Academic Editor: Nikolaos V. Boulgouris
Abstract
This paper presents a novel biometric identification system with high performance based on the features obtained from human retinal images. This system is composed of three principal modules including blood vessel segmentation, feature generation, and feature matching. Blood vessel segmentation module has the role of extracting blood vessels pattern from retinal images. Feature generation module includes the following stages. First, the optical disk is found and a circular region of interest (ROI) around it is selected in the segmented image. Then, using a polar transformation, a rotation invariant template is created from each ROI. In the next stage, these templates are analyzed in three different scales using wavelet transform to separate vessels according to their diameter sizes. In the last stage, vessels position and orientation in each scale are used to define a feature vector for each subject in the database. For feature matching, we introduce a modified correlation measure to obtain a similarity index for each scale of the feature vector. Then, we compute the total value of the similarity index by summing scale-weighted similarity indices. Experimental results on a database, including 300 retinal images obtained from 60 subjects, demonstrated an average equal error rate equal to 1 percent for our identification system.
1. Introduction
Biometric identification systems become a real demand for improving the security issues in different organizations. Commonly used biometric features include
face, fingerprint, voice, facial thermogram, iris, retina, gait, palm print,
hand geometry, and so on [1, 2]. Among these features, retina may provide
higher level of security due to its inherent robustness against imposture. On
the other hand, retinal pattern of each subject undergoes less modification
during life. In spite of these properties, retina has not been used frequently in
biometric systems mainly because of
technological limitations in manufacturing low-cost scanners [3–6]. This is the
reason why few works have been published on human identification using retinal images
[7–10]. Nowadays, with the progress in retinal scanner technology, relatively
low-cost retinal scanners are introduced to the market [6, 11]. The
first identification system using commercial retina scanner called
EyeDentification 7.5 was proposed by EyeDentify Company in 1976 [6]. Retinal-based
recognition for personal identification has further desirable properties such
as uniqueness, stability, and noninvasiveness. The features extracted from
retina can identify even among genetically identical twins [12]. Uniqueness of
retina comes from uniqueness of blood vessels pattern distribution at the top
of the retina.
Xu etal. [9] used the green grayscale retinal image
and obtained vector curve of blood vessel skeleton. Then, they defined a set of
feature vectors for each image including feature points, directions, and
scaling factor. In their method, feature matching consists of finding affine
transformation parameters which relates the query and its best corresponding
enrolled image. The major drawback of this algorithm is its computational cost,
since a number of rigid motion parameters should be computed for all possible
correspondences between the query and enrolled images in the database. Xu et
al. evaluated their algorithm on a database including 200 images and obtained
zero false recognition against 38 false rejections. Ortega etal. [10] used a
fuzzy circular Hough transform to localize the optical disk in the retinal
image. Then, they defined feature vectors based on the
ridge endings and bifurcations from vessels obtained from a crease model
of the retinal vessels inside the optical disk. For matching, they adopted a
similar approach as in [9] to compute the parameters of a rigid transformation
between feature vectors which gives the highest matching score. This algorithm
is computationally more efficient with respect to the algorithm presented in [9].
However, the performance of the algorithm has been evaluated using a very small
database including only 14 subjects. Recently,
Tabatabaee etal. [8] presented an approach for human identification using
retinal images. They localized the optical disk using Haar wavelet and active
contour model and used it for rotation compensation. Then, they used
Fourier-Mellin transform coefficients and complex moment magnitudes of the
rotated retinal image for feature definition. Finally, they applied fuzzy
-means
clustering for recognition and evaluated their algorithm on a database
including 108 images of 27 different subjects.
In this paper, we present a new
biometric identification system based on retinal images. The system generates
rotation invariant features by using polar transformation and multiscale
analysis of retinal segmented images. For identification, the system uses a
modified correlation function for computing similarity index measure.
Experimental results using our new identification system demonstrated its high performance. Our retinal
identification system is novel in the following ways: (i) our recently
introduced state-of-the-art algorithm [13] is used for vessel detection; (ii) a new multiscale code representing the blood vessel distribution pattern around
the optical disk is introduced and used as feature vector; and (iii) a
new similarity index called modified correlation is defined for feature
matching.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 will
talk about retinal technology. Section 3 provides an overview of our new
biometric identification system. In Section 4, we describe our vessel
segmentation algorithm. Sections 5 and 6 are devoted to feature generation and
matching modules, respectively. Evaluation results and discussion are presented
in Section 7. Finally, concluding remarks are given in Section 8.
2. Overview of Retinal Technology
2.1. Anatomy of the Retina
Figure 1 shows a side view of the eye.The
retina is approximately 0.5 mm thick and covers the inner side at the back of
the eye [8]. In the center of the retina is the optical nerve or optical disk
(OD), a circular to oval white area measuring about
mm across (about
of retina diameter) [14]. Blood
vessels are continuous patterns with little curvature, branch from OD and have
tree shape on the surface of retina (Figure 2). The mean diameter of the
vessels is about 250 μm
(
of retina diameter) [14].
Figure 1: Eye anatomy [
15].
Figure 2: Retina images from four different subjects.
The retina is essentially a sensory tissue
which consists of multiple layers. The retina also consists of literally
millions of photoreceptors whose function is to gather the light rays that are
sent to it and transform that light into electrical impulses which travel
through the optic nerve into the brain, which then converts these impulses into
images.The two distinct types of photoreceptors that exist within the
retina are called rods and cones. The cones (there are about 6 million
cones) help us see the different colours, and the rods (there are about 125
million rods) help with night and peripheral vision.
2.2. How the Retinal Anatomy Can Be Used to Identify People?
When talking about the eye, especially in terms
of biometrics, there is often confusion between the iris and the retina of the
eye, in that the two are similar. While the iris and the retina can be
grouped together into one broad category called “eye biometrics,” the function
of the two are completely different. The iris is the colored region
between the pupil and the white region of the eye (also referred to as the
sclera). The primary role of the iris is to dilate and constrict the size of
the pupil. As shown in Figure 1, the iris is located in the front of the eye,
and the retina is located towards the back of the eye. Because of its
internal location within the eye, the retina is not exposed to the external
environment, and thus it possesses a very stable biometric. It is the blood
vessel pattern in the retina that forms the foundation for the science and
technology of retinal recognition. Figure 2
shows different retinas captured from four people.
There are two famous studies which confirmed
the uniqueness of the blood vessel pattern of the retina. In 1935, a paper
was published by Simon and Goldstein [7], in which they discovered that every retina
possesses a unique and different blood vessel pattern. They even later
published a paper which suggested the use of photographs of these blood vessel
patterns of the retina as a means to identify people. The second study
was conducted in the 1950s by Dr. Paul Tower. He discovered that even
among identical twins, the blood vessel patterns of the retina are unique and
different [12].
2.3. Retinal Scanners
The first major vendor for the
research/development and production of retinal scanning devices was a company
called EyeDentify, Inc. This company was created in 1976. The first
types of devices used to obtain images of the retina were called “fundus
cameras.” These were instruments created for ophthalmologists but were
adapted to obtain images of the retina. However, there were a number of
problems using this type of device. First, the equipment was considered
to be very expensive and difficult to operate. Second, the light used to
illuminate the retina was considered to be far too bright and discomforting to
the user.
As a result, further research and development were conducted, which subsequently
yielded the first true prototype of a retinal scanning device in 1981.
This time, infrared light was used to illuminate the blood vessel pattern of
the retina. Infrared light has been primarily used in retinal recognition
because the blood vessel pattern in the retina can absorb infrared light at a
much quicker rate than the rest of the tissue in the eye. The infrared
light is reflected back to the retinal scanning device for processing. This
retinal scanning device utilized a complex system of scanning optics, mirrors,
and targeting systems in order to capture the blood vessel pattern of the
retina [6]. However, later research and development created devices with
much simpler designs. For example, these newer devices consisted of
integrated retinal scanning optics, which sharply reduced the costs of
production, in comparison to the production costs of the EyeDentification
System 7.5.
The last known retinal scanning device to be
manufactured by EyeDentify was the ICAM 2001. This device could store up
to 3000 enrolees, with a storage capacity of up to 3300 history transactions [16]. However,
this product was eventually taken off the market because of user acceptance and
public adoption issues and its high price. It is believed that some companies
like Retica Systems Inc. are working on a prototype retinal scanning device
that will be much easier to implement into commercial applications and will be much more user
friendly [11].
In summary, given its strong and weak points,
retinal recognition has the potential to be a very powerful biometric
identification technology. In Figure 3, you can see four types of
retinal scanners: (a), (b), and (c) correspond to human retinal scanner, and (d) corresponds to animal retinal scanner.
Figure 3: Some retinal scanners, (a) a human retinal scanner, (b) and (c) human retinal recognition scanners, and (d) a cow retinal scanner.
2.4. The Applications of Retinal Recognition
The primary applications for retinal recognition have
been for physical access entry for high security facilities. This includes
military installations, nuclear facilities, and laboratories. One of the
best-documented applications of the use of retinal recognition was conducted by
the State of Illinois, in an effort to reduce welfare fraud. The primary purpose was to identify
welfare recipients, so that benefits could not be claimed more than once.
Iris recognition is also used in conjunction with this project [11]. Retinal
imaging is a form of identification that can be used in both animals and
humans.
2.5. The Strengths and Weaknesses of Retinal Recognition
Retinal recognition also possesses its own set of
strengths and weaknesses, just like all other types of biometric
technology. The strengths can be described as follows.
(i)
The blood vessel pattern of the retina
hardly ever changes over the lifetime of an individual. Moreover, the
retina is not exposed to the threats posed by the external environment, as
other organs such as fingerprint.
(ii)
The retinal recognition is robust against
imposture due to inaccessibility of the retina.
(iii)
The actual average feature vector size is
very small compared to other biometric feature vectors. This could result
in quicker verification and identification processing times, as opposed to
larger sized feature vectors such as in iris recognition systems [17], which
could slow down the processing times.
(iv)
The rich and unique features which can be
extracted from the blood vessel pattern of the retina.
The weaknesses can be described as follows.
(i)
An individual may be afflicted with some
diseases of the eye such as hard glaucoma, cataracts, and so on which complicate
the identification process.
(ii)
The image acquisition involves the cooperation of the
subject, entails contact with the eyepiece, and requires a conscious effort on
the part of the user. All these factors adversely affect the public
acceptability of retinal biometric.
(iii)
Retinal vasculature can reveal some medical
conditions, for example, hypertension which is another factor deterring the
public acceptance of retinal scan-based biometrics.
3. Proposed System Block Diagram
Figure 4 illustrates different parts of our new
biometric identification system based on retinal images. As illustrated in the
block diagram, this system is composed of three principal modules including blood
vessel segmentation, feature generation, and feature matching. Blood vessel
segmentation provides a binary image containing blood vessels pattern which
will be used by the next module. Feature generation module contains several submodules: (i) vessel masking in the vicinity of OD, (ii) polar transformation
to obtain a rotation invariant binary image containing major retinal vessels, (iii) multiscale analysis of the resulted binary image using wavelet
transform in order to separate vessels according to their diameter sizes,and (iv) feature vector construction from three images, each containing vessels
with specified range of diameter size. Feature matching module contains the
following submodules: (i) computation of similarity indices called SIs
for three different scales, (ii) scale-weighted summation of SIs for
generating the total SI, and (iii) thresholding the computed SI for
subject identification.
Figure 4: Overview of the proposed retinal identification system.
4. Blood Vessel Segmentation
Blood vessel segmentation is essential
for our biometric identification system. For extracting retinal vessels, we use
an algorithm, recently introduced by Farzin etal. [13] based on a local
contrast enhancement process. This algorithm includes the following steps: (i) using a template matching technique OD in retinal image is localized; (ii) the original image is divided by the correlation image obtained in the previous
step to achieve a new image in which undesired brightness effect of OD is
suppressed, (iii) the vessel/background contrast is enhanced using a new
local processing operation based on statistical properties of the resulted image, and (iv) finally, a binary image
containing blood vessels is resulted by histogram thresholding of the contrast
enhanced image.
4.1. Localizing Optical Disk and Removing Its Effect in Retinal Image
Here, we use a template matching
technique to localize the optic disk. For this purpose, we correlate the original
green plane image with a template. The template is generated by averaging
rectangular ROIs containing OD in our retinal image database [13]. After
correlating each retinal image with the template, OD is localized as a bright
region in the correlated image with high density of vessels. Figure 5 shows the
template and the resulted correlated image. As illustrated, the bright region
in the correlated image corresponds to OD in the original image.
Figure 5: Optical disk localization: (a) original image, (b) template, and (c) correlated image.
The original image is subsequently divided (pixel by
pixel) by the correlation image obtained in the previous step to achieve a new
image in which undesired brightness effect of OD is suppressed (Figure 6).
Figure 6: OD removing results: (a) original image, (b) reducing of OD effect in the original image.
The location of OD in retinal images varies from one
subject to another due to natural variations in the position of OD in the retina
and also due to gaze angle. This variation may degrade the recognition
performance of the system. However, since our retinal recognition system is
based on the vessel distribution pattern in the vicinity of OD, its localization
may be used for compensating the variation of vessel distribution pattern
caused by the variation in OD location.
4.2. Local Contrast Enhancement
In local processing
operation, a sliding window of size
(
is at least 50 times smaller than the dimensions of the original image) is
used to obtain a contrast enhanced image. In each pixel, the new value is computed
using the mean/variance of window values and global maximum/minimum values of
the pixels in the original image. Let
be the value of the pixel
in the original image. The enhanced image
is
computed according to the following equations [13]:
(1)
where var and mean are variance and mean of the values inside the window, and
and
are global minimum and maximum of the original green plan image,
respectively. It is clear that
is a mapping function from
to
.
Figure 7 shows the local
contrast enhanced image.
Figure 7: Local contrast enhanced image.
4.3. Morphological Enhancement
After local contrast enhancement
process, we encounter a problem that large vessels are transformed to two
parallel curves as illustrated in Figure 8(a). This problem is caused by small
size of the selected window (in the previous step) compared to the large
vessels size. To solve this problem without modifying vessels thickness, we use morphological
dilation and erosion to fill the blank space between the two parallel curves. Figure
8(b) shows the large vessel in Figure 8(a) after morphological correction.
Figure 8: Morphological correction: (a) vessels after contrast enhancement, (b) vessels after morphological correction.
4.4. Histogram Thresholding
To achieve a binary
image containing the blood vessels pattern, we apply an optimal thresholding technique
[18] to the results provided by the previous stage. Figure 9(a) illustrates the final vessel segmentation result after
thresholding.
Figure 9: Blood segmentation and masking: (a) vessels pattern, (b) region of interest of vessels images around OD.
4.5. Segmentation Results
The vessel segmentation algorithm was presented
and evaluated in detail in our previous paper [13]. This algorithm was applied
to two databases including DRIVE [19] and STARE [20]. The average accuracies of
our algorithm were 0.937 and 0.948 for DRIVE and STARE databases, respectively,
which are comparable to state-of-the-art vessel segmentation methods [15, 19–25].
5. Feature Generation
Our retinal identification
system uses features of blood vessels pattern including their diameters and
their relative locations and angles. For generating these features, the algorithm
uses four submodules as briefly introduced in Section 2.1. Detailed
descriptions of these submodules are given in the following subsections.
5.1. Vessel Masking in the Vicinity of OD
Vessels around OD are more important for
identification purposes because their distribution pattern around OD has less
randomness within a subject. In other words, as the vessels are farther from
OD, they become thinner and their distribution is more random such that it has
less discriminative property. Hence, OD location can be used as a reference
point for positioning the human eye with respect to the scanner system. This means that OD should be placed at
the central region of the scanned image in order to allow the system to perform
the identification. After extracting the vessels and
localizing OD by vessel segmentation algorithm, we focus on vessels in the
vicinity of OD. A ring mask centered at OD location, with radii
and
(
), is used to select a ROI in the vessel-segmented binary image (Figure 9(b)). This binary ROI is used for feature generation in the next stages.
5.2. Polar Transformation and Rotation Invariancy
Eye and head movements in front of the
scanner may result in some degrees of rotation in retinal images acquired from
the same subject. Therefore, rotation invariant features are essential for preventing
identification errors caused by image rotation. This is the reason why we use polar
transformation to obtain a rotation invariant binary image containing retinal
vessels in the vicinity of OD. Polar image can be constructed by the following
transformations from Cartesian coordinates. The point
in Cartesian
coordinates is transformed to the point
in the polar coordinates. A polar image
created from ROI image is shown in Figure 10. The polar image size is
in which the second dimension
refers to view angle of ROI.
Figure 10: Polar transformation: (a) ROI in Cartesian coordinates, (b) polar image.
5.3. Multiscale Analysis of the Polar Image
Vessels in the vicinity of OD have
different ranges of diameter size. This property may be used as the first
feature in the feature generation module. In this way, one can emulate a human
observer mental activity in multiscale analysis of the polar image. In other
words, a human observer classifies vessels in the vicinity of OD into large,
medium, and small sizes, and uses their relative positions for identification of each individual. For
this purpose, we analyze the polar image in three scales by means of discrete
stationary biorthogonal wavelet transform. Obviously, alternative methods such
as using image processing for determining vessels diameters can be used. However,
the diameter nonuniformity of each vessel in the polar image may complicate
this kind of approaches (see Figure 11(b)). Figure 11(a) shows residual coefficients
resulted from applying wavelet transform to the polar image in Figure 10(b) in
the first three scales. To extract large vessels from polar image, we threshold
residual coefficients in the third scale of the wavelet transform. For
extracting medium-size vessels, we remove large vessels from the polar image
and repeat the same procedure on residual coefficients of the wavelet transform
in the second scale. Finally, we remove large- and medium-size vessels from the
polar image in order to obtain small vessels. The result of vessel separation
procedure is illustrated in Figure 11(b).
Figure 11: (a) Multiscale analysis of polar image: wavelet approximation coefficients in scale 3 (up), 2 (middle), and 1 (bottom); (b) vessel separation result: large (up), medium (middle), and small (bottom) vessels.
5.4. Feature Vector Construction
Figure 12 illustrates how a feature
vector is constructed using a wavelet decomposed polar image. For constructing
the feature vector, we localize vessels in each scale and replace them with
rectangular pulses. The duration of each pulse is experimentally fixed to 3
points, and its amplitude is equal to the angle between corresponding vessel
orientation and the horizontal axis. Therefore, the final feature vector is
composed of 3 vectors (one per scale), each containing 360 values. Evidently,
zero values in each vector correspond to nonvessel positions in the wavelet
decomposed polar image. Further consideration should be given to the memory size
required for each feature vector. One may reduce the redundancy of feature
vectors using run length coding (RLC). This coding can reduce the average size
of feature vectors from
bytes to only
bytes, which is significantly
smaller than 256 bytes for iris code [17].
Figure 12: Construction of feature vector in the second scale (medium-size vessels), the horizontal axis, shows the position of vessels (in degrees) in polar coordinates and the vertical axis and shows the angle (in degrees) between corresponding vessel orientation and the horizontal axis in the polar image.
6. Feature Matching
For feature
matching, we introduce a new similarity index based on a modified correlation
between the feature vectors. Modified correlation (MC) between two feature vectors
for the
th scale is defined as follows:
(2)
where
is the feature vector corresponding to the enrolled
image, and
is the feature vector corresponding to the
input query image,
is a coefficient experimentally set to 1.7,
represents the circular translation value, and
is the length of the feature vector in each scale.
is the step function defined as follows:
(3)
The role of
in (2) is to normalize the product of pulse
amplitudes in the feature vectors, because the amplitude of each pulse
specifies the orientation of the corresponding vessel and is used only for
determining the argument of
in (2). The role of
in (2) is to take into account the angle
between vessels in the enrolled and query images. Since the angle between
vessels rarely exceeds 90 degrees, we use a coefficient
(
2) in the
argument of
in order to reduce the modified correlation
value when the vessels are not oriented in the same direction. If the two
vessels have the same orientation, the angle between them will approach to zero
and
will take a value close to 1. In contrary, if
they are oriented differently (e.g., about 90 degrees), the angle between them
will be different from zero and
will approach to −1. The similarity index
between the enrolled and the query image corresponding to the
th scale
is defined as the maximum value of the modified correlation function:
(4)
Finally, a scale-weighted
summation of SIs is computed to obtain a total SI for the enrolled and query
images. In general, larger vessels are more effective than smaller ones for
identification. Therefore, we used three different weights
to obtain the weighted sum of similarity indices as follows:
(5)
where SI is the total similarity index
which is used for identification. In this work, we used the following
experimental weights:
,
, and
.
7. Experimental Results
We applied the algorithm on a
database including 60 subjects, 40 images from DRIVE [19], and 20 images from STARE
[20] database. We rotated randomly each image 5 times to obtain 300 images. We
evaluated the performance of our identification system in four different
experiments as follows.
Experiment A
The first 30
images of DRIVE database were enrolled, and 60 images of DRIVE and STARE databases
with 5 images per subject were entered to the system as queries.
Experiment B
The last 30
images of DRIVE database were enrolled, and 60 images of DRIVE and STARE databases
with 5 images per subject were entered to the system as queries.
Experiment C
The first 10
images of DRIVE database and the first 10 images of STARE database were
enrolled, and 60 images from DRIVE and STARE databases with 5 images per
subject were entered to the system as queries.
Experiment D
The first 15
images of DRIVE database and the last 15 images of STARE database were enrolled,
and 60 images of DRIVE and STARE databases with 5 images per subject were
entered to the system as queries.
These experiments demonstrated
that our system has an average accuracy equal to 99.0 percent. Table 1 shows
the results of each experiment. Figure 13 shows the variation of FRR and FAR
according to the distribution of nonmatching distance by selecting a proper
distance threshold. Also, in Figure 14, the ROC curve shows that in a very
small false acceptance rate we have large values of genuine acceptance rate for
identification.
Table 1: Experimental results.
Figure 13: Intersection of FRR and FAR diagram shows EER for Experiment A with

.
8. Conclusions and Perspectives
In this paper, a novel biometric system was
introduced using unique features from retinal images. Advantages of this system
can be summarized as follows.
(i)
It needs small memory size, since feature vectors are fairly compact.
(ii)
In the proposed
system, the identification result is not influenced by gaze angle, since the OD
location is used as a reference point for feature extraction, and only blood
vessels pattern around OD are detected and used for feature generation.
Therefore, if OD is not located in an authorized position around image center,
it can be detected and alarmed to the subject for a new scan with correct gaze
angle.
(iii)
Since
the vessels pattern only in the vicinity of OD is used for feature generation,
the vessel segmentation may be performed only in the vicinity of OD which
reduces drastically the computational cost of the algorithm.
(iv)
Our
feature generation algorithm uses multiscale analysis of the polar image which in
contrary to other image processing techniques is less sensitive to small
variations of the vessels diameters and extracts a considerable amount of
information.
The primary results
obtained by our retinal recognition system demonstrate its potential for being used
as a reliable biometric system. Further enhancements to our retinal recognition
system can be provided by the following:
(i)
most of the
parameters used in the algorithm have been selected experimentally in order to
obtain good results. These parameters such as the weights used in matching
process can be optimized for providing a higher average accuracy;
(ii)
the
effect of the optical disk position within the retinal image can be reduced by
performing a normalizing transformation which brings OD to the center of the
retinal image. In this way, the resulted retina codes will be less sensitive to
the OD position within the retinal image.
Acknowledgment
This work was partially supported by Iran Telecommunication Research Center under Grant no. T-500-7100.
References
- A. Jain, R. Bolle, and S. Pankanti, Biometrics: Personal Identification in a Networked Society, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999.
- D. Zhang, Automated Biometrics: Technologies and Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000.
- R. B. Hill, “Rotating beam ocular identification apparatus and method,” 1983, US patent no. 4393366.
- R. B. Hill, “Fovea-centered eye fundus scanner,” 1986, US patent no. 4620318.
- J. C. Johnson and R. B. Hill, “Eye fundus optical scanner system and method,” 1990, US patent no. 5532771.
- R. B. Hill, “Retinal identification,” in Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society, A. Jain, R. Bolle, and S. Pankati, Eds., p. 126, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999.
- C. Simon and I. Goldstein, “A new scientific method of identification,” New York State Journal of Medicine, vol. 35, no. 18, pp. 901–906, 1935.
- H. Tabatabaee, A. Milani Fard, and H. Jafariani, “A novel human identifier system using retina image and fuzzy clustering approach,” in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies
(ICTTA '06), pp. 1031–1036, Damascus, Syria, April 2006.
- Z.-W. Xu, X.-X. Guo, X.-Y. Hu, and X. Cheng, “The blood vessel recognition of ocular fundus,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC '05), pp. 4493–4498, Guangzhou, China, August 2005.
- M. Ortega, C. Marino, M. G. Penedo, M. Blanco, and F. Gonzalez, “Biometric authentication using digital retinal images,” in Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science (ACOS '06), pp. 422–427, Hangzhou, China, April 2006.
- http://www.retica.com/index.html.
- P. Tower, “The fundus oculi in monozygotic twins: report of six pairs of identical twins,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 225–239, 1955.
- H. Farzin, H. Abrisham Moghaddam, and M. Sh. Moin, “A new method for blood vessels segmentation in retinal images,” in Proceedings of the 13th Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME '07), Tehran, Iran, February 2007.
- K. G. Goh, W. Hsu, and M. L. Lee, “An automatic diabetic retinal image screening system,” in Medical Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 181–210, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
- S. Chaudhuri, S. Chatterjee, N. Katz, M. Nelson, and M. Goldbaum, “Detection of blood vessels in retinal images using two-dimensional matched filters,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 263–269, 1989.
- http://www.raycosecurity.com/biometrics/EyeDentify.html.
- W.-S. Chen, K.-H. Chih, S.-W. Shih, and C.-M. Hsieh, “Personal identification technique based on human Iris recognition with wavelet transform,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and
Signal Processing (ICASSP '05), vol. 2, pp. 949–952, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, March 2005.
- N. Otsu, “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 1979.
- J. Staal, M. D. Abràmoff, M. Niemeijer, M. A. Viergever, and B. van Ginneken, “Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 501–509, 2004.
- A. Hoover, V. Kouznetsova, and M. Goldbaum, “Locating blood vessels in retinal images by piecewise threshold probing of a matched filter response,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 203–210, 2000.
- D. Wu, M. Zhang, J.-C. Liu, and W. Bauman, “On the adaptive detection of blood vessels in retinal images,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 341–343, 2006.
- M. Niemeijer, J. J. Staal, B. van Ginneken, M. Loog, and M. D. Abràmoff, “Comparative study of retinal vessel segmentation methods on a new publicly available database,” in Medical Imaging 2004: Image Processing, J. M. Fitzpatrick and M. Sonka, Eds., vol. 5370 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 648–656, San Diego, Calif, USA, February 2004.
- F. Zana and J.-C. Klein, “Segmentation of vessel-like patterns using mathematical morphology and curvature evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1010–1019, 2001.
- X. Jiang and D. Mojon, “Adaptive local thresholding by verification-based multithreshold probing with application to vessel detection in retinal images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 131–137, 2003.
- M. E. Martínez-Perez, A. D. Hughes, A. V. Stanton, S. A. Thom, A. A. Bharath, and K. H. Parker, “Retinal blood vessel segmentation by means of scale-space analysis and region growing,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '99), pp. 90–97, Cambridge, UK, September 1999.