Research Article
Designing Bayesian Sampling Plans with Adaptive Progressive Hybrid Censored Samples
Table 2
Comparison of performance of
and
for type-I APHCS sampling plans with
,
,
, and
.
| | Case | | | | | | () | MBR | () |
| | 1 | 0.03232 | 2.65307 | 1.0 | 0.024969 | 0.0680 | 3.77836 | 3.7787 | 2.6875 | | 2 | 0.74270 | 2.96585 | 0.5 | 0.041609 | 0.1776 | 4.42776 | 4.4285 | 3.5000 | | 3 | 1.09222 | 3.45321 | 0.5 | 0.028669 | 0.0956 | 5.16970 | 5.1695 | 4.4375 | | 4 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012464 | 0.0338 | 5.54626 | 5.5387 | 5.0000 | | 5 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012483 | 0.0290 | 5.54148 | 5.5112 | 5.0000 | | 6 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012501 | 0.0254 | 5.53790 | 5.5379 | 5.0000 | | 7 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012557 | 0.0204 | 5.53296 | 5.5186 | 5.0000 | | 8 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012484 | 0.0272 | 5.53968 | 5.5397 | 5.0000 | | 9 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012484 | 0.0340 | 5.54648 | 5.5463 | 5.0000 | | 10 | 0.03226 | 1.89424 | 1.0 | 0.025017 | 0.1022 | 3.05372 | 3.0255 | 1.9167 | | 11 | 0.03227 | 1.59145 | 1.0 | 0.025005 | 0.1362 | 2.78493 | 2.7856 | 1.6094 | | 12 | 0.03243 | 1.43416 | 1.0 | 0.024997 | 0.1702 | 2.66179 | 2.6627 | 1.4500 | | 13 | 0.03236 | 1.17387 | 1.0 | 0.024997 | 0.3404 | 2.57163 | 2.5743 | 1.1875 | | 14 | 0.86992 | 2.97459 | 0.5 | 0.035551 | 0.2016 | 4.58166 | 4.5328 | 3.6250 | | 15 | 1.05811 | 3.20508 | 0.5 | 0.029348 | 0.1646 | 4.95713 | 4.9578 | 4.0938 | | 16 | 1.48282 | 3.18637 | 0.5 | 0.021057 | 0.1164 | 5.30664 | 5.3073 | 4.5625 | | 17 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012484 | 0.0680 | 5.58048 | 5.5806 | 5.0000 | | 18 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012484 | 0.0680 | 5.58048 | 5.5806 | 5.0000 | | 19 | 5.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.5 | 0.012484 | 0.0680 | 5.58048 | 5.5806 | 5.0000 | | 20 | 0.23970 | 2.54335 | 0.5 | 0.122214 | 0.0000 | 3.40526 | 3.4057 | 2.6875 | | 21 | 0.51853 | 2.39541 | 0.5 | 0.058749 | 0.1738 | 3.64649 | 3.6471 | 2.6875 | | 22 | 0.03232 | 2.65307 | 1.0 | 0.024969 | 0.1020 | 3.81236 | 3.8128 | 2.6875 | | 23 | 0.03232 | 2.65307 | 1.0 | 0.024969 | 0.1360 | 3.84636 | 3.8468 | 2.6875 | | 24 | 0.03230 | 2.65307 | 1.0 | 0.024969 | 0.1700 | 3.88033 | 3.8808 | 2.6875 | | 25 | 0.03232 | 2.65307 | 1.0 | 0.024969 | 0.3400 | 4.05036 | 4.0511 | 2.6875 | | 26 | 0.06464 | 2.65307 | 1.0 | 0.024969 | 0.0680 | 3.81068 | 3.8111 | 2.6875 | | 27 | 0.09696 | 2.65307 | 1.0 | 0.024969 | 0.0680 | 3.84300 | 3.8434 | 2.6875 | | 28 | 0.12643 | 2.65369 | 1.0 | 0.025544 | 0.0696 | 3.87526 | 3.8757 | 2.6875 | | 29 | 0.14945 | 2.65953 | 1.0 | 0.032612 | 0.0894 | 3.93100 | 3.9316 | 2.6875 | | 30 | 0.18998 | 2.61165 | 1.0 | 0.043161 | 0.1194 | 3.96419 | 4.0179 | 2.6875 | | 31 | 0.27042 | 2.61788 | 1.0 | 0.061671 | 0.1734 | 4.12337 | 4.1758 | 2.6875 |
|
|
: the Bayes risk of the sampling plan .
: the recalculated Bayes risk .
MBR: the Bayes risk reported in Lin and Huang [3].
|
