Research Article

Selection of Vendor Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process

Table 21

Final weights for vendors.

ā€‰Vendor AVendor BVendor C

C(.255, .6799, 2.916)(1.67, 2.9737, 8.114)(.83631, 1.6375, 5.1355)
(.1292, 1.3027, 3.6646)(.8598, 5.6977, 8.7850)(.4187, 3.1375, 5.6726)

Q(.2142, .6473, 2.5283)(.8933, 2.2446, 5.5806)(1.6715, 3.7062, 8.0434)
(.1160, .6473, 3.1414)(.4905, 2.2446, 6.9778)(.9724, 3.9498, 8.9235)

S(.1232, .3891, 2.1565)(.3396, .9009, 3.7430)(.0296, .1013, .7552)
(.0731, .4758, 2.6334)(.2135, 1.0378, 4.4814)(.0152, .1167, 1.0538)

CT(1.467, 3.1373, 7.8136)(.4615, 1.0538, 3.9344)(.4615, 1.0538, 3.9344)
(.4907, 2.3653, 7.2274)(.2947, .7949, 3.6389)(.1397, 1.87, 3.6389)

R(.5091, 1.8816, 6.26)(1.0880, 1.8816, 6.276)(.1382, .2705, 1.5900)
(.5155, 1.8962, 6.8607)(.5155, 1.8962, 6.8607)(.0497, .2727, 2.0187)

Global weights(2.5685, 6.7352, 21.67)(4.4524, 9.0546, 27.64)(3.1339, 6.7693, 19.4585)
(1.3245, 6.6873, 23.5275)(2.374, 11.6712, 30.7438)(1.5957, 9.3467, 21.3078)

Crisp weights8.655913.33279.7159