About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Urology

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 184602, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/184602
Research Article

IL1RN and KRT13 Expression in Bladder Cancer: Association with Pathologic Characteristics and Smoking Status

1Department of Urology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1–3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany

2Department for Statistical Analysis, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

Received 27 February 2014; Revised 23 June 2014; Accepted 26 June 2014; Published 8 July 2014

Academic Editor: Matthew Nielsen

Copyright © 2014 Thomas S. Worst et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose. To validate microarray data on cytokeratin 13 (KRT13) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN) expression in urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCB) and to correlate our findings with pathologic characteristics and tobacco smoking. Methods. UCB tissue samples ( ) and control samples ( ) were obtained from transurethral resection and radical cystectomy specimens. Immunohistochemical staining of KRT13 and IL1RN was performed and semiquantitative expression scores were assessed. Smoking status was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire. Expression scores were correlated with pathologic characteristics (tumor stage and grade) and with smoking status. Results. Loss of KRT13 and IL1RN expression was observed in UCB tissue samples when compared to controls ( , ) in which KRT13 and IL1RN expression were high. IL1RN expression was significantly reduced in muscle-invasive tumors ( ). In tissue samples of current smokers, a significant downregulation of IL1RN was found when compared to never smokers ( ). Conclusion. Decreased expressions of KRT13 and IL1RN are common features of UCB and are associated with aggressive disease. Tobacco smoking may enhance the loss of IL1RN, indicating an overweight of proinflammatory mediators involved in UCB progression. Further validation of the influence of smoking on IL1RN expression is warranted.

1. Introduction

Urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCB) is the seventh most prevalent type of cancer worldwide. In the United States, an estimated 73,000 new cases and 14,000 deaths occurred during 2012 [1]. Carcinogenesis of UCB often requires exposure to occupational carcinogens and environmental pollution [2]. Other risk factors include hereditary susceptibility and specific medical treatments [3, 4]. Tobacco smoking has been identified as a major lifestyle risk factor for developing UCB. It has been estimated that around 50% of all UCB cases can be attributed to tobacco smoking, with considerable variation in groups of former and current smokers [5].

Many of the ingredients in tobacco smoke such as aromatic amines are renally excreted and therefore directly expose the urothelium to toxic metabolites [6, 7]. Due to its reservoir function the exposure time is the longest in the urinary bladder. Metabolites of tobacco smoke may cause inflammatory reactions and lead to perturbation of cellular processes which may alter gene expression [8, 9]. We have previously reported on changes of different gene expressions in UCB tissue depending on smoking status in a microarray study [10]. Many of these genes are associated with inflammation processes as well as the integrity of the cytoskeleton and cell structure. Among these cytokeratin 13 (KRT13) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN) were strongly downregulated in UCB tissue of smokers. KRT13 is a gene encoding for an intermediate cytoskeleton protein and is typically expressed in the basal compartments of stratified epithelial tissues [11]. IL1RN is a member of the interleukin-1 superfamily and functions as an antagonist at the interleukin-1 (IL1) receptors 1 and 2 [12]. Therefore, it is capable of confining inflammatory processes mediated by other interleukins. The role of IL1RN during UCB carcinogenesis has not yet been elucidated.

In order to further evaluate the relevance of these two genes and their products in UCB, we aimed to validate our previous findings on the protein level by immunohistochemical analysis of UCB tissue samples.

2. Material and Methods

The procedures described in the present study have been approved by the local ethical review committee (reference number 2007-030 N-MA).

2.1. Patient Characteristics and Tissue Samples

Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of 109 patients (19 women and 90 men, mean age 61 years, range: 41–94 years) diagnosed with UCB were retrospectively evaluated. Of these tumors 95 were primary UCBs and 14 were recurrent UCBs. Tissue samples were obtained either during transurethral resection ( ) or during radical cystectomy ( ). From the latter 14 tumor-free FFPE tissue samples served as controls, resulting in a total of 123 tissue samples. The surgical procedures were performed in one institution. All specimens were routinely classified according to the 2002 TNM classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Tumor grade was assessed according to the 1998 WHO/International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus classification. All patients had answered a standardized questionnaire regarding their smoking behavior. According to this they were classified as current smokers (CS), former smokers (FS), and never smokers (NS).

2.2. Immunohistochemistry

Tissue samples were sectioned (4 μm thickness) and cut, placed on glass slides, and dried overnight at 36°C. The next day slides were deparaffinised and rehydrated, followed by a peroxidase block and several washing steps in tris-buffered saline (TBS). Slides were steam-heated with a target retrieval solution and subsequently incubated in ice-cold water. After a further washing step in TBS and a 20 min pretreatment in DAKO Real antibody diluent (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) the slides were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human KRT13 (Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) or rabbit polyclonal anti-human IL1RN (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) primary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature (anti-KRT13) or for overnight incubation at 4°C (anti-IL1RN). Both antibodies were diluted 1 : 200 in DAKO Real antibody diluent (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). After two washing steps in TBS, secondary EnVision HRP-labeled anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody (both DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) was added for 40 min incubation at room temperature. After three further washing steps, visualization was performed with AEC+ substrate chromogen (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) as recommended by the manufacturer. Counterstaining was performed with haematoxylin. The slides were coverslipped using Faramount aqueous medium.

2.3. Microscopic Evaluation

Microscopic evaluation was performed using a Leica Axioskop 2 Plus (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) under standardized conditions with a 10x eyepiece and a 40x objective. The protein expression status of KRT13 and IL1RN was scored semiquantitatively (− none/very low (≤10%), + low, ++ moderate, and +++ high). Five fields of view were evaluated per slide.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

According to tumor stage and grade, samples were classified into group 1 (benign controls), group 2 (PUNLMP and pTa low grade), group 3 (high grade non-muscle-invasive tumors: pTa high grade, pTis, and pT1), and group 4 (muscle-invasive tumors: pT2 and higher). Protein expression of KRT13 and IL1RN was compared between UCB tissue samples (groups 2–4) and controls (group 1). Subsequently, groups 2 ( ), 3 ( ), and 4 ( ) were compared independently with controls ( ). Multiple correlations between smoking status (CS versus NS and CS/FS versus NS) and protein expression were performed: (1) among all 123 tissue samples (109 UCBs and 14 controls), (2) among 109 UCB tissue samples, and (3) among 14 controls and the corresponding UCB tissue samples from the same patients ( ). All statistical evaluations were conducted using the Exact Trend Test (SAS software, release 9.3, SAS Institute, Cary, USA). values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Table 1 displays the distribution of UCB stage, grade, and smoking behavior among the patients and tissue samples. Microscopic evaluation showed an almost exclusive cytoplasmic expression of KRT13 in epithelial cells. IL1RN was also associated with the cell membrane and present in the extracellular space. The expression scores and correlations are summarized in Table 2. Considering the entire group of tissue samples, the expression of KRT13 was significantly lower in UCB when compared to controls with no morphologic urothelial alterations ( ).

tab1
Table 1: Pathologic and smoking characteristics of 109 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder samples and 14 controls.
tab2
Table 2: Correlations between KRT13 and IL1RN expression and tumor characteristics in UCB tissue samples compared with controls.

The immunoreactivity for IL1RN among all 109 UCB tissue samples was significantly weaker when compared with controls ( ). Furthermore an inverse correlation was seen between an increasing UBC stage and the expression of IL1RN, showing the strongest correlation for the group of muscle-invasive UCB alone ( ). Representative immunohistochemistry images showing the expression of IL1RN in different tumor stages are displayed in Figure 1.

fig1
Figure 1: IL1RN expression was in general moderate to high in group 2 ((a) pTa low grade), decreased in group 3 ((b) pT1), and was significantly lower in group 4 ((c) pT3). Benign urothelial tissue (group 1) showed the most intensive staining (d).

The expression of KRT13 was not significantly associated with smoking status. Similarly, no significant association was found between IL1RN expression and smoking status when considering the entire cohort. However, when focusing on the subgroup of UCB tissue samples and the control samples from the same patients ( ) of only CS and NS, a significant inverse correlation ( ) between IL1RN expression and smoking status was observed. These correlations between the expression of KRT13 and IL1RN and smoking status are summarized in Table 3.

tab3
Table 3: Correlations between KRT13 and IL1RN expression and smoking status among all samples and a subset from patients providing both tumor and control samples (only CS and NS were considered).

4. Discussion

In the present study we validated our previous findings on altered gene expression of KRT13 and IL1RN in UCB. Potential associations between protein expression status and tobacco smoking were evaluated.

Cytokeratins are cytoskeleton proteins and represent specific markers for epithelial cells of any origin. Several cytokeratins have been identified as prognostic markers in different tumor entities [13, 14]. KRT13 was reported to occur in combination with KRT8, KRT18 and KRT20 in UCB [11]. According to our own data KRT13 is less expressed in UCB. Other studies [1518] show a downregulation of KRT13 expression in more advanced stages and in high grade UCB. Recent findings suggested an epigenetic alteration of KRT13 gene due to hypermethylation leading to diminished expression of this gene in aggressive UCB [19]. Such correlations are consistent with previous findings in studies on epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) during which dedifferentiation of epithelial tumor cells into a mesenchymal phenotype may occur [20, 21]. During EMT tumor, cells acquire a higher grade of plasticity and become more likely to invade the surrounding tissue and to metastasize [22]. EMT may cause altered protein expression in UCB cells. However the type and number of proteins involved are not well known.

We were unable to show an association between a decreased expression of KRT13 and tobacco smoking which is in discordance with our previous findings [10]. The lack of data about the smoking dependency of KRT13 expression in UCB in the current literature precludes comparisons with other cohorts. Interestingly, the influence of tobacco smoke was associated with the occurrence of KRT13 overexpressing squamous cell metaplasia in the upper airway tract epithelium [23, 24]. Although these data are derived from animal models changes of KRT13 expression in human tissue directly exposed to tobacco smoke itself or to its ingredients, like urothelial tissue, seem to be possible.

We found a significant correlation of decreased IL1RN expression in UCB of current smokers. Its agonistic counterpart IL1 represents a potent mediator of inflammation and its tissue concentrations are elevated in many nonmalignant and malignant diseases [25, 26]. A pharmaceutically engineered analogon of IL1RN has become a treatment option for advanced rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory diseases [27, 28]. Genetic alterations and polymorphisms in the IL1RN gene have been associated with an increased risk for developing different malignancies, including gastric cancer [29], prostate cancer [30], and UCB [31, 32]. Therefore, alterations of IL1RN may be involved in the carcinogenesis of UCB. We hypothesize that an impaired function or amount of IL1RN disturbs the equilibrium between pro- and anti-inflammatory factors, leading to an excessive inflammatory stimulus. We found an inverse correlation between tissue protein levels of IL1RN and more advanced tumor stages. Whether a low expression of IL1RN is an early driver of UCB carcinogenesis or a later consequence of complex alterations in advanced tumor stages remains to be clarified in further investigations.

We tested a potential association between exposure to tobacco smoke as a major risk factor for UCB and IL1RN expression in a subgroup of UCB tissue samples and controls from CS and NS. A significant correlation between a decreased expression of IL1RN and smoking was found, suggesting an interference of tobacco smoke ingredients with UCB tissue.

Our study is limited by a relatively small sample size, especially regarding control samples and in the last named subgroup of CS and NS. Also the study uses benign tissue from UCB patients and not tissue samples from healthy individuals as controls. Therefore a bias of tumor-associated effects in control samples cannot be excluded. The use of immunohistochemistry is well established; however, it has inherent problems, for example, variable antibody choice and interpretation criteria as well as a potential inconsistency in specimen handling and technical procedures. However, immunohistochemical staining was an adequate validation method to test the protein expression status in the present study.

5. Conclusion

We confirmed a decreased protein expression of KRT13 in UCB as a potential indicator of EMT and increased cell plasticity. Decreased expressions of both KRT13 and IL1RN are common features of UCB and are associated with aggressive disease. In a subgroup of samples and controls IL1RN was significantly lower expressed in UCB of current smokers. Tobacco smoking may enhance the loss of IL1RN protein, potentially indicating an overweight of proinflammatory mediators involved in UCB progression. Further validation of the influence of smoking on IL1RN expression is warranted. Therefore transcriptomic profiling of other pro- and anti-inflammatory genes both on the protein and on the mRNA level should be performed to better understand the kinetics of inflammatory processes in UCB carcinogenesis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2013,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 11–30, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Letasiova, A. Medvedova, A. Sovcikova et al., “Bladder cancer, a review of the environmental risk factors,” Environmental Health, vol. 11, supplement 1, article S11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Burger, J. W. F. Catto, G. Dalbagni et al., “Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer,” European Urology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 234–241, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Pelucchi, C. Bosetti, E. Negri, M. Malvezzi, and C. La Vecchia, “Mechanisms of disease: the epidemiology of bladder cancer,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 327–340, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. D. Freedman, D. T. Silverman, A. R. Hollenbeck, A. Schatzkin, and C. C. Abnet, “Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women,” JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 306, no. 7, pp. 737–745, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. H. Seyler and J. T. Bernert, “Analysis of 4-aminobiphenyl in smoker's and nonsmoker's urine by tandem mass spectrometry,” Biomarkers, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 212–221, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Tao, B. W. Day, B. Hu et al., “Elevated 4-aminobiphenyl and 2,6-dimethylaniline hemoglobin adducts and increased risk of bladder cancer among lifelong nonsmokers-the shanghai bladder cancer study,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 937–945, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. S. Brody, “Transcriptome alterations induced by cigarette smoke,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 131, no. 12, pp. 2754–2762, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Lee and J. P. Cooke, “Nicotine and pathological angiogenesis.,” Life Sciences, vol. 91, no. 21-22, pp. 1058–1064, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. U. Gabriel, L. Li, C. Bolenz et al., “New insights into the influence of cigarette smoking on urothelial carcinogenesis: smoking-induced gene expression in tumor-free urothelium might discriminate muscle-invasive from nonmuscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 907–915, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Moll, W. W. Franke, D. L. Schiller, B. Geiger, and R. Krepler, “The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells,” Cell, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. P. Arend and C. Gabay, “Physiologic role of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist,” Arthritis Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 245–248, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Yamada, H. Sasaki, K. Aoyagi et al., “Expression of cytokeratin 7 predicts survival in stage I/IIA/IIB squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus,” Oncology Reports, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1021–1027, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. D. Mertz, F. Demichelis, A. Sboner et al., “Association of cytokeratin 7 and 19 expression with genomic stability and favorable prognosis in clear cell renal cell cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 569–576, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. E. Celis, M. Østergaard, B. Basse et al., “Loss of adipocyte-type fatty acid binding protein and other protein biomarkers is associated with progression of human bladder transitional cell carcinomas,” Cancer Research, vol. 56, no. 20, pp. 4782–4790, 1996. View at Scopus
  16. R. Moll, T. Achtstatter, E. Becht, J. Balcarova-Stander, M. Ittensohn, and W. W. Franke, “Cytokeratins in normal and malignant transitional epithelium. Maintenance of expression of urothelial differentiation features in transitional cell carcinomas and bladder carcinoma cell culture lines,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 123–144, 1988. View at Scopus
  17. H. E. Schaafsma, F. C. S. Ramaekers, G. N. P. van Muijen et al., “Distribution of cytokeratin polypeptides in human transitional cell carcinomas, with special emphasis on changing expression patterns during tumor progression,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 329–343, 1990. View at Scopus
  18. J. Southgate, P. Harnden, and L. K. Trejdosiewicz, “Cytokeratin expression patterns in normal and malignant urothelium: a review of the biological and diagnostic implications,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 657–664, 1999. View at Scopus
  19. C. J. Marsit, E. A. Houseman, B. C. Christensen et al., “Identification of methylated genes associated with aggressive bladder cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 8, Article ID e12334, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. D. Craene and G. Berx, “Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Dave, V. Mittal, N. M. Tan, and J. C. Chang, “Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cancer stem cells and treatment resistance,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 1, article 202, 2012. View at Scopus
  22. G. van der Horst, L. Bos, and G. van der Pluijm, “Epithelial plasticity, cancer stem cells, and the tumor-supportive stroma in bladder carcinoma,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 995–1009, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. J. Bolton, K. Pinnion, V. Oreffo, M. Foster, and K. E. Pinkerton, “Characterisation of the proximal airway squamous metaplasia induced by chronic tobacco smoke exposure in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Respiratory Research, vol. 10, article 118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. K. Schlage, H. Bülles, D. Friedrichs, M. Kuhn, A. Teredesai, and P. M. Terpstra, “Cytokeratin expression patterns in the rat respiratory tract as markers of epithelial differentiation in inhalation toxicology. II. Changes in cytokeratin expression patterns following 8-day exposure to room-aged cigarette sidestream smoke,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 344–360, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. A. Dinarello, A. Simon, and J. W. M. Van Der Meer, “Treating inflammation by blocking interleukin-1 in a broad spectrum of diseases,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 633–652, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. M. Lewis, S. Varghese, H. Xu, and H. R. Alexander, “Interleukin-1 and cancer progression: The emerging role of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist as a novel therapeutic agent in cancer treatment,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 4, article 48, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Mertens and J. A. Singh, “Anakinra for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1118–1125, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. D. Kalliolias and S. C. Liossis, “The future of the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra: from rheumatoid arthritis to adult-onset still's disease and systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 349–359, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Zhang, C. Liu, H. Peng, J. Zhang, and Q. Feng, “IL1 receptor antagonist gene IL1-RN variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism and cancer risk: a literature review and meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e46017, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Lindmark, S. L. Zheng, F. Wiklund et al., “Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist haplotype associated with prostate cancer risk,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 493–497, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. K. Bid, P. K. Manchanda, and R. D. Mittal, “Association of interleukin-1Ra gene polymorphism in patients with bladder cancer: case control study from North India,” Urology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1099–1104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. K. Ahirwar, A. Agrahari, A. Mandhani, and R. D. Mittal, “Cytokine gene polymorphisms are associated with risk of urinary bladder cancer and recurrence after BCG immunotherapy,” Biomarkers, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 213–218, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus