About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 612805, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/612805
Research Article

Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Wampee (Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels) Peel

1Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
2Biotechnological Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510610, China
3Department of Food Science & Human Nutrition, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

Received 5 March 2009; Revised 17 May 2009; Accepted 8 June 2009

Academic Editor: Vickram Ramkumar

Copyright © 2009 K. Nagendra Prasad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Antioxidant activities of wampee peel extracts using five different solvents (ethanol, hexane, ethyl acetate, butanol and water) were determined by using in-vitro antioxidant models including total antioxidant capability, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, reducing power, and superoxide scavenging activity. Ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) exhibited the highest antioxidant activity compared to other fractions, even higher than synthetic antioxidant butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT). In addition, the EAF exhibited strong anticancer activities against human gastric carcinoma (SGC-7901), human hepatocellular liver carcinoma (HepG-2) and human lung adenocarcinoma (A-549) cancer cell lines, higher than cisplatin, a conventional anticancer drug. The total phenolic content of wampee fraction was positively correlated with the antioxidant activity. This is the first report on the antioxidant and anticancer activities of the wampee peel extract. Thus, wampee peel can be used potentially as a readily accessible source of natural antioxidants and a possible pharmaceutical supplement.

1. Introduction

In recent years, more interest has been paid to protect foods and human beings against oxidative damage caused by free radicals like hydroxyl, peroxyl, and superoxide radicals. One possible solution is to explore the potential antioxidant and anticancer properties of plant extracts or isolated products of plant origin [1]. It is well known that many polyphenolic compounds, such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanidins, and tannins, which possess remarkable antioxidant and anticancer activities, are rich in plant materials. Some studies have shown the positive correlation of the increased dietary intake of natural antioxidants with the reduced coronary heart disease and cancer mortality, as well as with longer life expectancy [2, 3]. Moreover, many polyphenolic compounds have shown many health-benefiting bioactive properties, such as antioxidant, anticancer, antiviral, anti-inflammatory activities, and an ability to inhibit human platelet aggregation [46].

Wampee (Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels) belongs to the family Rutaceae and is originated from Southern China. The fruit which resembles grapes in appearance with acidic taste can be eaten along with the peel. The pulp can be used to prepare fruit cups, desserts, jam, or jelly. In addition, the fermented fruit can be used to prepare carbonated beverages similar to champagne, although dried wampee is a more desirable product [7]. Previous studies of bioactivities of wampee, particularly the extracts of its leaf and seed, mainly focused on the hepatoprotective [8], antiplatelet [4], hypoglycemic [9], antifungal and antiviral activities [10]. However, no systematic study has been conducted on the wampee peel even though it is used as a folk medicine in China for the treatment of stomachic, and bronchitis as well as it acts as vermifuge. For the first time, this study investigated the antioxidant and anticancer activities of the wampee peel extracts and demonstrated the potent bioactivities of the extracts suitable to be used as natural antioxidant compounds or pharmaceutical supplements.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Fresh fruit of wampee at the mature stage were obtained from an orchard in Guangzhou. Fruits were chosen for uniformity in shape and color, and washed carefully with tap water. The peels were manually separated, then dried in oven at 60°C for 24 hours, and finally they were grounded into powder using a blender. The moisture content of the fresh peel was determined to be 85%.

2.2. Chemicals and Reagents

1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH), nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT), methionine, riboflavin gallic acid and MTT [3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazole-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Trypsin and RPMI-1640 medium (pH 7.4) were obtained from GIBCO, Invitrogen, NY, USA. Fetal bovine serum was supplied by Ebioway (Guangzhou, China). Butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT) was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals and solvents used in this study were of analytical grade and obtained from Tianjin Reagent Company (Tianjin, China).

2.3. Extraction

Dried powder (10 g) of wampee peel was extracted in a rotary shaker with 200 mL of 50% ethanol at 30°C for 24 hours. The extract was then filtered, concentrated using a rotary evaporator (RE-52A, Shanghai Woshi Co. Shanghai, China), and finally lyophilized in a freeze-dryer (Savant, Vapornet VN 100, Labequip Ltd., Markham, Ontario, Canada) to obtain a crude ethanol fraction (CF). The extraction yield was determined to be %. Partition of the CF was performed further by the method of Zhao et al. [11] with slight modifications. The freeze-dried extract was dissolved in 25 mL water and then partitioned sequentially by 100 mL of hexane, ethyl acetate, butanol and water. Hexane fraction (HF), ethyl acetate fraction (EAF), butanol fraction (BF) and water fraction (WF) were collected separately and then concentrated using a rotary evaporator to remove the solvent. The residue was dissolved in water, then freeze dried and finally stored in refrigerator until further use.

2.4. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

Total phenolic content of each fraction obtained by the above methods was determined by the method of Singleton and Rossi [12] and then expressed as microgram/gram gallic acid equivalents. In brief, a 100  L-aliquot of the samples was added to 2 mL of 0.2% (w/v) Na2CO3 solution. After 2 minutesutes of incubation, 100  L of 500 mL/L Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added and the mixture was then allowed to stand for 30 minutes at 25°C. The absorbance was measured at 750 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-2802, Unico Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China). The blank consisted of all reagents and solvents but without the sample. The total phenolic content was determined using the standard gallic acid calibration curve.

2.5. Analyses of Antioxidant Activities
2.5.1. Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Activity

Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity was measured by the method described by Duan et al. [13] with some modifications. All solutions were prepared in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The wampee peel fractions at 12.5, 25, 37.5 and 50  g/mL respectively were mixed with 3 mL of reaction buffer solution (pH 7.4) containing 1.3  M riboflavin, 0.02 M methionine and 5.1  M NBT. The reaction solution was illuminated by exposure to two 30 W fluorescent lamps for 20 minutes and then the absorbance was measured at 560 nm using a spectrophotometer. Butylated hydroxy toluene (BHT) was used as positive control and the reaction mixture without any sample was used as control. The superoxide anion radical scavenging activity (%) was calculated as [1-(absorbance of sample/absorbance of control)] 100.

2.5.2. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

DPPH radical scavenging activities of all the fractions were determined by the method of Blois [14] with some modification. Initially, 0.2 mL of the fractions and BHT at a concentration of 25, 50, 75 and 100  g/mL respectively, was mixed with 1 mL of 0.2 mM DPPH (dissolved in methanol). The reaction mixture was incubated for 20 minutes at 28°C under dark condition. The control contained all reagents except the extract fraction while methanol was used as blank. The DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined by measuring the absorbance at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer. The DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) of the sample was calculated as [1-(absorbance of sample/absorbance of control)] 100.

2.5.3. Total Antioxidant Activity

Total antioxidant capacities of the wampee fractions and BHT were determined by the method of Pan et al. [15]. An aliquot (0.1 mL) of these fractions was combined with 1 mL of reagent solution (0.6 M sulphuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). The tubes were capped and incubated at 95°C for 90 minutes. After the samples were cooled to 25°C, the absorbance was measured at 695 nm against blank. The blank contained 1 mL of reagent solution without the sample. The total antioxidant activity was expressed as the absorbance value at 695 nm. The higher absorbance value indicates the greater antioxidant activity.

2.5.4. Reducing Power

Determination of reducing power was performed as described by Pan et al. [15] with slight modification. Various fractions (0.1 mL) and BHT were mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of 1% potassium ferricyanide. After the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 minutes, 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid, 2.5 mL distilled water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% ferric chloride solution were added and then the absorbance was measured at 700 nm against a blank. The blank consists of all the reagents without the sample. Increasing absorbance of the reaction mixture indicates increasing reducing power.

2.6. Analysis Of Anticancer Activity
2.6.1. Cell Line and Culture

The cell lines of HepG2 (human hepatocellular liver carcinoma), A-549, (human lung adenocarcinoma) and SGC-7901 (human gastric carcinoma) were obtained from Biomedicine Research and Development Centre of Jinan University (Guangzhou, China). The cells were cultured in a growth medium (RPMI-1640, pH 7.4), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics, penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin sulfate (100  g/mL).

2.6.2. Anticancer Assay

Since EAF showed the strongest antioxidant activity in all antioxidant tests, it was chosen for anticancer assay according to the method of Zhao et al. [16]. In brief, the cells were seeded into 4 wells of a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar 3599, Corning, NY, USA) at cells per well with 100  L RPMI-1640 growth medium and then incubated for 24 hours at 37°C under 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere (Incu-Safe, Sanyo, Japan). Later, the medium was removed while fresh growth medium containing EAF at 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.5 or 3.125  g/mL was added. After 3 days of incubation at 37°C under 5% CO2, the medium was removed while 0.1 mg/mL MTT reagent was then added. After incubation for 5 hours at 37°C, the MTT reagent was removed before adding 100  L DMSO to each well and gently shaken. The absorbance was then determined by ELISA reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) at 492 nm. Control wells received only the media without the tested samples. The conventional anticancer drug, cisplatin, was used as a positive control in this study. The inhibition of cell growth by EAF was calculated as a percent anticancer activity using the following formula: percent anticancer activity %, where and referred to the absorbances of control and the sample, respectively.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) of three replicate Determinations and then analyzed by SPSS V.13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s New Multiple-range test were used to determinutese the differences among the means. P values .05 were regarded as significant. Relationship between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity was determined using the Microsoft Office Excel program.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Total Phenolic Content and Extraction Yield

Table 1 shows the total phenolic content and extraction yield of each fractions of wampee peel. BF obtained the highest extraction yield ( %) while HF yielded the lowest ( %). For the phenolics, the EAF exhibited the highest phenolic content while the HF showed the lowest. Hexane was used to extract nonpolar compounds, while ethyl acetate was used to extract medium polar flavonoids and glycosides. In contrast, butanol and water were used for extracting polar compounds like aglycones, glucosides and sugars [17, 18]. According to our previous work, higher phenolic content was observed in the ethyl acetate fraction compared to the fractions of butanol and water from litchi fruit pericarp [11, 19]. Thus, EAF was used due to its relatively more efficient extraction of polyphenolic compounds from wampee peel for the further evaluation of antioxidant activity.

tab1
Table 1: Comparative analysis of extraction yield and total phenolic content of wampee peel fractions obtained using different solvents.
3.2. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

DPPH is a kind of stable free radical and accepts an electron or hydrogen radical to become a stable diamagnetic molecule which is widely used to investigate radical scavenging activity [14]. In the DPPH radical scavenging assay, antioxidants react with the DPPH radicals, which is a stable free radical and exists naturally in deep violet color, to turn into a yellow colored , -diphenyl- -picryl hydrazine. The degree of discoloration indicates the radical-scavenging potential of the antioxidant [20].

The DPPH radical scavenging activity of all the fractions from wampee peel increased with increase in fraction concentration (Figure 1). The percent scavenging ability of EAF at 50  g/mL was higher ( ) than that of other fractions and BHT ( ), with the order of EAF BHT WF CF BF HF. It has been found that phenolics, flavonoids and tocopherols reduce the DPPH radicals by their hydrogen donating ability [11, 13, 21]. The results obtained in this investigation reveal that all the fractions of wampee peel are free radical scavengers and able to react with the DPPH radical, which might be attributed to their electron donating ability.

612805.fig.001
Figure 1: DPPH radical scavenging activity of the crude ethanol fraction (EF), hexane fraction (HF), ethyl acetate fraction (EAF), butanol fraction (BF) and water fraction (WF) from wampee peel.
3.3. Total Antioxidant Capacity

The total antioxidant capacity of wampee fractions was measured spectrophotometrically through phosphomolybdenum method, which is based on the reduction of Mo (IV) to Mo (V) by the sample analyte and the subsequent formation of green phosphate/Mo (V) compounds with a maximum absorption at 695 nm [15, 22]. A high absorbance value of the sample indicates its strong antioxidant activity. Figure 2 shows the total antioxidant activities of wampee fractions and BHT. All the fractions showed a good total antioxidant activity, which was concentration-dependent. The total antioxidant activity of EAF at 100  g/mL was , significantly being higher ( ) than BHT with value of . Furthermore, the total antioxidant activity of EAF at all concentrations tested was higher than BHT and other fractions. The total antioxidant capacity may be attributed to their chemical composition and phenolic acid content. Jayaprakasha et al. [17] indicated that the total antioxidant activity of citrus was due to the presence of phenolics, carotenoids, flavonoids and ascorbic acid.

612805.fig.002
Figure 2: Total antioxidant capacity of the crude ethanol fraction (EF), hexane fraction (HF), ethyl acetate fraction (EAF), butanol fraction (BF) and water fraction (WF) from wampee peel. Higher absorbance value indicates higher antioxidant activity.
3.4. Superoxide Anion Scavenging Activity

Superoxide anion, the one-electron reduced form of molecular oxygen, is a precursor of other reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and singlet oxygen. Although the superoxide anion is relatively a weak oxidant, it may combine with other reactive species, such as nitric oxide, produced by macrophages, to give more reactive species [13, 20]. In this study, the superoxide anion scavenging effects of various fractions from wampee peel were analyzed and the results are given in Figure 3. Among the wampee peel fractions tested, EAF exhibited the highest superoxide anion scavenging activity in a dose-dependent manner. All the fractions except HF exhibited excellent superoxide anion scavenging activity compared with BHT. At 50  g/mL, the superoxide scavenging activity of CF, HF, EAF, BF and WF were , , , , , respectively, while BHT was only. Therefore the superoxide anion scavenging activity was in increasing order, EAF BF CF BHT WF HF. The superoxide anion scavenging activity might be due to the action of polyphenolic compounds. Also, the flavonoid molecules with polyhydroxylated substitutions on rings A and B and a free 3-hydroxyl substitution, conferred superoxide anion scavenging activity according to Siddhuraju et al. [23].

612805.fig.003
Figure 3: Superoxide scavenging activity of the crude ethanol fraction (EF), hexane fraction (HF), ethyl acetate fraction (EAF), butanol fraction (BF) and water fraction (WF) from wampee peel.
3.5. Reducing Power

Reducing power is also widely used in evaluating antioxidant activity of plant polyphenols. The reducing power is generally associated with the presence of reductones, which exert antioxidant action by breaking the free radical chains by donating a hydrogen atom. In this assay, the presence of reductants in the antioxidant sample causes the reduction of the Fe3+/ferricyanide complex to the Fe2+/ferrous form, so the reducing power of the sample can be monitored by measuring the formation of Perl’s Prussian blue at 700 nm [24]. In the present study, the EAF from wampee peel exhibited a strong reducing power and was equal to BHT, as shown in Figure 4. At 100  g/mL, the reducing power ability of EAF and BHT was . The reducing power of wampee peel fractions is probably due to the presence of phenolic compounds which might act as electron donors.

612805.fig.004
Figure 4: Reducing power activity of the crude ethanol fraction (EF), hexane fraction (HF), ethyl acetate fraction (EAF), butanol fraction (BF) and water fraction (WF) from wampee peel. Higher absorbance value indicates higher antioxidant activity.
3.6. Anticancer Activity

In this study, the anticancer activities of the EAF and cisplatin were investigated using an 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay on three human cancer cell lines, SCG-7901, HepG-2 and A-549. A mitochondrial enzyme in living cells, succinate-dehydrogenase, cleaves the tetrazolium ring and converts the MTT to an insoluble purple formazan and the amount of formazan produced is directly proportional to the number of viable cells [25]. The anticancer activity of EAF and cisplatin is presented in Table 2. Although the EAF inhibited the growth of cancer cells only at higher concentrations (100 and 50  g/mL), it exhibited comparable anticancer activity with cisplatin. At the concentration of 50  g/mL, the EAF possessed high anticancer activities against SCG-7901, HepG-2 and A-549 cancer cell lines, with the corresponding inhibitory activities of , and , respectively, being significantly higher than cisplatin having values of , and , respectively.

tab2
Table 2: Anticancer activities of the ethyl acetate fraction of wampee fruit pericarp and cisplatin.

Polyphenolic compounds might inhibit cancer cells by xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes that alter metabolic activation of potential carcinogens, while some flavonoids could also alter hormone production and inhibit aromatase to prevent the development of cancer cells [16]. The mechanism of action of anticancer activity of phenolics could be by disturbing the cellular division during mitotis at the telophase stage. It was also reported that phenolics reduced the amount of cellular protein and mitotic index, and the colony formation during cell proliferation of cancer cells [26].

Several studies exhibited a close relationship between antioxidant activities and total phenolic content [13, 15, 21]. In this study, the antioxidant activity of wampee peel fraction was also in agreement with the total amount of phenolics, which exhibited high associations with reducing power, superoxide scavenging activity and total antioxidant capacity ( , 0.9730 and 0.9228, resp.). Thus, the content of phenolic compounds could be used as an important indicator of antioxidant capacity. Wampee peel fractions contain high levels of phenolic compounds which contain one (or more) aromatic rings bearing one or more hydroxyl groups. The more the number of hydroxyl groups in the phenolics, the greater is the antioxidant activity [27, 28]. The presence of a 4-carbonyl group of the flavonoid molecule also contributes to anticancer activity. In addition, the presence of 2,3-double bond in flavonoid molecules correlates with mitochondirial damage and cancer cell death [29, 30]. Further investigations into the identification of these phenolic compounds present in the wampee peel are needed to better elucidate their antioxidant and anticancer activities.

4. Conclusion

In the present study, application of different solvents to extract antioxidant and anticancer compounds from wampee peel was investigated. The study indicated that the ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) possessed the highest phenolic content than other fractions. Also, the EAF exhibited strong antioxidant and anticancer activities, which were comparable to the commercial antioxidant BHT and the anticancer drug cisplatin. This seems that the wampee peel extract can be used as natural antioxidant and anticancer agent. Further investigation is being carried out to identify and characterize the inherent phenolic compounds responsible for the antioxidant and anticancer activities from the ethylacetate fraction of wampee peel.

Acknowledgment

This research is supported by the CAS/SAFEA international partnership program for creative research teams.

References

  1. M. Namiki, “Antioxidants/antimutagens in food,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 273–300, 1990.
  2. B. Halliwell, “Dietary polyphenols: good, bad, or indifferent for your health?” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 341–347, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. A. D. O. Rios, L. M. G. Antunes, and M. D. L. P. Bianchi, “Bixin and lycopene modulation of free radical generation induced by cisplatin-DNA interaction,” Food Chemistry, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1113–1118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G.-J. Fan, B. H. Han, Y.-H. Kang, and M. K. Park, “Evaluation of inhibitory potentials of chinese medicinal plants on platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor binding,” Natural Product Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 33–37, 2001.
  5. P. D. S. Spada, G. G. N. de Souza, G. V. Bortolini, J. A. P. Henriques, and M. Salvador, “Antioxidant, mutagenic, and antimutagenic activity of frozen fruits,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 144–151, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. S. M. Mohsen and A. S. M. Ammar, “Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of corn tassel extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 595–598, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Morton, “Fruits of warm climates,” Miami, Fla, USA, pp. 197-198, 1987.
  8. G. T. Liu, W.-X. Li, Y.-Y. Chen, and H.-L. Wei, “Hepatoprotective action of nine constituents isolated from the leaves of Clausena lansium in mice,” Drug Development Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 174–178, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Z. F. Shen, Q. M. Chen, H. F. Liu, and M. Z. Xie, “The hypoglycemic effect of clausenacoumarine,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 391–392, 1989.
  10. T. B. Ng, S. K. Lam, and W. P. Fong, “A homodimeric sporamin-type trypsin inhibitor with antiproliferative, HIV reverse transcriptase-inhibitory and antifungal activities from wampee (Clausena lansium) seeds,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 384, no. 2, pp. 289–293, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. M. Zhao, B. Yang, J. Wang, B. Li, and Y. Jiang, “Identification of the major flavonoids from pericarp tissues of lychee fruit in relation to their antioxidant activities,” Food Chemistry, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 539–544, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. V. L. Singleton and J. A. Rossi, “Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents,” American Journal of Enology and Vitriculture, vol. 16, pp. 144–158, 1965.
  13. X. Duan, G. Wu, and Y. Jiang, “Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of litchi fruit phenolics in relation to pericarp browning prevention,” Molecules, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 759–771, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. S. Blois, “Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical,” Nature, vol. 181, no. 4617, pp. 1199–1200, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. Y. Pan, K. Wang, S. Huang, et al., “Antioxidant activity of microwave-assisted extract of longan (Dimocarpus Longan Lour.) peel,” Food Chemistry, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1264–1270, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Zhao, B. Yang, J. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Yu, and Y. Jiang, “Immunomodulatory and anticancer activities of flavonoids extracted from litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) pericarp,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 162–166, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. G. K. Jayaprakasha, B. Girennavar, and B. S. Patil, “Radical scavenging activities of Rio Red grapefruits and Sour orange fruit extracts in different in vitro model systems,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 4484–4494, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. K. R. Markham, Techniques of Flavonoid Identification, Academic Press, London, UK, 1982.
  19. N. K. Prasad, B. Yang, N. Ruenroengklin, M. Zhao, and Y. Jiang, “Application of ultrasonication or high pressure to assist extraction of flavonoids from litchi fruit pericarp,” Journal of Food Process Engineering. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Ardestani and R. Yazdanparast, “Antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential of Achillea santolina extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. H. Li, X. Wang, Y. Li, P. Li, and H. Wang, “Polyphenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of selected China wines,” Food Chemistry, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 454–460, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. H. Abdille, R. P. Singh, G. K. Jayaprakasha, and B. S. Jena, “Antioxidant activity of the extracts from Dillenia indica fruits,” Food Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 891–896, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. P. Siddhuraju, P. S. Mohan, and K. Becker, “Studies on the antioxidant activity of Indian Laburnum (Cassia fistula L.): a preliminary assessment of crude extracts from stem bark, leaves, flowers and fruit pulp,” Food Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. N. Singh and P. S. Rajini, “Free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of potato peel,” Food Chemistry, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 611–616, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J.-Y. Lee, W.-I. Hwang, and S.-T. Lim, “Antioxidant and anticancer activities of organic extracts from Platycodon grandiflorum A. de Candolle roots,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 93, no. 2-3, pp. 409–415, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  26. A. Gawron and G. Kruk, “Cytotoxic effect of xanthotoxol (8-hydroxypsoralen) on TCTC cells in vitro,” Polish Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 1992.
  27. K. N. Prasad, S. Divakar, G. R. Shivamurthy, and S. M. Aradhya, “Isolation of a free radical-scavenging antioxidant from water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 1461–1468, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. N. Rangkadilok, S. Sitthimonchai, L. Worasuttayangkurn, C. Mahidol, M. Ruchirawat, and J. Satayavivad, “Evaluation of free radical scavenging and antityrosinase activities of standardized longan fruit extract,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 328–336, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  29. K. Plochmann, G. Korte, E. Koutsilieri, et al., “Structure-activity relationships of flavonoid-induced cytotoxicity on human leukemia cells,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 460, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. L. Bravo, “Polyphenols: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 317–333, 1998.