Methodology Report
Formal Implementation of a Performance Evaluation Model for the Face Recognition System
Table 5
Comparison between evaluation methods (FERET, FRVT, and the proposed performance evaluation tool).
| | FERET | FRVT | Proposed evaluation tool |
| | | Face recognition system | | Evaluation target | Face recognition system | Scenario | Face recognition system | | | Operation | |
| Face DB distribution method | DB distribution onsite (possibility of face DB disclosure) | DB distribution on-site (possibility of face DB disclosure) | Vendors provide the face recognition module. (No risk of disclosing face DB) | FRVT 2006: Vendors provide the face recognition module. (No risk of disclosing face DB) |
| Performance evaluator | Vendor staff | Vendor staff | Evaluator | FRVT 2006: Evaluator |
| Result analysis tool | Performance result analysis tool is required | Performance result analysis tool is required | No analysis tool is required |
| Result report | Manual work | Manual work | Automatically generated by the | generation | | | tool |
| Individual evaluation | Impossible | Impossible | Individual valuation by vendor |
| Evaluation costs | All related vendor staff should congregate in one place (expensive) | All related vendor staff should congregate in one place (expensive) | No meeting is required (low cost) | FRVT 2006: No meeting is required (low cost) |
| Responsibility of the | I/O file format should be complied | I/O file format should be complied | Complies with recognition module | vendor | with | with | interface |
|
|