Hexavalent Chromate Reductase Activity in Cell Free Extracts of <i>Penicillium</i> sp.

Arévalo-Rangel, Damaris L.; Cárdenas-González, Juan F.; Martínez-Juárez, Víctor M.; Acosta-Rodríguez, Ismael

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/909412

Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 909412 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/909412

Hexavalent Chromate Reductase Activity in Cell Free Extracts of Penicillium sp.

Damaris L. Arévalo-Rangel,¹Juan F. Cárdenas-González,¹Víctor M. Martínez-Juárez,²and Ismael Acosta-Rodríguez¹

Academic Editor: Spyros Perlepes

Received28 Apr 2013

Accepted22 Jul 2013

Published21 Aug 2013

Abstract

A chromium-resistant fungus isolated from contaminated air with industrial vapors can be used for reducing toxic Cr(VI) to Cr(III). This study analyzes in vitro reduction of hexavalent chromium using cell free extract(s) of the fungus that was characterized based on optimal temperature, pH, use of electron donors, metal ions and initial Cr(VI) concentration in the reaction mixture. This showed the highest activity at 37°C and pH 7.0; there is an increase in Cr(VI) reductase activity with addition of NADH as an electron donor, and it was highly inhibited by Hg²⁺, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺, and azide, EDTA, and KCN.

1. Introduction

Chromium (Cr) toxicity is one of the major causes of environmental pollution emanating from tannery effluents. This metal is used in the tanning of hides and leather, the manufacture of stainless steel, electroplating, and textile dyeing and used as a biocide in the cooling waters of nuclear power plants, resulting in chromium discharges causing environmental concerns [1]. Cr exists in nine valence states ranging from −2 to +6. Of these states, only hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] and trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] have primary environmental significance because they are the most stable oxidation forms in the environment [2]. Both are found in various bodies of water and wastewaters [3]. Cr(VI) typically exists in one of these two forms: chromate () or dichromate (), depending on the pH of the solution [3]. These two divalent oxyanions are very water soluble and poorly adsorbed by soil and organic matter, making them mobile in soil and groundwater [2]. Both chromate anions represent acute and chronic risks to animals and human health since they are extremely toxic, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic [4]. In contrast to Cr(VI) forms, the Cr(III) species, predominantly hydroxides, oxides, or sulphates, are less water soluble, mobile (100 times less toxic) [5], and (1,000 times less) mutagenic [6]. The principal techniques for recovering or removing Cr(VI), from wastewater are chemical reduction and precipitation, adsorption on activated carbon, ion exchange, and reverse osmosis, in a basic medium [7]. However, these methods have certain drawbacks, namely, high cost, low efficiency, and generation of toxic sludge or other wastes that require disposal and imply operational complexity [8].

An alternative to these methods is the removal of heavy metal contaminants by microorganisms. The metal removal ability of microorganisms, including bacteria [2, 6, 8, 9], microalgae [7, 10], and fungi [1, 11], has been studied extensively. Fungi, in general, are well known for their ability to biosorb and bioaccumulate metals [1, 11, 12] and have also been reported to be involved in reduction (biotransformation) of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) form [11–13]. The common Cr(VI) detoxification mechanisms reported in Cr-resistant microorganisms are periplasmic biosorption and intracellular bioaccumulation and biotransformation through direct enzymatic reaction [14, 15] or indirectly with metabolites [16]. In Cr(VI)-resistant filamentous fungi, such as Paecilomyces [13], Aspergillus and Penicillium [17], and Trichoderma [18], the Cr(VI) detoxification through transformation of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) form was observed due to cellular metabolism processes based on the reducing power of carbon sources. On the other hand, bioreduction of Cr(VI) has been demonstrated in several bacterial species including Pseudomonas sp. [19], Escherichia coli [20], Bacillus sp. [21], Desulfovibrio sp. [22], Microbacterium sp. [23], and Shewanella sp. [24], some fungi like A. niger and A. parasiticus [11], Paecilomyces [13], Fusarium sp. [25], Paecilomyces lilacinus [26], and Hypocrea tawa [27], and the yeasts Candida maltosa [28], Pichia sp. [29] and Candida utilis [30]. Direct microbial reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is the most promising practice with proved expediency in bioremediation.

The objective of this study was to analyze in vitro reduction of Cr(VI) by cell free extracts of Penicillium sp. resistant to Cr(VI).

2. Experimental

2.1. Microorganism and Culture Conditions

A chromate-resistant filamentous fungus was isolated from polluted air with industrial vapors, near the Chemical Science Faculty, located in the city of San Luis Potosí, Mexico, in Petri dishes containing modified Lee’s minimal medium (LMM, [31]) (with 0.25% KH₂PO₄, 0.20% MgSO₄, 0.50% (NH₄)₂SO₄, 0.50% NaCl, and 0.25% glucose) supplemented with 500 mg/L K₂CrO₄; the pH of the medium was adjusted and maintained at 5.3 with 100 mMol/L citrate-phosphate buffer. The cultures were incubated at 28°C for 7 days. The strain was identified based on its morphological structures such as the color, diameter of the mycelia, and microscopic observation of formation of spores [32]. Fungal cultures grown in thioglycolate broth were used as primary inoculums.

2.2. Cr(VI) Reduction by Resting Cells of Penicillium sp.

Culture suspensions of Penicillium sp. were grown for 4 days in 100 mL thioglycolate broth (pH 7.0) and harvested by centrifugation at 3000 ×g at 4°C; cell pellets (10 mL) obtained on centrifugation were washed twice with 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and resuspended in the same buffer. Triplicates of these suspended cell pellets were spiked with Cr(VI) concentrations of 2–10 mg/100 mL, vortexed for 30 min, and incubated at 30°C for 6 h. Heat-killed (2 mL) culture pellets were used as control. After 6 h incubation, the tubes were centrifuged, and 100 µL aliquots were withdrawn from each sample to estimate the remaining Cr(VI) by 1,5-diphenyl carbazide (DPC) method [33].

2.3. Cr(VI) Reduction by Permeabilized Cells of Penicillium sp.

Bacterial culture of Penicillium sp. was grown for 4 days, harvested, and washed with potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) as described above. The suspended culture pellets were treated with 0.2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate, 0.2% tween 80, (v/v), 0.2% Triton X-100 (v/v), and 0.2% toluene (v/v), by vortexing for 30 min to achieve cell permeabilization. Permeabilized cell suspensions (0.5 mL) were then added with 2–10 mg/100 mL of Cr(VI) as final concentrations and incubated for 6 h at 30°C. Experiments with each set of permeabilization treatment and Cr(VI) concentrations were performed in triplicates.

2.4. Preparations of Cell-Free Extracts

Cell-free extracts (CFE) of Penicillium sp. were prepared by modifying the previously published protocols [34]. Fungal suspensions grown for 4 days in 400 mL thioglycolate broth were harvested at 3000 ×g at 4°C for 10 min, washed, and resuspended in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The culture pellets thus obtained were resuspended in the 5% (v/v) of the original culture volume in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). These cell suspensions were placed in ice bath and disrupted using an Ultrasonic Mini Bead Beater Probe (Densply) with 15 cycles of 60 sec for each one. The sonicate thus obtained was then centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, and this is the CFE).

2.5. Chromate Reductase Assay

Enzymatic chromate reduction was estimated as described previously using a standard curve of Cr(VI) 0–30 mM [34]. Assay mixtures were modified from those described in previous studies [34]. The reaction system (1.0 mL) was made up of varying Cr(VI) final concentrations (5–30 mM) in 700 µL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) added with 250 µL aliquots of CFE for chromate reduction and 50 µL of NADH. The system volume of 1.0 mL was kept constant for all experiments.

Chromate reductase activity was measured at 37°C at different pH values using several buffers (100 mM phosphate-citrate, pH 5.0; 50 mM phosphate, pH 6.0–8.0, and 50 mM TRIS-HCl, pH 8-9). The effect of temperature was studied by measuring chromate reductase activity at different incubation temperatures between 20 and 60°C, at pH optimum. The CFE samples were also treated with several metal ions to a final concentration of 1 mM at optimal pH and temperature; Na⁺, Ca²⁺, Cu²⁺, Hg²⁺, Mg²⁺, Cd²⁺, and Fe³⁺ were tested by using 10 mM solutions of Na₂SO₄, CaCl₂, CuCl₂, HgCl₂, MgCl₂, CdCl₂, and FeCl₃. The electron donors tested were NADH, glucose, sodium acetate, formic acid, citrate, cystin, lactic acid, and ascorbic acid in a final concentration of 1 mM, and the inhibitors were EDTA, KCN, NaN₃, and β-mercaptoethanol at the same concentration. Unit enzyme activity for chromate reductase was derived as amount of enzyme that reduces 1 mMol of Cr(VI) per min at 37°C. Specific activity was defined as unit chromate reductase activity per minute per mg protein concentration in the CFE. Protein concentrations were estimated using Lowry method [35].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cr(VI) Removal by Resting Cell of Penicillium sp.

The resting cells of the fungus were expedient in reducing 0–10 mg/100 mL Cr(VI) concentrations in 8 hours as shown in Figure 1. The fungus removal was between 53% and 70% (2–10 mg/100/mL) of the metal, and these results resemble those reported by A. niger and A. parasiticus [11] Fusarium solani [25], Paecilomyces lilacinus [26], and the bacteria Pseudomonas sp. [19]. Structural properties of the biosorbent including the cellular support and other several factors are known to affect the biosorption rate [36].

3.2. Cr(VI) Reduction by Permeabilized Cells of Penicillium sp.

The cell permeabilization increased the Cr(VI) reduction by the resting cells, as the permeabilized cells with Triton X-100 which could reduce 57%, Toluene 52%, SDS 47.4%, and Tween 80, 40.4% (Figure 2) of 30 mM Cr(VI) within 6 h, suggesting an efficient intracellular mechanism of chromate reduction. The Cr(VI) reductase activity in CFE of cells grown in absence of Cr(VI) was 94.07 µmoles/min/mg protein. These results indicate that the Cr(VI) reductase was associated with the CFE. Fungal, yeast, and bacteria chromate reductases have been localized either in CFE of A. niger and A. parasiticus [11], Pichia jadinii M9, and Pichia anomala M10 [37], Pichia sp. [29], and Bacillus sp. [21], and cytosolic fraction of C. maltosa [28], Pichia sp. [29], and Pannonibacter phragmitetus [38] and membrane fraction Pseudomonas sp. G1DM21 [19], Bacillus megaterium [39], and Enterobacter cloacae [40].

3.3. Effect of pH on the Chromate Reductase Activity

The functioning of the chromate reductase of Penicillium sp. was characterized in different in vitro conditions. To define the optimal pH, the Cr(VI) reductase assays were carried in potassium phosphate, citrate phosphate, and Tris-HCl buffers of differential pH ranges; of the different buffers used the potassium phosphate buffer showed a characteristic pH curve for the enzymatic activity with an optimum pH of 7.0, as depicted from Figure 3, and these results resemble those reported by the fungal A. niger and A. parasiticus [11] and the yeast P. jadini M9 [37]. Other authors reported stability between 7.0 and 7.4 for the bacteria Pseudomonas sp. G1DM21 [19], 6.5 and 7.5 in E. coli CFE [41], and in the range of 5.0 to 8.0 in Bacillus sp. [42].

3.4. Effect of Temperature on the Chromate Reductase Activity

The optimal temperature for the Cr(VI) reductase activity was 37°C, but the reductase activity was altered significantly at 20°C (39% of inhibition), but when the assays were performed at 50°C temperature the reductase activity we found 14.2% of inhibition Figure 4. For P. jadinii M9, incubation at 55°C produced a reduction in activity of 55% [37]. In P. anomala when incubated at 8°C, a decrease in activity of 25% was observed, and at 50°C the activity was 50%. For A. niger and A. parasiticus [11], Pseudomonas sp. G1DM21 [19], E. coli a [41], and Bacillus sp. CFEs [42], the thermal stability was of 30°C [41, 42]. On the contrary, Pseudomonas putida CFE probed to be more resistant, keeping its stability up to 50°C [43].

3.5. Effect of Different Metal Cations on the Chromate Reductase Activity

The effect of different metal cations on the chromate reductase activity of Penicillium sp. was determined as exhibited in Figure 5. All the metal ions tested inhibit the Cr(VI) reductase activity of the CFE of 12% with Cu²⁺ and 40.2% with Na⁺, and these results are different than those reported by the yeast P. jadinii M9 Chromate reductase because only Cu²⁺ and Na⁺ produced an augmentation in the activity of 63 and 30%, respectively [37], and all other ions tested had an inhibitory effect but in different levels. A decrease of 56.5% was observed with Hg²⁺, while addition of Mg²⁺, Fe³⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cd²⁺ resulted in a decrease of activity between 40% and 51%. In P. anomala M10 chromate reductase, only Cu²⁺ produced a raise in activity of a 31%. Inhibition by Hg²⁺ was higher in P. anomala and Pseudomonas sp. than in Penicillium sp. with a decrease in activity of 85% and 90%, respectively [19, 37]. Inhibition by Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ was approximately 50%, while Fe³⁺ reduced the activity by 32%. These results agree with those reported for Arthrobacter crystallopoietes [44], and Bacillus sp. [42]. On the other hand, inhibition by Hg²⁺ can be related to its affinity to –SH ligands, then suspecting the presence of this chemical group in the active site of the enzyme related to chromate reductase activity [44].

3.6. Effect of Different Electron Donors on the Chromate Reductase Activity

The reductase activity increased on supplementation in the reaction mixtures with electron donors. All the electron donors analyzed increased the activity, and the most efficient were ascorbic acid, NADH, glucose, and citrate by 4.4, 4.0, 2.9, and 2.87 times, respectively (Figure 6), and these results are like those reported by the yeasts P. jadinii M9 and P. anomala Chromate reductase with NADH [37] and Pseudomonas sp. with citrate, acetate, glucose, and formate [19]. In previous reports on Bacillus sp., glucose has been reported to act as an electron donor and has been demonstrated to increase Cr(VI) reduction [45, 46], and also formate-dependent Cr(VI) reductases have been reported in Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1 [47]. Our work supports other studies reporting NADH or NADPH-dependent enzymatic reduction of Cr(VI) under aerobic conditions [19, 20, 37, 42, 43]. According to Ramirez-Díaz et al. [48], the oxidation of NADH donates an electron to the chromate reductase enzyme, and then the electron is transferred to Cr(VI) reducing it to the intermediate form, Cr(V), which finally accepts two electrons from other organic substances to produce Cr(III).

3.7. Effect of Different Respiratory Inhibitors on the Chromate Reductase Activity

Respiratory inhibitors like azide (1 mM), EDTA (1 mM), and cyanide (1 mM) caused inhibitions of 48%, 47%, and 32%, respectively (Figure 7), in the Cr(VI) reductase activity; these results corroborate with those obtained in previous studies, and it has been observed that cyanide and azide partially inhibited purified chromate reductase of E. coli ATCC 33456 19, [20] and aerobic chromate reduction by Bacillus subtilis [49] and inhibited more than 50% of membrane associated chromate reductase activity of S. putrefaciens MR-1 [49] while no inhibition was observed in CFE of Bacillus sp. ES29 [44]. Respiratory inhibitors act on de novo protein synthesis or affect the respiratory chain intermediates responsible for Cr(VI) reduction, wherein Cr(VI) serves as a terminal electron acceptor [43].

4. Conclusion

The present study analyzed a very efficient Cr(VI) reductase of Penicillium sp. Chromate reductase assays of the cell-free extracts (CFE) have shown a high Cr(VI) reductase activity. The Cr(VI) reduction potential of the resting cells was increased by cell permeabilization. Optimum temperature and pH of chromate reductase activity of the bacterium were found to be 37°C and 7.0, respectively, and activity was enhanced in presence of 0.1 mM NADH and other electron donors. 1 mMol of metal ions like Cu²⁺, Na⁺, Hg²⁺, Mg²⁺, Fe³⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cd²⁺ and respiratory inhibitors resulted in a decrease of the activity. Finally, the results of higher rates of Cr(VI) reduction by the CFE, functionality of the Cr(VI), indicate a potential application of Penicillium sp. for Cr(VI) bioremediation.

References

R. S. Bai and T. E. Abraham, “Biosorption of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution by Rhizopus nigricans,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Smith, W. A. Apel, J. N. Petersen, and B. M. Peyton, “Effect of carbon and energy source on bacterial chromate reduction,” Bioremediation Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 205–215, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shen and Y.-T. Wang, “Biological reduction of chromium by E. coli,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 560–572, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Marsh and M. J. McInerney, “Relationship of hydrogen bioavailability to chromate reduction in aquifer sediments,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1517–1521, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Beszedits, “Chromium removal from industrial wastewaters,” in Chromium in the Natural and Human Environments, J. O. Nriagu and E. Nieboer, Eds., pp. 232–263, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Lofroth and B. N. Ames, “Mutagenicity of inorganic compounds in Salmonella typhimurium: arsenic, chromium and selenium,” Mutation Research, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 65–66, 1978.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Park, Y.-S. Yun, H. Y. Cho, and J. M. Park, “Chromium biosorption by thermally treated biomass of the brown seaweed, Ecklonia sp,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 43, no. 26, pp. 8226–8232, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Sahin and A. Öztürk, “Biosorption of chromium (VI) ions from aqueous solution by the bacterium Bacillus thuriengensis,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, pp. 1895–1901, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
U. Thacker, R. Parikh, Y. Shouche, and D. Madamwar, “Reduction of chromate by cell-free extract of Brucella sp. isolated from Cr(VI) contaminated sites,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 1541–1547, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. K. Gupta and A. Rastogi, “Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by raw and acid-treated green alga Oedogonium hatei from aqueous solutions,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 396–402, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shugaba, F. Buba, B. G. Kolo, A. J. Nok, D. A. Ameh, and J. A. Lori, “Uptake and reduction of hexavalent chromium by Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus parasiticus,” Petroleum & Environmental Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Fukuda, K. Tsutsumi, Y. Ishino, T. Satou, A. Ogawa, and H. Morita, “Removal of hexavalent chromium in vitro and from contaminated soils by chromate-resistant fungi from chromium deposits,” Journal of Environmental Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111–118, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Cárdenas-González and I. Acosta Rodríguez, “Hexavalent chromium removal by a Paecilomyces sp. Fungal strain isolated from environment,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 676243, 6 pages, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D.-C. Lee, C.-J. Park, J.-E. Yang, Y.-H. Jeong, and H.-I. Rhee, “Screening of hexavalent chromium biosorbent from marine algae,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 445–448, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Valls, S. Atrian, V. de Lorenzo, and L. A. Fernández, “Engineering a mouse metallothionein on the cell surface of Ralstonia eutropha CH34 for immobilization of heavy metals in soil,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 661–665, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. A. O. Camargo, B. C. Okeke, F. M. Bento, and W. T. Frankenberger, “In vitro reduction of hexavalent chromium by a cell-free extract of Bacillus sp. ES 29 stimulated by Cu²⁺,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 62, no. 5-6, pp. 569–573, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. J. Acevedo-Aguilar, A. E. Espino-Saldaña, I. L. Leon-Rodriguez et al., “Hexavalent chromium removal in vitro and from industrial wastes, using chromate-resistant strains of filamentous fungi indigenous to contaminated wastes,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 809–815, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Morales-Barrera and E. Cristiani-Urbina, “Hexavalent chromium removal by a Trichoderma inhamatum fungal strain isolated from tannery effluent,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 187, no. 1–4, pp. 327–336, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Desai, K. Jain, and D. Madamwar, “Hexavalent chromate reductase activity in cytosolic fractions of Pseudomonas sp. G1DM21 isolated from Cr(VI) contaminated industrial landfill,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 713–721, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-C. Bae, H.-K. Lee, Y.-C. Choe et al., “Purification and characterization of NADPH-dependent Cr(VI) reductase from Escherichia coli ATCC 33456,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Campos, M. Martinez-Pacheco, and C. Cervantes, “Hexavalent-chromium reduction by a chromate-resistant Bacillus sp. strain,” Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 203–208, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Mabbett and L. E. Macaskie, “A novel isolate of Desulfovibrio sp. with enhanced ability to reduce Cr(VI),” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 683–687, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Pattanapipitpaisal, N. L. Brown, and L. E. Macaskie, “Chromate reduction and 16s rRNA identification of bacteria isolated from a Cr(VI)-contaminated site,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 57, no. 1-2, pp. 257–261, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Viamajala, B. M. Peyton, W. A. Apel, and J. N. Petersen, “Chromate reduction in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 is an inducible process associated with anaerobic growth,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 290–295, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sen and M. Ghosh Dastidar, “Biosorption of Cr (VI) by resting cells of Fusarium solani,” Iran Journal of Environmental Health Science Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Sharma and A. Adholeya, “Detoxification and accumulation of chromium from tannery effluent and spent chrome effluent by Paecilomyces lilacinus fungi,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 309–317, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Morales-Barrera, F. D. M. Guillén-Jiménez, A. Ortíz-Moreno et al., “Isolation, identification and characterization of a Hypocrea tawa strain with high Cr(VI) reduction potential,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 40, pp. 284–292, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Ramirez-Ramirez, C. Calvo-Méndez, M. Avila-Rodríguez et al., “Cr(VI) reduction in a chromate-resistant strain of Candida maltose isolated from the leather industry,” Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 85, pp. 63–68, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
P. M. Fernández, M. M. Martorell, J. I. Fariña, and L. I. Figueroa, “Removal efficiency of Cr⁶⁺ by indigenous Pichia sp isolated from textile factory effluent,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 708213, 6 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Muter, A. Patmalnieks, and A. Rapoport, “Interrelations of the yeast Candida utilis and Cr(VI): metal reduction and its distribution in the cell and medium,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 963–970, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Lee, H. R. Buckley, and C. C. Campbell, “An amino acid liquid synthetic medium for the development of mycelial and yeast forms of Candida albicans,” Sabouraudia Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 148–153, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
M. P. Kirk, F. P. Cannon, C. J. David, and A. J. Stalpers, Dictionary of the Fungi, CABI, Wallingford, UK, 2001.
A. E. Greenberg, L. S. Clesceri, and A. D. Eaton, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA, 18th edition, 1992.
A. Pal, S. Dutta, and A. K. Paul, “Reduction of hexavalent chromium by cell free extract of Bacillus sphaericus AND 303 isolated from serpentine soil,” Current Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 327–330, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall, “Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Bayramoǧlu, S. Bektaş, and M. Y. Arica, “Biosorption of heavy metal ions on immobilized white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 285–300, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Martorell, P. M. Fernández, J. I. Farina, and L. I. Figueroa, “Cr(VI) reduction by cell-free extracts of Pichia jadini and Pichia anomala isolated from textile-dye factory effluents,” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 71, pp. 80–85, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Xu, M. Luo, C. Jiang et al., “In vitro reduction of hexavalent chromium by cytoplasmic fractions of Pannonibacter phragmitetus LSSE-09 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 166, no. 4, pp. 933–941, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Cheung, H. Y. Lai, and J.-D. Gu, “Membrane-associated hexavalent chromium reductase of Bacillus megaterium TKW3 with induced expression,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 855–862, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
P.-C. Wang, T. Mori, K. Toda, and H. Ohtake, “Membrane-associated chromate reductase activity from Enterobacter cloacae,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 1670–1672, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
W.-C. Bae, H.-K. Lee, Y.-C. Choe et al., “Purification and characterization of NADPH-dependent Cr(VI) reductase from Escherichia coli ATCC 33456,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Elangovan, S. Abhipsa, B. Rohit, P. Ligy, and K. Chandraraj, “Reduction of Cr(VI) by a Bacillus sp,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 247–252, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Park, M. Keyhan, B. Wielinga, S. Fendorf, and A. Matin, “Purification to homogeneity and characterization of a novel Pseudomonas putida chromate reductase,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1788–1795, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. A. O. Camargo, F. M. Bento, B. C. Okeke, and W. T. Frankenberger, “Hexavalent chromium reduction by an actinomycete, Arthrobacter crystallopoietes ES 32,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 183–194, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-G. Liu, W.-H. Xu, G.-M. Zeng, X. Li, and H. Gao, “Cr(VI) reduction by Bacillus sp. isolated from chromium landfill,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1981–1986, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pal, S. Dutta, and A. K. Paul, “Reduction of hexavalent chromium by cell free extract of Bacillus sphaericus AND 303 isolated from serpentine soil,” Current Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 327–330, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Myers, B. P. Carstens, W. E. Antholine, and J. M. Myers, “Chromium(VI) reductase activity is associated with the cytoplasmic membrane of anaerobically grown Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. Ramirez-Díaz, C. Díaz-Pérez, E. Vargas, H. Riveros-Rosas, J. Campos-García, and C. Cervantes, “Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to chromium compounds,” Biometals, vol. 21, pp. 321–332, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Garbisu, I. Alkorta, M. J. Llama, and J. L. Serra, “Aerobic chromate reduction by Bacillus subtilis,” Biodegradation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 133–141, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Damaris L. Arévalo-Rangel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3768

Downloads

1908

Citations