- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 327637, 13 pages
The Alternative Route to Heme in the Methanogenic Archaeon Methanosarcina barkeri
1Institut für Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Spielmannstr 7, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
2Institut für Organische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hagenring 30, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Received 12 August 2013; Accepted 25 October 2013; Published 23 January 2014
Academic Editor: William B. Whitman
Copyright © 2014 Melanie Kühner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In living organisms heme is formed from the common precursor uroporphyrinogen III by either one of two substantially different pathways. In contrast to eukaryotes and most bacteria which employ the so-called “classical” heme biosynthesis pathway, the archaea use an alternative route. In this pathway, heme is formed from uroporphyrinogen III via the intermediates precorrin-2, sirohydrochlorin, siroheme, 12,18-didecarboxysiroheme, and iron-coproporphyrin III. In this study the heme biosynthesis proteins AhbAB, AhbC, and AhbD from Methanosarcina barkeri were functionally characterized. Using an in vivo enzyme activity assay it was shown that AhbA and AhbB (Mbar_A1459 and Mbar_A1460) together catalyze the conversion of siroheme into 12,18-didecarboxysiroheme. The two proteins form a heterodimeric complex which might be subject to feedback regulation by the pathway end-product heme. Further, AhbC (Mbar_A1793) was shown to catalyze the formation of iron-coproporphyrin III in vivo. Finally, recombinant AhbD (Mbar_A1458) was produced in E. coli and purified indicating that this protein most likely contains two [4Fe-4S] clusters. Using an in vitro enzyme activity assay it was demonstrated that AhbD catalyzes the conversion of iron-coproporphyrin III into heme.
Heme serves as an essential prosthetic group in many enzymes involved in fundamental biological processes in almost all organisms . In eukaryotes and most bacteria, the biosynthesis of heme proceeds via a conserved, well characterized “classical” pathway . In contrast, heme is formed via an alternative route in the archaea and some bacteria such as the sulfate-reducing Desulfovibrio species [3–9]. In both the classical and the alternative pathway, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) serves as the common precursor for heme formation which is converted into the biosynthetic intermediate uroporphyrinogen III (UROGEN) in three consecutive enzymatic steps. In the classical pathway UROGEN is then converted into heme via the intermediates coproporphyrinogen III, protoporphyrinogen IX, and protoporphyrin IX .
In contrast, in the course of the alternative heme biosynthesis route UROGEN is methylated to yield precorrin-2 which is then further transformed into heme via the intermediates sirohydrochlorin, siroheme (SH), 12,18-didecarboxysiroheme (DDSH), and iron-coproporphyrin III (Fe-COPRO III) (Figure 1(a)) . Whereas it was known for almost twenty years that the first step of the alternative route is the S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) dependent methylation of UROGEN to precorrin-2 [7–9], the remaining steps of the alternative heme biosynthesis pathway were elucidated only recently . The bioinformatic analysis of completely sequenced archaeal genomes revealed the presence of potential heme biosynthesis gene clusters consisting of the “early” hem genes required for the formation of UROGEN and several nir-like genes which encode proteins that are homologous to the enzymes involved in heme biosynthesis in denitrifying bacteria (Figure 1(b)) . Similar genes were also identified in the genomes of sulfate-reducing bacteria such as Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough or Desulfovibrio desulfuricans [6, 10]. Since most archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria do not possess a cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase and, thus, do not synthesize heme , it was speculated that the nir-like genes identified in the genomes of these organisms might be involved in heme biosynthesis. Subsequently, it was shown in vitro that the corresponding recombinant Nir-like proteins from D. vulgaris Hildenborough and D. desulfuricans were indeed able to catalyze the stepwise conversion of siroheme into heme, that is, the last steps of the alternative heme biosynthesis pathway (Figure 1(c)). According to their newly identified function during the alternative heme biosynthesis, these proteins were given the prefix Ahb .
It was shown that AhbA and AhbB together catalyzed the decarboxylation of the acetate side chains on rings C and D of SH to yield DDSH. The same reaction also occurs during heme biosynthesis in denitrifying bacteria where it is catalyzed by the homologous proteins NirD, NirL, NirG, and NirH . Next, AhbC was found to catalyze the removal of the acetate side chains on rings A and B of DDSH to give Fe-COPRO III. AhbC is homologous to NirJ involved in heme biosynthesis. Finally, AhbD was shown to convert Fe-COPRO III into heme by catalyzing the oxidative decarboxylation of the two propionate side chains on rings A and B to the corresponding vinyl groups . AhbD is also homologous to the heme biosynthesis protein NirJ, however, to a lower degree than AhbC. As mentioned above, the enzymatic activities of the Ahb proteins were shown mainly for the recombinant enzymes from the sulfate-reducing bacteria D. vulgaris Hildenborough and D. desulfuricans.
As previously reported and based on bioinformatic analysis, the archaea also possess homologues of these Nir-like alternative heme biosynthesis proteins which were named Ahb-Nir at the time . In this nomenclature, Ahb-NirD corresponds to AhbA, Ahb-NirH to AhbB, Ahb-NirJ2 to AhbC, and Ahb-NirJ1 to AhbD (Figure 1(b)). In order to avoid further confusion, we will adopt here the four letter nomenclature (AhbA, AhbB, AhbC, and AhbD) also for the archaeal Ahb-Nir proteins.
Although an equivalent functionality can be inferred for the Ahb proteins from both groups of organisms, that is, sulfate-reducing bacteria and archaea, based on amino acid sequence similarities, these predictions still require experimental proof. Especially, the catalytic functions of AhbC and AhbD should be verified experimentally before the respective enzyme names are assigned, since both proteins share similarity with NirJ and are also quite similar to each other. Therefore, in this study we investigated the catalytic functions of the Ahb proteins from the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina barkeri and established their roles for the novel heme biosynthesis pathway in this organism.
2. Materials and Methods
All chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany), Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany), Gerbu (Heidelberg, Germany), Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). DNA polymerases, restriction enzymes, and PCR requisites were purchased from New England Biolabs (Frankfurt a.M., Germany). Oligonucleotide primers and plasmid-miniprep kits were purchased from Metabion (Martinsried, Germany). PCR purification and gel extraction kits were obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). Ni-NTA agarose was purchased from Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany). Porphyrins were purchased from Frontier Scientific (Newark, USA). The four E. coli codon-optimized genes Mbar_A1459, _A1460, _A1458, and _A1793 from M. barkeri were synthesized by Life Technologies GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany).
2.2. Construction of Plasmids
For the construction of plasmid pETDuetnirDLGHJEN containing the genes nirD, nirL, nirG, nirH, nirJ, nirE, and nirN from Pseudomonas aeruginosa the DNA fragment containing all seven genes was amplified by PCR with the primers NirDLGHJEN_NdeI_fw (G GAG CGA CAT ATG GAC GAC CTC TCC) and NirDLGHJEN_KpnI_bw (GAC GGT ACC TCA GTG CGA GGT TCC) using plasmid pHAE2  as the template. The amplified DNA fragment was digested with the restriction enzymes NdeI and KpnI (underlined) and ligated into the correspondingly digested vector pETDuet-1 (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) to generate pETDuetnirDLGHJEN. For the construction of plasmid pETDuetahbAB the synthetic, codon-optimized gene Mbar_A1460 (encoding AhbB) was amplified by PCR using the primers 15NirH_Mba_fw (C GTA CAT ATG GAT AAA ACC GAT GTG AAA) and 16NirH_Mba_rev (C GTT CTC GAG TTA CAG ACG AAC ACC G). The amplified DNA fragment was digested with the restriction enzymes NdeI and XhoI (underlined) and ligated into correspondingly digested vector pETDuet-1 yielding plasmid pETDuetahbB. The synthetic, codon-optimized gene Mbar_A1459 (encoding AhbA) was amplified by PCR using the primers 13NirD_Mba_fw (TG CAG AAT TCG ATG ATC GAT ATT GAC AAC CTG) and 14NirD_Mba_rev (TAA CGC GGC CGC TTA ACG AAT ATC GAA). The amplified DNA fragment was digested with the restriction enzymes EcoRI and NotI and ligated into the correspondingly digested plasmid pETDuetahbB yielding plasmid pETDuetahbAB. The plasmid pET22bahbABCD containing the codon-optimized genes Mbar_A1459, _A1460, _A1458, and _A1793 (encoding AhbABCD) from M. barkeri was constructed by the “link and lock” method as described before  using pET22b (Novagen) as the vector system. The plasmid pET22bahbABCD was modified with the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) to insert a stop codon (underlined) either in ahbD by using the primers nirJ1_Stop (CTG AAT TGT GTT CAT TGA CGT GGT GCA AGC ACC AG) and nirJ1_Stop_antisense (CTG GT GCT TGC ACC ACG TCA ATG AAC ACA ATT CAG) to generate pET22bahbABCDt78a (producing AhbABC) or in ahbC to generate pET22bahbABCa76tD (producing AhbABD) by using the primers nirJ2_Stop (GGT CGT GAT AGC AAA TAA CTG CCG AGC CAT CTG) and nirJ2_Stop_antisense (CAG ATG GCT CGG CAG TTA TTT GCT ATC ACG ACC) for blocking the expression of the respective gene. For the construction of plasmid pETDuetahbD the codon-optimized gene Mbar_A1458 (encoding AhbD) was PCR amplified using the primers NirJ1_Duet_MfeI_fw (C AAT TGG ATG ATT GCC ATG ACC AAT G) and NirJ1_pGEX_XhoI_bw (G CTC GAG TTA TTT TTT ACC CGG AC) containing MfeI and XhoI restriction sites (underlined) and first cloned into the pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mbar_A1458 was then cut from this plasmid with MfeI and XhoI endonucleases and the resulting DNA fragment was ligated into the correspondingly digested vector pETDuet-1 (Novagen) generating pETDuetahbD. Plasmid pBCM-CysG6 encoding the recombinant siroheme synthase CysG from Salmonella typhimurium was kindly provided by Dr. Robert Schnell (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden) .
2.3. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
E. coli DH10B was used as the host for cloning. For production of recombinant proteins the E. coli strain BL21(DE3) was used. For recombinant protein production the E. coli strains carrying the corresponding vectors were grown at 37°C in LB-medium (aerobic growth conditions) or LB-medium containing 20 mM NaNO3 (anaerobic growth conditions) supplemented with appropriate antibiotics. Protein production was induced by adding 500 μM IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranosid) to the cultures as soon as an optical density at 578 nm of 0.5 for aerobically and 0.2 for anaerobically grown cultures was reached. Cultures of E. coli cells containing plasmid pBCM-CysG6 were induced for protein production with 0.01% (w/v) arabinose. After induction the cells were further cultivated at 25°C overnight before harvesting by centrifugation and storing the cell pellet at −20°C.
2.4. In Vivo Enzyme Activity Assay
In vivo activity assays were performed by cultivating E. coli BL21(DE3) cells containing either only pBCM-CysG6 (production of Salmonella typhimurium CysG) or pBCM-CysG6 in combination with pETDuetnirDLGHJEN (production of P. aeruginosa NirDLGH), pETDuetahbAB (production of M. barkeri AhbAB), pET22bahbABCD (production of M. barkeri AhbABCD), pET22bahbABCDt78a (production of M. barkeri AhbABC), or pET22bahbABCa76tD (production of M. barkeri AhbABD), respectively. The cells were grown anaerobically in 120 mL plasma bottles and induced for protein production as described above. After overnight cultivation the cells were harvested and either directly used for HPLC sample preparation or stored at −20°C.
2.5. Purification of Enzymes
Recombinant AhbAB from M. barkeri was produced aerobically in E. coli BL21(DE3) containing the plasmid pETDuetahbAB and the protein complex was purified by IMAC (immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography). The cell pellet was resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol) and the cells were disrupted using a French Press system (1000 psi). The soluble protein fraction was obtained by ultracentrifugation (45 min, 175000 ×g, 4°C). The supernatant was loaded on a Ni-NTA column and washed with 10 column volumes (CV) of buffer A and 2 CV of buffer A containing 50 mM imidazole before eluting the bound proteins with 7 CV of buffer A containing 300 mM imidazole. The protein content of the elution fractions was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and the AhbAB containing fractions were pooled. The final buffer exchange against buffer A was performed with a NAP-25 Sephadex column (Illustra NAP-25, GE Healthcare). The purified AhbAB was stored at −20°C.
Recombinant AhbD from M. barkeri was produced in aerobically growing E. coli BL21(DE3) containing the plasmid pETDuetahbD. After cell harvest all procedures done for the purification of AhbD were performed under anaerobic conditions in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratories, Grass Lake, MI, USA). For the resuspension of the cell pellet buffer B (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 0.3% Triton X-100, 2 mM DTT) was used. The soluble protein fraction was obtained as described above. The supernatant was loaded on a 5 mL Blue Sepharose column (HiTrap Blue HP, GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM DTT and after sample application the column was washed thoroughly with this buffer. The bound proteins were eluted using a linear gradient from 0 M NaCl to 1 M NaCl in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM DTT. The AhbD containing fractions (elution at about 500 mM NaCl) were pooled and the buffer was exchanged against 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM DTT. Then, the protein solution was loaded on an anion exchange column (Mono Q 5/50 GL, GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM DTT and the column was washed with the same buffer. A linear gradient from 0 M NaCl to 0.5 M NaCl in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM DTT was used for the elution of the bound proteins. The AhbD containing fractions were pooled and concentrated to 5.6 mg/mL. The purified AhbD was stored at 4°C.
2.6. Dialysis of AhbAB
100 μL of purified AhbAB at a concentration of 7.8 mg/mL were dialyzed at 4°C overnight against 100 mL of buffer A using a Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassette (10k MWCO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). Then, the used buffer A was exchanged against 100 mL of fresh buffer A and the dialysis was continued at 4°C for another three hours.
2.7. Determination of Protein Concentration
For the determination of protein concentrations the Bradford Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions with BSA as the protein standard.
2.8. In Vitro Iron-Sulfur Cluster Reconstitution
The in vitro reconstitution of iron-sulfur clusters was performed as previously described . After reconstitution the excess of iron and sulfide was removed by centrifugation and subsequent passage of the protein solution through a NAP-25 column (GE Healthcare) which was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.9. Determination of Iron and Sulfide Contents
The iron content of purified AhbD was determined according to  after denaturation of the protein with 1 M perchloric acid and using bathophenanthroline as the chelating reagent. The sulfide content was determined as previously described .
2.10. Molecular Mass Determination
The native molecular mass of purified proteins was estimated by gel permeation chromatography as previously described .
2.11. In Vitro Enzyme Activity Assay for AhbAB
The assay was performed under anaerobic conditions in a glove box (Coy Laboratories). The substrate siroheme was produced in vivo by the production of recombinant CysG in E. coli as described above. Then, a crude cell free extract was prepared under anaerobic conditions from the siroheme containing E. coli cells which was used directly as the substrate solution for the activity assay. The assay mixtures contained in a total volume of 250 μL of assay buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol) a final concentration of 20 μM purified AhbAB which was incubated prior to substrate addition with 0 μM, 5 μM, or 20 μM hemin. Then, 75 μL of the siroheme containing cell free extract was added to start the reaction. For the control reaction AhbAB and hemin were omitted from the mixture. The reactions were incubated at 37°C for 19 h. Then, the accumulated tetrapyrroles were extracted from the assay mixtures and analyzed by HPLC as described below.
2.12. In Vitro Enzyme Activity Assay for AhbD
The assay was performed under anaerobic conditions in a glove box (Coy Laboratories). A stock solution of 500 μM iron-coproporphyrin III (Fe-COPRO III) was generated according to Chim et al. . The enzyme activity assay mixture contained 20 μM Fe-COPRO III, 500 μM S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM), 1 mM sodium dithionite (DT), and 5 μM purified, reconstituted AhbD in buffer B. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 6 h and 15 h at 17°C. To stop the enzymatic reaction 5% (v/v) of concentrated HCl was added to the mixture which was stored at −20°C until further use.
2.13. Tetrapyrrole Extraction and Preparation of HPLC Samples
For the extraction of the potential heme bound to purified AhbAB the protein solution was mixed 1 : 1 (v/v) with solution 1 (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, and 2% Tween 80) and 5% (v/v) of concentrated HCl was added to denature the proteins. After shaking the mixture on a Vortex-Genie 2 mixer (Scientific Industries Inc., Bohemia, NY, USA) for two minutes the sample was centrifuged (10 min, 16100 ×g). Then, an acetone/HCl mixture (39 : 1 (v/v)) was added 1 : 1 (v/v) to the supernatant followed by another centrifugation step. The resulting supernatant containing the extracted tetrapyrroles was analyzed by HPLC.
For the preparation of HPLC samples of the in vivo enzyme activity assays the cell pellets were resuspended 1 : 4 (w/v) in solution 1. The cells were disrupted with glass beads in a cell disruptor (10 min, 3000 rpm) and centrifuged (10 min, 16100 ×g). Addition of 600 μL acetone/HCl (39 : 1 (v/v)) to 200 μL of the supernatant and vortexing for 10 minutes was used to extract the tetrapyrroles and precipitate the proteins. The samples were centrifuged (10 min, 16100 ×g) and the supernatant was concentrated in a speed vac (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) to a final volume of 200 μL before adding 5% (v/v) of concentrated HCl and centrifuging (10 min, 16100 ×g). The obtained supernatant was used for HPLC analysis.
For the preparation of HPLC samples of the in vitro enzyme activity assays the assay mixture was mixed 1 : 1 (v/v) with acetone/HCl (39 : 1 (v/v)) followed by vortexing and centrifugation (10 min, 16100 ×g). 5% (v/v) of concentrated HCl was added to the supernatant and centrifuged again to remove residual protein before injection into the HPLC system.
2.14. Preparation of HPLC Standards
Hemin or Fe-COPRO III was first dissolved in 150 μL of acetone/HCl (39 : 1 (v/v)) and then 75 μL of solution 1 was added. The obtained tetrapyrrole solutions were centrifuged (10 min, 16100 ×g) and the supernatant was used for HPLC analysis.
2.15. High Performance Liquid Chromatography of Tetrapyrroles
Tetrapyrrole extracts were analyzed using a JASCO HPLC 2000 series system (Jasco, Gross-Umstadt, Germany). The tetrapyrroles were detected by photometric diode array analysis at 200–650 nm and by fluorescence measurements using an excitation wavelength of 409 nm and an emission wavelength of 630 nm.
The chromatographic separation of samples (30 μL injection volume) containing heme and Fe-COPRO III was performed on an Equisil BDS C18 column (Dr. Maisch HPLC GmbH, Ammerbuch-Entringen, Germany) with 5 μm particle size and 250 mm × 4.6 mm column dimensions at 25°C. The tetrapyrroles were eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min using a gradient system based on previously published methods . Solvent A consisted of 1 M ammonium acetate (pH 5.2) (analytical grade, Sigma-Aldrich), solvent B of methanol (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich), and solvent C of acetonitrile (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich). At the time of sample injection the mobile phase consisted of 60% solvent A, 30% solvent B, and 10% solvent C. Within 30 min the content of solvent B was increased to 75% with concomitant decrease of solvent A to 15% while solvent C was held constant at 10%. Then, the content of solvent B was increased to 90% within 5 min while solvent C was held constant at 10%. These conditions (90% B and 10% C) were held for 15 min before returning to the initial conditions.
The separation of samples (20 μL injection volume) containing siroheme and 12,18-didecarboxysiroheme was performed on a ReproSil-Pur C18 AQ column (Dr. Maisch HPLC GmbH) with 5 μm particle size and 150 mm × 2 mm column dimensions at 25°C and a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. For the elution of the tetrapyrroles a gradient system was used with solvent A consisting of 0.01% (v/v) formic acid in water (analytical grade, Merck) and solvent B consisting of acetonitrile (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich). The initial conditions of the mobile phase consisted of 95% solvent A and 5% solvent B, which was increased to 20% within 6 min. Then, the content of solvent B was increased to 30% within 19 min and finally increased to 100% within 5 min and held for 10 min before returning to the initial conditions.
2.16. HPLC-MS Analysis of Siroheme and 12,18-Didecarboxysiroheme
The HPLC separation of the tetrapyrroles was performed as described above. The masses of the eluting tetrapyrroles were measured by ESI-MS on an LTQ XL linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the positive ion mode.
2.17. UV-Visible Absorption Spectroscopy
UV-visible absorption spectra of purified proteins were recorded using either a V-600 or a V-650 spectrophotometer (Jasco, Gross-Umstadt, Germany).
2.18. N-Terminal Sequencing
The N-terminal sequence of the purified protein was determined by Edman degradation.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. AhbA and AhbB from Methanosarcina barkeri Catalyze the Decarboxylation of Siroheme to 12,18-Didecarboxysiroheme
During the alternative heme biosynthesis route the acetate side chains on rings C and D of siroheme are decarboxylated to the corresponding methyl groups (Figure 1(c)). This reaction is catalyzed by enzymes (AhbA and AhbB) that are homologous to the heme biosynthesis enzymes NirD, NirL, NirG, and NirH which catalyze the same reaction during heme formation in denitrifying bacteria such as Paracoccus pantotrophus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa . In M. barkeri the potential AhbA and AhbB proteins are encoded by the genes Mbar_A1459 and Mbar_A1460, respectively (Figure 1(b)). Whereas in M. barkeri and other methanogenic archaea AhbA and AhbB are encoded by two distinct genes, these two genes are fused to one single gene in all other heme-synthesizing archaea . Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that AhbA and AhbB together catalyze the decarboxylation of siroheme in M. barkeri as observed for the homologous proteins from Desulfovibrio species . Thus, in the following we will name the siroheme decarboxylase AhbAB. In order to experimentally verify the predicted function of AhbAB from M. barkeri as a siroheme decarboxylase, we developed an in vivo enzyme activity assay. In this assay, siroheme, the substrate of AhbAB, was produced in E. coli by the recombinant siroheme synthase CysG from Salmonella typhimurium encoded on plasmid pBCM-CysG6 . After overnight CysG production, the siroheme (SH) content of the E. coli cells was analyzed by tetrapyrrole extraction and HPLC analysis as described in Materials and Methods and shown in Figure 2(a). Next, we coproduced recombinant CysG together with recombinant AhbA and AhbB from M. barkeri in the same E. coli host and analyzed the accumulated tetrapyrroles after overnight protein production as before. Additionally, the same experiment was performed with recombinant NirD, NirL, NirG, and NirH from P. aeruginosa, constituting the potential siroheme decarboxylase for heme formation in this organism, which were all coproduced with CysG as a positive control.
As shown in Figure 2(a), the HPLC analysis of the tetrapyrroles extracted from E. coli cells producing only CysG revealed the presence of one major compound at a retention time of 13.9 min which was identified as SH by HPLC-MS analysis (Figure 2(b)). The detected mass of 912.36 for the [M+H]+ ion corresponded to SH in its dilactone form. The formation of lactone derivatives of isobacteriochlorins was observed previously [19–21] and probably occurred during the tetrapyrrole extraction under aerobic conditions. Nevertheless, this result showed that SH, the potential substrate for AhbAB from M. barkeri, accumulated in CysG producing E. coli cells. When recombinant NirD, NirL, NirG, and NirH from P. aeruginosa were coproduced together with CysG in the same E. coli host, only residual amounts of SH were detected by HPLC analysis at a retention time of 13.9 min and a new major compound emerged at a retention time of about 17.2 min. The mass of this compound (824.36 for the [M+H]+ ion) corresponded to 12,18-didecarboxysiroheme (DDSH) in its dilactone form (Figure 2(b)). Thus, this result not only showed that our in vivo activity assay was suitable for the detection of SH decarboxylase activity, but also demonstrated for the first time that NirD, NirL, NirG, and NirH from P. aeruginosa indeed represent the SH decarboxylase for heme formation in this denitrifying bacterium. Finally, DDSH was also formed in vivo when AhbA and AhbB from M. barkeri were co-produced together with CysG as judged by HPLC analysis of the extracted tetrapyrroles (Figure 2(a)). This result clearly established that the M. barkeri genes Mbar_A1459 and Mbar_A1460 encode the SH decarboxylase AhbAB.
3.2. AhbA and AhbB from Methanosarcina barkeri form a Heterodimeric, Heme-Binding Complex
In M. barkeri and other methanogenic archaea, the SH decarboxylase AhbAB is composed of two protein subunits encoded by two distinct genes. In contrast, in all other heme-synthesizing archaea these two genes are fused to one single gene encoding the predicted SH decarboxylase in these organisms . Therefore, we hypothesized that AhbA and AhbB from M. barkeri might form a mixed complex with each other in vivo which represents the physiological relevant form of the enzyme. In order to test this hypothesis, we coproduced recombinant AhbA carrying an N-terminal His6-tag together with nontagged AhbB in the same E. coli host. Then, His6-AhbA was purified by affinity chromatography on Ni-NTA agarose and the protein content of the final elution fraction was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Figure 3(a), the nontagged AhbB was copurified together with His6-AhbA during this experiment strongly suggesting the formation of a mixed AhbAB complex in vivo. Further, the purified complex was analyzed by gel permeation chromatography which revealed the presence of a heterodimer (data not shown). Based on these novel results, we propose that the SH decarboxylase from M. barkeri is a heterodimeric enzyme consisting of the two subunits AhbA and AhbB.
Interestingly, the purified AhbAB complex was bright orange in color. The UV-visible absorption spectra of the purified protein in the as isolated and the dithionite-reduced form suggested the presence of a bound heme cofactor with absorption maxima at 423, 539, and 571 nm for the as isolated form and absorption maxima at 426, 530, and 559 nm in the dithionite-reduced form (Figure 3(b)). In order to characterize the bound chromophore in more detail, the purified protein was denatured by the addition of hydrochloric acid and the potential heme cofactor was extracted by acidified acetone. Subsequently, the extracted chromophore was analyzed by HPLC and was identified as heme based on its retention time (Figure 3(c)) and UV-visible absorption spectrum (data not shown). Although the bound heme was removed from the AhbAB complex under denaturing conditions, we were unable to separate the protein-chromophore complex by dialysis. The ratio of heme to AhbAB was estimated by peak integration after HPLC analysis and was determined to be about 0.03 mol heme per mol AhbAB. In summary, these results clearly showed for the first time that AhbA and AhbB from M. barkeri form a heterodimeric AhbAB complex which partially contains a noncovalently, but tightly bound heme .
The presence of heme in the purified AhbAB complex was completely unexpected. Usually, heme serves as a redox cofactor in enzymes or as a gas sensor in regulatory proteins. However, there is no need for a redox cofactor in the siroheme decarboxylase AhbAB and the homologous proteins NirDLGH which catalyze the same reaction during the biosynthesis of heme do not contain any bound heme after purification (K. Haufschildt and G. Layer, unpublished results). A potential role of the heme as a cofactor for the catalytic activity of AhbAB seems unlikely considering that AhbAB catalyzes a reaction during the biosynthesis of the cofactor itself. Such a situation would raise the “chicken and egg” question. Alternatively, there are several different possibilities for the role of the bound heme in AhbAB. First, the presence of heme in the AhbAB preparation might reflect an end-product inhibition mechanism which controls the catalytic activity of AhbAB. In such a mechanism, the heme-free AhbAB complex would catalyze the decarboxylation of SH to DDSH in M. barkeri when heme is needed. As soon as the demand for heme is satisfied, the cofactor would bind to the AhbAB complex and might possibly inhibit its catalytic activity. Second, heme binding to AhbAB might control protein stability as observed for glutamyl-tRNA reductase which was reported to be inhibited upon heme binding and also seemed to be more amenable to proteolytic degradation in the heme-bound form [22–24]. The eukaryotic 5-aminolevulinic acid synthase (ALAS1) represents another example for a feedback-regulation by heme. In this case, gene expression and protein stability were reported to be dependent on the heme levels in mitochondria [25, 26]. Therefore, a third mechanism might be that heme-bound AhbAB might somehow influence gene expression of the heme biosynthesis genes. In this context it is interesting to note that the proteins AhbA and AhbB are annotated in the databases as transcriptional regulators belonging to the Lrp/AsnC-family.
3.3. Heme Does Not Inhibit the In Vitro Enzyme Activity of Purified AhbAB
In order to obtain more insights into the role of the heme bound to AhbAB we tested the possibility that heme might inhibit the catalytic activity of the protein. For this purpose, we tested the AhbAB activity in an in vitro enzyme activity assay in the absence and presence of different amounts of added heme as described in the Materials and Methods section. As shown in Figure 4, DDSH was formed by the action of purified AhbAB independent of the absence or presence of added heme. Even in the presence of equimolar amounts of heme with respect to the enzyme no inhibition of AhbAB was observed. These results indicate that heme does not inhibit the catalytic activity of AhbAB. Nevertheless, AhbAB might be subject to feedback-regulation by heme by one of the other possible mechanisms described above.
3.4. AhbC from Methanosarcina barkeri Catalyzes the Formation of Iron-Coproporphyrin III
During the alternative heme biosynthesis in archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria the AhbC protein catalyzes the removal of the acetate side chains on rings A and B of DDSH yielding Fe-COPRO III. AhbC is a predicted Radical SAM enzyme homologous to the heme biosynthesis enzyme NirJ [3, 6]. The heme biosynthesis gene clusters of M. barkeri (Figure 1(b)) contain two genes encoding two distinct NirJ-like proteins (previously named Ahb-NirJ1 and Ahb-NirJ2 ). The gene Mbar_A1793 encodes a protein which shares 38.8% amino acid sequence identity with P. aeruginosa NirJ and, thus, most likely represents AhbC. The second NirJ-like protein in M. barkeri, which shares 29.5% sequence identity with P. aeruginosa NirJ, is encoded by the gene Mbar_A1458 and probably represents AhbD, the terminal enzyme of the alternative heme biosynthesis pathway. In order to experimentally verify these functional predictions, we chose the same in vivo assay strategy as before for AhbAB. Thus, we coproduced recombinant CysG from S. typhimurium and AhbAB from M. barkeri together with either AhbC (Mbar_A1793) or AhbD (Mbar_A1458) or both AhbC and AhbD from M. barkeri in the same E. coli host. After overnight protein production the accumulated tetrapyrroles were extracted from the E. coli cell free extracts and analyzed by HPLC.
As shown in Figure 5, Fe-COPRO III (retention time 19.6 min) was produced in E. coli cells in the presence of recombinant CysG, AhbAB, and either both AhbC and AhbD or AhbC alone. In contrast, no Fe-COPRO III was produced in the presence of CysG, AhbAB, and AhbD when AhbC was missing in the in vivo assay. These results clearly demonstrated that the gene Mbar_A1793 indeed encodes the enzyme AhbC which is responsible for the conversion of DDSH into Fe-COPRO III during the alternative heme biosynthesis in M. barkeri.
3.5. AhbD from Methanosarcina barkeri Is an Iron-Sulfur Cluster Containing Radical SAM Heme Synthase
So far, we were able to assign the respective enzymatic functions to the M. barkeri proteins Mbar_A1459, Mbar_A1460, and Mbar_A1793 by the use of our in vivo activity assay. However, in order to establish the enzymatic function of Mbar_A1458 as a heme synthase that converts Fe-COPRO III into heme, the in vivo strategy in E. coli was not suitable, since E. coli produces heme by itself via the classical pathway. Therefore, the potential AhbD from M. barkeri (Mbar_A1458) was produced as a recombinant protein in E. coli and purified, in order to establish an in vitro enzyme activity assay. The recombinant AhbD did not carry any additional tag and was purified by affinity chromatography on a HiTrap Blue HP column (GE Healthcare) and subsequent anion exchange chromatography on a Mono Q 5/50 GL column (GE Healthcare) as described in the Materials and Methods section. Using this purification strategy about 0.9 mg of AhbD was obtained from 1 L of bacterial culture. After purification, the protein exhibited a slightly brownish color and the UV-visible absorption spectrum (not shown) of purified AhbD displayed a broad absorption feature at around 410 nm indicating the presence of an iron-sulfur cluster. As mentioned above, AhbD belongs to the family of Radical SAM enzymes and, therefore, the presence of a [4Fe-4S] cluster which is coordinated by the three cysteine residues of the characteristic amino acid sequence motif CX3CX2C was expected . Moreover, the amino acid sequence of AhbD contains a second conserved cysteine-rich region at the C-terminus exhibiting the sequence motif CX2CX5CX20C. Therefore, AhbD might harbor a second iron-sulfur cluster in addition to the one that is coordinated by the cysteines of the Radical SAM cysteine motif (CX3CX2C) which is found at the N-terminus of AhbD. In order to obtain more insight into the iron-sulfur content of AhbD, we determined the iron content of the anaerobically purified protein. We observed that purified AhbD contained only 2.2 mol iron per mol AhbD which was less than expected for a protein containing at least one [4Fe-4S] cluster. However, this observation could be explained either by partial loss of the iron-sulfur cluster(s) during purification or by incomplete iron-sulfur cluster incorporation in vivo during recombinant protein production. Therefore, the purified AhbD was subjected to in vitro iron-sulfur cluster reconstitution as described in the Materials and Methods section. After cluster reconstitution and removal of excess iron and sulfide the protein exhibited an intense brown color and the UV-visible absorption spectrum indicated the presence of [4Fe-4S] clusters (Figure 6(a)). Subsequently, the iron and sulfide contents of the protein were determined. We observed that reconstituted AhbD contained 8.5 mol iron per mol AhbD and 5.1 mol sulfide per mol AhbD. These results indicate that AhbD most likely contains two [4Fe-4S] clusters and therefore belongs to the subfamily of Radical SAM enzymes that contain more than one iron-sulfur cluster .
In order to determine whether the purified, reconstituted AhbD was able to catalyze the conversion of Fe-COPRO III to heme, an in vitro enzyme activity assay was established. In this assay the purified protein was incubated with the substrate Fe-COPRO III together with the cofactor S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) and sodium dithionite (DT) as the reductant for the iron-sulfur cluster of AhbD. After incubation of the mixture at 17°C for 0 h, 6 h, and 15 h the reaction was stopped by the addition of hydrochloric acid. The tetrapyrroles present in the reaction mixtures were extracted and subjected to HPLC analysis (Figure 6(b)). At the beginning of the reaction (0 h) only Fe-COPRO III was present in the mixture (Figure 6(b), first panel). After 6 h of incubation the amount of Fe-COPRO III had clearly decreased and two new compounds emerged at retention times of about 30.1 min and 37.5 min (Figure 6(b), second panel). The compound at 37.5 min retention time was heme as revealed by comparison with the chromatographic behavior of a hemin standard (see also Figure 3(c)). The compound at about 30.1 min retention time might be a monovinyl reaction intermediate. Finally, after 15 h the substrate Fe-COPRO III and the potential monovinyl intermediate completely disappeared and only the reaction product heme was detected in the reaction mixture (Figure 6(b), third panel). In contrast, when purified AhbD was omitted from the reaction mixture, no conversion of Fe-COPRO III to heme was observed after 15 h (Figure 6(b), fourth panel). The same was true when the “as isolated” enzyme (not reconstituted) was used (data not shown) showing that the full incorporation of the iron-sulfur clusters was required for AhbD activity. These results clearly established the enzymatic function of Mbar_A1458 as AhbD, that is, a heme synthase that converts Fe-COPRO III into heme during the alternative heme biosynthesis pathway in Methanosarcina barkeri.
In heme-synthesizing archaea heme is formed via an alternative pathway which differs significantly from the long known classical pathway found in most bacteria and eukaryotes. Previously, several archaeal genes were identified which were proposed to be involved in this alternative pathway, however, the function of only two of them was experimentally verified . In this study, the predicted functions of the enzymes catalyzing the last three steps of the alternative heme biosynthesis pathway in M. barkeri were verified. Therefore, for M. barkeri the two enzymes which consecutively convert uroporphyrinogen III into sirohydrochlorin  and the three enzymes which convert siroheme into heme (this study) were biochemically characterized. The only missing enzyme to complete the whole pathway in this organism is the chelatase which incorporates iron into sirohydrochlorin to form siroheme. Several potential chelatases are encoded in the M. barkeri genome and future studies will have to show which of them acts as the iron-chelatase during heme formation.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Robert Schnell (Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden) for the kind gift of plasmid pBCM-CysG6  as well as Professor Dr. Dieter Jahn and Dr. Jürgen Moser (Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany) for helpful discussions. This work was financially supported by Grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LA 2412/2-1) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie to G. Layer.
- A. R. Battersby, “Tetrapyrroles: the pigments of life,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 507–526, 2000.
- G. Layer, J. Reichelt, D. Jahn, and D. W. Heinz, “Structure and function of enzymes in heme biosynthesis,” Protein Science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1137–1161, 2010.
- S. Storbeck, S. Rolfes, E. Raux-Deery, M. J. Warren, D. Jahn, and G. Layer, “A novel pathway for the biosynthesis of heme in Archaea: genome-based bioinformatic predictions and experimental evidence,” Archaea, vol. 2010, Article ID 175050, 15 pages, 2010.
- G. Cavallaro, L. Decaria, and A. Rosato, “Genome-based analysis of heme biosynthesis and uptake in prokaryotic systems,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 4946–4954, 2008.
- H. Panek and M. R. O'Brian, “A whole genome view of prokaryotic haem biosynthesis,” Microbiology, vol. 148, no. 8, pp. 2273–2282, 2002.
- S. Bali, A. D. Lawrence, S. A. Lobo et al., “Molecular hijacking of siroheme for the synthesis of heme and d1 heme,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 45, pp. 18260–18265, 2011.
- H. Akutsu, J.-S. Park, and S. Sano, “L-methionine methyl is specifically incorporated into the C-2 and C-7 positions of the porphyrin of cytochrome c3 in a strictly anaerobic bacterium, Desulfovibrio vulgaris,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 115, no. 25, pp. 12185–12186, 1993.
- B. Buchenau, J. Kahnt, I. U. Heinemann, D. Jahn, and R. K. Thauer, “Heme biosynthesis in Methanosarcina barkeri via a pathway involving two methylation reactions,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 188, no. 24, pp. 8666–8668, 2006.
- T. Ishida, L. Yu, H. Akutsu et al., “A primitive pathway of porphyrin biosynthesis and enzymology in Desulfovibrio vulgaris,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 4853–4858, 1998.
- S. A. L. Lobo, A. Brindley, M. J. Warren, and L. M. Saraiva, “Functional characterization of the early steps of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis and modification in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 420, no. 2, pp. 317–325, 2009.
- S. Kawasaki, H. Arai, T. Kodama, and Y. Igarashi, “Gene cluster for dissimilatory nitrite reductase (nir) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: sequencing and identification of a locus for heme d1 biosynthesis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 1997.
- H. M. McGoldrick, C. A. Roessner, E. Raux et al., “Identification and characterization of a novel vitamin B12 (cobalamin) biosynthetic enzyme (CobZ) from Rhodobacter capsulatus, containing flavin, heme, and Fe-S cofactors,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 2, pp. 1086–1094, 2005.
- R. Schnell, T. Sandalova, U. Hellman, Y. Lindqvist, and G. Schneider, “Siroheme- and [Fe4-S4]-dependent NirA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a sulfite reductase with a covalent Cys-Tyr bond in the active site,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 29, pp. 27319–27328, 2005.
- L. Flühe, T. A. Knappe, M. J. Gattner et al., “The radical SAM enzyme AlbA catalyzes thioether bond formation in subtilosin A,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 350–357, 2012.
- W. W. Fish, “Rapid colorimetric micromethod for the quantitation of complexed iron in biological samples,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 158, pp. 357–364, 1988.
- H. Beinert, “Semi-micro methods for analysis of labile sulfide and of labile sulfide plus sulfane sulfur in unusually stable iron-sulfur proteins,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 373–378, 1983.
- N. Chim, A. Iniguez, T. Q. Nguyen, and C. W. Goulding, “Unusual diheme conformation of the heme-degrading protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 395, no. 3, pp. 595–608, 2010.
- M. Danton and C. K. Lim, “Porphyrin profiles in blood, urine and faeces by HPLC/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 20, no. 6-7, pp. 612–621, 2006.
- S. Storbeck, J. Walther, J. Müller et al., “The Pseudomonas aeruginosa nirE gene encodes the S-adenosyl-L-methionine- dependent uroporphyrinogen III methyltransferase required for heme d1 biosynthesis,” FEBS Journal, vol. 276, no. 20, pp. 5973–5982, 2009.
- A. R. Battersby, K. Jones, E. McDonald, J. A. Robinson, and H. R. Morris, “The structures and chemistrty of isobacteriochlorins from Desulphovibrio gigas,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 18, no. 25, pp. 2213–2216, 1977.
- A. R. Battersby, E. McDonald, H. R. Morris et al., “Biosynthesis of vitamin B12: structural studies on the corriphryins from Propionibacterium shermanii and the link with sirohydrochlorin,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 18, no. 25, pp. 2217–2220, 1977.
- M. de Armas-Ricard, G. Levicán, A. Katz, J. Moser, D. Jahn, and O. Orellana, “Cellular levels of heme affect the activity of dimeric glutamyl-tRNA reductase,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 405, no. 1, pp. 134–139, 2011.
- A. M. Jones and T. Elliott, “A purified mutant HemA protein from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium lacks bound heme and is defective for heme-mediated regulation in vivo,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 307, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2010.
- A. Srivastava and S. I. Beale, “Glutamyl-tRNA reductase of Chlorobium vibrioforme is a dissociable homodimer that contains one tightly bound heme per subunit,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 13, pp. 4444–4450, 2005.
- J. Zheng, Y. Shan, R. W. Lambrecht, S. E. Donohue, and H. L. Bonkovsky, “Differential regulation of human ALAS1 mRNA and protein levels by heme and cobalt protoporphyrin,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 319, no. 1-2, pp. 153–161, 2008.
- K. Yoshino, H. Munakata, O. Kuge, A. Ito, and T. Ogishima, “Haeme-regulated degradation of δ-aminolevulinate synthase 1 in rat liver mitochondria,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 453–458, 2007.
- H. J. Sofia, G. Chen, B. G. Hetzler, J. F. Reyes-Spindola, and N. E. Miller, “Radical SAM, a novel protein superfamily linking unresolved steps in familiar biosynthetic pathways with radical mechanisms: functional characterization using new analysis and information visualization methods,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1097–1106, 2001.
- N. D. Lanz and S. J. Booker, “Identification and function of auxiliary iron-sulfur clusters in radical SAM enzymes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1824, no. 11, pp. 1196–1212, 2012.