A Comparison of Epithelial Cells, Fibroblasts, and Osteoblasts in Dental Implant Titanium Topographies
Table 1
One-way ANOVA statistical analysis of the control group (0 sec) and test groups using 30 sec of acid etching after 10, 30, and 60 sec of sandblasting for samples from bone E1, fibroblast 3T3, and an epidermal cell XB-2 cells after 1 and 24 h ().
(a)
Statistical analysis*
Variations
Time of sandblasting (sec)
0b
10
30
60
Groups
Cells
value
Group comparisonsa
value
Group comparisons
value
Group comparisons
value
Group comparisons
1 h cell adhesion
3T3/E1/XB-2
0.0161
XB-2 > E1
0.0077
3T3 > E1 XB-2 > E1
0.0013
XB-2 > E1 XB-2 > 3T3
<0.0001
3T3 > E1 3T3 > XB-2 XB-2 > E1
24 h cell proliferation
3T3/E1/XB-2
0.0705
none
0.0026
3T3 > E1 XB-2 > E1
0.0231
XB-2 > E1
<0.0001
3T3 > E1 3T3 > XB-2 XB-2 > E1
(b)
Statistical analysis*
Variations
E1 bone cell
3T3 fibroblast cell
XB-2 epidermal cell
Groups
0 secb and through 30 sec etching after 10, 30, and 60 sec blasting
value
Group comparisonsa
value
Group comparisonsa
value
Group comparisonsa
1 h cell adhesion
0/10/30/60
0.0025
30 > 0, 10, 60
0.0026
10 > 30 60 > 10
0.0005
0 > 10, 30, 60 10 > 60
24 h cell proliferation
0/10/30/60
0.0510
none
0.0791
none
0.2788
none
*Groups significantly differ at ; a“none” indicates the group comparisons are not significantly different at ; b“0 sec” indicates the control group without the blasting/etching treatment.