Methodology Report

Formal Implementation of a Performance Evaluation Model for the Face Recognition System

Table 5

Comparison between evaluation methods (FERET, FRVT, and the proposed performance evaluation tool).

FERETFRVTProposed evaluation tool

Face recognition system
Evaluation targetFace recognition systemScenarioFace recognition system
Operation

Face DB distribution method DB distribution onsite (possibility of face DB disclosure)DB distribution on-site (possibility of face DB disclosure)Vendors provide the face recognition module. (No risk of disclosing face DB)
FRVT 2006: Vendors provide the face recognition module. (No risk of disclosing face DB)

Performance evaluator Vendor staffVendor staffEvaluator
FRVT 2006: Evaluator

Result analysis tool Performance result analysis tool is requiredPerformance result analysis tool is requiredNo analysis tool is required

Result reportManual workManual workAutomatically generated by the
generationtool

Individual evaluation ImpossibleImpossibleIndividual valuation by vendor

Evaluation costs All related vendor staff should congregate in one place (expensive)All related vendor staff should congregate in one place (expensive) No meeting is required (low cost)
FRVT 2006: No meeting is required (low cost)

Responsibility of theI/O file format should be complied I/O file format should be complied Complies with recognition module
vendorwithwith interface