Table 1:
Sixteen studies using allograft prosthetic composite in the treatment of proximal femoral bone loss, number of patients per study, primary diagnosis, and mean followup.
Study
𝑛
Primary diagnosis
Mean followup (yrs)
1
Chandler et al. [
6
]
30
Aseptic
2
2
Langlais et al. [
16
]
21
Tumor
6
3
Haddad et al. [
17
]
55
Tumor, Aseptic, Septic revision
8.8
4
Zehr et al. [
13
]
14
Tumor
10
5
Zmolek and Dorr [
18
]
15
Aseptic failure
2
6
Safir et al. [
19
]
50
Septic, aseptic
16.2
7
Vastel et al. [
20
]
44
Aseptic failure
7.1
8
Babis et al. [
21
]
72
Aseptic
12
9
Lee et al. [
22
]
15
Aseptic, septic loosening
4.2
10
Roque et al. [
23
]
73
Tumor
6.7
11
Biau et al. [
24
]
32
Tumor
5.6
12
Donati et al. [
25
]
22
Tumor
4.8
13
Farid et al. [
26
]
20
Tumor
6.3
14
Graham and Stockley [
27
]
25
Aseptic, septic loosening
4.5
15
Muscolo et al. [
28
]
37
Tumor
7.5
16
J. W. Wang and C. J. Wang [
29
]
15
Aseptic, septic loosening
7.6