Review Article
Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy and Management of the Distal Ureter: A Review of Current Techniques and Outcomes
Table 2
Oncologic outcomes of LPN versus ONU
cases. CR, conventional retroperitoneal; CT,
conventional transperitoneal; HAR, hand-assisted retroperitoneal; HAT,
hand-assisted transperitoneal; LND, lymph node dissection; LS, laparoscopic
stapling; NL, not listed; ONU, open nephroureterectomy; SD, surgeon discretion; TURUO,
transurethral resection; TV, transvesical.
| Author | Surgery | N | Follow up (mo) | History of bladder tumor specified | Bladder cuff surgery | Path stage (Ta,Tis,T1/T2, T3,T4) | Path grade (1/2/3) | LND | Urothelial recurrence (%) | Local recurrence (%) | Port-site recurrence (%) | Distal recurrence (%) | Disease-specific survival (@ year) |
| Muntener et al. [8] | CT | 39 | 74 | Yes | Open (19), LS (13), other (5) | 22/15/2NL | 8LG/31HG | No | 16 (41) | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 7 (18) | 68 (5) |
| Schatteman et al. [9] | CT/CR | 95/5 | 20 | No | Open (55), Other (45) | 54/46 | 24/28/48 | 20% of cases | NL | 13 (13) | 3 (3) | 16 (16) | 88 (2) |
| Rouprêt et al. [10] | CT
| 20
| 69
| No | Open | 15/511/15 | 12LG/8HG | SD | 2 (10) | 0 (0)
| 0 (0) | 2 (10) | 90 (5) | ONU | 26 | 78 | 7LG/19HG | 4 (15) | 0 (0) | 9 (35) | 62 (5) |
| Okegawa et al. [11] | CR
| 25
| 24
| Yes | Open | 14/119/14 | 2/17/6 | No | 5 (20)
| 0 (0)
| 0 (0) | 2 (8) | 91 (2) | ONU | 23 | 29 | 1/15/7 | 4 (17) | 0 (0) | 3 (13) | 89 (2) |
| Tsujihata et al. [12] | CR
| 25
| 22
| No | Open | 12/1315/6 | 5/15/5 | No | 7 (28)
| 0 (0)
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 64 (2) | ONU | 24 | 22 | 0/11/12 | 8 (33) | 0 (0) | 2 (8) | 58 (2) |
| Manabe et al. [20] | CR
| 58
| 14
| Excluded | Open | 28/3070/96 | 4/31/23 | No | 19 (33)
| 1 (2)
| 1 (2) | 10 (17) | 85 (2) | ONU | 166 | 28 | 15/87/64 | 63 (38) | 2 (1) | 33 (20) | 87 (2) |
| Taweemonkongsap et al. [13] | CR
| 31
| 26 | Yes | Open | 16/15
| 18LG/13HG
| SD | 9 (29) | 2 (6) | 0 (0) | 3 (10) | 86 (2)
| ONU | 29 | 28 | 13/16 | 10LG/19HG | 13 (45) | 1 (3) | 2 (7) | 93 (2) |
| Chung et al. [14] | HAT | 39 | 48 | No | Open | 18/21 | 1/22/16 | SD | 17 (44)
| 1 (3)
| 0 (0) | 6 (15)
| 90 (5)
| ONU | 36 | 60 | 17/19 | 1/20/15 | 13 (36) | 3 (8) | 4 (11) | 86 (5) |
| Raman et al. [15] | HAT | 38 | 32 | Yes | Open (30), | 27/9 | 23LG/15HG | No | 11 (29)
| 1 (3)
| 0 (0) | 2 (6) | 81 (5)
| ONU | 52 | 51 | TURUO (8) | 41/11 | 33LG/19HG | 18 (35) | 0 (0) | 6 (11) | 77 (5) |
| Wolf et al. [16] | HAT | 53 | 25 | Yes | TURUO (23), TV (22), Open (6), LS
(2) | 38/15 | 18/9/26 | SD | (55) | (8) | 0 (0) | (16) | 80 (3) |
| Cannon et al. [17] | HAT | 34 | 14 | No | Open | 17/18 | NL | No | 8 (24) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (6) | NL |
| Hsueh et al. [21] | HAR
| 66
| 38
| No | Open | 35/31
| 1/25/38
| No | 13 (20) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | 6 (9) | 80 (5) | ONU | 77 | 54 | 43/33 | 3/39/34 | 19 (25) | 2 (3) | 12 (16) | 75 (5) |
| Chung et al. [18] | HAR
| 25
| 32
| No | Open | 13/12
| 1/13/11
| No | 9 (36) | 3 (12) | 0 (0) | 2 (8) | 92 (3) | ONU | 41 | 62 | 18/23 | 1/23/17 | 13 (32) | 3 (7) | 5 (12) | 92 (3) |
| Nakashima et al. [19] | HAR
| 35
| 23
| Yes | Open | 22 ≤ T2,13T3
| 17 ≤ G2,18G3
| No | 12 (34) | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 3 (9) | 89 (2) | ONU | 38 | 56 | 26 ≤ T2,11T3 | 24 ≤ G2,13G3 | 21 (55) | 1 (3) | 2 (5) | 91 (2) |
|
|