Research Article

Selection of Vendor Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process

Table 20

Overall priority of membership and nonmembership function of each vendor.

ā€‰Criteria weightsVendor AVendor BVendor C

Cost(1.042, 1.31, 2.402)(.255, .519, 1.214)(1.67, 2.27, 3.378)(.8631, 1.25, 2.138)
(.689, 1.31, 2.5)(.1898, .519, 1.46)(1.23, 2.27, 3.50)(.599, 1.25, 2.26)

Quality(1.1394, 1.74, 2.62)(.188, .372, .965)(.784, 1.29, 2.13)(.8631, 1.25, 2.138)
(.853, 1.74, 2.78)(.136, .372, 1.13)(.575, 1.29, 2.51)(.599, 1.25, 2.26)

Service(.1572, .33, .95)(.784, 1.179, 2.27)(2.16, 2.73, 3.94)(.188, .307, .795)
(.130, .38, 1.10)(.562, 1.252, 2.394)(1.642, 2.731, 4.0748)(.117, .307, .9851)

Cycle time(1.00, 1.52, 2.49)(.4615, .6936, 1.5801)(.4615, .6936, 1.5801)(.4615, .6936, 1.5801)
(.472, 1.146, 2.23)(.2960, .6936, 1.6318)(.6244, .6936, 1.6318)(.2960, .6936, 1.6318)

Reputation(.68, .99, 2.00)(.7487, 1.9006, 3.138)(1.6007, 1.9506, 3.138)(.2032, .2732, .795)
(.451, .998, 2.10)(1.1432, 1.9006, 3.2676)(1.1432, 1.9006, 3.2676)(.1101, .2732, .9613)