Review Article

A Review of the Risk Factors for Iron Deficiency Anaemia among Adolescents in Developing Countries

Table 2

Quality assessment of the studies using quality control checklist.

StudyClear research questionParticipant selection free from biasComparable study groupsParticipant withdrawals or response rate describedUse of blindingDescription of intervention protocol and/or data collection proceduresOutcomes clearly definedAppropriate statistical analysisConclusions supported by resultsUnlikely funding biasOverall quality rating

Fentie et al. [31]++N/A+N/A++++++
Fage et al. [32]++N/A+N/A++++++
Wiafe et al. [33]++N/A+N/A++++++
Gebreyesus et al. [34]++N/A+N/A++++++
Chalise et al. [35]++N/AN/A++++++
Shaka and Wondimagegne [36]++N/A+N/A++++++
Ahankari et al. [37]++N/A+N/A++++++
Regasa and Haidar [38]++N/A+N/A++++++
Agrawal et al. [39]++N/A+N/A++++++
Thomas et al. [40]+N/A+N/A++++++
Nelima [41]++N/AN/A++++NR+
Ramzi et al. [42]++N/AN/A++++++
Kaur et al. [43]++N/A+N/A++++NR+
Leenstra et al. [44]++N/A+N/A++++++
El Sahn et al. [45]++N/A+N/A++++++

N/A, not applicable (due to cross-sectional design of study); NR, not reported. +, positive overall score: this overall score is given if criteria 2, 3, 6, and 7 of the QCC and one additional criterion have received a positive score. Ø, neutral overall score: this score is given if more criteria are met than for a negative overall score, but an overall positive score is not reached. −, negative overall score: this score is given if six or more QCC criteria are not met.