Clinical Study

Proximal Hypospadias Repair Outcomes in Patients with a Specific Disorder of Sexual Development Diagnosis

Table 2

Anatomy, procedure, and outcomes comparison.

Group 1: proximal hypospadias with a specific DSD diagnosis ( )Group 2: 46,XY proximal hypospadias without a specific DSD diagnosis ( ) value

Mean age at initial hypospadias repair (years)2.371.53

Meatal location
 Proximal shaft2 (11.8)16 (18.8)
 Penoscrotal3 (17.6)38 (44.7)
 Perineal12 (70.6)31 (36.5)
 Planned stage procedure10 (58.8)21 (24.7)

Orthoplasty
 Nesbit plication16 (94.1)72 (84.7)
 Mean number of Nesbit plications sutures1.251.32
 Division of urethral plate10 (58.8)20 (23.5)
 Corporal body grafting2 (11.8)11 (12.9)

Urethroplasty
 TIP6 (35.3)62 (73.8)
 Scrotal skin tube inlay/onlay6 (35.3)8 (9.5)
 Island inlay/onlay2 (11.8)3 (3.6)
 Flap inlay2 (11.8)3 (3.6)
 Combination distal TIP/island inlay1 (5.9)8 (9.5)

Scrotoplasty
 Simple4 (25)31 (37.8)
 Complex12 (75)51 (62.2)

Gonads
 UDT8 (47.1)12 (14.1)
 Gonad biopsy4 (23.5)0 (0.0)
 Gonadectomy6 (35.3)0 (0.0)

Outcomes
 Mean total number of procedures2.061.61
 Mean total number of procedures—planned procedures0.470.36
 Patients with a complication5 (29.4)19 (22.4)
 Clinical follow-up (years)2.071.89