About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Urology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 696752, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/696752
Research Article

Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses

1Department of Urology, Regional Urology, 255 Bert Kouns - Industrial Loop, Shreveport, LA 71106, USA
2Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
3Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
4Department of Urology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Received 27 February 2012; Accepted 17 July 2012

Academic Editor: Rafael Carrion

Copyright © 2012 Gerard D. Henry et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to Cite this Article

Gerard D. Henry, Antonino Saccà, Elizabeth Eisenhart, Mario A. Cleves, and Andrew C. Kramer, “Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses,” Advances in Urology, vol. 2012, Article ID 696752, 5 pages, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/696752