Review Article
Adapted Lethality: What We Can Learn from Guinea Pig-Adapted Ebola Virus Infection Model
Table 1
Comparison of lethality, virus reproduction, and the time to adaptation (# of passages) in different adaptation series.
| Adaptation series | 8mc [5] | K-5 [9] | GLA [11] | GPA-P7 [8] | [6] | [7] | D-5 [9] | [10] |
| Original virus stock | Mayinga, ZEBOV | Mayinga, ZEBOV | Mayinga, ZEBOV | Mayinga, ZEBOV | Mayinga, ZEBOV | Mayinga, ZEBOV | Mayinga, ZEBOV | Mayinga, ZEBOV |
| Preadaptation history | Vero E6 cell line passages | NHPs + L68 cell line passages | NHPs + Vero cell line passages | Individual clone, obtained from infected Vero cells | Vero E6 cell line passages | — | — | — |
| Adaptation to | Guinea pig | Guinea pig | Guinea pig | Guinea pig | Guinea pig | Guinea pig | Mouse | Mouse |
| Adapted virus lethality | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 80% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Number of passages to full lethality | 8 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| Increase in virus titer (nonadapted nonlethal versus adapted lethal, PFU/mL) | 2.9/5.5 Liver | 3.5/3.5 Plasma | 0.0/4.2 Plasma 1.62/4.2 Liver 3.22/4.2 Peritoneal exudate | 6.3/7.0 | 2.9/5.0 | 2.1/5.2 Plasma 1.7/(4.8–6.4) In different tissues | 9.5/11.7 | 4.2/7.8 |
|
|
Note: all virus titers in our adaptation series 8mc, K-5, GLA, GPA-P7, and D-5 were determined on day 6 p/i.
|