homogenous at larger areas and are also characterized by a fine mosaic-like domain structure in the range of 10 μm (Figure 6).

Figure 5: SEM images of a 125 nm thick BiFeO3 film prepared at a source-to-substrate distance of . (a) was obtained with accelerating voltage of 10 kV. (b) was obtained with 2.5 kV. Large (~50 μm) grains are observed along with smaller features related to the ferroelectric domain structure.
Figure 6: SEM images of an 87 nm thick BiFeO3 film prepared at a source-to-substrate distance of .

5. Weak Ferromagnetism Phenomena

Weak ferromagnetism phenomena have been observed long ago in antiferromagnetic (AF) fine particles and have been explained as a result of unbalanced magnetic moments of the two magnetic sublattices due to their finite size [17]. The presence of uncompensated surface spins leads to anomalous magnetic properties, such as large moments, coercivities, and hysteresis loop shifts. The antiferromagnetic ordering of BiFeO3 is G-type that is, each spin is surrounded by six antiparallel spins on the nearest Fe neighbors. This ordering should give rise to magnetically compensated interfaces which is not favorable to exchange biasing. Thus surface magnetic heterogeneities, complexity of the underlying BFO film and nanoscale domain wall features, are crucial for the development of exchange biasing [14]. In sufficiently small particles the reduced coordination of surface spins can cause a fundamental change in the magnetic order throughout the particle [18]. In this case, a clear distinction between surface and bulk spin contributions to the total magnetic moment cannot be done. In AF thin films these phenomena are expected to dominate at low film thickness due to the increased contribution of the surfaces. The hysteresis loops at low temperatures (Figure 7) show ferromagnetic contributions, coercivity of 150 Oe, and a small exchange biasing evidenced by the vertical displacement of the loops, which is maximal (120 Oe) for the 87 nm film. The high field slope corresponds to the canting of the AF moments which is maximal for the 43 nm thin film. The remanence values are low and must be attributed to both bulk and surface contributions.

Figure 7: Hysteresis curves at 5 K after field cooling under a field of 70 kOe. Only the low field range is shown.

These different contributions become clearer in the magnetization versus temperature plots (Figure 8). The surface contribution is enhanced below 20 K. The thickness dependence implies that there is a surface contribution of 6.4 μemu/cm2 and volume contribution of 1.16 emu/cm3 at 5 K which become 4.3 μemu/cm2 and 0.7 emu/cm3, respectively, at 300 K. These values range from 0.065 to 0.04 μB/Fe atom. As the magnetization values are higher for thinner films they must be attributed to surface contributions and should not be confused with some weaker contributions due to intrinsic mechanisms which could reflect an underlying competition between antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic interactions and the appearance of spin-glass state in the intermediate temperature range. Similar thickness dependence has been reported for spin-glass phenomena observed in compressively strained BiFeO3 films from 19 to 114 nm epitaxially grown on LaAlO3 [19]. The observation of similar behavior in our films deposited on the amorphous silicon oxide layers shows that strain mechanisms that have been revoked are not the only possible causes leading to the appearance of low temperature ferromagnetic contributions.

Figure 8: Magnetization as a function of temperature for BFO films of different thickness. The measurements have been done upon warming from 5 K to 300 K in the presence of a 100 Oe field after cooling under a field of 70 kOe.

6. Effects of Doping

The XRD patterns of the Bi1−xBaxFeO3 series are shown in Figure 9. Ba doping suppresses the formation of impurity phases. In Figure 10, the variation of unit cell with Ba content is shown. The data are compared with the simple Vegard’s law for a solid solution, extrapolating between the end members BiFeO3 and BaFeO3 (dashed line). The continuous line is a fit based on a simple geometrical relation for the size of the perovskite cell with the ionic radii as free parameters, yielding 1.35 nm, 1.42 nm, and 1.45 nm for Bi3+, Ba2+, and oxygen, respectively. These values differ from those tabulated by Shannon [20] (1.03 nm, 1.35 nm, and 1.40 nm, resp.). The systematic increase of the cell constant with doping shows that Ba enters the main perovskite phase.

Figure 9: Grazing incidence XRD patterns Bi1−xBaxFeO3 films.
Figure 10: Pseudocubic unit cell parameter of Bi1−xBaxFeO3 films.

Low doping range is more interesting as it does not affect the ferroelectric properties, and it is sufficient to suppress the leakage currents. A compilation of the leakage current measurements, under different doping, is shown in Figure 11. Reduction of leakage is believed to occur because of the reduced oxygen vacancy which stabilizes the oxygen octahedral [21]. However, the abrupt enhancement of current at a threshold voltage can be attributed to an electronic localization-delocalization transition through band-filling control since oxygen vacancy distribution should be continuously varied by sweeping the applied voltage [22]. In general, the effect of substitutions is not limited to the “chemical pressure” due to ionic-radius mismatch with respect to Bi (minimal for Ca, La, moderate for Sr, and highest for Ba) but also to the effects to the stereochemically active (6s2) lone-pair activity. In this case, the best results have been obtained for Sr and Ca substitutions.

Figure 11: Leakage current across 90 nm thick doped BFO films (i.e., the maximum voltage corresponds to 100 kV/cm).

7. Conclusion

Polycrystalline BFO films have been grown by RF magnetron sputtering on different substrates. The formation of the BFO depends very sensitively on sputtering conditions and heat-treatment temperature. In general, it was found that, when the substrate is placed close to the target , the formation of BFO is more stable, that is, the phase can be obtained within a wide range of conditions but the films do not show a specific crystallographic texture, in contrast to those sputtered at . As the films have been grown on the amorphous oxide layers of silicon wafers, it is proven that texture can be achieved without epitaxy of 20 nm films and furthermore that the low temperature weak ferromagnetism phenomena are not related to epitaxial strains. Doping suppresses the formation of impurity phases and leakage currents.


This research has been cofinanced by the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Heracleitus-II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund. The authors would like to thank the authors John Kafegidakis and Ruud Bernsen at Phenom-World BV for recording some of the SEM images.


  1. C.-W. Nan, M. I. Bichurin, S. Dong, D. Viehland, and G. Srinivasan, “Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: historical perspective, status, and future directions,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 3, Article ID 031101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Bibes and A. Barthélémy, “Towards a magnetoelectric memory,” Nature Materials, vol. 7, pp. 425–426, 2008.
  3. G. Catalan and J. F. Scott, “Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 2463–2485, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. R. Palkar, J. John, and R. Pinto, “Observation of saturated polarization and dielectric anomaly in magnetoelectric BiFeO3 thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 1628–1630, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Zavaliche, S. Y. Yang, T. Zhao et al., “Multiferroic BiFeO3 films: domain structure and polarization dynamics,” Phase Transitions, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 991–1017, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. X. Lu, J. L. Zhao, J. R. Sun, J. Wang, and B. G. Shen, “Ferroelectric domain structure of the BiFeO3 film grown on different substrates,” Physica B, vol. 406, no. 3, pp. 305–308, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Li, T. Sritharan, S. Zhang, X. He, Y. Liu, and T. Chen, “Multiferroic properties of sputtered BiFeO3 thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 13, Article ID 132908, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Y. Zheng, X. S. Gao, Z. H. Zhou, and J. Wang, “Multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films deposited on SrRuO3 buffer layer by rf sputtering,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 5, Article ID 054104, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Chaodan, Z. Duanming, Y. Jun et al., “Synthesis and ferroelectric properties of BiFeO3 thin films grown by sputtering,” Integrated Ferroelectrics, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Ternon, J. Thery, T. Baron, C. Ducros, F. Sanchette, and J. Kreisel, “Structural properties of films grown by magnetron sputtering of a BiFeO3 target,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, no. 2, pp. 481–484, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Grace, D. B. McDonald, M. T. Reiten, J. Olson, R. T. Kampwirth, and K. E. Gray, “The effect of oxidant on resputtering of Bi from Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O films,” The Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 1600, 1991.
  12. Y.-H. Chu, L. W. Martin, M. B. Holcomb, and R. Ramesh, “Controlling magnetism with multiferroics,” Materials Today, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 16–23, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Zhu and W. Cao, “Imaging of 180 ferroelectric domains in LiTaO3 by means of scanning electron microscopy,” Physica Status Solidi A, vol. 173, 1999.
  14. G. Catalan, H. Béa, S. Fusil et al., “Fractal dimension and size scaling of domains in thin films of multiferroic BiFeO3,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 2, Article ID 027602, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. W. Martin, Y.-H. Chu, M. B. Holcomb et al., “Nanoscale control of exchange bias with BiFeO3 thin films,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 2050–2055, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. B. Chen, M. B. Katz, X. Q. Pan et al., “Ferroelectric domain structures of epitaxial (001) BiFeO3 thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 7, Article ID 072907, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. H. Morrish, The Physical Principles of Magnetism, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  18. H. Ohldag, A. Scholl, F. Nolting et al., “Correlation between exchange bias and pinned interfacial spins,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 1, Article ID 017203, 2003. View at Scopus
  19. C.-J. Cheng, C. Lu, Z. Chen et al., “Thickness-dependent magnetism and spin-glass behaviors in compressively strained BiFeO3 thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 98, no. 24, Article ID 242502, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. D. Shannon, “Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides,” Acta Crystallographica A, vol. 32, pp. 751–767, 1976.
  21. H. Ishiwara, “Impurity substitution effects in BiFeO3 thin filmsm-dashFrom a viewpoint of FeRAM applications,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 603–611, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C.-H. Yang, J. Seidel, S. Y. Kim et al., “Electric modulation of conduction in multiferroic Ca-doped BiFeO3 films,” Nature Materials, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 485–493, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus