About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Numerical Analysis
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 419021, 21 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/419021
Research Article

Discontinuous Time Relaxation Method for the Time-Dependent Navier-Stokes Equations

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4020, USA

Received 17 July 2010; Accepted 16 September 2010

Academic Editor: William John Layton

Copyright © 2010 Monika Neda. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. N. Kolmogorov, “The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 30, pp. 9–13, 1941.
  2. N. A. Adams and S. Stolz, “Deconvolution methods for subgrid-scale approximation in large eddy simulation,” in Modern Simulation Strategies for Turbulent Flow, R.T. Edwards, 2001.
  3. W. Layton and M. Neda, “Truncation of scales by time relaxation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 325, no. 2, pp. 788–807, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. L. C. Berselli, T. Iliescu, and W. J. Layton, Mathematics of Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows, Scientific Computation, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
  5. V. John, Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Incompressible Flows, vol. 34 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004.
  6. B. J. Geurts, “Inverse modeling for large eddy simulation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 9, pp. 3585–3587, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. P. Sagaut, Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, Scientific Computation, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
  8. M. Germano, “Differential filters of elliptic type,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1757–1758, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. S. Stolz and N. A. Adams, “An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 11, pp. 1699–1701, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. M. Bertero and P. Boccacci, Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging, Institute of Physics, Bristol, UK, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Stolz, N. A. Adams, and L. Kleiser, “The approximate deconvolution model for large-eddy simulation of compressible flows and its application to shock-turbulent-boundary-layer interaction,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2985–3001, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Stolz, N. A. Adams, and L. Kleiser, “An approximate deconvolution model for large-eddy simulation with application to incompressible wall-bounded flows,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 997–1015, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  13. B. Rivière, Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Elliptic and Parabolic Equations, vol. 35 of Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2008.
  14. V. J. Ervin, W. J. Layton, and M. Neda, “Numerical analysis of a higher order time relaxation model of fluids,” International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling, vol. 4, no. 3-4, pp. 648–670, 2007.
  15. W. J. Layton, C. C. Manica, M. Neda, and L. G. Rebholz, “Helicity and energy conservation and dissipation in approximate deconvolution LES models of turbulence,” Advances and Applications in Fluid Mechanics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–46, 2008. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. V. Girault, B. Rivière, and M. F. Wheeler, “A discontinuous Galerkin method with nonoverlapping domain decomposition for the Stokes and Navier-Stokes problems,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 74, no. 249, pp. 53–84, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. V. Girault, B. Rivière, and M. F. Wheeler, “A splitting method using discontinuous Galerkin for the transient incompressible Navier-Stokes equations,” Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1115–1147, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. B. Cockburn, G. Kanschat, and D. Schotzau, “A locally conservative LDG method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 74, no. 251, pp. 1067–1095, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. S. Kaya and B. Rivière, “A discontinuous subgrid eddy viscosity method for the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1572–1595, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. M. F. Wheeler, “An elliptic collocation-finite element method with interior penalties,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 152–161, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  21. Y. Epshteyn and B. Rivière, “Estimation of penalty parameters for symmetric interior penalty Galerkin methods,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 843–872, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. C. C. Manica and S. K. Merdan, “Convergence analysis of the finite element method for a fundamental model in turbulence,” Tech. Rep. TR-MATH 06-12, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2006.
  23. C. C. Manica, M. Neda, M. Olshanskii, and L. Rebholz, “Enabling numerical accuracy of Navier-Stokes-α through deconvolution and enhanced stability,” Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis. In press.
  24. J. M. Connors, “Convergence analysis and computational testing of the finite element discretization of the Navier-Stokes-alpha model,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 26, pp. 1328–1350, 2010.
  25. A. Bowers and L. Rebholz, “Increasing accuracy and efficiency in FE computations of the Leray-deconvolution model,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. In press.
  26. A. Dunca and Y. Epshteyn, “On the Stolz-Adams deconvolution model for the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1890–1902, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. W. Layton, C. C. Manica, M. Neda, and L. G. Rebholz, “Numerical analysis and computational testing of a high accuracy Leray-deconvolution model of turbulence,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 555–582, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  28. W. Layton, “A remark on regularity of an elliptic-elliptic singular perturbation problem,” Tech. Rep., University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2007.
  29. I. Stanculescu, “Existence theory of abstract approximate deconvolution models of turbulence,” Annali dell'Universitá di Ferrara, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 145–168, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  30. M. Anitescu, F. Pahlevani, and W. J. Layton, “Implicit for local effects and explicit for nonlocal effects is unconditionally stable,” Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, vol. 18, pp. 174–187, 2004. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  31. M. Crouzeix and P.-A. Raviart, “Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations. I,” RAIRO: Numerical Analysis, vol. 7, no. R-3, pp. 33–75, 1973.
  32. J. G. Heywood and R. Rannacher, “Finite-element approximation of the nonstationary Navier-Stokes problem. IV. Error analysis for second-order time discretization,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 353–384, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet