- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 873589, 10 pages
Identification of the Major Expressed S-Layer and Cell Surface-Layer-Related Proteins in the Model Methanogenic Archaea: Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro and Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A
1Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
4Mass Spectrometry Resource, Boston University School of Medicine, 670 Albany Street, Rm 511, Boston, MA 02118, USA
5OPX Biotechnologies, Inc. Research Division, 2425 55th Street, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
6Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Received 28 December 2011; Accepted 2 February 2012
Academic Editor: Jerry Eichler
Copyright © 2012 Lars Rohlin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Many archaeal cell envelopes contain a protein coat or sheath composed of one or more surface exposed proteins. These surface layer (S-layer) proteins contribute structural integrity and protect the lipid membrane from environmental challenges. To explore the species diversity of these layers in the Methanosarcinaceae, the major S-layer protein in Methanosarcina barkeri strain Fusaro was identified using proteomics. The Mbar_A1758 gene product was present in multiple forms with apparent sizes of 130, 120, and 100 kDa, consistent with post-translational modifications including signal peptide excision and protein glycosylation. A protein with features related to the surface layer proteins found in Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A and Methanosarcina mazei Goel was identified in the M. barkeri genome. These data reveal a distinct conserved protein signature with features and implied cell surface architecture in the Methanosarcinaceae that is absent in other archaea. Paralogous gene expression patterns in two Methanosarcina species revealed abundant expression of a single S-layer paralog in each strain. Respective promoter elements were identified and shown to be conserved in mRNA coding and upstream untranslated regions. Prior M. acetivorans genome annotations assigned S-layer or surface layer associated roles of eighty genes: however, of 68 examined none was significantly expressed relative to the experimentally determined S-layer gene.
Like cell envelopes of other archaeal species as well as gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, the envelopes of methanogenic archaea have essential roles in protecting the cell from environmental challenges [1–3]. For example, envelopes resist attacks directed at the cytoplasmic membrane by extracellular enzymes, small lipophilic or chaotrophic molecules, and other toxic agents. The envelopes also aid in resisting osmotic stress and dehydration while allowing transit of small molecular weight nutrients and waste products . However, relatively little is known about the cell envelopes of the Methanosarcinaceae, which include highly studied model organisms Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A, Methanosarcina mazei Goe1, and Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro. Prior electron microscopy studies reveal the presence of a typical S-layer surrounding the cytoplasmic membrane [5, 6]. Bioinformatic studies have predicted surface-layer and surface-layer-related proteins for these methanogenic strains. For example, the genome annotations of M. acetivorans list 81 ORFs with these assigned functions , while over 14 and 52 ORFs were annotated in the M. mazei, and M. barkeri genomes to code related surface layer proteins, respectively [8, 9]. In another study using a comparative bioinformatics approach, M. mazei, M. barkeri, and M. acetivorans were predicted to possess 12, 12, and 3 putative S-layer proteins, respectively . There was little overlap of these gene predictions with the above annotations.
Little data exist that experimentally addresse the above predictions except for recent proteomic reports that identified major surface layer proteins in two strains, M. mazei Goe1 and M. acetivorans C2A . The Methanosarcina studies revealed a protein in each species with a similar predicted amino acid sequence (i.e., MM1976 and MA0829), but differing in apparent size as revealed by SDS-PAGE. The M. mazei S-layer displayed three species of approximately 131, 119, and 101 kDa in size, each possessing glycan modifications of unknown composition. M. acetivorans displayed major S-layer protein forms 134, 119, and 114 kDa in apparent size . Interestingly, these proteins were previously annotated as hypothetical proteins in the M. mazei and M. acetivorans genomes in contrast to the numerous other proteins annotated as surface layer or surface-related [7–9]. Based on protein homology searches to MM1976 and MA0829, the M. mazei and M. acetivorans genomes contained four to seven related ORFs . The roles and expression of these related ORFs plus those previously annotated as surface associated in these model Methanosarcina strains remain unclear.
To address the above questions, combined proteomic, bioinformatic, and gene expression studies were performed to explore the diversity of surface layers in two model Methanosarcina strains. The major S-layer protein in M. barkeri was identified (Mbar_A1758) and its sequence was used to define a family of paralogous and orthologous proteins in the Methanosarcinaceae. Transcript levels of abundantly expressed ORFs from two model strains were examined and paralogous genes were identified. Finally, the expression of many M. acetivorans genes previously annotated as S-layer and surface-layer-associated proteins was examined: none were found to be significantly expressed. Together, these M. acetivorans, M. mazei, and M. barkeri studies reveal the presence of a distinct family of S-layer genes/proteins that support a bioinformatics-based reassessment of Methanosarcinaceae cell surface layers.
2. Methods and Materials
2.1. Cell Culture
M. acetivorans C2A (DSM 2834) and M. barkeri Fusaro (DSM 804) were cultivated on a mineral salts-based medium in their single cell forms as described previously  with an atmosphere (80 : 20) of nitrogen and carbon dioxide in the vessel headspace. Following sterilization, the medium was supplemented with filter-sterilized 0.1 mL 50% methanol or 0.2 mL 5 M acetate per 10 mL medium as previously described for M. acetivorans . For M. barkeri cell growth, cultures were grown either with methanol (0.5% v/v) or with an 80 : 20 atmosphere of hydrogen : carbon dioxide in the vessel headspace.
2.2. RNA Purification
For RNA isolations, cultures of M. acetivorans or M. barkeri were grown on the indicated substrates with serial transfer for a minimum of three times to midexponential phase prior to cell harvest. Total RNA was purified from 10 mL of cell samples using the RNAwiz (Ambion Austin, TX) following the manufacturer’s instructions and as described . The purified RNA was treated with DNase I as described [14, 15] and stored at −70°C until used.
2.3. Quantitative RT-PCR
Real-time reverse transcription (RT-PCR) reactions were performed using Superscript II (Invitrogen) as previously described . To remove complementary RNA, 1 μL RNase H was added to mixture and incubated for 20 min at 37°C. The real-time PCR reactions were conducted on a Biorad iCycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA) using a four-step program consisting of denaturing, annealing, extension, and acquisition steps. The RT-PCR primers were created by a modified version of MyPROBES . The PCR product lengths were 100–200 bp where the melting temperature was in the range of 55–66°C. The GC content was 55–65%, and the primer length was 17–22 bases (see the supplementary material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/873589, Table S1). Each primer pair was calibrated using genomic DNA . Gene expression values were determined in triplicate and compared to a reference gene that showed no significant variation in expression in the M. acetivorans microarray experiments (i.e., MA3998), or with genomic DNA for the M. barkeri experiments. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and the standard deviations were less than 5%. Error bars are indicated in the appropriate figures. Abundance units (AUs) are expressed in copy number per 5 ng RNA .
2.4. Primer Extension Analysis
Primer extension reactions were performed to determine the mRNA 5′ ends using-gene specific primers which were located 60 bases downstream of the ATG start codon of the gene (Mbar_A1758) and 100 bases for (MA0829) (Table S1 listing each primer). Total RNA was isolated as described above. A total of 30 μg of RNA was used in each primer extension reaction and carried out as describe in , but the Sequitherm Excel II Kit (Epicentre Madison, WI) was used to create ladder from sequencing reactions of unrelated DNA.
2.5. SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Protein Visualization
Proteins were resolved on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gels using MES Running Buffer (Invitrogen) as previously described . Images of stained proteins using SYPRO Ruby (Bio-Rad) were captured using a Molecular Imager FX scanner and PDQuest Image Analysis Software (Bio-Rad). Glycosylated proteins were revealed by Pro-Q Emerald 300 Glycoprotein Stain following the manufacturer’s protocol (Molecular Probes) as previously described . Protein molecular weight standards were obtained from Molecular Probes (Candy Cane glycoprotein standards) and Bio-Rad (biotinylated broad range protein standards).
2.6. Trypsin Proteolysis and Nano-HPLC-MS/MS
Protein bands to be identified were excised from SDS-PAGE gels by a spot-excision robot (Proteome Works, Bio-Rad) or by hand. The gel-embedded proteins were reduced, iodoacetamide-alkylated, and trypsin-digested (Promega, sequencing grade modified trypsin). Product peptides were extracted from the polyacrylamide matrix in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water and dried by vacuum centrifugation. Peptides were dissolved in 10 μL of 0.1% formic acid (FA) solution and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with electrospray ionization (ESI) on an Applied BioSystems QSTAR Pulsar XL (QqTOF) mass spectrometer as previously described . Tandem mass spectra were recorded automatically during the liquid chromatography run by information-dependent analysis (IDA) on the mass spectrometer with collision energies selected by the software to yield maximum fragmentation efficiency . Database searches were performed on the MS/MS data utilizing Mascot (Matrix Science) and the complete MSDB database. Protein sequence searches employed one missed cleavage and a mass tolerance of 0.3 Da for both precursor and product ions. Protein hits were accepted based on ≥2 ascribed peptides, at least one of which possessed a MOWSE score ≥ 50 (). Correspondences between MS/MS spectra and ascribed sequences were also verified manually.
2.7. Informatics Analysis and Data Visualization
Protein similarities were determined using BLAST  whereas the alignment and the phylogenetic tree of proteins were performed with clustalw . The visualization of the trees was performed with splitTree4 . Upstream DNA regions were searched for palindromic and repeated motifs using simple Perl script software written in house as were searches for conserved elements in the UTR regions . Potential Rho-independent terminator sequences were predicted using TransTermHP software . The signal peptides were predicted using signalP 3.0  and the transmembrane domains were predicted using TMHMM . The RNA secondary structures were predicted using RNAfold webserver .
3.1. Identification of the Major M. barkeri Cell Surface Protein
We recently identified the major S-layer proteins in M. acetivorans C2A and M. mazei Goe1 to be the MA0829 and MM1976 gene products, respectively . However, the identity and size(s) of the major M. barkeri S-layer protein(s) are currently unknown due to the presence of multiple paralogous genes related to the secreted and modified major surface proteins of M. acetivorans and M. mazei (described below). To address these questions, a proteomic analysis was performed using M. barkeri cells grown to midexponential phase with methanol as the sole source of carbon and energy (Section 2). Cell-extracted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and were visualized by fluorescence staining, employing SYPRO Ruby to reveal the total protein content (Figure 1(b)) and Pro-Q Emerald (Figure 1(a)) to reveal glycosylated proteins. Three prominent glycosylated species with apparent sizes of 130, 120, and 100 kDa were revealed by the Pro-Q Emerald stain (Figure 1(a), bands 1–3). The 130 kDa species appeared predominant by the SYPRO Ruby total protein stain (Figure 1(b)). In addition, several bands smaller in size also contained glycoproteins (Figure 1(a), marked as bands 4–6).
The major glycan-stained M. barkeri protein bands (Figure 1(a), marked 1–3) were excised from the SDS-PAGE gels and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis (Table S2). Highly abundant in each band was the protein encoded by Mbar_A1758. This gene is predicted to encode a hypothetical protein of 73,535 Da in size ( IMG JGI) but because the gel exhibited species with 130, 120, and 100 kDa, it appears that the protein is posttranslationally modified, as are the S-layer proteins of M. acetivorans and M. mazei (; discussed below). By tandem mass spectrometry, the mature N-terminus (ADSVEIR) was determined to begin with residue 25 (Table S3).
3.2. The M. barkeri Genome Possesses Nine Mbar_A1758-Like Proteins
A bioinformatic search for Mbar_A1758-like proteins encoded in the M. barkeri Fusaro genome (Section 2) revealed nine highly conserved ORFs (Table 1). All paralogs are predicted to possess signal peptides that suggest protein export, plus one or two Pfam domains of unknown function called DUF1608. However, the proteins vary in apparent size and in the presence of a C-terminal hydrophobic transmembrane element.
To determine which paralogs were abundantly expressed in M. barkeri, unique primer pairs were designed for each gene and employed in a quantitative PCR-based gene transcription assay (Figure 2(a); Section 2): RNA was isolated from cells grown to mid-exponential phase with either methanol or hydrogen/carbon dioxide as sole source of carbon and energy. Only one of the M. barkeri ORFs (i.e., Mbar_A1758) was abundantly expressed. Of the remaining eight genes, transcripts for only two, Mba_A1034 and Mbar_A2016, were detected (ca., at 1.7 and 1.2% of the Mbar_A1758 transcripts). Based on abundant detection of the Mbar_A1758 protein in M. barkeri cell extracts and in the uniquely high level of its transcript, it appears to constitute the major envelope S-layer protein. For subsequent gene identification and description, we designate this protein/gene as .
3.3. The M. acetivorans Genome Possesses Multiple MA0829-Like Genes
A prior Pandit phylogeny search of the M. acetivorans genome  revealed four proteins related to MA0829 (i.e., MA0068, MA0844, MA3556, and MA3639). All of these were predicted to encode proteins that contained domains of unknown function, designated as DUF1608. In an expanded bioinformatic search of the M. acetivorans genome (Section 2) six additional ORFs were identified of varying sizes from 34 to 131 kDa (Table 1). Interestingly, all have been annotated as hypothetical proteins of unknown function (; discussed below) and possess one or two DUF1608 domains.
3.4. The M. acetivorans MA0829 Gene is Abundantly Expressed
To determine which of these ten MA0829-like genes in M. acetivorans genome were expressed, unique DNA primer pairs were designed for each as described above for M. barkeri (Section 2, Table S1) and cells were grown to mid-exponential phase with either methanol or acetate as the sole carbon and energy supply. Total cellular RNA was isolated and employed in a quantitative PCR-based gene expression assay (Figure 2(b)). With the one exception (ORF MA0829, designated to distinguish it from the related ORFs) all transcripts were present in low to nearly undetectable abundance. Relative to , the next most highly expressed ORF was MA3556 () followed by MA0068 () at levels of approximately 3.5 and 1.8%, respectively. Interestingly, our prior proteomic study, which enriched for surface proteins, detected the MA0068 and MA3556 proteins from Concanavalin A eluates, suggesting that the proteins are either glycosylated or interact with glycans. They were not detected without employing Concanavalin A enrichment . Potential roles of these paralogous slmA1-like genes are discussed below.
3.5. Identification of the MA0829 mRNA 5′ End
The M. acetivorans slmA1 transcript’s 5′ end was determined (Section 2). A single 5′ terminus was observed corresponding to a position located 159 nucleotides upstream of the slmA1 translational start (Figure 3(a), bent arrow). Analysis of the DNA coding region upstream of the mRNA initiation site contained a recognizable TATA box needed for TBP recognition/recruitment and DNA binding . Three short regions of dyad symmetry of 14 to 21 nucleotides in length were also seen in this region (Figure 3(b), thin arrows). Finally, inspection of the 5′ mRNA untranslated region (UTR) revealed several potential RNA secondary structures (Section 2: Figure S1).
The M. acetivorans slmA1 gene is located upstream of two genes that encode hypothetical proteins (i.e., MA0830-MA0831) and downstream of a tRNA gene (Figure 3). To determine if the MA0830 ORF is cotranscribed with slmA1, quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments were performed (Figure 4). MA0830 expression was about 2% (acetate) to 7% (methanol) of the level seen for slmA1, suggesting that little to no transcription read-through occurs from the upstream MA0829 promoter element. There is a rho-independent-like terminator sequence after MA0829 predicted using TransTermHP . The proteomic studies provided no evidence for significant amounts of either MA0830 or MA0831.
To compare slmA1 gene expression levels relative to several highly abundant ORFs that function in M. acetivorans methanogenesis, specific primer pairs (Table S1) were designed for the mcrA and pta genes. Among the most highly expressed in the cell, the mcrA gene encodes the A subunit of the methyl coenzyme M reductase enzyme of the central pathway in methane formation, while pta encodes phosphotransacetylase required for acetate activation and utilization. The resulting qPCR analysis demonstrated that slmA1 expression was significantly higher (ca. by 2 to 10-fold) than for either mcrA or pta (Figure 4).
The M. barkeri slmA1 mRNA 5′ end was also identified (Section 2, Figure 3(b)) and it corresponds to a position analogous to that found for M. acetivorans slmA1. Located 154 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the translational start site, M. barkeri slmA1 has a UTR sequence highly conserved in relation to that of M. acetivorans (>91% identity). Further upstream, the DNA also contained a conserved TATA box. Interestingly, an annotated hypothetical protein coded directly downstream of slmA1, Mbar_A1759, was identified in this proteomic study (data not shown). However, that gene was only weakly transcribed in methanol grown cells relative to Mbar_A1758, and it does not appear to be significantly accumulated by M. barkeri.
3.6. The M. mazei Genome Possesses Five Mbar_A1758-Like Proteins
A search of the M. mazei Goe1 genome for M. acetivorans MA0829-like and M. barkeri Mbar_A1758-like proteins (Section 2) revealed five highly conserved ORFs (Table 1, described below). One of these, MM1976 (), was previously identified to be the major S-layer protein on the M. mazei cell surface .
3.7. Are the Previously Annotated M. acetivorans S-Layer and Surface-Related Proteins Abundantly Expressed?
The annotation of the M. acetivorans genome lists approximately eighty ORFs with assigned functions as S-layer proteins or surface-related proteins  (Table S4). To determine if any of these ORFs were significantly expressed, we analyzed two M. acetivorans microarray data sets from cells grown under the conditions with acetate or with methanol as the sole supply of carbon and energy (Section 2). The compiled pixel data sets were then normalized to the mcrA gene that encodes methyl coenzyme M reductase (MA4546). Strikingly, none of the sixty eight previously annotated ORFs for which we had data were significantly expressed relative to mcrA (ca., below 3-4%). As noted above, (MA0829) expression was 2–4-fold above that observed for the mcrA gene (Figure 4). Lastly, the twelve surface layer proteins predicted for M. acetivorans by Saleh et al.  constituted a subset of those shown in Table S3: they were not significantly expressed relative to MA0829. These experimental findings indicate limitations of the computational tools used to predict archaeal S-layer proteins and surface associated proteins for this group of methanogens.
4.1. Identification and Properties of the M. barkeri Surface Layer Protein
Based on the prior M. acetivorans and M. mazei S-layer proteomic and bioinformatic data, it was not possible to predict which of the three to five closely related ORFs in the M. barkeri genome encoded the major S-layer protein(s) of this microbe. Glycoprotein staining of SDS-PAGE separated M. barkeri cell extracts revealed three distinct bands containing the Mbar_A1758 polypeptide (see Pro-Q Emerald glycoprotein stained lanes 1–3, Figure 1(a)). This M. barkeri protein is analogous to the surface exposed M. acetivorans and M. mazei S-layer proteins revealed by biotin-tagging studies . It is posttranslationally processed by removal of the N-terminal signal sequence and further modified by addition of unknown sugar moieties. The mature N-terminus (ADSVEIR) was determined to begin with residue 25 (Table S4) and corresponds to those determined for MA0829 and MM1976 . Lectin blotting revealed interactions between Mbar_A1758 and the lectins Con A, Galanthus nivalis lectin (GNL), and Pisum sativum agglutinin (PSA). Con A, preferentially binding α-mannose and α-glucose, has previously been shown by us to bind the M. mazei and M. acetivorans S-layer proteins. GNL binds (α-1,3) mannose residues preferentially and, unlike most mannose-binding lectins, does not bind α-glucose. PSA prefers to bind α-mannose-containing oligosaccharides with N-acetylchitobiose-linked α-fucose residues. These lectin results suggest future approaches to enrich Mbar_A1758 from whole-cell lysates.
4.2. The Highly Expressed Methanasarcina slmA1 Genes
The M. acetivorans MA0829 gene () was among the most highly expressed in the cell (Figures 2 and 4). Interestingly, the downstream gene, MA0830, was not significantly transcribed and does not appear to be part of an operon-like structure. The M. barkeri slmA1 gene (Mbar_A1758) was also highly transcribed from an identical upstream transcription start site (Figure 3(b)). The high conservation among the UTRs and promoter elements for the predominant slmA1 genes from M. acetivorans, M. mazei, and M. barkeri suggests that all three organisms control transcription and translation of their S-layer proteins in a similar way. The role of the UTR and putative secondary mRNA structures (Figure S1) in gene expression is currently unknown.
While the Mbar_A1758 and MA0829 proteins are the most abundantly expressed S-layer proteins in M. barkeri and M. acetivorans, two additional proteins, MA0068 and MA3556, were detected by proteomic methods, albeit at much lower levels . Correspondingly, their genes were transcribed at far lower levels relative to MA0829 (i.e., at less than 0.04 and 0.02 of the level, resp., Figure 2(b)). Whether they represent minor components of the S-layer somehow needed for envelope porosity and/or proper assembly is unknown. Alternatively, they may be more highly expressed under different cell growth conditions. Likewise, for the Mbar_A1034 and Mbar_A2016 gene products detected in M. barkeri.
Alignment of the primary amino acid sequences of the three major S-layer proteins from M. barkeri, M. acetivorans, and M. mazei (Figure 6) reveals high conservation (65% identity and 88% similarity). Each protein has a similar signal peptide sequence targeting secretion followed by tandem DUF1608 domains and a short 60 amino acid linker region. The latter element would presumably tether the S-layer protein to the cytoplasmic membrane by a C-terminal and hydrophobic transmembrane helix. A more detailed assessment of these proteins and their respective paralogs is in progress.
4.3. Mbar_A1758-Like Proteins in Other Microorganisms
Mbar_A1758-like proteins identified in the sequenced genomes of Methanosarcina species and other microorganisms (Section 2, Table 1) are displayed in the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 5. Four major conclusions may be drawn. First, these proteins group into six deeply branched clusters with the M. acetivorans MA0829 () and the M. mazei MM1976 () proteins next to one another, and adjacent to three M. barkeri ORFs (Mbar_A1758, Mbar_A2011, and Mbar_A3145). An additional two M. barkeri ORFs (Mbar_A1815, Mbar_A1816) are the next most closely related proteins. Thus, it was not possible to predict in advance which of these five M. barkeri genes might encode the major S-layer protein for this organism. From the gene expression studies (Figure 3(b)), Mbar_A1758 is the logical candidate due to its high level of transcription relative to all of the other related genes. Moreover, proteomic studies show that the Mbar_A1758 gene product is highly abundant, proteolytically processed, and further modified by unknown glycan additions.
Second, while the number of MA0829 homologs in M. acetivorans and M. barkeri is similar (i.e., ten and nine proteins, resp.), M. mazei only possesses five (Table 1). Interestingly, all of these appear to be closely related to an M. acetivorans and M. barkeri ORF (Figure 5), where only one Methanosarcina cluster lacks a M. mazei member. Four of the five M. mazei ORFs have been detected by their binding to Con A (Leon et al., in preparation) and only MM2002 has not been observed. M. acetivorans proteins MA3556 and MA0068 were readily detected from Con A elutes, while proteins MA0653 and MA4531 were observed less consistently. Noteworthy, the major ORFs detected in our Methanosarcina studies fall into three distinct groups on the phylogenetic tree (Figure 5). One contains the most abundantly detected proteins while the other two are less abundant.
Third, only two other methanogenic archaea possess MA0829-like genes/proteins. These are Methanococcoides burtonii (four homologs: Mbur_0268, Mbur_1089, Mbur_1690, and Mbur_2129) and Methanosaeta thermophila PT (three homologs: Mthe_0148, Mthe_0677, and Mthe_1177). None of these putative proteins appear to be closely related to any of the abundantly identified Methanosarcina S-layer ORFs, but rather cluster together near the more distant and weakly expressed Methanosarcina genes (Figure 5). Interestingly, the Mbur_1690 ORF was detected in the cell-free supernatant of M. burtonii cultures , and this protein is most similar to the S-layer proteins detected in M. acetivorans and M. mazei .
Fourth, only two nonmethanogenic archaea possess MA0829-like genes/proteins (Figure 5). These include one each in Haloarcula marismortui (rrnAC0971, UniProt Q5V3G1) and in Natronomonas pharaonis DSM2160 (NP1800A, UniProt Q3IS97). No related ORFs were identified in either the Bacteria or the Eukarya. The MA0829 protein appears to be relatively rare in a phylogenetic context, but at the same time, it is one of the major proteins in these few organisms known to possess it.
4.4. Previously Annotated Surface Layer and Surface-Layer-Associated Proteins
While multiple S-layer and surface-layer-associated genes were annotated by the Methanosarcina genome sequencing projects [7–9], it is now evident that experimental data were too limited to accurately predict the S-layer proteins present in these archaeal species. Interestingly, the bioinformatic study of Saleh et al.  predicted yet different S-layer proteins with little overlap to other predictions. However, an analysis of several microarray data sets for M. acetivorans failed to support the abundant expression of the above-mentioned candidates (Table S4).
In conclusion, this study establishes the presence of a single major S-layer protein in each Methanosarcina strain examined. Its signature is well conserved within the Methanosarcinaceae but nearly absent in any other types of organisms. The current study revises criteria for predictions of newly sequenced genomes and metagenomic data sets. In fact, it will be interesting should future studies assign newly revealed slmA1 genes/proteins to Methanosarcinaceae only. If so, the DUF1608 motif is restricted to a relatively narrow range of species.
This research was supported by the Department of Energy Biosciences Division grant award DE-FG02-08ER64689 to RPG, by the UCLA-DOE Institute of Genomics and Proteomics to JL and RPG, by the U.S. National Institute of Health (GM085402) to JL and RROL, and by the Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA fellowship (NIH 5F31AI61886-02) to D. R. L. The UCLA Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Technology Center was established and equipped by a generous gift from the W. M. Keck Foundation. The authors thank Patricia A. Denny and Paul C. Denny (University of Southern California School of Dentistry) for performing the lectin blotting.
- J. Eichler, et al., “The cell envelopes of haloarchaea: staying in shape in a world of salt,” in Prokaryotic Cell Wall Compounds: Structure and Biochemistry, H. König, H. Claus, and A. Varma, Eds., pp. 253–270, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
- H. König and H. Claus, “Cell envelopes of methanogens,” in Prokaryotic Cell Wall Compounds: Structure and Biochemistry, H. König, H. Claus, and A. Varma, Eds., pp. 231–252, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
- R. Rachel, “Cell envelopes of crenarchaeota and nanoarchaeota,” in Prokaryotic Cell Wall Compounds: Structure and Biochemistry, H. König, H. Claus, and A. Varma, Eds., pp. 271–294, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
- A. F. Ellen, B. Zolghadr, A. M. J. Driessen, and S. V. Albers, “Shaping the archaeal cell envelope,” Archaea, vol. 2010, Article ID 608243, 13 pages, 2010.
- K. R. Sowers, J. E. Boone, and R. P. Gunsalus, “Disaggregation of Methanosarcina spp. and growth as single cells at elevated osmolarity,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 3832–3839, 1993.
- K. R. Sowers and R. P. Gunsalus, “Adaptation for growth at various saline concentrations by the archaebacterium Methanosarcina thermophila,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 998–1002, 1988.
- J. E. Galagan, C. Nusbaum, A. Roy et al., “The genome of M. acetivorans reveals extensive metabolic and physiological diversity,” Genome Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 532–542, 2002.
- U. Deppenmeier, A. Johann, T. Hartsch et al., “The genome of Methanosarcina mazei: evidence for lateral gene transfer between bacteria and archaea,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 453–461, 2002.
- D. L. Maeder, I. Anderson, T. S. Brettin et al., “The Methanosarcina barkeri genome: comparative analysis with Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei reveals extensive rearrangement within methanosarcinal genomes,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 188, no. 22, pp. 7922–7931, 2006.
- M. Saleh, C. Song, S. Nasserulla, and L. G. Leduc, “Indicators from archaeal secretomes,” Microbiological Research, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2010.
- D. R. Francoleon, P. Boontheung, Y. Yang et al., “S-layer, surface-accessible, and concanavalin a binding proteins of Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1972–1982, 2009.
- L. Rohlin and R. P. Gunsalus, “Carbon-dependent control of electron transfer and central carbon pathway genes for methane biosynthesis in the Archaean, Methanosarcina acetivorans strain C2A,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 10, article 62, 2010.
- K. R. Sowers, D. E. Robertson, D. Noll, R. P. Gunsalus, and M. F. Roberts, “N epsilon-acetyl-beta-lysine: an osmolyte synthesized by methanogenic archaebacteria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 23, pp. 9083–9087, 1990.
- M. K. Oh, L. Rohlin, K. C. Kao, and J. C. Liao, “Global expression profiling of acetate-grown Escherichia coli,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 15, pp. 13175–13183, 2002.
- L. Rohlin, J. D. Trent, K. Salmon, U. Kim, R. P. Gunsalus, and J. C. Liao, “Heat shock response of Archaeoglobus fulgidus,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 17, pp. 6046–6057, 2005.
- S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3402, 1997.
- M. A. Larkin, G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown et al., “Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2947–2948, 2007.
- D. H. Huson and D. Bryant, “Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 254–267, 2006.
- C. L. Kingsford, K. Ayanbule, and S. L. Salzberg, “Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of Rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake,” Genome Biology, vol. 8, no. 2, article R22, 2007.
- O. Emanuelsson, S. Brunak, G. von Heijne, and H. Nielsen, “Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools,” Nature Protocols, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 953–971, 2007.
- A. Krogh, B. Larsson, G. Von Heijne, and E. L. L. Sonnhammer, “Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 567–580, 2001.
- D. H. Mathews, J. Sabina, M. Zuker, and D. H. Turner, “Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 288, no. 5, pp. 911–940, 1999.
- N. F. W. Saunders, C. Ng, M. Raftery, M. Guilhaus, A. Goodchild, and R. Cavicchioli, “Proteomic and computational analysis of secreted proteins with type I signal peptides from the antarctic archaeon Methanococcoides burtonii,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 2457–2464, 2006.