- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 181905, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/181905

## Control of Temperature and Aluminum Fluoride Concentration Based on Model Prediction in Aluminum Electrolysis

North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China

Received 28 February 2014; Accepted 14 April 2014; Published 21 May 2014

Academic Editor: Peter Majewski

Copyright © 2014 Zeng Shuiping et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The temperature and the aluminum fluoride (AlF_{3}) concentration of electrolyte greatly affect the current efficiency and energy consumption in aluminum electrolysis. This paper developed a new kind of algorithm to control the temperature and AlF_{3} concentration of electrolyte for 300 kA prebake aluminum production cells by altering the setting cell voltage and the AlF_{3} adding rate. One is liquidus model which can be used to calculate AlF_{3} concentration of electrolyte by some technical parameters and target superheat and the other is the temperature models which can determine the required cell voltage by the technical parameters and target temperature. Consequently, the AlF_{3} addition rate can be decided by the AlF_{3} concentration. The temperature and AlF_{3} concentration of electrolyte in the production are measured and the differences between the measurement and the corresponding calculation are used as feedback to correct the model. The coefficients in the model are also revised according to the external conditions. This system has been used in an aluminum company for 2 years. Both the temperature and the AlF_{3} concentration of electrolyte can be controlled as required and the energy consumption of the aluminum production was much decreased.

#### 1. Introduction

The control of aluminum reduction cells is very important to improve the economic index and has been given more and more attention recently. Because the current efficiency and the energy consumption of the process cannot be known within a short period of time, they are not suitable to be used as control parameters in the process control system. The temperature and AlF_{3} concentration of electrolyte are very important factors for aluminum production cells. Temperature should be kept in a reasonable range, usually 945–955°C (degree Celsius). Industrial processes showed that if temperature is 10 degree higher than the required value, the current efficiency decreases by 2% and the energy consumption increases by 3% [1]. The AlF_{3} concentration of electrolyte is the most important factor affecting the superheat of the alumina reduction. The superheat can be taken as a comprehensive embodiment to the energy equilibrium and the material equilibrium. The suitable superheat should be kept to make the cell good operation because large superheat causes the cell ledge to melt and energy consumption to increase and low superheat causes Al_{2}O_{3} to dissolve difficult and low stability of cells. Many researchers considered that superheat should be kept between 6 and 12°C. If the superheat increases by 10°C, the current efficiency would decrease 1.2–1.5% [2]. Because the superheat is calculated from cell temperature and crystallized temperature of the electrolyte, the superheat can be decided by the compounds of the electrolyte if the temperature does not change obviously. The concentration of AlF_{3} and Al_{2}O_{3} in electrolyte usually changes faster than others with time. Al_{2}O_{3} can be controlled automatically by the cell controller to be kept between 1.5 and 2.5% [2], so the concentration of AlF_{3} is a very important parameter to affect the superheat and should be controlled.

The industrial aluminum production is a dynamic process which has some repeated operations, such as aluminum tapping once everyday, anode changed, and anode effect killing. It is well known that the aluminum production cell is a big delay, multivariety, nonlinear process and it is difficult to derive a mathematical model theoretically to describe the procedure. Till now the control of temperature and liquidus is based on the experience from the operators although some models are introduced in some papers [3, 4]. The fuzzy control was used in some factories in recent years, which made some progresses, but there are some defaults for the aluminum production. Once the rule base was constructed, they would work a long period of time and cannot be revised easily. It is unfortunate that the fuzzy control does not use the feedback to correct the control output and the previous experience cannot well suit the next stage in some cases [5].

#### 2. Calculation of Temperature and Concentration of AlF_{3}

##### 2.1. Model for the Temperature with Some Technical Parameters

The temperature of electrolyte depended on the heat balance in aluminum electrolysis, which is very complex because the heat loss cannot be calculated precisely. Some papers discussed problem [6], but only the percentage of the heat flow of some areas was shown in picture so it is impossible to give a precise equation to calculate the temperature. It is fortunate that we have a lot of data sampled online or measured in site, which were saved in the database and can be used to analyze the behavior of aluminum production [7, 8].

Usually operators control the cell temperature in practice by changing the cell voltage, the addition amount of AlF_{3}, and the aluminum level. Here we also use the three parameters to calculate the cell temperature. Therefore, the cell voltage, aluminum level, and fluoride addition were selected as varieties to build an equation by multiregression method. Theoretic analysis and operators’ experiences in the industrial process showed that the cell voltage increase results in cell temperature increase, the fluoride addition results in decrease of temperature, and the higher the aluminum level, the lower the temperature. The two power regressions were used in the equation because the higher power has little contribution to the process. The model type was set as follows:

The equation can be also expressed as where , is temperature (°C) at time and , respectively; , is cell voltage and fluoride addition weight, respectively, at ; is aluminum level at ; is atmosphere temperature; Err is error revision item; and , , , , and are coefficients.

The coefficients (, , , , and ) were calculated from the historic data in database by means of multiregression. Err is the difference between the measured temperature and the calculated one. Here just was adopted as twice power because fluoride addition affects the temperature more complex than cell voltage and aluminum level. The cold material absorbs large amount of heat and the addition of AlF_{3} causes the ledge to melt, which causes the heat to be diffused faster.

The following is a temperature model built originally with historic data for one test cell: where is error revision item; it is set to zero at first.

##### 2.2. Model for the Concentration of AlF_{3}

AlF_{3} is easy to vaporize at high temperature, so its concentration changes constantly by time. In the production process it must be added many times every day. As we know, the vaporization rate of AlF_{3} is mainly decided by temperature and concentration of AlF_{3}. From the theory and practice, we know that the higher the temperature, the faster the vaporization and the higher the concentration, the faster the vaporization also. Because AlF_{3} is not free in the electrolyte and some of it combined with other substances, we considered the item of amount of added AlF_{3} in the calculation period. So, the vaporization rate of AlF_{3} can be expressed as
where is vaporization rate of AlF_{3}; is temperature of electrolyte; is amount of added AlF_{3}; AlF concentration of free AlF_{3}; , , and are the coefficients; and is constant.

The constant is called correction item, which is set to zero at first time. In the control process it is calculated as follows: where is the weight of electrolyte, which is calculated from the height of electrolyte.

There is another question that the ledge of the cell absorbs some AlF_{3} or it melts with the change of temperature and the AlF_{3} concentration, which results in the AlF3 into the electrolyte. Also some added AlF_{3} cannot be dissolved quickly, which causes the time delay of the concentration of AlF_{3}. This is a very complex problem, and it cannot be calculated precisely. Here it is supposed that undissolved AlF_{3} equals the dissolved AlF_{3} from solid phase. Therefore the can be calculated as follows:
where is the total vaporized weight of AlF_{3} during calculation period and in (4) and (5) can be read from the scale pan; is the time (days) corresponding to the . Therefore the concentration of AlF_{3} can be got as follows:
where is days from last analysis to calculated time, and AlF are free concentration of AlF_{3} at the calculated time and at the time sampling for last analysis, respectively, , are the weight of AlF_{3} added and vaporized during calculation periods, respectively, and is average weight of the electrolyte from the calculation time to the sampling time for last analysis, which is related to electrolyte level.

#### 3. Calculation of AlF_{3} Addition Amount and the Set Voltage

##### 3.1. The Amount of AlF_{3} Addition

The main purpose to control AlF_{3} concentration is to keep the superheat in given range, so the needed AlF_{3} addition depended on the target temperature and superheat. Usually superheat is required between 6 and 12°C. If the temperature was set at 950°C, the liquidus should be 938–944°C. Liquid temperature of the electrolyte is only determined by its composition. Asbjorn gave an empirical equation to calculate the liquid temperature from the electrolyte composition [9]. According to the liquidus measurement in the plant, the calculated value is rather bigger than the measured one, so we use an item to revise the equation. With added revised item it can be used to calculate the concentration of AlF_{3}, which is [10]where , , and are liquidus in degree Celsius (°C), by Solheim empirical equation, by equation with correction, and by measurement, respectively; CaF, AlO, MgF, KF, LiF, and AlF are the concentrations of CaF_{2}, Al_{2}O_{3}, MgF_{2}, KF, LiF, and AlF_{3} in weight percent, respectively; Δ1 is revised item calculated by measured data on site.

Because many components in electrolyte vary slowly in a long time for many aluminum plants, we supposed they are constant in analysis cycle, such as CaF = 5.2, MgF = 1.2, KF = 0.4, and LiF = 0.8. If the liquidus of the electrolyte is preset, the required concentration of AlF_{3} can be calculated from analyzed data using (8), (9), and (10). If the objective temperature is 952°C and superheat is 10°C, the concentration of AlF_{3} is 37.1% (wt) for the cells we need to control. The amount of AlF_{3} addition can be calculated by use of (2) to (7).

##### 3.2. The Set Voltage

The system controls the temperature and the concentration of AlF_{3} by adjusting the cell average voltage and fluoride addition. In temperature model (3), can be measured every day, can be set to be the required value [11], is solved by (8), and Err is got by the difference between last measurement and the corresponding calculation. So the set voltage can only depend on the target temperature. In the special case the temperature is decided by the cell voltage.

#### 4. Correction for the Models

##### 4.1. The Error Items in the Models

In certain periods the external condition does not have a big change, so that both models can satisfy the control of the cells by only revising the error items, which are renewed at least every week. For the temperature model, the differences between the measured temperature and the target temperature were used to revise the error item. For the liquidus model, the difference between the measured liquidus temperature and the calculated liquidus temperature was used to revise the error item by (10). The liquidus temperature was measured at least once every week.

##### 4.2. The Coefficients in the Models

As the cell age increases or the external condition changes, the error items will jump up and down, which means the models built with the historic data are not suitable anymore, so the coefficients of the models should be revised with the new data. This case is usually caused by two conditions, one is the change of material property, such as anode, alumina and fluoride, the other is the cell has used too long. Here we use the average square difference as follows to renew the coefficients of the models: where is the average square difference for the error item of liquidus model, is the average square difference for the error item of temperature model, and are the calculated superheat from the model and the measured one, respectively, and are the calculated temperatures from the model and the measured one, respectively, and is the days to be used to calculate the error.

Usually, if , , or , the coefficients of the models should be revised. This usually occurs when a batch of feedings was used up or the electrical current changes greatly.

#### 5. Application of the System

##### 5.1. The Construct of Control System

According to the description above, the control system mainly includes decision of objective temperature and superheat, calculation of control amount by the building models, and the correction of the model online. The schedule is shown in Figure 1. The max adjusted voltage is 30 mv and the fluoride addition 100 kg; that is, if the set voltage is larger than 30 mv, it is set to 30 mv; if computed value of the fluoride addition is larger than 100 kg, it equals 100 kg. This system worked in the upper computers, which integrated with the diagnosis system [12].

##### 5.2. The Results of the Control

The system has been working in an aluminum company in West China for 2 years. The four cells were indicated by plant manager for test. Figure 2 shows the temperature changes for one cell. The average temperature is 951 centigrade degree. Figure 3 shows the concentration of AlF_{3} changes with time. All data in the figures come from the economic reports in the factory.

It is shown in Figures 2 and 3 that the temperature and the concentration of AlF_{3} can be well controlled by the models developed by this paper. Figure 4 showed that the energy consumption decreases more than 1000 kwHr/tAl in 12 months.

#### 6. Conclusions

The model of temperature and the concentration of AlF_{3} were built by use of historic data sampled previously, and the error can be corrected online in order to keep the system stable and running with good results. The algorithm of the set voltage and the amount of AlF_{3} addition was given in combination with the industrial aluminum production, and the control system was constructed and applied in an aluminum plant. The application showed that the temperature and the concentration of AlF_{3} can be well controlled and the energy consumption decreases more than 1000 kwHr/tAl within 12 months by the method described here.

There are still some problems in the control process; for example, the accuracy of the measured data has much effect on the control results. Because of the correction of models based on the measurement of temperature and the analysis of the concentration of AlF_{3}, the error of measurement causes the faults of calculation from the models. Several times we observed the bad control is much related to the measurements, so that precise measurement is the key to promise the control effect by this method. If the measured data is incorrect, we must use a filter to treat the data, which will be discussed in other papers. The other problem which caused the temperature and the concentration of AlF_{3} away from the set value is that the anode change operation is not standard arrangement. It is considered that precise measurement and standard change anode is the base of good control system. On the other hand, the calculated model is different for each cell, because of the different historic data, which caused a large amount of calculation in running process.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Baotou Hope Aluminum Company for providing convenience for the application of the control system. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 51174007).

#### References

- Q. Zhuxian,
*Prebake Aluminum Production*, Metallurgy Press, Beijing, China, 3rd edition, 2005. - L. Yexiang and L. Jie,
*Modern Aluminum Electrolysis*, Metallurgy Press, Beijing, China, 2008. - Simões, Thiago, Martins, João Alberto, et al., “The impact of bath ratio control improvements on current efficiency increase,”
*TMS Light Metals*, pp. 361–365, 2008. View at Google Scholar - H. Yong-bo, Q. Xiang-dong, and Z. Jie-min, “Coupled heat/mass-balance model for analyzing correlation between excess AlF
_{3}concentration and aluminum electrolyte temperature,”*Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China*, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 724–729, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - Z. Shuiping, L. Jinhong, and R. Bijun, “Adaptive fuzzy control system of 300 kA aluminum production cell,”
*TMS Light Metals*, pp. 559–563, 2007. View at Google Scholar - V. Yurkov, V. Mann, T. Piskazhova, K. Nikandrov, and O. Trebukh, “Dynamic control of the cryolite ratio and the bath temperature of aluminium reduction cell,”
*TMS Light Metals*, pp. 383–388, 2002. View at Google Scholar - L. Jie, W. Qianpu, X. Jin et al., “Intelligent fuzzy control system for aluminum reduction cells,”
*Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals*, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 557–562, 1998. View at Google Scholar - C. Xiangtao, L. Jie, Z. Wengen et al., “The development and application of data warehouse and data mining in aluminum electrolysis control systems,”
*TMS Light Metals*, pp. 515–519, 2006. View at Google Scholar - S. Asbjorn, R. Sverre, S. Egil, S. Lisbet, S. Asmund, and T. Trond, “Liquidus temperatures for primary crystallization of cryolite in molten salt systems of interest for aluminum electrolysis,”
*Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B: Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science*, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 739–744, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - Z. Shuiping and L. Jinhong, “Fruzzy predictive control system of cryolite ratio for prebake aluminum production cells,” in
*Proceedings of 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation*, pp. 1229–1233, Zhongqing, China, 2008. - Z. Shuiping and L. Yexiang, “Mathematical model for continuous detection of current efficiency in aluminum production,”
*Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China*, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 686–687, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - S. Zeng, L. Cui, and J. Li, “Diagnosis system for alumina reduction based on BP neural network,”
*Journal of Computers*, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 929–933, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus