Review Article
Nanocouplers for Infrared and Visible Light
Table 1
Comparison of various nanocoupling approaches.
| Approach | Coupling efficiency: low (10%), medium (10–50%), high (50%) | Size: compact (10 m) or large (>10 m) | Subwavelength coupling or focusing | Lateral or vertical coupling | References |
| 4.1. Tapered dielectric | High | Both | No | Lateral | [18–25] | 4.2. Tapered metal | Medium and large | Compact | Yes | Lateral | [26–39] | 4.3. Tapered metamaterial | Low and medium | Compact | Yes | Lateral | [40–42] | 5.1. Next to another | High | Both | Yes | Lateral | [43–53] | 5.2. End-fire | High | Compact | No | Lateral | [54–60] | 5.3. Resonant stub | High | Compact | Yes | Lateral | [11, 61–64] | 6.1. Dielectric lens | High | Large | No | Lateral | [66, 67, 69, 70] | 6.2. Plasmonic lens | Medium | Compact | Yes | Lateral | [71–78] | 6.3. Negative index lens | N/a | N/a | Yes | Lateral | [79, 80, 84, 100] | 6.4. Photonic crystal lens | N/a | Compact | Yes | Lateral | [101–105] | 6.5. Hyperlens | Low or medium | Compact | Yes | Lateral | [107–122] | 7.1. Antenna | Medium | Compact | Yes | Both | [125–131] | 7.2. Grating | High | Large | No | Vertical | [132–140] | 7.3. Random scatterers | Low | N/a | Yes | Both | [141] |
|
|