Shear Strengthening Performance of Hybrid FRP-FRCM

Table 8

Comparisons between the existing experimental results and proposed model.

Reference	Specimen ID	Type of bond	Type of fiber
				(%)	(kN)	(kN)	(kN)	(kN)	(kN)
[4]	SB-GT	S	G	0.297	146.3	48.02	—	60.27	216.6	0.68
	UW-GT	U	G	0.297	180.2	48.02	—	60.27	216.6	0.83
	SB-CT1	S	C	0.229	155.5	48.02	—	60.27	216.6	0.72
	UW-CT1	U	C	0.229	151.8	48.02	—	60.27	216.6	0.70
	SB-CT2	S	C	0.516	245.4	48.02	—	60.27	216.6	1.13
	UW-CT2	U	C	0.516	253.4	48.02	—	60.27	216.6	1.17
[10]	Beam 4	U	G	0.096	294.0	53.25	35.59	43.37	264.4	1.11
[11]	TRA1	S	P	0.135	188.7	31.82	34.55	31.47	195.7	0.96
	TRA2	U	P	0.034	170.4	31.82	38.81	16.10	173.5	0.98
	TRB1	S	P	0.202	279.1	31.82	38.81	47.02	235.3	1.19
	TRB2	S	P	0.202	191.7	31.82	38.81	39.47	220.2	0.87
	TRB3	U	P	0.095	191.9	31.82	38.81	22.87	187.0	1.03
	TRB4	U	P	0.095	200.0	31.82	38.81	27.37	196.0	1.02
	TRB5	U	P	0.095	199.8	31.82	38.81	27.37	196.0	1.02
[14]	BS2	S	B	0.195	82.7	19.96	—	19.6	79.1	1.05
	BS3	S	B	0.195	83.5	19.96	—	19.6	79.1	1.06
	BS4	S	B	0.390	88.7	19.96	—	19.6	79.1	1.12
	BS5	S	B	0.390	92.5	19.96	—	19.6	79.1	1.17
Mean										0.99
Coefficient of variation										0.16

Note. S = side-bonding; U = U-jacketing; G = glass; C = carbon; P = PBO; B = basalt.