Copyright © 2005 Anke Meyer-Bäse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Exploratory data-driven methods such as unsupervised
clustering and independent component analysis (ICA) are considered
to be hypothesis-generating procedures and are complementary to
the hypothesis-led statistical inferential methods in functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Recently, a new paradigm in ICA
emerged, that of finding “clusters” of dependent components.
This intriguing idea found its implementation into two new ICA
algorithms: tree-dependent and topographic ICA. For fMRI, this
represents the unifying paradigm of combining two powerful
exploratory data analysis methods, ICA and unsupervised clustering
techniques. For the fMRI data, a comparative quantitative
evaluation between the two methods, tree-dependent and topographic
ICA, was performed. The comparative results were evaluated by (1)
task-related activation maps, (2) associated time courses, and (3)
ROC study. The most important findings in this paper are that (1)
both tree-dependent and topographic ICA are able to identify
signal components with high correlation to the fMRI stimulus, and
that (2) topographic ICA outperforms all other ICA methods
including tree-dependent ICA for 8 and 9 ICs. However for
16 ICs, topographic ICA is outperformed by tree-dependent ICA
(KGV) using as an approximation of the mutual information the
kernel generalized variance. The applicability of the new
algorithm is demonstrated on experimental data.