Review Article
Surgical Treatment Options for the Young and Active Middle-Aged Patient with Glenohumeral Arthritis
Table 1
Outcomes of palliative and reparative treatment for glenohumeral arthritis.
| Author | Surgical technique | Number of patients | Main results | Other notable findings |
| Van Thiel et al. [13] | Palliative | 71 | Significant improvement in pain, SST score, and range of motion in short term | 22% went on to shoulder replacement in 10.1 months | Cameron et al. [22] | Palliative | 61 | Significant improvement in pain at 28 months | Workers' Compensation patients fared poorly | Weinstein et al. [26] | Palliative | 25 | 84% had good or excellent findings at 30 months | Poor results associated with severe joint incongruity or large osteophytes | Millett et al. [25] | Reparative | 25 | Significant improvement in pain, ASES score, ability to work | Best results in those with isolated humeral lesions | Frank et al. [18] | Reparative | 16 | Significant improvements in pain, ASES score, and SST score at 27.8 months | 3 patients had failed results | Snow and Funk [27] | Reparative | 6 | Significant improvement in constant score | Repeat arthroscopy confirmed good filling of lesions with fibrocartilage |
|
|