About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in OptoElectronics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 592754, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/592754
Research Article

Plasmonic Nanostructure for Enhanced Light Absorption in Ultrathin Silicon Solar Cells

1School of Physical Science and Engineering and Key Laboratory of Material Physics of The Ministry of Education of China, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
2Electric and information Engineering College, Pingdingshan University, Henan Province, Pingdingshan 467000, China
3Department of Mathematics and Physics, Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management, Zhengzhou 450015, China

Received 9 July 2012; Revised 18 September 2012; Accepted 24 September 2012

Academic Editor: Pavel A. Belov

Copyright © 2012 Jinna He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The performances of thin film solar cells are considerably limited by the low light absorption. Plasmonic nanostructures have been introduced in the thin film solar cells as a possible solution around this issue in recent years. Here, we propose a solar cell design, in which an ultrathin Si film covered by a periodic array of Ag strips is placed on a metallic nanograting substrate. The simulation results demonstrate that the designed structure gives rise to 170% light absorption enhancement over the full solar spectrum with respect to the bared Si thin film. The excited multiple resonant modes, including optical waveguide modes within the Si layer, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of Ag stripes, and surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) arising from the bottom grating, and the coupling effect between LSPR and SPP modes through an optimization of the array periods are considered to contribute to the significant absorption enhancement. This plasmonic solar cell design paves a promising way to increase light absorption for thin film solar cell applications.

1. Introduction

The low conversion efficiencies and high production costs have been the major difficulties facing photovoltaic technology. For solar cells based on bulk crystalline silicon, around 40% of a solar cell module’s price comes from the silicon (Si) materials and its processing costs. To reduce the costs, thin film solar cells with an active layer thickness of about 1 to 2 μm are desired. Thin film solar cells with the thickness of material film smaller than the carrier diffusion length can also reduce carrier recombination and improve carrier collection efficiency in bulk recombination-dominated semiconductors. In addition, a significant reduction of the active materials enables some scare semiconductor materials such as Te and In to be used in a large scale. However, the performance of all thin film solar cells is limited by the poor light absorption due to the reduced absorber thickness. For example, the indirect band gap semiconductor Si material has poor absorption to near-band gap light, where the absorption length is larger than 300 μm. Therefore, light trapping schemes are essential for the design of ultrathin solar cells with improved absorption.

In the past years, many light trapping techniques have been investigated for solar cell applications. A typical example is the use of micron-size pyramidal surface textures [1]. However, such textures are not suitable for thin film solar cells due to large texturing size with respect to the film thickness. Recently, the concept of plasmonic solar cells, that is, the combination of plasmonics and photovoltaic fields, has been proposed to improve light absorption [24]. Metallic nanostructures engineered within the solar cell geometry enable concentrating and folding light into the ultrathin active layer, and thereby increase light absorption. For example, Au or Ag nanoparticles placed on the top surface of solar cells can act as scattering elements to couple light into the absorber layer through effectively increasing the optical path length [58]. Over 30% enhancement in photocurrent has been demonstrated experimentally in a 1.25 m thick silicon-on-insulator by utilizing this approach [8]. The dependences of incoupling efficiency on nanoparticle shape and size have also been discussed in detail [9]. Furthermore, the strong near fields resulting from the LSPRs excitations of metallic strips on the top of the active layer can effectively trap light into the absorber layer and lead to an enhancement of about 43% in short circuit currents [10]. More recently, a kind of novel thin film solar cell design of introducing several metallic patterned back contacts has been investigated widely [1115]. These patterned back contacts can couple the sunlight into SPP mode propagating along the metal/semiconductor interface and waveguide mode within the absorber layer, leading to about 30% broadband absorption enhancement over the solar spectrum when compared to the bared thin film cells [11].

Since the excitation of plasmon resonances can capture and trap the sunlight into the active layer and increase absorption strength, multiple plasmon resonances are desired for the thin film solar cell with superior performance. Previous designs of plasmonic solar cells are mostly based on placing one- or two-dimensional metallic nanoparticle arrays on the top or buried inside the active layer [58, 1618], or introducing several metallic nanogratings, such as the nanohole, hexagonal or triangular structures [12, 19, 20] at the bottom of active layer as the patterned back contacts for improving light absorption. The common disadvantages associated with those efforts are that LSPR or SPP modes are excited individually only by utilizing the metallic nanoparticles or nanograting structures. In this work, we propose an ultrathin solar cell design, which consists of a periodic array of Ag strips on a silica-coated Si film supported by a metallic grating substrate, as shown in Figure 1. This design not only takes advantage of LSPR excited in metal strips on the top, but also can couple sunlight to multiple SPP modes at metal/semiconductor interface by the coupling of the bottom nanograting. Furthermore, the coupling effects between the LSPR and SPP modes can be achieved by tuning the array periods for further increasing light absorption inside the active layer. A remarkable absorption enhancement of about 170% with a broad period range is obtained over the full solar spectrum when compared with the case of metallic nanostructures absence (i.e., the bared thin film cells). Such an absorption enhancement is much higher than those reported previously for ultrathin Si solar cells based on metal nanostructures placed on the top or at the bottom [10, 11, 14, 1620] where either LSPR modes or SPP modes are excited alternatively. Additionally, the proposed design with the ultrathin absorber layer can reduce the usage of the active materials significantly and decrease the production costs of solar cells. Moreover, the metallic stripes on the top surface can also act as surface electrodes, eliminating the involvement of common surface electrodes (e.g., ITO). Finally, the fabrication of such metal-semiconductor-metal nanograting structures is technically feasible by using some advance nanofabrication methods [21, 22].

fig1
Figure 1: (a) Schematic diagram of the proposed thin film Si solar cell structure. (b) Side view of the unit cell, where the structural parameters are defined.

2. Structure Design and Simulation Method

The proposed structure with the defined structural parameters is illustrated in Figures 1(a) and 1(b), which consists from the top surface to the bottom of a periodic array of Ag strips, a dielectric spacer layer of SiO2, an absorber layer of Si, and an Ag nanograting substrate. The grooves of nanogating are filled with SiO2. The dielectric spacer layer can avoid the strong damping of LSPR in Ag stripes, which is responsible for enhanced light absorption inside absorber layer. Since a large spacer is very detrimental for high near-fields enhancement inside the active layer, a suitable thickness of 5 nm was selected here. In all our calculations, the thickness of Ag strips and the depth of nanograting are set to ; the widths of the Ag strips and the grooves in nanograting are chosen to be and ; the thickness of Si layer and the height of Ag nanograting are fixed at and , and the period is set to , respectively.

Numerical electromagnetic simulations were performed by the commercial finite element software of COMSOL Multiphysics 3.5. The periodic boundaries were employed to a unit cell for simulating an infinite array. Perfectly matched layers (PML) were applied in the propagation direction to eliminate the nonphysical reflections at domain boundaries. The whole structure was illuminated from the top surface at normal incidence with E-field along the metal stripes (TE wave) or H-field along the metal stripes (TM wave). The absorption inside the absorber layer for an incidence monochrome plane wave with certain wavelength was calculated by using where is the Poynting vector and is the boundary of the analyzed active layer [11].

The absorption enhancement function () is defined as the ratio of the absorption inside the absorber layer combined with metal nanostructures to that without the metal nanostructures. The absorption efficiency for the thin film solar cell was obtained by calculating the ratio of light absorption power inside the Si layer to the incident light power. In our simulations, the absorber material is crystalline silicon and the dispersive optical properties (refractive index, absorption) of silver and crystalline silicon materials are from the experimentally obtained data [23, 24]. The SiO2 permittivity is chosen to be 3.24 and the external dielectric environment is considered to be air. In addition, to match the solar spectrum to Si absorption, a wavelength range from 400 nm to 1000 nm was considered.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Excitations of Multiple Absorption Enhancement Bands

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the absorption efficiency spectra for the thin film solar cells with and without metal nanostructures, respectively. For the case of the bared Si film (Figure 2(a)), two absorption peaks are exhibited in the considered spectrum range. The enhanced magnetic fields inside the Si layer associated with the two absorption resonances reveal them originating from the Fabry-Periot (FP) cavity resonance [25], as the insets shown in Figure 2(a). The FP resonance occurs generally when both the layer thickness and the incidence wavelengths satisfy the resonance condition, and thereby are sensitively dependent on the thickness of the Si layer. As the layer thickness increases, the FP cavity resonances shift to red and its higher-order modes will appear at the short wavelengths. When combining the Si film with the metal nanostructures, multiple absorption peaks appear in the absorption spectrum (Figure 2(b)). For comparison, the absorption enhancement spectrum () is also calculated as shown in the insets of Figure 2(b). It can be seen clearly that the introduction of metal structures leads to multiple strong enhanced absorption bands. Furthermore, it is also indicated that generating the large absorption enhancements at the longer wavelengths where the Si film is weakly absorbing is relatively easy compared to the short wavelengths where the Si film exhibits strong absorption.

fig2
Figure 2: (a) Absorption spectrum of the bared Si film. The insets show the normalized stimulated magnetic field distributions () at wavelengths of 420 nm and 600 nm, respectively. (b) Absorption spectrum for the proposed solar cell structure under TM polarized plane wave incidences. The absorption enhancement spectrum () is shown in the insets.
3.2. Absorption Enhancement Mechanisms

To explore the mechanisms of absorption enhancement and improve the light absorption capability of the proposed structure for solar cell applications, the absorption enhancement map () versus the period of unit cells and the normalized magnetic field distributions () across the Si layer at the wavelengths of the absorption enhancement peaks are investigated, as shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. Inside those maps of Figure 3, each point represents the full-field simulation result with the corresponding wavelengths and periods. The field distributions () in Figure 4 correspond to illuminations with TM polarized plane wave (H-field along the metal strips and E-field in this plane normal to the metal stripes). Four possible enhancement mechanisms, including the slab waveguide modes, the high near field enhancement associated with LSPR modes of metal strips, and the SPP modes at the metal/silicon interface as well as the coupling effects between LSPR and SPP modes will be discussed in detail in the following.

fig3
Figure 3: Map of the absorption enhancement () spectra for the proposed structure with 80 nm thick Si layer versus the periods of unit cell under (a) TM and (b) TE polarized plane wave incidence, respectively.
fig4
Figure 4: The normalized magnetic field distribution () in the cross-section for TM polarized plane wave incidence at the wavelengths of (a) 545 nm, (b) 670 nm, and (c) 760 nm, corresponding to the three absorption enhancement peaks “a,” “b,” and “c” displayed in Figure 2(b), respectively.

Figure 3(a) shows that the proposed structure exhibits multiple strong absorption enhancement bands at different values of periods. For the structure with a period of 320 nm (as the vertical white dashed line shown in Figure 3(a)), three obvious absorption enhancement peaks are observed, which are marked as “a,” “b,” and “c” in the map and the corresponding field distributions () are plotted in Figures 4(a), 4(b), and 4(c), respectively. In Figure 3(a), the wavelength of the absorption peak “a” is always located around 550 nm when the period changes (the horizontal red dashed line). Moreover, the corresponding magnetic field distributions in Figure 4(a) exhibit a modal profile of the slab waveguide modes of finite thickness planar dielectric films, which have been given in various situations including with and without the metal back contacts [12, 26]. The wavelength of the slab waveguide mode depends on the absorber thickness. The induced electromagnetic fields for the slab waveguide mode are mostly confined inside the absorber layer and decay sharply into the surrounding air or metal slab, contributing to the absorption enhancement.

In Figure 3(a), the absorption enhancement peak “b” is always located around 700 nm (the black dashed line) while the absorption enhancement peak “c” depends quite sensitively on the array periods (the green dashed line of “2”), suggesting different physical origins of the two absorption enhancement bands. Since the peak “b” does not shift with changing the periods and the corresponding field distributions in Figure 4(b) carry a clear feature of localized surface plasmon mode with the enhanced magnetic fields still confined in the Si layer but mostly surrounding the metal strips, it can be attributed to LSPR mode of the metal strips. The resonant wavelength of the LSPR mode depends sensitively on the structural parameters of metal strips. The width and thickness of metal strips have been carefully chosen through optimization because small nanoparticles scatter very weakly, whereas large nanoparticles behave like a mirror to reflect a large fraction of incident light back into free space and are not beneficial for light absorption inside the absorber layer. The peak “c” shifts to red with increasing the periods and the changing trend (the green dashed line of “2”) presents a dispersive behavior of a SPP mode propagating at the metal/semiconductor interface according to the grating coupling theory [27, 28]. Moreover, the corresponding field distribution in Figure 4(c) exhibits the characteristic of surface wave with the maximum field intensity near the metal/silicon interface but decay quickly apart from the interface. Thus, the peak “c” can be attributed to SPP mode excited by the bottom grating. Since the attenuation rate of the field intensity in the metal is much larger than that in the silicon layer due to higher loss of metal materials, the view of coupled light energies mostly confined into the semiconductor layer give a suggestion of absorption enhancement mechanism.

Figure 3(a) shows that as the period is increased from the initial value of 200 nm, the wavelength of the SPP mode redshifts to approach that of the LSPR mode and a behavior of anticrossing is observed around , suggesting a strong interaction of the localized and propagating surface plasmons [29, 30]. The absorption enhancement bands of LSPR and SPP modes become stronger and broader in the regions of coupling and light absorption is increased further by coupling effects. When the period continues to increase, multiple absorption enhancement bands appear and the anticrossing behavior is observed when the wavelengths of these absorption peaks overlap with that of LSPR mode. The changing trend of other three enhanced absorption bands with the periods are highlighted by the green dashed lines of “1,” “3,” and “4,” respectively, which present a similar dispersive behavior as that of the SPP mode marked by “2,” implying a SPP-related absorption enhancement mechanism. Obviously, as the period increases, the SPP mode redshifts and more higher-order SPP modes appear, leading to multiple absorption enhancement bands at longer wavelengths.

Unlike TM polarizations, the SPP and LSPR modes are absent under TE plane wave incidence (E-field along the metal strips and H-field in this plane normal to the metal strips). Only the enhanced absorption related to the TE waveguide modes are observed in Figure 4(b), where the two enhanced absorption bands marked as the black dashed line of “1” and “2” are expected to attribute to the TE0 and TE1 waveguide modes. It can be seen that the absorption enhancement factor related to the TE waveguide modes is very high, but the width of absorption enhancement bands is very narrow. As the period become large, the absorption enhancement increases and some higher-order modes of TE0 waveguide appear (the red dashed line), contributing to the overall absorption enhancement under TE plane wave incidence.

3.3. Total Absorption Enhancement under the Solar Illuminations

To perform a full evaluation on the performance of the proposed design, the total absorption enhancement under solar illuminations must be considered. Generally, the short circuit current in a solar cell is proportional to the number of absorbed photons if assuming unity internal quantum efficiency (every photoexcited electron-hole pair is collected). Therefore, the total absorption enhancement must be evaluated based on the number of photons being absorbed. Figure 5(a) presents the photon number spectrum of the standard AM1.5 solar irradiation (AM()). The absorbed photon number spectrum (APNS) inside the active layer under solar illuminations can be obtained by using the following equation [31]: where the absorption efficiency spectrum represents the absorbed power inside the Si layer with unity incident light power, as shown in Figure 5(b) for TM or TE polarized light incidence. Figure 5(c) displays the APNS for the proposed solar cells at two polarizations and that for an 80 nm thick bared Si film, respectively. Compared to the bared Si film, the introduction of metal structures in thin film solar cells leads to an obvious increase of the absorbed photon numbers inside the Si layer.

fig5
Figure 5: (a) Photon number spectrum of the AM1.5 solar irradiations (AM()). (b) Absorption efficiency spectrum (). (c) Absorbed photon number spectrum (APNS). (d) Total enhancement of absorbed photon number (TEAPN) inside the Si layer over the entire solar spectrum versus the different array periods. The subscripts “TE” and “TM” in (a) and (b) represent different polarizations for the proposed solar cells with a period of 550 nm. The subscript “B” corresponds to the bared Si film with a thickness of 80 nm.

Considering the equal contributions from TE and TM polarized light, the APNS of the proposed solar cells under randomly polarized sunlight can be described as where the subscript represent the case of TE or TM polarizations. The total enhancement of absorbed photon number (TEAPN) inside the Si layer is defined as

The wavelength range for integrating is selected from 400 nm to 1000 nm. Figure 5(d) shows the simulation results of the total enhancement (TEAPN) versus different array periods. Obviously, a very large enhancement up to 170% can be achieved in our designed structures when compared with the case of a bared Si layer. Furthermore, the high enhancement of about 170% is broadband for the array period with a large range from about 300 nm to 550 nm, thus providing a very good fabrication tolerance for practical devices. Such results are impressive and superior to those of some previous designs of plasmonic thin film solar cells. In addition, it should be pointed that although the thickness of 80 nm employed in our simulations was used in certain devices, the active layer thickness for the ultrathin Si solar cells is typically 200–600 nm in the practical device applications. In this case, more optical waveguide modes would be excited to play important roles in absorption enhancement [11, 12]. Therefore, for the proposed structure with thicker active layer, multiple plasmon resonance modes associated with the introduction of metal structures together with these optical modes are predicated to contribute to the overall absorption enhancement. Since the configuration of metallic materials rather than the discussed crystalline silicon materials is responsible for the absorption enhancement in our proposed design, similar performances are also expected by extending the similar design into other active solar materials such as CdTe and organics. Therefore, our proposed design has the potential to become a solar cell platform for various thin film solar cell systems.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, the light absorption properties of a novel ultrathin film Si solar cell structure were discussed in detail by using the finite element method. As compared to a bared Si thin film, the total absorption enhancement of absorbed photon number can reach to 170% within a broad period range by introducing Ag strips on top and Ag nanograting as the back contacts in the solar cell structure. The absorption enhancement mechanisms are revealed by analyzing the enhanced field distributions and investigating the absorption enhancement spectra as a function of periods. These results pave a promising way for the realization of high efficiency thin-film solar cells.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (no. 10974183 and 11104252), the Ministry of Education of China (no. 20114101110003), the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (no. 2011ZF55015), and the Basic and Frontier Technology Research Program of Henan Province (no. 122300410162 and 112300410264).

References

  1. M. A. Green, “Lambertian light trapping in textured solar cells and light-emitting diodes: analytical solutions,” Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 235–241, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. A. Atwater and A. Polman, “Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,” Nature Materials, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 205–213, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. R. Catchpole and A. Polman, “Plasmonic solar cells,” Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 26, pp. 21793–21800, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Spinelli, V. Ferry, J. van de Groep et al., “Plasmonic light trapping in thin-film Si solar cells,” Journal of Optics, vol. 14, no. 2, Article ID 024002, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. M. Schaadt, B. Feng, and E. T. Yu, “Enhanced semiconductor optical absorption via surface plasmon excitation in metal nanoparticles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, no. 6, Article ID 063106, 3 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Qu, F. Liu, Y. Huang, W. Xie, and Q. Xu, “Mechanism of optical absorption enhancement in thin film organic solar cells with plasmonic metal nanoparticles,” Optics Express, vol. 19, no. 24, pp. 24795–24803, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Hägglund, M. Zäch, G. Petersson, and B. Kasemo, “Electromagnetic coupling of light into a silicon solar cell by nanodisk plasmons,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 5, Article ID 053110, 3 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Pillai, K. R. Catchpole, T. Trupke, and M. A. Green, “Surface plasmon enhanced silicon solar cells,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 093105, 8 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. R. Catchpole and A. Polman, “Design principles for particle plasmon enhanced solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 19, Article ID 191113, 3 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. A. Pala, J. White, E. Barnard, J. Liu, and M. L. Brongersma, “Design of plasmonic thin-film solar cells with broadband absorption enhancements,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 34, pp. 3504–3509, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. Wang, S. Wu, K. Reinhardt, Y. Lu, and S. Chen, “Broadband light absorption enhancement in thin-film silicon solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2012–2018, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. E. Ferry, L. A. Sweatlock, D. Pacifici, and H. A. Atwater, “Plasmonic nanostructure design for efficient light coupling into solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 4391–4397, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Biswas and D. Zhou, “Simulation and modelling of photonic and plasmonic crystal back reflectors for efficient light trapping,” Physica Status Solidi A, vol. 207, no. 3, pp. 667–670, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. B. Dunbar, T. Pfadler, and L. Schmidt-Mende, “Highly absorbing solar cells—a survey of plasmonic nanostructures,” Optics Express, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. A177–A189, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. Wang, S. Wu, R. J. Knize, K. Reinhardt, Y. Lu, and S. Chen, “Enhanced photon absorption and carrier generation in nanowire solar cells,” Optics Express, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3733–3743, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Rockstuhl, S. Fahr, and F. Lederer, “Absorption enhancement in solar cells by localized plasmon polaritons,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 104, no. 12, Article ID 123102, 7 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. A. Akimov, W. S. Koh, and K. Ostrikov, “Enhancement of optical absorption in thin-film solar cells through the excitation of higher-order nanoparticle plasmon modes,” Optics Express, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 10195–10205, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Shen, P. Bienstman, and B. Maes, “Plasmonic absorption enhancement in organic solar cells with thin active layers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 106, no. 7, Article ID 073109, 5 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. Bai, Q. Gan, G. Song, L. Chen, Z. Kafafi, and F. Bartoli, “Broadband short-range surface plasmon structures for absorption enhancement in organic photovoltaics,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. A620–A630, 2010. View at Scopus
  20. E. Battal, T. A. Yogurt, L. E. Aygun, and A. K. Okyay, “Triangular metallic gratings for large absorption enhancement in thin film Si solar cells,” Optics Express, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 9548–9464, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. J. Guo, “Nanoimprint lithography: methods and material requirements,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 495–513, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Y. Chen and K. W. Sun, “Enhancement of the light conversion efficiency of silicon solar cells by using nanoimprint anti-reflection layer,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 629–633, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Physical Review B, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4370–4379, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Academic Press, 1985.
  25. A. W. Snyder and J. D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory, Springer, 1983.
  26. V. E. Ferry, J. N. Munday, and H. A. Atwater, “Design considerations for plasmonic photovoltaics,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 43, pp. 4794–4808, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1988.
  28. N. Papanikolaou, “Optical properties of metallic nanoparticle arrays on a thin metallic film,” Physical Review B, vol. 75, no. 23, Article ID 235426, 7 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. N. He, G. W. Cai, P. Ding, C. Z. Fan, and E. J. Liang, “Surface plasmons coupling for local field enhancement in nanoring arrays on a metallic film,” Physics Express, vol. 2, no. 10, 2012.
  30. P. Ding, E. J. Liang, G. W. Cai, W. Q. Hu, C. Z. Fan, and Q. Z. Xue, “Dual-band perfect absorption and field enhancement by interaction between localized and propagating surface plasmons in optical metamaterials,” Journal of Optics, vol. 13, no. 7, Article ID 075005, 7 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. A. Akimov and W. S. Koh, “Design of plasmonic nanoparticles for efficient subwavelength light trapping in thin-film solar cells,” Plasmonics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 155–161, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus