Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Methanogenic Communities in Different Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digesters

Figure 2

Community structure and dynamics of methanogenic archaea in 11 reactors at three sampling times (T1, T2, and T3; see Table S1 for details) according to T-RFLP profiles of mcrA amplicons digested with the restriction enzyme HaeIII (reactors R3.1, R4.5, R4.6, R4.8, and R4.17 (a); reactors R4.13, R4.14, R4.15, R4.16, R4.19, and R4.20 (b)). Only T-RFs comprising at least 1% relative abundance in at least one sample are presented. Laboratory-scale reactors were operated under mesophilic conditions (37–40°C) except that reactors R4.5 and R4.6 were changed to thermophilic conditions (55°C) between the second and the third sampling points. Methanoculleus and Methanosaeta members had very similar T-RF sizes (176 and 175, resp.; Table S2, SI) after digestion of mcrA amplicons with HaeIII. Thus, their differentiation in R3.1 was additionally achieved by using MspI analysis in a separate reaction, which indicated the absence of strict acetoclastic methanogens in this reactor. In other reactors, the proportion of both phylotypes varied. R3.1 was fed with chicken manure and cattle manure; R4.5 was set up only with cattle manure; R4.6 was set up with cattle manure and DDGS; R4.8 and R4.17 were fed with cattle manure and maize silage; R4.13 and R4.14 were fed with cattle manure and maize straw; R4.15 and R4.16 were set up with cattle manure and extruded maize straw; R4.19 and R4.20 treated Jatropha press cake.
(a)
(b)