Review Article

The Role of Acromioplasty for Management of Rotator Cuff Problems: Where Is the Evidence?

Table 1

Summary of prospective randomized controlled trials studying the role of acromioplasty in treatment of rotator cuff disease.

AuthorJournal/yearInclusion criteriaPatients/ageFollow up rate and lengthRandomizationMeasured outcomesPrimary resultSecondary result

Henkus et al. [26]JBJS-B
2009
Subacromial impingement syndrome57 pts;
mean age 47
56/57
(98%); 30 months
26 bursectomy only;
30 bursectomy w/acromioplasty
Constant, SST, pain VASNo difference Acromion morphology made no difference in outcome

Shin et al. [27]Arthroscopy
2012
Small-to medium-sized rotator cuff tears150 pts;
mean age 56.8
120/150
(80%); 35 months
60 in ARCR-A;
60 in ARCR
Constant, ASES, UCLA, pain VASNo differenceAcromion morphology made no difference in outcome; retear rates (MRI): 17% ARCR-A versus 20% ARCR ( )

MacDonald et al. [28]JBJS-A
2011
Full-thickness cuff tears; 86 pts;
mean age 56.8
68/86
(79%); 24 months
32 in ARCR-A;
36 in ARCR
WORC, ASESNo difference Revision rate: 0/32 ARCR-A versus 4/36 in ARCR ( )

Milano et al. [29]Arthroscopy
2007
Full-thickness cuff tears; type 2 and 3 acromions80 pts;
mean age 60.4
71/80
(89%); 24 months
34 in ARCR-A;
37 in ARCR
Constant, DASH, work-DASHNo difference

Gartsman and O’Connor [30]JSES
2004
Full-thickness supraspinatus tear, type 2 acromion93 pts;
mean age 59.7
93/93
(100%); 15.6 months
47 in ARCR-A;
46 in ARCR
ASESNo difference

ARCR-A: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bursectomy and acromioplasty; ARCR: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bursectomy only; SST: Simple Shoulder Test score; VAS: visual analog score; UCLA: University of California Los Angeles Shoulder score; WORC: Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index; ASES: American Shoulder and Elbow Society shoulder score; DASH: disability of arm, shoulder and hand score.