Research Article
Specifying Process Views for a Measurement, Evaluation, and Improvement Strategy
Table 8
EQ evaluation of JIRA, both before (v.1) and after (v.1.1) implementing improvements.
| | JIRA v.1 | JIRA v.1.1 | Characteristics and attributes | EI | P/G I | EI | P/G I |
| External Quality | | 38% | | 74% | 1. Operability | | 30% | | 60% | 1.1. Learnability | | 26% | | 59% | 1.1.1. Feedback suitability | | 38% | | 38% | 1.1.1.1. Navigability feedback completeness | 33% | | 33% | | 1.1.1.2. Task progress feedback appropriateness | 30% | | 30% | | 1.1.1.3. Entry form feedback awareness | 50% | | 50% | | 1.1.2. Helpfulness | | 15% | | 80% | 1.1.2.1. Context-sensitive help availability | 20% | | 80% | | 1.1.2.2. Help completeness | 10% | | 80% | | 1.2. Ease of use | | 34% | | 61% | 1.2.1. Controllability | | 80% | | 80% | 1.2.1.1. Permanence of main controls | 60% | | 60% | | 1.2.1.2. Stability of main controls | 100% | | 100% | | 1.2.2. Error management | | 0% | | 30% | 1.2.2.1. Error prevention | 0% | | 30% | | 1.2.3. Data entry ease | | 23% | | 73% | 1.2.3.1. Defaults | 10% | | 50% | | 1.2.3.2. Mandatory entry | 10% | | 80% | | 1.2.3.3. Control appropriateness | 50% | | 90% | | 2. Information quality | | 45% | | 88% | 2.1. Information suitability | | 45% | | 88% | 2.1.1. Consistency | | 40% | | 90% | 2.1.2. Information coverage | | 50% | | 85% | 2.1.2.1. Appropriateness | 50% | | 90% | | 2.1.2.2. Completeness | 50% | | 80% | |
|
|