About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in OptoElectronics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 804646, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/804646
Research Article

Germanium Doping to Improve Carrier Mobility in CdO Films

Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Bahrain, P.O. Box 32038, Sakhir, Bahrain

Received 16 January 2013; Accepted 12 March 2013

Academic Editor: Jianguo Lu

Copyright © 2013 A. A. Dakhel. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This investigation addresses the structural, optical, and electrical properties of germanium incorporated cadmium oxide (CdO : Ge) thin films. The focus was on the improvement in carrier mobility to achieve high transparency for near-infrared light and low resistivity at the same time. The properties were studied using X-ray diffraction, SEM, spectral photometry, and Hall measurements. All CdO : Ge films were polycrystalline with high texture orientation along [111] direction. It was observed that it is possible to control the carrier concentration () and mobility () with Ge-incorporation level. The mobility could be improved to a highest value of  cm2/V·s with Ge doping of 0.25 wt% while maintaining the electrical resistivity as low as  Ω·cm and good transparency % in the NIR spectral region. The results of the present work proved to select Ge as dopant to achieve high carrier mobility with low resistivity for application in transparent conducting oxide (TCO) field. Generally, the properties found make CdO : Ge films particularly interesting for the application in optoelectronic devices like thin-film solar cells.

1. Introduction

Transparent conduction oxides (TCOs) like ZnO, CdO, SnO2, In2O3, and NiO are degenerate semiconducting group. They exhibit typical n-type conduction, which is caused by a deviation from stoichiometry due to the low formation energies for intrinsic donor defects, such as natural structural metal interstitials (Mi) and oxygen vacancies (VO). It was found that it is possible to control TCO optoelectronic properties by managing and controlling their structural defects. Therefore, the TCOs have widespread use in many advanced technologies, like flat panel displays and solar energy systems [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to examine ways for improving their optoelectronic functions. These enhancements could be realized by a suitable doping, which increases the carrier mobility () and consequently the conductivity but without reduction in the transparency.

The present work deals with CdO. It is one of TCOs with an n-type electrical resistivity of 10−2–10−4 Ω·cm and good transparency in the visible and NIR spectral regions with a direct bandgap of 2.2–2.7 eV [24]. The carrier mobility in CdO films is considerably dependent on growth method and conditions, like the type of the substrate and its temperature. For example, the room-temperature carrier mobility in CdO film grown by MOCVD method on glass substrate at 412°C was 105 cm2/V·s [5]. This high mobility was attributed to a reduction in neutral impurity scattering (NIS) due to improved grown film crystallinity rather than ionized impurity or grain boundaries (GBs) [5].

The carrier mobility in CdO films could be improved by doping with different metallic ions. It was established experimentally that doping of host CdO by ions of radius slightly smaller than that of Cd2+, like Tl [6], Y [7], In [8, 9], and Sm [10], could improve the electronic mobility and conductivity of carriers. However, doping of host CdO with dopant ions of “much” smaller size like Cr, W, and B could more effectively improve the carrier mobility [1113].

The present investigation concerns germanium Ge4+ as dopant of 6-coordination-number (CN) radius 5.3 × 10−2 nm, which is “much” smaller than that of Cd2+ (9.5 × 10−2 nm) [14]. However, doping of host CdO with Ge ions has not yet been investigated, although such doping was conducted for other TCOs like ZnO [15, 16]. The present fundamental work reports the effect of germanium doping on the structural, electrical, optical, and optoelectronic properties of host CdO. It will be seen that Ge doping of CdO is efficient in the construction of electronic transport ways for improving the carrier mobility in comparison with other dopants and could be successfully used for technical applications based on its IR-TCO characteristics.

2. Experimental Procedure

Ge-doped CdO thin films were deposited in a vacuum chamber of residual oxygen atmosphere of about 1.3 × 10−3 Pa. The substrates were ultrasonically cleaned glass slides. The starting materials, pure Ge and CdO (Fluka A. G./Germany), were evaporated alternatively (layer by layer) in a vacuum chamber by alumina baskets (Midwest Tungsten Service, USA). The as-grown films were totally oxidised and stabilised with flash annealing in air at 400°C for 1 h keeping samples inside the closed furnace for slow natural cooling to room temperature. All samples were prepared in almost the same conditions including the reference pure CdO film. The evaporated masses were controlled with a piezoelectric microbalance crystal sensor (Philips FTM5). The thicknesses were measured after annealing using an MP100-M spectrometer (Mission Peak Optics Inc., USA) to be 0.10–0.22 m. Films were deposited in different sets to study the effect of doping level. The wt% of dopant Ge ions to Cd ions in CdO films was determined during the morphological study by a scanning electron microscope SEM (SEM/EDX microscope Zeiss EVO) to be 0.10%, 0.19%, 0.25%, 0.27%, and 0.31%, and accordingly the samples were named, like 0.25% Ge sample. The structural properties of the prepared films were studied using X-ray diffraction (Philips PW 1710) with    curves in the range 20–75° and a Cu    radiation (0.15406 nm). Normal incidence transmission    and reflection    measurements were done in UV-VIS-NIR spectral region (300–3000 nm) on a Shimadzu UV-3600 double beam spectrophotometer. The electrical measurements were performed with a standard Van der Pauw method with aluminium dot contacts in a magnetic field of about one Tesla and using a Keithley 195A digital multimeter and a Keithley 225 current source.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characterisation

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the prepared pure and Ge-doped CdO films on glass substrates. These patterns reveal that all the investigated films are cubic Fm3m CdO structure. The undoped CdO film was polycrystalline with energetically preferred [111] orientation of lattice constant 0.4695 nm, as given in [17]. Due to Ge doping, the host CdO films grown on glass substrate became more [111] oriented. As a measure of relative preferred orientation (RPO), we consider the intensity ratio () in pure and Ge-doped CdO. As shown in Figure 2, the RPO increased strongly getting a maximum for 0.25% Ge sample, which becomes almost a [111] singly oriented crystal. As another consequence of Ge doping, the lattice parameter (calculated by least squares method) decreased with increasing of Ge content, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. This can be explained, in general, by smaller ionic size of dopant Ge4+ ions and the nature of mechanism of G2+ ions incorporation in host CdO crystalline structure (that will be discussed later).

804646.fig.001
Figure 1: X-ray diffraction patterns for pure and Ge-doped CdO films deposited on glass substrates. The radiation used was Cu  -line.
804646.fig.002
Figure 2: The variation of host CdO crystalline lattice parameter (2-1), [111] preferred orientation (2-2), and crystallite size (2-3) with Ge-incorporation level.

There is not any peak found corresponding to Ge or its oxide phase in the XRD patterns of Ge-doped CdO. This implies that Ge ions were dissolved in the lattice of CdO. There are several possibilities for Ge ions to be incorporated in the host CdO crystalline lattice structure; they could occupy structural interstitial positions, occupy empty locations of Cd ions, or replace Cd ions. The real doping by replacement of Cd2+ ions with Ge4+ ions forming substitutional solid solution (SSS) needs several conditions to be fulfilled. The Shannon ionic radius difference of Cd2+ and Ge4+ is 44% [14], which is much larger than 15% necessary for the formation of SSS, according to the well-known Hume-Rothery rules. Furthermore, Ge-oxide crystalline structure (hexagonal) is different from that of CdO (cubic), which supports the un-favourability of Ge oxide to form an SSS with CdO. However, the close electronegativities (1.7 and 1.8 Pau for Cd and Ge, resp.) support the favourability of forming SSS. Thus, the occupation of locations in the structural interstitial positions of CdO lattice with Ge4+ (Gei) ions is most likely to happen at incorporation. Such incorporation disturbs the charge balance of the unit cell that can be settled by creation of Cd2+ ion vacancies () and/or formation of interstitial oxygen (Oi). These variations cause decrease in lattice parameter since Ge4+ ion is smaller than Cd2+ ion. Furthermore, some of the Ge4+ ions that occupy interstitial positions might move by the thermal motion, small size, and high diffusivity and occupy Cd2+-ion vacancies () making real (or SSS-type) doping.

The mean X-ray crystallite size (CS) was estimated from the intensive (111) reflection by using Scherrer equation [18]: , where    is the X-ray wavelength (0.1540 nm),    is the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak (in radian), and    corresponds to the peak position. The CS was 35 nm for undoped CdO film that slightly increases with Ge incorporation to 38–42 nm, as shown in Figures 2 and 3. In general, this implies that the present samples are nanocrystallites. Furthermore, as the CS is considered as a good tool to estimate the crystallinity of the film, then the film crystallinity improves as Ge% content increases up to 0.19% Ge. Then, for incorporation level of more than 0.25%, the film gradually deteriorated.

fig3
Figure 3: SEM micrographs of (a) undoped CdO, (b) 0.1% Ge-doped CdO, (c) 0.19% Ge-doped CdO, and (d) 0.25% Ge-doped CdO films.

The SEM study shows the morphological variations in the CdO films because of Ge doping. Figure 3 shows the SEM micrographs of undoped CdO (Figure 3(a)), 0.1% Ge-doped (Figure 3(b)), 0.19 Ge-doped (Figure 3(c)), and 0.25% Ge-doped (Figure 3(d)) CdO samples. It can be seen that pure CdO and 0.1% Ge-doped CdO films have woolly shape microtopography. For more Ge content, this morphological structure gradually converted to a granular in 0.19%, 0.25%, and 0.31% Ge-doped films with almost round grains of size (GS) 100–140 nm. Furthermore, the SEM study proved uniform distribution of Ge ions in the films.

3.2. DC Electrical Properties

The electrical properties (conductivity (), mobility (), and carrier concentration ()) were measured for pure and Ge-incorporated CdO films grown on glass substrates by a standard Van der Pauw method, and the average results are presented in Table 1 and Figure 4. The experimental error due to the Al-contact spot size was estimated to be about 5%. The measurements show that the pure and all Ge-incorporated CdO films are n-type degenerate semiconductors. This means that Ge doping to host CdO leads to that Fermi level lies in the conduction band and doped CdO exhibits n-type character. The conductivity of pure host CdO thin film (39.75 S/cm) was initially found to increase rapidly to 783.1 S/cm with small amount of 0.1% Ge incorporation and then getting the utmost value (3.663 × 103 S/cm) for 0.25% Ge film, after which it decreased with the increasing of the Ge content. Similarly, the carrier concentration of host CdO (4.4 × 1019 cm−3) was also found to increase up to the utmost value (3.68 × 1020 cm−3) for 0.19% Ge sample and then decrease with increasing Gd incorporation. The mobility attained the utmost value of about 91 cm2/Vs at 0.25–0.27% Ge concentration. The increase in carrier concentration of host CdO film with addition of small amount of Ge4+ ions indicates, in general, that most of the incorporated Ge4+ ions act as donors. However, higher Ge incorporation in CdO lattice results in a gradual enhancement of certain carrier compensators like defects. This results in a reduction of measured free carrier concentration. Similar explanation was also adopted and examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with Cr-doped ZnO [19]. It is interesting to mention that the obtained dependences shown in Figure 4 are similar in forms to those obtained in [20] for doping of CdO with Al, of 6-CN ionic radius 2.32 × 10−2 nm, which may support the vision given in the introduction. The enhancement followed by reduction of conductivity and mobility of carriers in CdO : Ge (Figure 4) could be explained in conjunction with the structural variations due to Ge incorporation by the following model. With Ge4+ doping, two oppositely competitive effects emerged, by which the conduction-parameters variation with Ge doping could be explained. Doping with small concentration of Ge4+-donors improves all the conduction parameters especially the mobility by improving the conduction provision of free carriers. For higher Ge-doping level, the created Cd vacancies () and oxygen interstitials (Oi) increased. These p-type defects can gradually compensate and consequently reduce conduction electron density in addition to inhibiting them, which reduces their mobility. In the result, all electrical properties reduced, as observed for Ge-doping level of larger than 0.25–0.27%. This means that there is a critical concentration, at which the doped CdO reaches the greatest conductivity and mobility. In comparison with CdO doped with ions of “much” smaller size than that of Cd2+, the mobility attained 85.2 cm2/V·s for 1.3% Cr-doped CdO, 39.0 cm2/V·s for 0.1% W-doped CdO, and 45–47 cm2/V·s for 6–8% B-doped CdO [1113], which means that doping with 0.25–0.27% Ge ions leads to a better value of mobility, from TCO point of view.

tab1
Table 1: The measured electrical parameters (resistivity (), mobility (), and carrier concentration ()) and bandgap () for pure and Ge-incorporated CdO films grown on glass substrate.
804646.fig.004
Figure 4: Variation of resistivity (), carrier concentration (), and mobility () with Ge-incorporation level of host CdO film grown on glass substrates.

The carrier mean free path (mfp) is defined as [21, 22] , where is the Planck constant and is the electronic charge. The highest value of mfp among the studied samples was 11.6 nm for 0.25% Ge. This value is much smaller than CS and GS. Thus, the carrier scattering by phonons, Ge impurities, and lattice defects has the major contribution compared to scattering by crystallite and grain boundaries. This conclusion is supported by the theoretical work of Zhang and Ma [22], in which they have concluded that for the degenerate polycrystalline TCO films with relatively large crystallite sizes and high carrier concentrations (higher than 5 × 1018 cm−3), the grain boundary scattering on electrical carriers makes a small contribution to limit the mobility of the films, and the main scattering mechanisms are ionized impurity scattering and lattice phonons.

3.3. Optoelectronic Properties

The spectral normal transmittance    and reflectance    of the prepared Ge-incorporated CdO films grown on corning glass substrate in the UV-VIS-NIR region (300–3000 nm) are depicted in Figure 5. The maxima () of the transmittance    spectra are in the NIR region; that is, the better spectral transparent region () of the films is the NIR region of   nm. In addition, the high-wavelength side of the transmittance curves    of the doped CdO samples shows a clear damping due to the high density of free electrons. The absorbance    that can be calculated by    [23] is used to evaluate the direct optical bandgap by Tauc method [24]: where is the film’s constant. The extrapolation of the versus    plot for any film, as shown in Figure 6, gives the direct bandgap value (Table 1). The inset of Figure 6 shows the Tauc plot for pure Ge-oxide () film prepared by thermal oxidation (400°C/1 h) in air of evaporated Ge film; the bandgap was 4.6 eV, which is close to 4.3 eV found in [25]. For undoped CdO film, the bandgap obtained is in the range (2.2 eV–2.6 eV), which is known for CdO films prepared by different techniques [2]. The bandgap varies with Ge incorporation as shown in Figure 7; it shrinks by ~6% with light (0.1%) doping and reaches a minimum value of 2.32 eV with 0.25% Ge-doping level. Thus, bandgap can be engineered with Ge% doping.

804646.fig.005
Figure 5: Spectral normal transmittance and reflectance of the pure and Ge-incorporated CdO films deposited on glass substrates.
804646.fig.006
Figure 6: Tauc plot for Ge-doped CdO films. The inset shows Tauc plot for undoped CdO and Ge-oxide films.
804646.fig.007
Figure 7: Variation of bandgap () of host CdO films with Ge-incorporation level. The inset shows the -dependence of the  . The straight line shows the best fit with equation (2).

The variation of bandgap with Ge incorporation has two components: the bandgap widening (BGW) [26] and bandgap narrowing (BGN) [27]. Thus, phenomenologically it is possible to correlate the bandgap variations with the carrier concentration by considering both BGW and BGN. The BGW is given by , where  eV·m2  [26]. The BGN is given by , where and [28]. The effective dielectric constant is considered as long-wavelength dielectric constant (), which is equal to about for pure CdO. Thus, where is a fitting parameter and  eV·m2. Straight line was obtained by plotting optoelectronic function (OEF): versus , as shown in the inset of Figure 7, which gives  eV·m that is very close to the theoretical values 1.10 × 10−9 eV·m.

4. Conclusions

The structural study shows that the included Ge4+ ions were dissolved in the crystalline lattice of CdO. The incorporated Ge4+ ions disturb the charge balance of the unit cell that can be settled by creation of Cd2+ ion vacancies () and/or insertion of interstitial oxygen (Oi). The incorporated dopant Ge4+ ions behave as donors while the ( and Oi) species behave like p-type defects. The competition of these two opposite influence doers controls the conduction parameters of Ge-content CdO films. The carrier mobility varies with Ge-incorporation level attaining utmost value of about 91 cm2/V·s with 0.25–0.27% Ge concentration while maintaining the electrical resistivity at 2.73 × 10−4 Ω·cm. This value is higher than that found with Cr-, W-, and B-incorporated CdO films prepared by the same method and conditions and thus considered as one of the highest values found for doped CdO grown on glass substrate. The improvement of the mobility was observed, accompanied with improving of crystallinity and crystalline [111] orientation. From infrared-transparent-conducting oxide (IR-TCO) point of view, germanium is sufficiently effective for CdO light doping. The doping creates structural and electronic energy spectrum variations that consequently shrink the bandgap. The variation of the bandgap with doping level was calculated in the framework of the available models.

References

  1. S. Calnan and A. N. Tiwari, “High mobility transparent conducting oxides for thin film solar cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 518, no. 7, pp. 1839–1849, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. Z. Zhao, D. L. Morel, and C. S. Ferekides, “Electrical and optical properties of tin-doped CdO films deposited by atmospheric metalorganic chemical vapor deposition,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 413, no. 1-2, pp. 203–211, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. M. Carballeda-Galicia, R. Castanedo-Pérez, O. Jiménez-Sandoval, S. Jiménez-Sandoval, G. Torres-Delgado, and C. I. Zúñiga-Romero, “High transmittance CdO thin films obtained by the sol-gel method,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 371, no. 1, pp. 105–108, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Burbano, D. O. Scanlon, and G. W. Watson, “Sources of conductivity and doping limits in CdO from hybrid density functional theory,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 38, pp. 15065–15072, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. W. Metz, J. R. Ireland, J. G. Zheng et al., “Transparent conducting oxides: texture and microstructure effects on charge carrier mobility in MOCVD-derived CdO thin films grown with a thermally stable, low-melting precursor,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 27, pp. 8477–8492, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. A. Dakhel, “Effect of thallium doping on the electrical and optical properties of CdO thin films,” Physica Status Solidi (A), vol. 205, no. 11, pp. 2704–2710, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Dou, R. G. Egdell, T. Walker, D. S. L. Law, and G. Beamson, “N-type doping in CdO ceramics: a study by EELS and photoemission spectroscopy,” Surface Science, vol. 398, no. 1-2, pp. 241–258, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Wang, J. R. Babcock, N. L. Edleman et al., “Indium-cadmium-oxide films having exceptional electrical conductivity and optical transparency: clues for optimizing transparent conductors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 13, pp. 7113–7116, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Asahi, A. Wang, J. R. Babcock et al., “First-principles calculations for understanding high conductivity and optical transparency in InxCd1-xO films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 411, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. A. Dakhel, “Transparent conducting properties of samarium-doped CdO,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 475, no. 1-2, pp. 51–54, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. A. Dakhel, “Investigation on high carrier mobility in chromium incorporated CdO thin films on glass,” International Journal of Thin Films Science and Technology, vol. 1, pp. 25–33, 2012.
  12. A. A. Dakhel, “Electrical and optical investigations on Tungsten-incorporated CdO thin films,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2405–2410, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. A. Dakhel, “Structural, optical and electrical measurements on boron-doped CdO thin films,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 46, no. 21, pp. 6925–6931, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. D. Shannon, “Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides,” Acta Crystallographica A, vol. 32, part 5, pp. 751–767, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Jiang, Z. Wang, and Z. Ning, “Study of structural and optical properties of Ge doped ZnO films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 517, no. 24, pp. 6717–6720, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. B. Lv, Y. Dai, K. Yang et al., “Density functional investigation of structural, electronic and optical properties of Ge-doped ZnO,” Physica B, vol. 406, no. 20, pp. 3926–3930, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. Powder Diffraction File, Joint Committee for Powder Diffraction Studies (JCPDS) file No. 05-0640.
  18. E. F. Kaelble, Ed., Handbook of X-Rays for Diffraction, Emission, Absorption, and Microscopy, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
  19. R. S. Ajimsha, A. K. Das, B. N. Singh, P. Misra, and L. M. Kukreja, “Correlation between electrical and optical properties of Cr:ZnO thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition,” Physica B, vol. 406, no. 24, pp. 4578–4583, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. N. Wongcharoen, T. Gaewdang, and T. Wongcharoen, “Electrical properties of Al-doped CdO thin films prepared by thermal evaporation in vacuum,” Energy Procedia, vol. 15, pp. 361–370, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Chen, Z. L. Pei, X. Wang et al., “Intrinsic limit of electrical properties of transparent conductive oxide films,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 33, no. 20, article 2538, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. D. H. Zhang and H. L. Ma, “Scattering mechanisms of charge carriers in transparent conducting oxide films,” Applied Physics A, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 487–492, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. W. Q. Hong, “Extraction of extinction coefficient of weak absorbing thin films from special absorption,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 22, no. 9, article 1384, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Tauc and F. Abelesn, Eds., Optical Properties of Solids, North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1969.
  25. V. V. Afanasev, A. Stesmans, A. Delabie, F. Bellenger, M. Housse, and M. Meuris, “Electronic structure of GeO2-passivated interfaces of (100)Ge with Al2O3 and HfO2,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 2, Article ID 022109, 3 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. I. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1975.
  27. Y. Z. Zhang, J. G. Lu, Z. Z. Ye et al., “Effects of growth temperature on Li–N dual-doped p-type ZnO thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 254, no. 7, pp. 1993–1996, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. A. Dakhel, “Optoelectronic properties of Eu- and H-codoped CdO films,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar