|
| Study |
Number of patients |
Type of repair | Clinical Outcome | Clinical Outcome | Anatomic Outcome |
Preoperative →
Postoperative
follow-up score
(measure) | Percentage of patients satisfied | Percentage of repairs intact (imaging method) |
|
| Porat et al. (2008) [9] | 36 | Conversion | 17.24 → 31.47 (UCLA) | | |
|
|
Deutsch (2007) [10] | 41 | Conversion | 42 → 93 (ASES) | 98% | |
|
| Kamath et al. (2009) [11] | 42 | Conversion | 46.1 → 82.1 (ASES) | 93% | 88% intact (ultrasound) |
|
| Iyengar et al. (2011) [12] | 22 | Conversion | 19.1 → 32.9 (UCLA) | | 82% intact (MRI) |
|
| Kim et al. (2013) [13] | 54 | Bursal surface
Conversion | 6.7 → 1.4 (VAS)
14.7 → 30.9 (UCLA)
36.1 → 90.7 (ASES)
4.7 → 10.0 (SST) | | 89% intact (MRI) |
| 29 | Articular surface
Conversion | 5.8 → 0.9 (VAS)
15.7 → 30.5 (UCLA)
42.4 → 90.4 (ASES)
5.1 → 9.7 (SST) | | 92% intact (MRI) |
|
| Kim et al. (2014) [14] | 21 | Bursal surface
Conversion | 5.38 → 1.19 (VAS)
19.81 → 32.52 (UCLA)
47.78 → 90.80 (ASES)
57.38 → 83.00 (Constant) | | 90.5% intact (MRI) |
| 20 | Articular surface
Conversion | 4.95 → 1.05 (VAS)
19.80 → 32.70 (UCLA)
48.69 → 91.80 (ASES)
51.00 → 75.85 (Constant) | | 100% intact (MRI) |
|
| Shin (2012) [15] | 24 | Conversion | 5.3 → 1.1 (VAS)
49.2 → 86.2 (ASES)
59.0 → 87.1 (Constant) | 92% | 92% intact (MRI) |
| 24 | Transtendon | 5.5 → 1.4 (VAS)
50.8 → 89.1 (ASES)
54.8 → 84.8 (Constant) | 92% | 100% intact (MRI) |
|
| Castagna et al. (2015) [16] | 37 | Conversion | 3.6 (ΔVAS)
29 (Δ Constant) | | |
| 37 | Transtendon | 3.4 (ΔVAS)
25.1 (Δ Constant) | | |
|
| Franceschi et al. (2013) [17] | 28 | Conversion | 47 → 90 (ASES)
46 → 91 (Constant) | | 96% intact (MRI) |
| 32 | Transtendon | 46 → 91 (ASES)
48 → 92 (Constant) | | 97% intact (MRI) |
|
| Ide et al. (2005) [18] | 17 | Transtendon | 17.3 → 32.9 (UCLA) | | |
|
| Waibl and Buess (2005) [19] | 22 | Transtendon | 17.1 → 31.2 (UCLA) | 91% | |
|
| Castagna et al. (2009) [20] | 54 | Transtendon | 14.1 → 32.9 (UCLA)
9.8 → 0.8 (SST)
45.3 → 90.6 (Constant) | 98% | |
|
| Castricini et al. (2009) [21] | 31 | Transtendon | 44.4 → 91.6 (Constant) | 93% | 100% intact (MRI) |
|
| Seo et al. (2011) [22] | 24 | Transtendon Double-row | 6.6 → 0.6 (VAS)
38 → 89 (ASES) | 92% | |
|
| Tauber et al. (2008) [23] | 16 | Transosseous | 15.8 → 32.8 (UCLA) | 94% | |
|
| Spencer et al. (2010) [24] | 20 | Intra-articular | 74 → 92 (PSS) | | |
|
