About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Operations Research
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 259439, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/259439
Research Article

Using DEA Factor Efficiency Scores to Eliminate Subjectivity in Goal Programming

Department of Technology and Society, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3760, USA

Received 30 April 2011; Accepted 26 July 2011

Academic Editor: Carlos Romero

Copyright © 2011 Herbert F. Lewis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and R. Ferguson, “Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming,” Management Science, vol. 1, pp. 138–151, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper, Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1961. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  3. J. L. Cohon and D. H. Marks, “A review and evaluation of multi-objective programming techniques,” Water Resources Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 208–220, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. L. Cohon, Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  5. M. Zeleny, “The pros and cons of goal programming,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 357–359, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Min and J. Storbeck, “On the origin and persistence of misconceptions in goal programming,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 301–312, 1991. View at Scopus
  7. W. B. Widhelm, “Extensions of goal programming models,” Omega, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 212–214, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Romero, “Multi-objective and goal programming approaches as a distance function model,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 249–251, 1985. View at Scopus
  9. C. Romero, C. Sutcliffe, J. Board, and P. Cheshire, “Naïve weighting in non-preemptive goal programming (Viewpoint and reply),” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 35, pp. 647–649, 1985. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. S. I. Gass, “A process for determining priorities and weights for large-scale linear goal programmes,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 779–785, 1986. View at Scopus
  11. P. L. Yu and M. Zeleny, “Linear multiparametric programming by multicriteria simplex method,” Management Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 159–170, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. R. E. Steuer, “Multiple objective linear programming with internal criterion weights,” Management Science, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 305–316, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  13. R. E. Steuer, “Goal programming sensitivity analysis using interval penalty weights,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 16–31, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. S. Sengupta, M. L. Podrebarac, and T. D. H. Fernando, “Probabilities of optima in multi-objective linear programs,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, J. L. Cochran and M. Zeleny, Eds., pp. 217–235, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC, USA, 1973. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  15. E. Werczberger, “Multi-objective linear programming with partial ranking of objectives,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 331–339, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. R. Rakes and L. S. Franz, “Decision support models for project planning,” Omega, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73–74, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Narasimhan, “Goal programming in a fuzzy environment,” Decision Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 325–336, 1980.
  18. J. S. Dyer and R. K. Sarin, “Measurable multiattribute value functions,” Operations Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 810–822, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. W. Kirkwood and R. K. Sarin, “Ranking with partial information: a method and an application,” Operations Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  20. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  21. J. Butler, J. Jia, and J. Dyer, “Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 531–546, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. J. Kopp, “The measurement of productive efficiency: a reconsideration,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 477–503, 1981.
  23. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. H. F. Lewis, T. R. Sexton, and M. A. Dolan, “An efficiency-based multicriteria strategic planning model for ambulatory surgery centers,” Journal of Medical Systems. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  25. A. D. Athanassopoulos, “Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 535–550, 1995. View at Scopus
  26. T. J. Stewart, “Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 654–665, 1996. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  27. A. D. Athanassopoulos and V. V. Podinovski, “Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 142–150, 1997. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  28. C. S. Sarrico, S. M. Hogan, R. G. Dyson, and A. D. Athanassopoulos, “Data envelopment analysis and university selection,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1163–1177, 1997. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  29. M. Arakawa, H. Nakayama, I. Hagiwara, and H. Yamakawa, “Multiobjective optimization using adaptive range genetic algorithms with data envelopment analysis,” in Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (AIAA '98), vol. 3, pp. 2074–2082, 1998. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  30. T. Joro, P. Korhonen, and J. Wallenius, “Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming,” Management Science, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 962–970, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Post and J. Spronk, “Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 472–487, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  32. E. Takeda and J. Satoh, “Data envelopment analysis approach to multicriteria decision problems with incomplete information,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 81–90, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. H. F. Lewis and T. R. Sexton, “Data envelopment analysis with reverse inputs and outputs,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 113–132, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus