About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Archaea
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 453642, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/453642
Review Article

Selenocysteine, Pyrrolysine, and the Unique Energy Metabolism of Methanogenic Archaea

1Institut für Molekulare Biowissenschaften, Molekulare Mikrobiologie & Bioenergetik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, 376 Biological Sciences Building 484 West 12th Avenue Columbus, OH 43210-1292, USA

Received 15 June 2010; Accepted 13 July 2010

Academic Editor: Jerry Eichler

Copyright © 2010 Michael Rother and Joseph A. Krzycki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Methanogenic archaea are a group of strictly anaerobic microorganisms characterized by their strict dependence on the process of methanogenesis for energy conservation. Among the archaea, they are also the only known group synthesizing proteins containing selenocysteine or pyrrolysine. All but one of the known archaeal pyrrolysine-containing and all but two of the confirmed archaeal selenocysteine-containing protein are involved in methanogenesis. Synthesis of these proteins proceeds through suppression of translational stop codons but otherwise the two systems are fundamentally different. This paper highlights these differences and summarizes the recent developments in selenocysteine- and pyrrolysine-related research on archaea and aims to put this knowledge into the context of their unique energy metabolism.

1. Introduction

Expansion of the amino acid repertoire of proteins beyond the 20 “canonical” amino acids is a phenomenon observed almost 50 years ago [1]. Numerous modifications of the carboxyl- or amino-terminals or the individual side chains of amino acids after ribosomal synthesis of the respective polypeptide had finished were identified and the biosynthetic path elucidated (reviewed in [2]). It is thus not surprising that a similar process was assumed when selenocysteine, 2-selenoalanine, was discovered as constituent of eukaryal and bacterial proteins [3]. What made selenocysteine special is that subsequent efforts established the cotranslational nature of its insertion into proteins at the position of a UGA stop codon on the respective mRNA [4, 5]. Thus, selenocysteine was designated the 21st proteinogenic amino acid [6]. Discovery of pyrrolysine, lysine with in amide linkage to (4R,5R)-4-methyl-pyrroline-5-carboxylate, occurred in a different order, a single in-frame amber codon within the gene encoding the monomethylamine (MMA) methyltransferase in Methanosarcina barkeri [7, 8] was later found to correspond to pyrrolysine in the crystal structure [9, 10] and have its own tRNA [11]. As pyrrolysine was also shown to be inserted cotranslationally, it was designated the 22nd proteinogenic amino acid [10]. Beside the fact that translation of selenocysteine and pyrrolysine both involves suppression of stop codons the two systems have little in common (also reviewed in [12, 13]). To emphasize the differences between the mechanisms underlying selenocysteine and pyrrolysine translation, to summarize recent insights from efforts to better understand the biology of these two unusual amino acids, and to put this knowledge into the physiological context of the unique energy metabolism of methanogenesis are the aims of this paper.

2. Selenocysteine and Methanogenesis

The early observation that selenium supply influences growth performance of some methanogens [1416] is due to the fact that most of their selenocysteine-(Sec-)containing enzymes are involved in the organism’s primary metabolism, methanogenesis. This process is of profound global importance as ca. 2% of the net CO2 fixed into biomass is recycled through methane [17, 18]. All known methanogens are members of the domain archaea. The range of substrates methanogenic archaea use for methanogenesis is rather limited reflecting the narrow ecological niche methanogens occupy; mostly simple C1- and C2-compounds such as CO2 (with hydrogen as reductant), carbon monoxide, methanol, methylamines (mono-, di-, and trimethylamine, as well as tetramethylammonium ion), methylsulfides, and acetate are converted to methane. The different substrate classes are metabolized via distinct, but overlapping, pathways of methanogenesis (for reviews, see [1921]). Of the five established orders of methanogenic archaea [22], the Methanococcales, Methanobacterales, Methanomicrobiales, Methanopyrales, and Methanosarcinales, all (with very few exceptions) but the latter are strictly hydrogenotrophic, that is, only H2 + CO2 and/or formate serve as energy substrates.

It is intriguing that before Böck’s and Stadtman’s laboratories became famous for their selenium-related research they both studied (among other things) different aspects of methanogens [3234]. It, thus, seems a striking coincidence that within the Archaea proteins containing selenocysteine [35], are until now restricted to methanogens (Methanococcales and the related Methanopyrales) [36, 37]. The known archaeal Sec-containing proteins are listed in Table 1. It should be emphasized that most methanogens do not employ selenocysteine, which poses the question as to why they get along just fine without it while others employ, and sometimes even depend on, the residue. There is no straightforward answer to this question but some considerations will be given below.

tab1
Table 1: Sec-containing proteins of archaea.

If the methanogenic growth substrate is formate, it is first oxidized to CO2 via (sometimes Sec-containing) formate dehydrogenase (FDH, Figure 1) [24]. In the hydrogenotrophic pathway of methanogenesis, CO2 is sequentially reduced to methane in seven steps via coenzyme-bound intermediates using H2 as the electron donor (Figure 1). The eight-electron reduction proceeds through the redox levels of formate, formaldehyde, and methanol. Formyl-MF dehydrogenase (FMD), of which a subunit (FwuB) can contain Sec [25] catalyzes CO2 reduction to the formyl-level and attachment to methanofuran (a 2-aminomethylfuran derivative). Of the three hydrogenases responsible for hydrogen activation in Methanococcus, subunits of two can contain Sec. These are the large subunit of the F420-dependent hydrogenase Fru (FruA, F420 is a hydride carrier functionally analogous to dinucleotide cofactors) [38] and two subunits of the F420-independent Vhu hydrogenase (VhuU and VhuD) [39]. Vhu and the heterodisulfide reductase (HDR), of which the large subunit (HdrA) can contain Sec [40], form a tight complex [41]. The heterodisulfide of coenzyme M and coenzyme B formed in the last step of methanogenesis serves as the terminal electron acceptor, which is reduced by HDR [18].

453642.fig.001
Figure 1: Scheme of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis involving Sec-containing proteins (orange); the Cys-containing isoforms are in white. CoM-S-S-CoB, heterodisulfide of coenzyme M and coenzyme B; Fd, ferredoxin; F , oxidized Fd; F , reduced Fd; FDH, formate dehydrogenase; FMD, formyl-methanofuran dehydrogenase; Fru, F420-reducing hydrogenase; F420, (oxidized) 8-hydroxy-5-deazariboflavin derivative; F420H2, reduced coenzyme F420; H4MPT, tetrahydromethanopterin, HDR, heterodisulfide reductase; HS-CoB, coenzyme B (N-7-mercaptoheptanoyl-O-phospho-L-threonine); HS-CoM, coenzyme M (2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid); MF, methanofuran; Vhu, F420-nonreducing hydrogenase.

3. Pyrrolysine and Methanogenesis

The Methanosarcinales have the most diverse catabolism of all methanogens, largely due to the ability to use methylated substrates. Methylotrophic methanogenesis requires simultaneous oxidation and reduction of the methyl group (Figure 2) on the same C1 carriers employed during hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. The reducing equivalents from the oxidation of one methyl group, at least some of which are produced as hydrogen [42], are used to reduce three methyl groups to methane. Several steps of both the reductive and oxidative branches of methylotrophic methanogenesis may rely on distinct isozymes from those essential for acetotrophic or hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis [43]. Both oxidative and reductive branches originate with methyl-Coenzyme M (methyl-CoM); thus, key to the diverse substrate range of Methanosarcinales are a number of methyltransferases with specificity for a particular methylated substrate such as methanol [44, 45], MMA [46], dimethylamine (DMA) [47], or trimethylamine (TMA) [48]. Each methyltransferase methylates a dedicated cognate corrinoid protein, subsequently demethylated by one of several corrinoid protein:CoM methyltransferases, such as MtbA, or MtaA [49]. An iron-sulfur protein, RamA, reductively activates the methylamine corrinoid proteins prior to initial methyl transfer [50]. The corrinoid proteins are homologous to the B12-binding domain of methionine synthase [7, 8, 51, 52] and share the double Rossman fold which binds the cofactor, while the corrinoid:CoM methyltransferases are closely related to uroporphorinogen decarboxylases [51, 53]. Both corrinoid proteins and CoM methylases are often erroneously classified as their more commonly known homologs in genome annotations. In contrast, the methanol, MMA, DMA, and TMA methyltransferases share no sequence similarity with each other [7, 8]. However, both the methanol [54] and MMA methyltransferases [9] have TIM barrel structures in common with methyltransferases interacting with homologous corrinoid proteins [55].

453642.fig.002
Figure 2: Scheme of methylotrophic methanogenesis. Methyl groups from methanol, TMA, DMA, and MMA are mobilized into metabolism by the action of a substrate-specific methyltransferase interacting with its cognate corrinoid protein in which the cofactor’s cobalt ion cycles between methyl-Co(III) and Co(I) states. Methyltransferases that are pyrrolysyl-proteins are marked with an asterisk. The corrinoid cofactor is then demethylated by the action of a methylcobamide:CoM methyltransferase such as MtbA (for methylamines) or MtaA (for methanol). Adventitious oxidation can inactive the corrinoid proteins to the Co(II) state, which can be reductively reactivated by RamA (for methylamines) and possibly by RamA homologs for other pathways. Reducing equivalents in the form of hydrogen, F420H2, or F from the oxidation of methyl-CoM are used to reduce methanophenazine (MP) and subsequently CoM-S-S-CoB, thereby generating ATP via electron transport phosphorylation and the free HS-CoM and HS-CoB cofactors; CoM-S-S-CoB is then recycled by the reduction of methyl-CoM to methane. See Figure 1 for cofactor abbreviations.

Multiple isoforms of each type of methyltransferase and cognate corrinoid protein are often encoded in different Methanosarcinales genomes [5659]. Mutagenesis of all three methanol methyltransferase genes is required to eliminate methanol dependent growth in Methanosarcina acetivorans [60]. Although two MMA methyltransferase genes (mtmB1 and mtmB2) are found in M. barkeri MS, only MtmB1 is isolated as an abundant protein during growth on MMA [46, 61]. The mtmB2 gene of Methanosarcina mazei is most highly expressed during growth on methanol, possibly representing a nitrogen scavenging strategy [62]. MttB1, the predominant TMA methyltransferase isoform [48, 61], may preferentially interact with a TMA-specific permease in Methanococcoides burtonii [63].

The abundance of the isolated methylamine methyltransferases added to the initial surprise of finding a single in-frame amber codon in mtmB1 in two different strains of M. barkeri [7]. An amber codon was also found in the M. barkeri mtbB1, mtbB2, and mtbB3 genes encoding isozymes of DMA methyltransferase, and the M. barkeri and Methanosarcina thermophila TMA methyltransferase gene mttB [8]. The genomes of M. barkeri, M. acetivorans, M. mazei, and M. burtonii have since shown the amber codon is a conserved trait in all methylamine methyltransferase genes [5659]. In each class of methyltransferase the amber codon placement is different, but conserved in genes encoding isozymes of a particular methyltransferase. A single exception is the mttB3 gene of M. burtonii that lacks an in-frame amber codon [63]. This gene is not expressed during growth on TMA [63], but may instead be specific for a known or unknown methylotrophic substrate. For example, the encoding gene for tetramethylammonium chloride methyltransferase is not yet identified [64]. The UAG codon remains in methylamine methyltransferase transcripts [8], yet little detectable UAG termination product of mtmB is detectable in cell extracts [65, 66]. Peptide sequencing of HPLC isolated peptides revealed the reading frame conserved before and after the UAG-encoded position [8, 65], with a lysine observed at the UAG-encoded position. Lysine codon usage is normal in other genes in M. barkeri, and the possibility that a labile lysine residue could be present at the UAG position that was destroyed during peptide isolation [65] was addressed by the structure of MtmB and the subsequent visualization of pyrrolysine [9, 10]. Mass spectroscopy of MtmB, MtbB, and MttB confirmed the mass of pyrrolysine corresponding to the proposed structure at the UAG encoded position of all three proteins [61].

4. Peculiarities of Archaeal Selenocysteine Synthesis and Incorporation

The pathway of Sec biosynthesis and incorporation is well understood in E. coli [67]. First, Sec-specific tRNA (tRN ) is charged with serine by seryl-tRNA synthetase, and the seryl moiety is subsequently converted to a selenocysteyl-moiety by Sec synthase (SS). The selenium donor is selenomonophosphate generated by selenophosphate synthetase (SPS). The specialized translation elongation factor SelB (homologous to EF-Tu) delivers in its GTP-bound form the selenocysteylated tRNA to the ribosome via binding of a secondary structure on the selenoprotein mRNA, the SECIS element, located immediately adjacent to the UGA codon [6871]. This binding triggers a conformational change in the quaternary Sec-tRN -SelB-GTP-SECIS complex, which allows for insertion of the charged tRNA into the ribosomal A site [72, 73].

Both Sec synthesis and Sec insertion differ in Archaea from the bacterial path (Figure 3). In fact, identical strategies appear to be employed by archaea and eukarya—to the exclusion of bacteria. Conversion of the seryl-moiety to Sec proceeds via two steps: seryl-tRN is phosphorylated to O-phosphoseryl-tRN in an ATP-dependent reaction by phosphoseryl-tRN kinase (PSTK) [74, 75]; subsequently, the O-phosphoseryl-moiety is converted to the Sec-moiety by O-phosphoseryl-tRN :Sec synthase (SepSecS) [76]. SepSecS (also named SecS in the eukaryal system [77]) is (like SS) a pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzyme, and its proposed reaction mechanism is analogous to that proposed for bacterial SS [76, 78]. Although it has been shown for Trypanosoma brucei that only the PSTK- and SepSecS-dependent pathway is present [79], and although high-resolution structures of both enzymes have recently become available [8084], the physiological function of O-phosphoseryl-tRN and, thus, the selective advantage for investing an additional ATP in Sec synthesis (as compared to the bacterial system) is not evident. The possibility that this pathway renders activation of selenium in the SPS reaction unnecessary [85, 86], turned out not to apply [29]. Severely selenium deprived rats were shown to incorporate cysteine at the selenocysteine-position of selenium-dependent thioredoxin reductase, probably in order to salvage at least some enzymatic activity [87]. Furthermore, it was suggested that O-phosphoseryl-tRN might be converted to cysteinyl-tRN in Methanococcus maripaludis [88]. However, if no highly stringent mechanisms to ensure the fidelity of codon/amino acid correlation during translation under “normal” physiological conditions were operative, such a possibility would render any UGA codon within a selenoprotein mRNA ambiguous for the amino acid to be inserted, which in turn would have detrimental effects on the “mistranslated” protein’s activity. Fortunately, M. maripaludis, for which this scenario was proposed, is the ideal model to study it and exciting new insights regarding the physiological meaningfulness of the additional phosphorylation step await us. The same is true for the in vivo role of selenium-binding protein (SeBP), a 81 amino acid polypeptide which binds one reduced selenium per tetrameric protein in vitro [89, 90] and could therefore be involved in transport and intracellular trafficking of selenium.

453642.fig.003
Figure 3: Schematic representation of selenocysteine biosynthesis and incorporation in Archaea. UTR, -untranslated region; PSTK, seryl-tRN kinase, [Se], reduced Se-species; SelB, Sec-specific elongation factor; SepSecS, O-phosphoseryl-tRN :selenocysteine synthase; Ser, serine; Se-P, seleno(mono)phosphate; SerRS, seryl-tRNA synthetase; SPS, selenophosphate synthetase; see text for details.

In eukarya and archaea, the SECIS element is located in the nontranslated regions of selenoprotein mRNAs; noteworthy, there is no relation between the SECIS elements in terms of structure and/or sequence, which indicates that they have distinct evolutionary origins [67] and that the modes of SECIS-function, that is, SECIS recognition, might differ. While the bacterial SECIS is specifically bound by the Sec-specific translation elongation factor SelB, the archaeal and eukaryal counterparts are not; there, the respective SelBs do not contain a C-terminal extension shown to be responsible for SECIS-binding in E. coli [9193]. Instead eukaryal SECIS elements are bound by “SECIS-binding protein 2” (SBP2) and the ribosomal protein L30 [94, 95]. Other factors have also been shown to be involved in SECIS-dependent UGA recoding, but their exact function is not clear yet (current knowledge is summarized in [96, 97]). So far, no SECIS-binding factor has been identified in Archaea. Homologs of SBP2 are not encoded in any available archaeal genome and the two L30 homologs of Methanococcus maripaludis appear not to be involved in selenocysteine insertion because their homologous overproduction had no effect on selenoprotein formation of the organism (Sattler and Rother, unpublished data). Further, Methanocaldococcus jannaschii encodes three L30 homologes [40] and the one most similar to SBP2 was tested whether it could function in eukaryal selenoprotein synthesis but did not [94]. This may not be too surprising as both the structure/sequence and the distance of the archaeal SECIS elements to the respective UGA codons they recode is different to the eukaryal SECS elements [67], which may be as far as 5.4 kb downstream of their cognate UGA [98] with an average distance of 500–2,500 nt [30, 99]; the archaeal SECIS structures are usually located in closer proximity (80–1,300 nt [40, 100, 101]). It is possible that a distance constraint is the reason for a unique situation regarding the selenoprotein FdhA (encoding a subunit of formate dehydrogenase; see Table 1); the putative SECIS element is located in the -nontranslated region of the respective deduced mRNA, maybe because the distance of the Sec codon and the -nontranslated ( 1,600 nt) region would be too great. However, this scenario needs to be verified by experimentation and fortunately, the tools required for such an in vivo analysis are now available [102, 103].

5. Pyrrolysine Synthesis and Incorporation Is Different from Sec

An amber decoding tRN (then called tRN ) was identified as the product of the pylT gene [11] simultaneously with the discovery of pyrrolysine. This gene is the first of the pylTSBCD gene cluster found in representative Methanosarcinales [11]. The five pyl genes have proven sufficient for the biosynthesis and genetic encoding of pyrrolysine [66].

Initial scenarios suggested that tRN might be charged with lysine, either by a complex of class I and class II lysyl-tRNA synthetases [104], or by the pylS gene product, identified as a homolog of class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases [11]. Both ideas proved incorrect. Loss of the genes encoding one or the other LysRS from Methanosarcina acetivorans does not affect UAG translation as pyrrolysine [105], and the substrate of PylS is not lysine, but pyrrolysine itself [106]. Quite unexpected by analogy to selenocysteine, pyrrolysine is not made on tRN , but as a free amino acid which is directly ligated to the tRNA (Figure 4).

453642.fig.004
Figure 4: Schematic representation of pyrrolysine incorporation into protein. The pylB, pylC, and pylD genes have been shown to enable pyrrolysine biosynthesis in E. coli, but their exact roles are unknown. A conceptual and speculative scheme is shown which is keeping with the activities of proteins in their respective proteins families. Lysine is likely to form the acyl of pyrrolysine, but may also be coupled to an early precursor which subsequently cyclizes after amide bond formation. Pyrrolysine is given entrance to the genetic code by PylS in Archaea, the equivalent in Bacteria are the products of the split gene pylSc and pylSn. The direct formation of pyl-tRN is likely followed by binding to the elongation factor used by the canonical amino acids, that is, EF-1 in Archaea. The common bacterial elongation factor EF-Tu can bind charged tRN both in vivo and in vitro. The recognition of pyl-tRN by non-specialized elongation factors underlies the relatively high level of UAG translation in a reporter gene such as uidA with an introduced amber codon in organisms having tRN , PylS, and pyrrolysine or an analog to charge tRN . The PYLIS is not essential for this level of translation, as shown by replacement of PYLIS in mtmB1, but may enhance UAG translation to some extent. This effect is unlikely to require the structure formed by PYLIS. See text for further details.

PylS is a pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase, as shown by in vitro activity with chemically synthesized pyrrolysine [10, 107, 108]. The 50  M  of PylS for stereochemically pure pyrrolysine remains the lowest observed for any substrate or pyrrolysine analog tested [107]. The function of the pylS and pylT gene products was confirmed by in vivo synthesis of pyrrolysine-containing proteins in E. coli transformed with pylT and pylS and supplemented with exogenous pyrrolysine [107]. As an orthologous pair, PylS and tRN have been exploited in recent years to incorporate Pyl analogs with modifiable tags for production of recombinant proteins with derivatizable residues [109111]. Several structures of the catalytic core of M. mazei PylRS enzymes are now available, although these lack the first 180 residues of the protein [112115]. The activated pyrrolysyl-adenylate made prior to ligation to tRN lies in a deep groove with the pyrroline ring buried in a hydrophobic pocket [113, 114]. A mobile loop can bring a tyrosine into H-bonding distance of the imine nitrogen of pyrrolysine [113], but is not essential for activity [114]. Analogs of pyrrolysine lacking an electronegative group at this position are recognized with a lowered specificity constant [116]. Mutation of the hydrophobic pocket has led to enhanced activity with a derivatizable pyrrolysine analog [117], or εN-acetyl-lysine [118].

In contrast to the single archaeal pylS gene, bacteria such as Desulfitobacterium hafniense encode pylS in two separate genes, with the catalytic domain encoded by pylSc and the N-terminal region encoded by pylSn [11, 13, 106]. PylSc is competent in vitro as a pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase, but has minimal detectable activity in vivo [115, 119]. This may be due to high affinity binding of tRN by PylSn which presumably interacts with PylSc (Jiang and Krzycki, manuscript in preparation). The structure of PylSc and tRN complex [115] revealed the compact core of tRN enhancing interaction with the catalytic domain. Interestingly, unique elements of tRN such as the elongated anticodon stem, small variable loop, and T-loop without the classical T C sequence [11, 120], were not directly contacted by PylSc.

Recombinant expression of pylTSBCD in E. coli results in translation of UAG as internally biosynthesized pyrrolysine in reporter proteins [66]. Transformation of only pylBCD leads to pyrrolysine production, as determined by PylS-based charging and amino acid activation assays [66]. The recombinantly produced amino acid comigrates with synthetic pyrrolysine in TLC (Gaston and Krzycki, unpublished data). The enzymatic activities of the pyrrolysine biosynthetic genes, that is, PylB, PylC, and PylD are yet unknown but they share homologies that lead to logical possibilities [11, 66, 121]. The pylB gene product is highly similar to biotin synthase, while lacking key residues for binding dethiobiotin but it has all other hallmarks of the radical SAM family whose members catalyze various intramolecular rearrangements, reductions, and methylation reactions [122]. PylB may catalyze formation of the methylated ring or ring precursor. The pylC gene product is related to the carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase and D-alanine-D-alanine ligase superfamily and might play a role in amide bond of pyrrolysine between lysine and the ring precursor. PylD has an NAD-binding signature, and could be involved in formation of the imine bond.

The ability of a single gene cluster, pylTSBCD, to transform a naïve organism to incorporate genetically encoded biosynthesized pyrrolysine could underlie the far-flung distribution of pyrrolysine genes in microbes [66]. Although only Methanosarcinales are known to have pyl genes in the Archaea, all five pyl genes have been noted in Gram-positive bacteria such as Desulfitobacterium hafniense [11], Desulfotomaculum acetoxidans, and Acetohalobium arabaticum [13]. A recently sequenced genome also reveals a complete pyl operon in Thermincola sp. JR as well. Examples of pyl genes are also found in Gram-negative bacteria such as a -proteobacterial worm intestinal symbiont [123]. In the Gram-positive bacteria, pylScBCDSn typically form a single gene cluster (with the exception of A. arabaticum where pylSn precedes pylSc), whereas in the -proteobacterium separate pylBCD and pylTScSn gene clusters are found on different contigs of the unclosed genome sequence.

UAG appears to serve globally as both sense and stop codon in archaea having the pyl genes. An E. coli uidA gene with an introduced amber codon transformed into M. acetivorans resulted in mostly amber-terminated gene product, but also produced full-length active β-glucuronidase, complete with pyrrolysine, at an apparent efficiency of 20%–30% [124]. When this data is considered in light of the translation of mtmB1 or reporter genes with introduced amber codons in E. coli dependent on pylT and pylS [66, 107, 124], it appears very likely that amber suppression underlies this relatively high level of pyrrolysine incorporation.

Sec incorporation into protein requires the presence of the SECIS element in the transcript as discussed above. An analogous pyrrolysine insertion sequence (PYLIS) element was proposed [125] whose basic structure exists in solution [126]. In the initial sequencing of the first mtmB and mttB genes, this same element was observed, but nothing similar could be seen in mtbB [127], a result that was further emphasized by a later more exhaustive bioinformatics study [12]. Direct replacement of the PYLIS confirmed it was not essential for incorporation of pyrrolysine into MtmB, albeit with a decrease in full-length product in the absence of the element [124]. Concomitant increase in amber-truncated mtmB1 product indicated that some portion of the PYLIS might enhance UAG translation or diminish UAG-directed termination. The effect observed is unlikely to require the entire structure formed by the PYLIS as comparison of the PYLIS from ten methanogen mtmB genes shows only limited evidence of covariance [128].

Again, unlike Sec, factors that might participate in highly efficient translation of UAG as pyrrolysine during mtmB expression have not been identified. Two release factors are encoded in the genomes of M. mazei and M. acetivorans, which were proposed to possibly participate in UAG translation as pyrrolysine by differential recognition of stop codons [12], but only one of these homologs is found in the genomes of M. barkeri, M. burtonii, or Methanohalophilus mahii suggesting this could not be a general method of enhancing UAG translation. The two release factors from M. acetivorans were tested and one was capable of recognizing all three stop codons, whereas the other had no activity, leaving its function an open question [129].

Unlike Sec-tRN , Pyl-tRN can be recognized by bacterial EF-Tu in vitro [120] and in vivo [107], and by eukaryotic EF-1   as well [110, 111]. This would seem to obviate the need for another elongation factor, although it would be possible that an elongation factor with a higher affinity for Pyl-tRN could function in pyrrolysine-utilizing archaea or bacteria. The pyl genes-containing Methanosarcinales encode an archaeal EF1 , as well as a SelB homolog that could enhance recognition of Pyl-tRN [130]. This idea has not yet been tested, but it should be noted that close homologs of this same SelB-like protein could be found in other methanogens that lack pyl genes, indicating the role of this factor may not be connected to pyrrolysine metabolism.

6. Why Use Sec?

Most of the organisms for which genome information is available obviously do not employ Sec at all. Although not abided by all bioinformaticians, more than a TGA-interrupted gene and an orphan translation factor are needed to conclude that an organism synthesizes selenoproteins [131]. The simplest way would be to conduct an experiment but at least tRN and the Sec-biosynthesis factors (SS or PSTK/SepSecS) have to be encoded as well.

Why organisms use Sec is still not understood, mostly because for most characterized selenoproteins the specific functions of Sec are still unknown. Furthermore, for all but one of the selenoproteins of prokaryotes (clostridial glycine reductase), homologous proteins with cysteine (Cys) at the respective position exist [132]. This is true even within one organism in Sec-utilizing methanogens. In M. maripaludis strain JJ, for example, all of its selenoproteins are dispensable during growth with H2 + CO2 because they can be substituted by a set of Cys-isoforms. On the other hand, a very close relative, M. maripaludis strain S2, cannot do without its selenoproteins, probably because for at least one of them no complementing Cys-isoform exists or is sufficiently active [29]. It was shown for strain JJ that the Cys-isoforms are present at a much higher level than the selenoproteins they replace, which was interpreted as a means to counteract decreased kinetic efficiency of the Cys-containing proteins in order to retain competitive substrate flux through the methanogenic pathway [133]. Thus, using selenoproteins could be a strategy to avoid unnecessary protein synthesis. However, the notion that selenoenzymes are “super-cysteine-enzymes”, an argument often used and derived from the observed drastically lower enzymatic efficiencies of Sec to Cys mutant variants of selenoproteins [134, 135], is proven to not always be correct [136]. It can, thus, not be the sole explanation for the use of Sec. The same is true for the argument that Sec is more reactive than Cys due to the fact that the selenol group is mostly deprotonated at physiological pH while the thiol group is mostly protonated due to the different p values (5.2 for Sec, 8.3 for Cys) [137, 138]. However, measuring the respective values in different Cys- and Sec-containing peptide- and protein-contexts showed that p cannot serve as the sole explanation for the use of Sec [139, 140]. Selenoproteins have a lower redox potential than their Cys-homologs in the cases where this was determined [141, 142], a feature that is also often used to explain the use of Sec. It was recently pointed out that Sec has a higher nucleophilic character than Cys and as a consequence might better facilitate initial high rates in redox catalysis [143]. On the other hand, it has been argued that higher electophilicity of Sec than Cys and ultimately protection of a Sec-containing enzyme from overoxidation could be the “biological rationale” to employ Sec [144]. However, all these arguments may be true for some, but most probably not for all Sec-containing proteins. Furthermore, a much more facile accessibility of the radical oxidation state of Sec as compared to Cys has been observed and although no known selenoproteins has been shown to use a radical mechanism, the electrochemical difference is remarkable. Therefore, it may have biological implications, such as in mediation of one-electron- and two-electron-transfer processes [145]. All of the mentioned potential advantages of Sec over Cys might apply for methanogenic archaea employing Sec, as most of the selenoproteins act in the central metabolic pathway, methanogenesis, and the organisms thrive at lowered redox potential conditions [146]. As such, methanogenic archaea would be ideal to study the differences between selenoproteins and their cysteine-containing isoforms in a naturally occurring system.

Today, there is broad consensus that Sec constitutes a very ancient trait, present already in the last universal common ancestor [76, 147, 148]. A simple explanation of why some methanogens use Sec and others do not is unequal loss of the trait due to different selective pressures during evolution. Closely related Methanococcus species, or even strains of the same species probably represent “moments” in this process [29, 149]. The Sec-utilization trait was and is being lost in archaea—and those still synthesizing selenoproteins might just thrive under conditions, like permanent absence of oxygen and low reductant concentration, which are not selecting against this trait. On the other hand, very low selenium availability should rapidly select against this trait and with typical environmental concentrations of selenate ranging from 20 nM to less than 100 pM [150, 151] such a scenario is plausible. Furthermore, microbial and chemical reduction of selenate [152, 153] and selenite [154] to insoluble elemental selenium and gaseous hydrogen selenide can deplete bioavailable selenium even further.

7. Why Use Pyl?

The major physiological reason apparent for pyrrolysine remains methylamine methyltransfer. The pyl operon lies adjacent to a separately transcribed MMA methyltransferase operon in all Methanosarcina species examined to date [11]. The only essential activity lost by deletion of pylT and the pyl promoter from M. acetivorans is the ability to use methylamines, resulting in cells unable to grow on MMA, DMA, or TMA, yet with no apparent defect in growth or methanogenesis from methanol or acetate, save that methylamines no longer are a nitrogen source [155]. This result suggests that the only viable routes to metabolism of methylamines in this organism are the corrinoid-dependent methyltransferases made via UAG translation as pyrrolysine.

To date, every bacterial species found to have a pyl operon has also had homologs of methylamine methyltransferase genes with conserved amber codons. Nearby genes often encode corrinoid proteins, and occasionally bacterial RamA homologs, and corrinoid:pterin methyltransferases. These genes suggest some of these bacteria have pathways to mobilize methylamine into metabolism as methylated pterins to serve as electron donors for anaerobic respirations and as a source of cellular carbon and nitrogen. Few examples exist of bacteria that use CoM (e.g., see [156]), however, in D. acetoxidans a cluster of genes encoding homologs of MtmB, its cognate corrinoid protein MttC, CoM methylase MtbA, and bacterial RamA are found. It is tempting to suggest this organism could employ CoM as a methyl-donor. At times, the link between methylamine metabolism and the pyl operon is even more intimate than seen with the methylamine utilizing methanogens. For example, the pyl gene cluster of A. arabaticum is interspersed with a gene encoding a trimethylamine methyltransferase homolog [13], and in D. acetoxidans an iron-sulfur protein encoded between pylT and pylS is a member of the bacterial family of proteins that are close homologs of RamA, demonstrated to activate the methylamine:corrinoid methyltransferase reaction in methanogenic archaea [50].

Homologs of the methanogen methylamine methyltransferases whose genes lack an amber codon are found in the genomes of many bacteria and a few nonmethanogenic archaea [11, 12, 123]. Such genomes always lack a complete set of pyl genes, unless they also possess methylamine methyltransferase genes with amber codons. Genes presumably encoding pyrrolysine-free homologs of the TMA methyltransferase are relatively prevalent, and BLAST [157] searches will readily retrieve such homologs predominantly from various -proteobacteria, as well as in Bacteriodes spp, and the crenarchaeote Thermofilum pendulans. Rarer examples of DMA methyltransferase and MMA methyltransferase gene homologs lacking the amber codon can also be found. These proteins are diverged from the methylamine methyltransferases with pyrrolysine, and it remains to be seen if these genes are actual methylamine methyltransferases. The methylamine methyltransferases without amber codons have at the site corresponding to pyrrolysine a small or bulky hydrophobic residue, suggesting that these proteins will not have similar chemistry.

This begs the question as to what function pyrrolysine could serve in the demonstrated methylamine methyltransferases. Pyrrolysine brings a unique electrophilic nature to the repertoire of genetically encoded amino acids, one that can otherwise only be introduced into proteins by cofactors or residue modification [158]. Pyrrolysine reactivity with nucleophiles [9, 10] suggests the ability to participate in corrinoid dependent methylamine methyltransferase reactions by interacting with either the methylamine substrate or product. In the case of the MMA methyltransferase, pyrrolysine lies in the bottom of an anionic cleft that corresponds to the active site in corrinoid-dependent methyltransferases that are structurally analogous to MtmB [9, 10]. The pyrroline ring rotates by 9 upon forming an adduct with a nucleophile such as ammonia or hydroxylamine, and it is postulated that such a methylamine-pyrrolysine adduct could facilitate methyltransfer to the Co(I) form of the cognate corrinoid protein [9]. The ring rotation would bring the methyl-group of the MMA-pyrrolysine adduct into roughly the same position occupied prior to corrinoid transfer of the methyl-group during function of the methyl-tetrahydrofolate:corrinoid methyltransferase domain of methionine synthase [55]. Recently, site directed mutagenesis and inhibitor studies showed that pyrrolysine is crucial for rapid transfer of the methyl-group to corrinoid cofactor or protein (Longstaff, Soares, and Krzycki, manuscript in preparation). However, while these studies will demonstrate the importance of pyrrolysine in methyltransfer, many aspects of the proposed model for pyrrolysine function remain completely untested and are a priority for the field.

Pyrrolysine has been physically observed in one protein beyond methylamine methyltransferases, Thg1 from M. acetivorans [159, 160]. Thg1 homologs are present in a diverse number of methanogens, and in M. acetivorans only, the gene has acquired an in-frame amber codon that can be translated as pyrrolysine and is not essential for activity. This result is not surprising, considering Methanosarcina acetivorans will incorporate pyrrolysine into a recombinant bacterial reporter protein whose gene has an introduced amber codon [124]. Other examples of the ambiguity of UAG codons in M. acetivorans are readily found. The pyl genes themselves contain an example of a UAG codon serving as stop rather than sense codon. The pylB gene has a TAA codon ending the open reading frame in M. barkeri, but a TAG codon corresponds to the same position in M. mazei, M. acetivorans, and M. burtonii, and when the M. acetivorans gene is expressed in E. coli with TAG changed to TAA, the protein is functional in pyrrolysine biosynthesis [66]. A family of transposase genes derived from a Bacillus insertion element found in M. acetivorans and M. mazei [12, 56, 58] may also prove an interesting story when the functionality of these genes is investigated. Each representative has a conserved in-frame amber codon. One of the M. acetivorans transposase genes with an amber codon is most similar to several from M. mazei, indicating possible transfer of this transposase gene between species. The same family of transposases is found in M. burtonii, but in spite of the presence of pyl genes in this organism, these highly similar genes lack the amber codon [128].

8. Conclusion

Selenocysteine and pyrrolysine are powerful examples of the versatility inherent in the genetic code. They further provide examples of how precedent, though valuable, is not always the best predictor in scientific investigation, and that unpredicted paths can often be found as solutions for apparently similar phenomena. Selenocysteine was first thought to be another example of a posttranslationally modified amino acid, and was later found to be a genetically encoded amino acid made and incorporated into protein in a way unlike the canonical twenty amino acids. Pyrrolysine was subsequently thought to be most likely analogous to selenocysteine, yet it is biosynthesized and ligated to tRNA in a manner much more reminiscent of the common twenty amino acids. The story of each of these residues illustrates the immense information and opportunity found in the sequenced genomes, but also provides a reminder of the obligate pairing of prediction with experimental investigation.

Acknowledgments

M. Rother acknowledges the support from V. Müller, University of Frankfurt. Work in M. Rother’s laboratory is supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (through SFB 579). The work of J. Krzycki’s laboratory is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM070663 and Department of Energy Grant DE-FG0202-91ER200042.

References

  1. A. Kaji, H. Kaji, and G. D. Novelli, “A soluble amino acid incorporating system,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 406–409, 1963. View at Scopus
  2. F. Wold, “In vivo chemical modification of proteins (post-translational modification),” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 50, pp. 783–814, 1981. View at Scopus
  3. J. E. Cone, R. M. Del Rio, J. N. Davis, and T. C. Stadtman, “Chemical characterization of the selenoprotein component of clostridial glycine reductase: identification of selenocysteine as the organoselenium moiety,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 2659–2663, 1976. View at Scopus
  4. I. Chambers, J. Frampton, P. Goldfarb, N. Affara, W. McBain, and P. R. Harrison, “The structure of the mouse glutathione peroxidase gene: the selenocysteine in the active site is encoded by the 'termination' codon, TGA,” The EMBO journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1221–1227, 1986. View at Scopus
  5. F. Zinoni, A. Birkmann, T. C. Stadtman, and A. Böck, “Nucleotide sequence and expression of the selenocysteine-containing polypeptide of formate dehydrogenase (formate-hydrogen-lyase-linked) from Escherichia coli,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 13, pp. 4650–4654, 1986. View at Scopus
  6. A. Böck, K. Forchhammer, J. Heider et al., “Selenocysteine: the 21st amino acid,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 515–520, 1991. View at Scopus
  7. S. A. Burke, S. L. Lo, and J. A. Krzycki, “Clustered genes encoding the methyltransferases of methanogenesis from monomethylamine,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 180, no. 13, pp. 3432–3440, 1998. View at Scopus
  8. L. Paul, D. J. Ferguson Jr., and J. A. Krzycki, “The trimethylamine methyltransferase gene and multiple dimethylamine methyltransferase genes of Methanosarcina barkeri contain in-frame and read-through amber codons,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 182, no. 9, pp. 2520–2529, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Hao, W. Gong, T. K. Ferguson, C. M. James, J. A. Krzycki, and M. K. Chan, “A new UAG-encoded residue in the structure of a methanogen methyltransferase,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5572, pp. 1462–1466, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Hao, G. Zhao, P. T. Kang et al., “Reactivity and chemical synthesis of L-pyrrolysine—the 22nd genetically encoded amino acid,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1317–1324, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Srinivasan, C. M. James, and J. A. Krzycki, “Pyrrolysine encoded by UAG in archaea: charging of a UAG-decoding specialized tRNA,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5572, pp. 1459–1462, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Zhang, P. V. Baranov, J. F. Atkins, and V. N. Gladyshev, “Pyrrolysine and selenocysteine use dissimilar decoding strategies,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 21, pp. 20740–20751, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Yuan, P. O'Donoghue, A. Ambrogelly et al., “Distinct genetic code expansion strategies for selenocysteine and pyrrolysine are reflected in different aminoacyl-tRNA formation systems,” FEBS Letters, vol. 584, pp. 342–349, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. B. Jones and T. C. Stadtman, “Methanococcus vannielii: culture and effects of selenium and tungsten on growth,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 1404–1406, 1977. View at Scopus
  15. W. J. Jones, J. A. Leigh, C. R. Woese, R. S. Wolfe, and F. Mayer, “Methanococcus jannaschii sp. nov., an extremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarine hydrothermal vent,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 254–261, 1983. View at Scopus
  16. W. B. Whitman, E. Ankwanda, and R. S. Wolfe, “Nutrition and carbon metabolism of Methanococcus voltae,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 852–863, 1982. View at Scopus
  17. P. Bousquet, P. Ciais, J. B. Miller et al., “Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7110, pp. 439–443, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. K. Thauer, A.-K. Kaster, H. Seedorf, W. Buckel, and R. Hedderich, “Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 579–591, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. G. Ferry, “Enzymology of the fermentation of acetate to methane by Methanosarcina thermophila,” Biofactors, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 1997. View at Scopus
  20. U. Deppenmeier and V. Müller, “Life close to the thermodynamic limit: how methanogenic archaea conserve energy,” in Bioenergetics: Energy Conservation and Conversion, G. Schäfer and H. S. Penefsky, Eds., vol. 45, pp. 123–152, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008.
  21. R. K. Thauer, “Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a tribute to Marjory Stephenson,” Microbiology, vol. 144, no. 9, pp. 2377–2406, 1998. View at Scopus
  22. D. R. Boone, W. B. Whitman, and P. Rouviere, “Diversity and taxonomy of methanogens,” in Methanogenesis, J. G. Ferry, Ed., pp. 35–80, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  23. J. B. Jones and T. C. Stadtman, “Selenium-dependent and selenium-independent formate dehydrogenase of Methanococcus vannielii. Separation of the two forms and characterization of the purified selenium independent form,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 256, no. 2, pp. 656–663, 1981. View at Scopus
  24. J. B. Jones, G. L. Dilworth, and T. C. Stadtman, “Occurrence of selenocysteine in the selenium-dependent formate dehydrogenase of Methanococcus vannielii,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 255–260, 1979. View at Scopus
  25. J. A. Vorholt, M. Vaupel, and R. K. Thauer, “A selenium-dependent and a selenium-independent formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase and their transcriptional regulation in the hyperthermophilic Methanopyrus kandleri,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1033–1042, 1997. View at Scopus
  26. S. Halboth and A. Klein, “Methanococcus voltae harbors four gene clusters potentially encoding two [NiFe] and two [NiFeSe] hydrogenases, each of the cofactor F420-reducing or F420-non-reducing types,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 233, no. 1-2, pp. 217–224, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. O. Sorgenfrei, D. Linder, M. Karas, and A. Klein, “A novel very small subunit of a selenium containing [NiFe] hydrogenase of Methanococcus voltae is postranslationally processed by cleavage at a defined position,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 213, no. 3, pp. 1355–1358, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Wilting, S. Schorling, B. C. Persson, and A. Böck, “Selenoprotein synthesis in Archaea: identification of an mRNA element of Methanococcus jannaschii probably directing selenocysteine insertion,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 266, no. 4, pp. 637–641, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Stock, M. Selzer, and M. Rother, “In vivo requirement of selenophosphate for selenoprotein synthesis in archaea,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 149–160, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. V. Kryukov and V. N. Gladyshev, “The prokaryotic selenoproteome,” EMBO Reports, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 538–543, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. E. Graham, N. Kyrpides, I. J. Anderson, R. Overbeek, and W. B. Whitman, “Genome of methanocaldococcus (methanococcus) jannaschii,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 330, pp. 40–123, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Böck and O. Kandler, “Antibiotic sensitivity of archaebacteria,” in Archaebacteria, C. R. Woese and R. S. Wolfe, Eds., vol. 8, pp. 525–544, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  33. G. Schmid and A. Böck, “Immunological comparison of ribosomal proteins from archaebacteria,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 282–288, 1981. View at Scopus
  34. T. C. Stadtman, “Methane fermentation,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 21, pp. 121–142, 1967. View at Scopus
  35. A. Böck, M. Rother, M. Leibundgut, and N. Ban, “Selenium metabolism in prokaryotes,” in Seleniumml: Its Molecular Biology and Role in Human Health, D. L. Hatfield, M. J. Berry, and V. N. Gladyshev, Eds., pp. 9–28, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.
  36. M. Rother, A. Resch, R. Wilting, and A. Böck, “Selenoprotein synthesis in archaea,” Biofactors, vol. 14, no. 1–4, pp. 75–83, 2001. View at Scopus
  37. T. Stock and M. Rother, “Selenoproteins in Archaea and Gram-positive bacteria,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1790, pp. 1520–1532, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. D. Eirich, “Proposed structure for coenzyme F420 from methanobacterium,” Biochemistry, vol. 17, no. 22, pp. 4583–4593, 1978. View at Scopus
  39. O. Sorgenfrei, S. Müller, M. Pfeiffer, I. Sniezko, and A. Klein, “The [NiFe] hydrogenases of Methanococcus voltae: genes, enzymes and regulation,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 189–195, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. J. Bult, O. White, G. J. Olsen et al., “Complete genome sequence of the Methanogenic archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii,” Science, vol. 273, no. 5278, pp. 1058–1073, 1996. View at Scopus
  41. E. Setzke, R. Hedderich, S. Heiden, and R. K. Thauer, “H2: heterodisulfide oxidoreductase complex from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Composition and properties,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 139–148, 1994. View at Scopus
  42. G. Kulkarni, D. M. Kridelbaugh, A. M. Guss, and W. W. Metcalf, “Hydrogen is a preferred intermediate in the energy-conserving electron transport chain of Methanosarcina barkeri,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 37, pp. 15915–15920, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. V. Welander and W. W. Metcalf, “Mutagenesis of the C1 oxidation pathway in Methanosarcina barkeri: new insights into the Mtr/Mer bypass pathway,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 6, pp. 1928–1936, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. P. van der Meijden, H. J. Heythuysen, A. Pouwels, F. Houwen, C. van der Drift, and G. D. Vogels, “Methyltransferases involved in methanol conversion by Methanosarcina barkeri,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 238–242, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. Sauer, U. Harms, and R. K. Thauer, “Methanol: coenzyme M methyltransferase from Methanosarcina barkeri purification, properties and encoding genes of the corrinoid protein MT1,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 670–677, 1997. View at Scopus
  46. S. A. Burke and J. A. Krzycki, “Reconstitution of monomethylamine:coenzyme M methyl transfer with a corrinoid protein and two methyltransferases purified from Methanosarcina barkeri,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 26, pp. 16570–16577, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. J. Ferguson Jr., N. Gorlatova, D. A. Grahame, and J. A. Krzycki, “Reconstitution of dimethylamine:coenzyme M methyl transfer with a discrete corrinoid protein and two methyltransferases purified from Methanosarcina barkeri,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 37, pp. 29053–29060, 2000. View at Scopus
  48. D. J. Ferguson Jr. and J. A. Krzycki, “Reconstitution of trimethylamine-dependent coenzyme M methylation with the trimethylamine corrinoid protein and the isozymes of methyltransferase II from Methanosarcina barkeri,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 846–852, 1997. View at Scopus
  49. D. J. Ferguson Jr., J. A. Krzycki, and D. A. Grahame, “Specific roles of methylcobamide:coenzyme M methyltransferase isozymes in metabolism of methanol and methylamines in Methanosarcina barkeri,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 9, pp. 5189–5194, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. T. Ferguson, J. A. Soares, T. Lienard, G. Gottschalk, and J. A. Krzycki, “RamA, a protein required for reductive activation of corrinoid-dependent methylamine methyltransferase reactions in methanogenic archaea,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 4, pp. 2285–2295, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. Paul and J. A. Krzycki, “Sequence and transcript analysis of a novel Methanosarcina barkeri methyltransferase II homolog and its associated corrinoid protein homologous to methionine synthase,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 178, no. 22, pp. 6599–6607, 1996. View at Scopus
  52. C. L. Drennan, S. Huang, J. T. Drummond, R. G. Matthews, and M. L. Ludwig, “How a protein binds B12: A 3.0 Å X-ray structure of B12-binding domains of methionine synthase,” Science, vol. 266, no. 5191, pp. 1669–1674, 1994. View at Scopus
  53. U. Harms and R. K. Thauer, “Methylcobalamin:coenzyme M methyltransferase isoenzymes MtaA and MtbA from Methanosarcina barkeri. Cloning, sequencing and differential transcription of the encoding genes, and functional overexpression of the mtaA gene in Escherichia coli,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 653–659, 1996. View at Scopus
  54. C. H. Hagemeier, M. Krüer, R. K. Thauer, E. Warkentin, and U. Ermler, “Insight into the mechanism of biological methanol activation based on the crystal structure of the methanol-cobalamin methyltransferase complex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 50, pp. 18917–18922, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. C. Evans, D. P. Huddler, M. T. Hilgers, G. Romanchuk, R. G. Matthews, and M. L. Ludwig, “Structures of the N-terminal modules imply large domain motions during catalysis by methionine synthase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 3729–3736, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. E. Galagan, C. Nusbaum, A. Roy et al., “The genome of M. acetivorans reveals extensive metabolic and physiological diversity,” Genome Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 532–542, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. D. L. Maeder, I. Anderson, T. S. Brettin et al., “The Methanosarcina barkeri genome: comparative analysis with Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei reveals extensive rearrangement within methanosarcinal genomes,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 188, no. 22, pp. 7922–7931, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. U. Deppenmeier, A. Johann, T. Hartsch et al., “The genome of Methanosarcina mazei: evidence for lateral gene transfer between bacteria and archaea,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 453–461, 2002. View at Scopus
  59. A. Goodchild, N. F. W. Saunders, H. Ertan et al., “A proteomic determination of cold adaptation in the Antarctic archaeon, Methanococcoides burtonii,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 309–321, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. M. A. Pritchett and W. W. Metcalf, “Genetic, physiological and biochemical characterization of multiple methanol methyltransferase isozymes in Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1183–1194, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. A. Soares, L. Zhang, R. L. Pitsch et al., “The residue mass of L-pyrrolysine in three distinct methylamine methyltransferases,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 44, pp. 36962–36969, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K. Veit, C. Ehlers, and R. A. Schmitz, “Effects of nitrogen and carbon sources on transcription of soluble methyltransferases in Methanosarcina mazei strain Gö1,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 17, pp. 6147–6154, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. J. Williams, D. W. Burg, H. Ertan et al., “Global proteomic analysis of the insoluble, soluble, and supernatant fractions of the psychrophilic archaeon Methanococcoides burtonii part II: the effect of different methylated growth substrates,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 653–663, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Asakawa, K. Sauer, W. Liesack, and R. K. Thauer, “Tetramethylammoniumml:coenzyme M methyltransferase system from Methanococcoides sp,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 220–226, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. M. James, T. K. Ferguson, J. F. Leykam, and J. A. Krzycki, “The amber codon in the gene encoding the monomethylamine methyltransferase isolated from Methanosarcina Barkeri is translated as a sense codon,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 36, pp. 34252–34258, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. G. Longstaff, R. C. Larue, J. E. Faust et al., “A natural genetic code expansion cassette enables transmissible biosynthesis and genetic encoding of pyrrolysine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 1021–1026, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. Böck, M. Thanbichler, M. Rother, and A. Resch, “Selenocysteine,” in Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases, M. Ibba, C. S. Francklyn, and S. Cusack, Eds., pp. 320–327, Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, Wash, USA, 2005.
  68. F. Zinoni, J. Heider, and A. Böck, “Features of the formate dehydrogenase mRNA necessary for decoding of the UGA codon as selenocysteine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 4660–4664, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. Heider, C. Baron, and A. Böck, “Coding from a distance: dissection of the mRNA determinants required for the incorporation of selenocysteine into protein,” EMBO Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 3759–3766, 1992. View at Scopus
  70. C. Baron, J. Heider, and A. Böck, “Interaction of translation factor SELB with the formate dehydrogenase H selenopolypeptide mRNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 4181–4185, 1993. View at Scopus
  71. M. Thanbichler, A. Böck, and R. S. Goody, “Kinetics of the interaction of translation factor SelB from Escherichia coli with guanosine nucleotides and selenocysteine insertion sequence RNA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 27, pp. 20458–20466, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. Thanbichler and A. Böck, “Functional analysis of prokaryotic SELB proteins,” Biofactors, vol. 14, no. 1–4, pp. 53–59, 2001. View at Scopus
  73. N. Fischer, A. Paleskava, K. B. Gromadski et al., “Towards understanding selenocysteine incorporation into bacterial proteins,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 388, no. 10, pp. 1061–1067, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. B. A. Carlson, X.-M. Xu, G. V. Kryukov et al., “Identification and characterization of phosphoseryl-tRNA[Ser]Sec kinase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 35, pp. 12848–12853, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. T. Kaiser, K. Gromadski, M. Rother, H. Engelhardt, M. V. Rodnina, and M. C. Wahl, “Structural and functional investigation of a putative archaeal selenocysteine synthase,” Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 40, pp. 13315–13327, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. Yuan, S. Palioura, J. C. Salazar et al., “RNA-dependent conversion of phosphoserine forms selenocysteine in eukaryotes and archaea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 50, pp. 18923–18927, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. X.-M. Xu, B. A. Carlson, H. Mix et al., “Biosynthesis of selenocysteine on its tRNA in eukaryotes,” PLoS Biology, vol. 5, no. 1, article no. e4, pp. 0096–0105, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. K. Forchhammer and A. Böck, “Selenocysteine synthase from Escherichia coli: analysis of the reaction sequence,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 10, pp. 6324–6328, 1991. View at Scopus
  79. E. Aeby, S. Palioura, M. Pusnik et al., “The canonical pathway for selenocysteine insertion is dispensable in trypanosomes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 5088–5092, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. O. M. Ganichkin, X.-M. Xu, B. A. Carlson et al., “Structure and catalytic mechanism of eukaryotic selenocysteine synthase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 9, pp. 5849–5865, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. Y. Araiso, S. Palioura, R. Ishitani et al., “Structural insights into RNA-dependent eukaryal and archaeal selenocysteine formation,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1187–1199, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. Y. Araiso, R. L. Sherrer, R. Ishitani, J. M. L. Ho, D. Söll, and O. Nureki, “Structure of a tRNA-dependent kinase essential for selenocysteine decoding,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 38, pp. 16215–16220, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. Palioura, R. L. Sherrer, T. A. Steitz, D. Soil, and M. Simonovic, “The human SepSecS-tRNASec complex reveals the mechanism of selenocysteine formation,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5938, pp. 321–325, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. Y. Itoh, S. Chiba, S.-I. Sekine, and S. Yokoyama, “Crystal structure of human selenocysteine tRNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 18, pp. 6259–6268, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. R. S. Glass, W. P. Singh, W. Jung, Z. Veres, T. D. Scholz, and T. C. Stadtman, “Monoselenophosphate: synthesis, characterization, and identity with the prokaryotic biological selenium donor, compound SePX,” Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 47, pp. 12555–12559, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. Ehrenreich, K. Forchhammer, P. Tormay, B. Veprek, and A. Böck, “Selenoprotein synthesis in E. coli. Purification and characterisation of the enzyme catalysing selenium activation,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 206, no. 3, pp. 767–773, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. J. Lu, L. Zhong, M. E. Lönn, R. F. Burk, K. E. Hill, and A. Holmgren, “Penultimate selenocysteine residue replaced by cysteine in thioredoxin reductase from selenium-deficient rat liver,” FASEB Journal, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 2394–2402, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. Yuan, M. J. Hohn, R. L. Sherrer, S. Palioura, D. Su, and D. Söll Dieter, “A tRNA-dependent cysteine biosynthesis enzyme recognizes the selenocysteine-specific tRNA in Escherichia coli,” FEBS Letters, vol. 584, no. 13, pp. 2857–2861, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. W. T. Self, R. Pierce, and T. C. Stadtman, “Cloning and heterologous expression of a Methanococcus vannielii gene encoding a selenium-binding protein,” IUBMB Life, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 501–507, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. K. G. Patteson, N. Trivedi, and T. C. Stadtman, “Methanococcus vannielii selenium-binding protein (SeBP): chemical reactivity of recombinant SeBP produced in Escherichia coli,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 34, pp. 12029–12034, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Rother, R. Wilting, S. Commans, and A. Böck, “Identification and characterisation of the selenocysteine-specific translation factor SelB from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 299, no. 2, pp. 351–358, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. D. Fagegaltier, N. Hubert, K. Yamada, T. Mizutani, P. Carbon, and A. Krol, “Characterization of mSelB, a novel mammalian elongation factor for selenoprotein translation,” EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 17, pp. 4796–4805, 2000. View at Scopus
  93. R. M. Tujebajeva, P. R. Copeland, X.-M. Xu et al., “Decoding apparatus for eukaryotic selenocysteine insertion,” EMBO Reports, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 158–163, 2000. View at Scopus
  94. L. Chavatte, B. A. Brown II, and D. M. Driscoll, “Ribosomal protein L30 is a component of the UGA-selenocysteine recoding machinery in eukaryotes,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 408–416, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. P. R. Copeland, J. E. Fletcher, B. A. Carlson, D. L. Hatfield, and D. M. Driscoll, “A novel RNA binding protein, SBP2, is required for the translation of mammalian selenoprotein mRNAs,” EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 306–314, 2000. View at Scopus
  96. C. Allmang, L. Wurth, and A. Krol, “The selenium to selenoprotein pathway in eukaryotes: more molecular partners than anticipated,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1790, pp. 1415–1423, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. J. E. Squires and M. J. Berry, “Eukaryotic selenoprotein synthesis: mechanistic insight incorporating new factors and new functions for old factors,” IUBMB life, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 232–235, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. C. Buettner, J. W. Harney, and P. R. Larsen, “The 3-untranslated region of human type 2 lodothyronine deiodinase mRNA contains a functional selenocysteine insertion sequence element,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 50, pp. 33374–33378, 1998. View at Scopus
  99. G. W. Martin III, J. W. Harney, and M. J. Berry, “Selenocysteine incorporation in eukaryotes: insights into mechanism and efficiency from sequence, structure, and spacing proximity studies of the type 1 deiodinase SECIS element,” RNA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 1996. View at Scopus
  100. A. I. Slesarev, K. V. Mezhevaya, K. S. Makarova et al., “The complete genome of hyperthermophile Methanopyrus kandleri AV19 and monophyly of archaeal methanogens,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 4644–4649, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. E. L. Hendrickson, R. Kaul, Y. Zhou et al., “Complete genome sequence of the genetically tractable hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanococcus maripaludis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 20, pp. 6956–6969, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. D. L. Tumbula and W. B. Whitman, “Genetics of Methanococcus: possibilities for functional genomics in archaea,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. M. Rother and W. W. Metcalf, “Genetic technologies for Archaea,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 745–751, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. C. Polycarpo, A. Ambrogelly, B. Ruan et al., “Activation of the pyrrolysine suppressor tRNA requires formation of a ternary complex with class I and class II Lysyl-tRNA synthetases,” Molecular Cell, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 287–294, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. A. Mahapatra, G. Srinivasan, K. B. Richter et al., “Class I and class II lysyl-tRNA synthetase mutants and the genetic encoding of pyrrolysine in Methanosarcina spp,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1306–1318, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. J. A. Krzycki, “The direct genetic encoding of pyrrolysine,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 706–712, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. S. K. Blight, R. C. Larue, A. Mahapatra et al., “Direct charging of tRNACUA with pyrrolysine in vitro and in vivo,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7006, pp. 333–335, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. C. Polycarpo, A. Ambrogelly, A. Bérubé et al., “An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that specifically activates pyrrolysine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 34, pp. 12450–12454, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. T. Fekner, X. Li, M. M. Lee, and M. K. Chan, “A pyrrolysine analogue for protein click chemistry,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1633–1635, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. T. Mukai, T. Kobayashi, N. Hino, T. Yanagisawa, K. Sakamoto, and S. Yokoyama, “Adding l-lysine derivatives to the genetic code of mammalian cells with engineered pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetases,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 371, no. 4, pp. 818–822, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. P. R. Chen, D. Groff, J. Guo et al., “A facile system for encoding unnatural amino acids in mammalian cells,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 48, no. 22, pp. 4052–4055, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. R. Ishii, O. Nureki, T. Yanagisawa, R. Fukunaga, and S. Yokoyama, “Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of the catalytic domain of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase from the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina mazei,” Acta Crystallographica Section F, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1031–1033, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. J. M. Kavran, S. Gundllapalli, P. O'Donoghue, M. Englert, D. Söll, and T. A. Steitz, “Structure of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase, an archaeal enzyme for genetic code innovation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 27, pp. 11268–11273, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. T. Yanagisawa, R. Ishii, R. Fukunaga, T. Kobayashi, K. Sakamoto, and S. Yokoyama, “Crystallographic studies on multiple conformational states of active-site loops in pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 378, no. 3, pp. 634–652, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. K. Nozawa, P. O'Donoghue, S. Gundllapalli et al., “Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNAPyl structure reveals the molecular basis of orthogonality,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7233, pp. 1163–1167, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. W.-T. Li, A. Mahapatra, D. G. Longstaff et al., “Specificity of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase for pyrrolysine and pyrrolysine analogs,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 385, no. 4, pp. 1156–1164, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. T. Yanagisawa, R. Ishii, R. Fukunaga, T. Kobayashi, K. Sakamoto, and S. Yokoyama, “Multistep engineering of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase to genetically encode Nε-(o-azidobenzyloxycarbonyl) lysine for site-specific protein modification,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1187–1197, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. H. Neumann, S. Y. Peak-Chew, and J. W. Chin, “Genetically encoding Nε-acetyllysine in recombinant proteins,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 232–234, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. S. Herring, A. Ambrogelly, S. Gundllapalli, P. O'Donoghue, C. R. Polycarpo, and D. Söll, “The amino-terminal domain of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase is dispensable in vitro but required for in vivo activity,” FEBS Letters, vol. 581, no. 17, pp. 3197–3203, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. A. Théobald-Dietrich, M. Frugier, R. Giegé, and J. Rudinger-Thirion, “Atypical archaeal tRNA pyrrolysine transcript behaves towards EF-Tu as a typical elongator tRNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1091–1096, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. J. A. Krzycki, “Function of genetically encoded pyrrolysine in corrinoid-dependent methylamine methyltransferases,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 484–491, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. P. A. Frey, A. D. Hegeman, and F. J. Ruzicka, “The radical SAM superfamily,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 63–88, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. Y. Zhang and V. N. Gladyshev, “High content of proteins containing 21st and 22nd amino acids, selenocysteine and pyrrolysine, in a symbiotic deltaproteobacterium of gutless worm Olavius algarvensis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 15, pp. 4952–4963, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. D. G. Longstaff, S. K. Blight, L. Zhang, K. B. Green-Church, and J. A. Krzycki, “In vivo contextual requirements for UAG translation as pyrrolysine,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 229–241, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. O. Namy, J.-P. Rousset, S. Napthine, and I. Brierley, “Reprogrammed genetic decoding in cellular gene expression,” Molecular Cell, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. A. Théobald-Dietrich, R. Giegé, and J. Rudinger-Thirion, “Evidence for the existence in mRNAs of a hairpin element responsible for ribosome dependent pyrrolysine insertion into proteins,” Biochimie, vol. 87, no. 9-10, pp. 813–817, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. L. Paul, Analysis of the genes encoding the enzymes initiating methanogenesis from methylthols, trimethylamine, and dimethylamine in Methanosarcina barkeri, MS. Ph.D., Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 1999.
  128. J. A. Krzycki, “UAG translation as pyrrolysine,” in Recoding: Expansion of Decoding Rules Enriches Gene Expression, J. F. Atkins and R. F. Gesteland, Eds., vol. 24, pp. 53–77, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  129. E. Alkalaeva, B. Eliseev, A. Ambrogelly et al., “Translation termination in pyrrolysine-utilizing archaea,” FEBS Letters, vol. 583, no. 21, pp. 3455–3460, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. M. Ibba and D. Söll, “Aminoacyl-tRNAs: setting the limits of the genetic code,” Genes and Development, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 731–738, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. M. Li, Y. Huang, and Y. Xiao, “A method for identification of selenoprotein genes in archaeal genomes,,” Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 62–70, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. D. E. Fomenko, W. Xing, B. M. Adair, D. J. Thomas, and V. N. Gladyshev, “High-throughput identification of catalytic redox-active cystein residues,” Science, vol. 315, no. 5810, pp. 387–389, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. M. Rother, I. Mathes, F. Lottspeich, and A. Böck, “Inactivation of the selB gene in Methanococcus maripaludis: effect on synthesis of selenoproteins and their sulfur-containing homologs,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. C. Buettner, J. W. Harney, and P. R. Larsen, “The role of selenocysteine 133 in catalysis by the human type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase,” Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 12, pp. 4606–4612, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. M. J. Axley, A. Böck, and T. C. Stadtman, “Catalytic properties of an Escherichia coli formate dehydrogenase mutant in which sulfur replaces selenium,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 19, pp. 8450–8454, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. S. Gromer, L. Johansson, H. Bauer et al., “Active sites of thioredoxin reductases: why selenoproteins?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 22, pp. 12618–12623, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. R. E. Huber and R. S. Criddle, “Comparison of the chemical properties of selenocysteine and selenocystine with their sulfur analogs,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 164–173, 1967. View at Scopus
  138. F. Zinoni, A. Birkmann, W. Leinfelder, and A. Böck, “Cotranslational insertion of selenocysteine into formate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli directed by a UGA codon,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 3156–3160, 1987. View at Scopus
  139. G. Bulaj, T. Kortemme, and D. P. Goldenberg, “Ionization-reactivity relationships for cysteine thiols in polypeptides,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 25, pp. 8965–8972, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. S. Toppo, L. Flohé, F. Ursini, S. Vanin, and M. Maiorino, “Catalytic mechanisms and specificities of glutathione peroxidases: variations of a basic scheme,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1790, pp. 1486–1500, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. S. Müller, H. Senn, B. Gsell, W. Vetter, C. Baron, and A. Böck, “The formation of diselenide bridges in proteins by incorporation of selenocysteine residues: biosynthesis and characterization of (Se)2-thioredoxin,” Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 3404–3412, 1994. View at Scopus
  142. N. Metanis, E. Keinan, and P. E. Dawson, “Synthetic seleno-glutaredoxin 3 analogues are highly reducing oxidoreductases with enhanced catalytic efficiency,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 51, pp. 16684–16691, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. E. S.J. Arnér, “Selenoproteins-What unique properties can arise with selenocysteine in place of cysteine?” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 316, no. 8, pp. 1296–1303, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. E. L. Ruggles and R. J. Hondal, “Differing views of the role of selenium in thioredoxin reductase,” Amino Acids. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  145. T. Nauser, S. Dockheer, R. Kissner, and W. H. Koppenol, “Catalysis of electron transfer by selenocysteine,” Biochemistry, vol. 45, no. 19, pp. 6038–6043, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. S. H. Zinder, “Physiological ecology of methanogens,” in Methanogenesis, J. G. Ferry, Ed., pp. 128–206, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  147. Y. Zhang, H. Romero, G. Salinas, and V. N. Gladyshev, “Dynamic evolution of selenocysteine utilization in bacteria: a balance between selenoprotein loss and evolution of selenocysteine from redox active cysteine residues,” Genome Biology, vol. 7, no. 10, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. H. Romero, Y. Zhang, V. N. Gladyshev, and G. Salinas, “Evolution of selenium utilization traits,” Genome biology, vol. 6, no. 8, p. R66, 2005. View at Scopus
  149. A. Böck and M. Rother, “A pseudo-SECIS element in Methanococcus voltae documents evolution of a selenoprotein into a sulphur-containing homologue,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 148–150, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. H. L. Ehrlich and D. K. Newman, “Geomicrobiology of selenium and tellurium,” in Geomicrobiology, pp. 527–536, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2009.
  151. G. J. Rapp, “Seleniumml: element and geochemistry,” in The Encyclopedia of Geochemistry and Environmental Sciences, R. W. Fairbridge, Ed., vol. IVA, pp. 1079–1080, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1972.
  152. J. F. Stolz and R. S. Oremland, “Bacterial respiration of arsenic and selenium,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 615–627, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. J. F. Stolz, P. Basu, J. M. Santini, and R. S. Oremland, “Arsenic and selenium in microbial metabolism,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 60, pp. 107–130, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. C. A. Woolfolk and H. R. Whiteley, “Reduction of inorganic compounds with molecular hydrogen by Micrococcus lactilyticus. I. Stoichiometry with compounds of arsenic, selenium, tellurium, transition and other elements,” Journal of bacteriology, vol. 84, pp. 647–658, 1962.
  155. A. Mahapatra, A. Patel, J. A. Soares et al., “Characterization of a Methanosarcina acetivorans mutant unable to translate UAG as pyrrolysine,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 56–66, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. A. M. Krishnakumar, D. Sliwa, J. A. Endrizzi, E. S. Boyd, S. A. Ensign, and J. W. Peters, “Getting a handle on the role of coenzyme M in alkene metabolism,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 445–456, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. J. Rétey, “Discovery and role of methylidene imidazolone, a highly electrophilic prosthetic group,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1647, no. 1-2, pp. 179–184, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. M. G. Abad, B. S. Rao, and J. E. Jackman, “Template-dependent 35 nucleotide addition is a shared feature of tRNAHis guanylyltransferase enzymes from multiple domains of life,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 674–679, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. I. U. Heinemann, P. O'Donoghue, C. Madinger et al., “The appearance of pyrrolysine in tRNAHis guanylyltransferase by neutral evolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 50, pp. 21103–21108, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus