- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 178614, 10 pages
S100A1: A Regulator of Striated Muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Handling, Sarcomeric, and Mitochondrial Function
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Laboratory for Molecular and Translational Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, INF 350, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
2Department of Medicine, Center for Translational Medicine, Laboratory for Cardiac Stem Cell and Gene Therapy, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
Received 11 November 2009; Accepted 12 January 2010
Academic Editor: Henk L. M. Granzier
Copyright © 2010 Mirko Völkers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Calcium () signaling plays a key role in a wide range of physiological functions including control of cardiac and skeletal muscle performance. To assure a precise coordination of both temporally and spatially transduction of intracellular oscillations to downstream signaling networks and target operations, cycling regulation in muscle tissue is conducted by a plethora of diverse molecules. S100A1 is a member of the -binding S100 protein family and represents the most abundant S100 isoform in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Early studies revealed distinct expression patterns of S100A1 in healthy and diseased cardiac tissue from animal models and humans. Further elaborate investigations uncovered S100A1 protein as a basic requirement for striated muscle handling integrity. S100A1 is a critical regulator of cardiomyocyte cycling and contractile performance. S100A1-mediated inotropy unfolds independent and on top of AR-stimulated contractility with unchanged AR downstream signaling. S100A1 has further been detected at different sites within the cardiac sarcomere indicating potential roles in myofilament function. More recently, a study reported a mitochondrial location of S100A1 in cardiomyocytes. Additionally, normalizing the level of S100A1 protein by means of viral cardiac gene transfer in animal heart failure models resulted in a disrupted progression towards cardiac failure and enhanced survival. This brief review is confined to the physiological and pathophysiological relevance of S100A1 in cardiac and skeletal muscle handling with a particular focus on its potential as a molecular target for future therapeutic interventions.
Ca2+ is a highly versatile intracellular signal that controls many different cellular functions. Therefore, Ca2+ signals need to be flexible yet precisely regulated. Besides controlling gene transcription and growth, Ca2+ regulates the contraction and relaxation in muscles tissue. Skeletal and cardiac muscle belong to the striated tissue and share many functional aspects. The Ca2+ signals require downstream proteins to connect Ca2+ oscillations to different signaling domains. Ca2+ cycling in muscle tissue is regulated by a plethora of proteins, transmitting the Ca2+ messages with precision and in a temporally and spatially coordinated manner. One of these specific Ca2+ binding protein families within muscle cells is the S100 protein family.
The process of excitation-contraction coupling (ECC) in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells requires membrane depolarization. After membrane depolarization, Ca2+ influx is activated via voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channels into the cytosol of both skeletal muscle cells and cardiac myocytes . This rise in cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration leads to Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) (Ca2+ induced Ca2+ release-CICR) by activation of Ryanodine receptors (RyR), whereas in skeletal muscle voltage dependent Ca2+ release occurs (VICR). After Ca2+ release of the RyR, Ca2+ molecules subsequently bind to the contractile proteins such as troponin c, which causes contraction of the myocytes. Thereafter, Ca2+ is cleared from the cytosol by reuptake of Ca2+ into the SR by the action of a sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA).
Much evidence has accumulated that abnormal regulation of intracellular Ca2+ by the SR plays a key role in the development of cardiac diseases. A decreased Ca2+ transient leads to a decreased contractility of the cardiomyocytes. The reduced Ca2+ transients are mainly related to a decreased SR Ca2+ load. Correction of the disorder of Ca2+ cycling has a potential as a new and intriguing therapeutic strategy against cardiac disease states.
Among others proteins, it has been proven that S100A1 regulates sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ handling in skeletal and cardiac muscles [2, 3]. In this brief review, we discuss the physiological role of S100A1 in the regulation of ECC in skeletal and cardiac muscles. In addition, we focus on pathophysiological consequences of altered S100A1 expression in cardiovascular disease to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of S100A1. Finally, we aim to highlight the potential of an S100A1-targeted therapy in cardiovascular diseases.
2. S100 Protein Family
S100 Ca2+-binding proteins are the largest subfamily of EF-hand proteins (25 human genes), putatively targeting more than 90 proteins (previously reviewed in [4, 5]). S100 proteins are small acidic proteins (10–12 kDa) that are found exclusively in vertebrates. These proteins were first identified by Moore in 1965 and characterized as “S100” in consequence for their unique solubility in 100% saturated solution with ammonium sulphate and were designated by consecutive arabic numbers placed behind the stem symbol, for example, s100a1, s100a2, s100a3, and so forth  due to their clustered organization on human chromosome 1q21.
Each S100 monomer contains two EF-hand Ca2+ binding domains interconnected by an intermediate region (hinge region) (Figure 1)  exerting unique features when compared with other EF-hand proteins. First, the two EF hands in each monomer differ in sequence and affinity for Ca2+ binding. The c-terminal EF hand contains the classical canonical Ca2+ binding motif and ligates Ca2+ in a similar manner to calmodulin and troponin C, resulting in Kd 10–50 M. The NH2-terminal pseudo-EF hand contains two additional amino acids and is a characteristic of S100 proteins. Consequently, Ca2+ affinities decreased to a Kd between 200–500M (reviewed in ). Importantly, Ca2+ affinity is regulated by posttranslational mechanism facilitating Ca2+ binding and activation of S100 proteins even at nanomolar free Ca2+ concentrations. Ca2+ binding eventually triggers exposure of a hydrophobic epitope which is believed to mediately represent a major interaction site enabling accommodation of target proteins through the exposure of a hydrophobic epitope that surface represents the interaction site of most S100 proteins for the binding of target proteins (Figure 2). The second unique characteristic compared to EF-hand proteins of S100 proteins is their dimeric nature, as it has been shown both in vivo and in vitro that S100 proteins form noncovalent homo- and heterodimers (Figure 2). Third, S100 proteins are expressed in a tissue- and cell- specific fashion, pointing to higher degree of specification. The most abundant S100 protein isoform in cardiac and skeletal muscle is S100A1 among other S100 isoforms such as S100A4, S100A6, and S100B and in heart S100A1 is mainly found in ventricular cardiomyoctes.
3. S100A1—A Member of the S100 Protein Family
In a wide range of small (mouse, rat) and large (rabbit, dog, swine) animals, S100A1 is preferentially found in the heart and in lower concentrations in skeletal muscle [8–10]. Healthy human tissue exhibits a similar distribution , and most recently, large-scale analyses of the human transcriptome by Su et al.  and Shmueli et al.  comprehensively confirmed that the human heart is the predominant location of S100A1. S100A1 expression steadily increases during cardiac development in mice and reaches a plateau in ventricular myocardium in the postnatal state . Estimations of total intracellular concentrations of S100A1 in isolated murine and rat left ventricular myocytes revealed a range between 40 to 200 nM (, Völkers M, unpublished observations).
In the adult heart, S100A1 protein is not uniformly expressed but exhibits its highest mRNA and protein levels in the left ventricle, with lower concentrations in the right ventricle and atria [6, 15]. Analysis of the S100A1 promoter in rodents identified a subset of transcription-factor consensus sequences (i.e., homeobox protein NK-2 homolog E, myocyte enhancer factor-2, GATA4)  that are well known to drive cardiac-specific gene expression of cardiac troponin C or calsequestrin and potentially to convey predominant cardiac expression of S100A1. First clinical interest in S100A1 has been sparked due to its altered expression in diseased myocardium.
3.1. Protein Structure
The S100A1 monomer with a molecular weight of 10.4 kDa consists of two EF-hand Ca2+ binding motif connected by a hinge region. In each EF-hand, a Ca2+ binding loop is flanked by -helices, resulting in a helix-EF-hand-helix arrangement. Helix 1 and II flank the n-terminal loop, whereas helices III and IV flank the c-terminal loop (Figure 1). Stabilization of the homodimer occurs independent of Ca2+ binding through hydrophobic bonds between helices I and I’ of each monomer . After Ca2+ binding each monomer undergoes a conformational change resulting in the exposure of a hydrophobic pocket in the C-terminus which is believed to be the major docking site for Ca2+-dependent interactions between S100A1 and its target proteins. This pocket consists of residues of the hinge region, helix III and the C-terminus. Since residues within the hinge region and C-terminus display the greatest sequence variability among S100 isoforms, they are viewed to mediate isoform-specific target recognition . Ca2+ binding to individual EF-hands in the S100A1 dimer has been estimated to occur with a Kd of 200–500 M at the N-terminal and a Kd of 10–50 M at the C-terminal. However, Ca2+ affinity of both sides is tightly regulated by posttranslational mechanism, that is, redox dependent S-glutathionylation of cysteine residues which enables S100A1 to sense Ca2+ even at nanomolar concentration (see below).
3.2. Cardiac Subcellular S100A1 Location
Dependent on the Ca2+ binding in adult cardiomyocytes, S100A1 mainly resides on the SR, mitochondria and myofilaments. At the molecular level, S100A1 has been shown to interact with the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) [16–19], the SR Ca2+-ATPase 2a (SERCA2a)-phospholamban (PLB) complex [16, 20, 21], the F1 portion of the mitochondrial ATP synthase  mostly in a Ca2+-dependent manner and acts also as a binding partner for the giant myofilament protein titin [23, 24]. As mentioned, Ca2+ binding triggers exposure of hydrophobic epitope mainly deﬁned by residues within the S100A1 hinge region and COOH-terminal extension (Figure 2) . Because most actions of S100A1 apparently rely on transition to its Ca2+-activated state, it is important to note that recent studies provided first evidence for redox-dependent posttranslational control of S100A1’s Ca2+ sensitivity. NO-dependent S-glutathionylation of a single cysteine residue within the hydrophobic COOH terminus eventually facilitated binding of Ca2+ at nanomolar concentrations reflecting diastolic Ca2+ levels in cardiomyocytes [25, 26]. The only S-nitrosylation site of S100A1 is its unique Cys-85 residue. Recent studies indicate that under physiological conditions the ability of S100A1 protein to act as a calcium receptor can be turned on by glutathionylation (cysteinylation) of its Cys85 residue and off by reduction of the mixed disulfide S100A1–glutathione (S100A1–cysteine) species. To our knowledge no studies in cardiomyocytes exist which investigate the basal redox state of S100A1. However preliminary data indicate that the addition of reducing agents to the cardiomyocytes abolished the inotropic effects of S100A1 in vitro (M. Volkers, unpublished data).
Redox and NO-related posttranslational modification of single cysteine residue might therefore enable S100A1 to sense spatially defined short-term as well as long-term global Ca2+ oscillations in cardiac cells over a broad concentration range enabling its interaction with target proteins such as RyR and SERCA. However, the impact of altered redox conditions and NO homeostasis on S100A1 actions in myocardium has not yet been tested.
4. Molecular Targets and Physiological Functions in Cardiac Myocytes
4.1. Lesson from Genetically Altered Miced
Gain- and loss-in-function studies comprehensively characterized S100A1 as a unique molecular inotrope in vivo and ex vivo. Increasing S100A1 protein levels in isolated adult and neonatal cardiomyocytes enhanced both their systolic and diastolic performance through modulation of cellular Ca2+ handling and myofilament function [17, 19, 20, 24, 27]. Cardiac-specific overexpression of S100A1 in mice displayed a phenotype of chronically heightened cardiac performance without detrimental effects on survival or development of cardiac hypertrophy . The S100A1-mediated increase in cardiac performance is independent of beta-adrenergic stimulation and is even preserved under stimulation with catecholamines. Expression analysis yielded that S100A1-mediated inotropic effects are neither the result of altered abundance of SR and sarcolemmmal Ca2+ regulators, respectively, nor that they depend on -AR signalling [2, 15, 17–19, 21, 28–35]. To our knowledge, the apparent independence of S100A1 inotropic actions from the -AR signalling pathway is a unique feature of the Ca2+ sensing protein and of particular importance in cardiovascular physiology and therapy.
In line with cardiac specific overexpression of S100A1 in transgenic mice, viral-based overexpression of S100A1 in rabbit and rat hearts and isolated cardiomyocytes recapitulated the hypercontractile phenotype based on enhanced Ca2+ cycling but independent, and additive to beta-AR signalling [15, 17, 18, 33, 34]. Therefore, it is interesting to note that acute or chronic elevated S100A1 proteins in cardiomyocytes induce sustained cardiac inotropy, without toxic effects to the cardiomyocytes. This is clinically important because chronic inotropic stimulation of the heart through activation of the beta-receptors or downstream effectors such as PKA eventually led to cardiac hypertrophy and failure.
In contrast, heterozygous and homozygous S100A1 knockout (SKO) mice showed unaltered in vivo baseline cardiac function and heart rate, but displayed deficiencies in their contractile function in response to -AR stimulation and enhanced transsarcolemmal Ca2+ influx .
This is interesting to note because heterozygous SKO hearts, with only 50% of S100A1 protein levels found in wild-type hearts, exhibit the same acute defects than homozygous SKO hearts with complete lack of S100A1 expression. Thus 50% of normal left-ventricular S100A1 protein levels are apparently required for cardiac adaptation to acute hemodynamic stress. Of note, loss of -AR-dependent inotropy in SKO mice occurs despite regular -AR signaling ranging from unaltered -AR density to proper PKA-dependent target phosphorylation, thereby indicating that -AR-mediated positive inotropy essentially relies on normal S100A1 protein levels in the heart.
Additional exploration of isolated S100A1 knock-out cardiomyocytes revealed blunted Ca2+ transients in response to sympathetic stimulation and increased extracellular [Ca2+] . This is mainly mediated by a decreased Ca2+ release (and reduced SR Ca2+ load). Similar results were obtained in neonatal ventricular cardiomyocytes, with a S100A1 protein knockdown to 20–30% of control protein levels .
Thus defective mobilization of Ca2+ from intracellular stores might provide a reasonable mechanism for the impaired inotropic reserve in S100A1-deficient and -depleted cardiomyocytes. In line with this, murine S100A1 knock out ventricular cardiomyocytes have enhanced l-type Ca2+ current  (Most P, unpublished data), which indicates that desensitized Ca2+ induced Ca2+ release (CICR) under basal conditions might be compensated by increased .
4.2. Molecular Targets: Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Cardiac Myocytes
Studies focused on mechanisms underlying S100A1 inotropic actions provided evidence that S100A1 targets SR but not transsarcolemmal Ca2+ fluxes in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Several studies identified the impact of S100A1 on intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and consistently found that S100A1 increases systolic and diastolic performance through an enhanced Ca2+ induced Ca2+ release and augmented SR Ca2+ reuptake [17–19, 21, 27, 31]. At the subcellular level, endogenous S100A1 displays a striated like pattern in ventricular cardiac myocytes and is found at the junctional and longitudinal sarcoplasmic reticulum. Accordingly, S100A1 was found to colocalize and interact with SERCA2 and RyR2 in a Ca2+-dependent manner in human, mouse and rat myocardium.
In line with Ca2+-dependent conformational changes, binding studies identified the S100A1 COOH terminus (S100A1ct) as the critical structure for the interaction with the SERCA-PLB complex . Functional analysis in isolated SR vesicles and intact cardiomyocytes showed that S100A1 apparently stimulated SERCA2 activity resulting in increased SR Ca2+ reuptake and enhanced SR Ca2+ load. In isolated SR vesicles a similar increase in SERCA activity was obtained with S100A1ct consisting of the c-terminal amino acid residues 75–94, which indicates the crucial role of helix IV for the Ca2+ dependent functions of S100A1.
The underlying molecular mechanism has not been explored yet, but it is important to note that neither S100A1 nor S100A1ct affects PLB phosphorylation at serine 16 or threonine 17 sites, suggesting that neither PKA nor CaMKII are involved in S100A1-mediated SERCA2 regulation. This might also indicate that S100A1 does not limit access of these kinases to their specific phosphorylation sites .
S100A1 binding to the RyR also seems to be Ca2+-dependent since mapping studies also identified S100A1ct as the critical S100A1 epitope for its RyR2 interaction . Recent studies found that S100A1 can bind to the calmodulin (CaM) binding domain in the cytoplasmic portion of skeletal ryanodine receptor isoform (RyR1), which is highly conserved between RyR1 and RyR2 [37, 38]. S100A1 modulates both diastolic and systolic RyR2 functions and thereby alters frequency and characteristics of elementary SR Ca2+ events (Ca2+ sparks) and Ca2+ induced SR Ca2+ release, respectively. At nanomolar free Ca2+ concentrations, S100A1 decreased 3H-ryanodine binding to the SR Ca2+ release channel, suggesting an inhibitory effect on RyR2 opening under diastolic conditions [18, 20]. In line with this, S100A1 interaction with RyR2 even at diastolic Ca2+ concentration [150 nM] decreased Ca2+ spark frequency and diastolic SR Ca2+ leak in quiescent rabbit cardiac myocytes and cardiac SR vesicle preparations, which indicates that S100A1 can improve RyR2 closure during cardiomyocyte relaxation . In contrast, at micromolar systolic Ca2+ concentrations S100A1 provoked increased 3H-ryanodine binding in isolated SR vesicles . Accordingly, a recent study confirmed that S100A1 increased fractional Ca2+ release of the SR in voltage-clamped rabbit cardiomyocytes, suggesting that S100A1 can improve excitation-contraction coupling gain in cardiac myocytes under systolic conditions . Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that S100A1 promotes RyR2 closure during diastole but can augment systolic RyR2. The differential effects predict more than only one binding site at the RyR2 and this notion is further supported by recent mapping studies. At least three different S100A1 binding domains have been identified with different binding affinities within the cytoplasmic portion of the RyR . Further functional analyses confirmed that of S100A1 actions on diastolic RyR2 function neither changed FKBP12.6 not sorcin stoichiometry with the RyR2 channel . Therefore it is attractive to hypothesize that both inhibitory and stimulatory bindings sites for S100A1 might coexist at the RyR2, which eventually account for physiological normal diastolic and systolic performance of the SR Ca2+ release channel. Moreover, given the redox sensitivity of the RyR, NO-dependent posttranslational modifications of S100A1 might contribute to the actions on the SR release channel, that is, through transfers of NO moieties. In summary, the precise mechanism underlying S100A1-mediated regulation of RyR2 remains to be determined, but evidence points toward a biphasic modulation of RyR2 activity.
Interestingly, it has been shown that S100A1 neither altered L-type Ca2+ current nor sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) reverse or forward mode in adult ventricular cardiomyocytes  and similar results were found for intracellular S100A1 in neonatal ventricular cardiac myocytes . These results further support the notion that enhanced cardiomyocyte S100A1 proteins do not evoke cardiac hypertrophy, because the S100A1 Ca2+ sensor does not seem to enhance subsarcolemmal Ca2+ fluxes participating in Ca2+ dependent hypertrophic cardiac growth [19, 31].
4.2.1. Molecular Targets: Sarcomere
Inotropic actions of S100A1 are apparently not restricted to the SR, because S100A1 has been shown to regulate both myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity and diastolic compliance. S100A1 has been detected at different sites within the cardiac sarcomere, suggesting a possible role in myofilament function [23, 24, 40–42]. S100A1 has been detected at the Z-line, at the periphery of the M-lines as well as within I- and A-bands. In the I-band, Ca2+-dependent interaction with the PEVK subdomain of titin has been shown to result in improved sarcomeric compliance [23, 24]. It remains to be established if the binding partner in the A-band is also titin or another thick-filament protein. Granzier and colleagues hypothesized if S100A1 does bind titin in the A-band, the location of the binding sites suggests interaction with titin’s super-repeat domains.
Based on their results, Granzier and colleagues hypothesized that S100A1 inhibition of titin-actin interaction might result in reduced precontractile titin-based passive tension. In addition, it has been shown that S100A1 can reduce myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity without affecting maximal force development and PKA- and PKC-dependent troponin I phosphorylation. As a result, S100A1 might facilitate diastolic Ca2+ dissociation from myofilaments thereby improving cardiac relaxation by an additional, SR-independent mechanism. At present, it is unknown whether S100A1 has additional sarcomeric targets warranting further studies to determine the functional role of S100A1 location at Z-disc adjacent protein structures.
4.2.2. Molecular Targets: Additional Targets-Mitochondria
Böerries et al. provided first evidence that S100A1 is found in cardiac mitochondria by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. In the mitochondria S100A1 interacts with the F1-ATPase in a Ca dependent manner . This resulted in enhanced activity of the ATP generation. The same study identified the adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT) as a mitochondrial S100A1 target. This suggests that interaction of S100A1 with ANT might influence the ADP and ATP exchange between the mitochondria and the cytoplasm. This might also be involved in the regulation of cardiac apoptosis, as another study yielded antiapoptotic effects of S100A1 in isolated neonatal rat ventricular myocytes . In line with this, decreased S100A1 protein levels resulted in a reciprocal energetic phenotype with decreased ATP-levels and enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis. These findings support a crucial role for S100A1 in cardiac energy homeostasis . Additional studies are underway to clarify the impact of S100A1 on the interplay between the SR and mitochondria.
4.3. Cardiomyocyte Ca2+ Handling and Contractile Performance
S100A1 plays an important role in cardiac myocytes Ca2+ cycling and contractile performance. Based on the molecular targets, numerous studies have shown that the overall effect of increased S100A1 protein levels can increase intracellular Ca2+ cycling, SR Ca2+ load, and contractile performance in field-stimulated mice, rat, and rabbit ventricular myocytes. These changes in cardiomyocyte performance most likely reflect altered function of S100A1 molecular targets as discussed above. Given the fact that S100A1 enhances both SERCA2 activity and diastolic RyR2 diastole, combined actions most likely contribute to enhanced SR Ca2+ load and accelerated cardiomyocyte relaxation. In addition, improved myofilament Ca2+ dissociation in concert with reduced presystolic passive tension might contribute to improved diastolic function. In systole, increased SR Ca2+ load, in concert with enhanced systolic RyR2 opening eventually represents a powerful mechanism by which S100A1 can augment systolic Ca2+ transients and cardiac contractile performance (Figure 3).
In summary, several important conclusions and hypotheses can be drawn from these results: first S100A1 is a molecular inotrope in cardiomyocytes exerting a PKA-independent enhancement of cardiac Ca2+ cycling thereby acting beyond and independently of cAMP-dependent signaling. Secondly, S100A1 specifically targets SR Ca2+ fluxes, improving both systolic SR Ca2+ release capability (enhances systolic RyR2 activity) and diastolic SR Ca2+ storage capability (decreases diastolic RyR2 open probability and enhances SERCA2a activity. The synchronous enhancement of SERCA2a activity and decreased RyR2 activity in diastole is a hitherto unique and potentially synergistic molecular mechanism which amplifies its inotropic actions but might help to prevent Ca2+-triggered arrhythmias; finally, S100A1 modulation of cardiac titin function might adapt cardiac passive tension and sarcomeric Ca2+ sensitivity to improved Ca2+ cycling, thereby facilitating diastolic cardiac performance. Finally, S100A1 mitochondrial actions might reflect a mechanism to couple Ca2+-dependent energetic demand with mitochondrial energy production. Figure 3 provides a scheme to illustrate the molecular mechanism of S100A1 in a normal cardiomyocyte.
4.4. Skeletal Muscle Ca2+ Handling
Skeletal muscle expresses S100A1 at lower levels than cardiac muscle . However, numerous studies have demonstrated an important role of S100A1 in skeletal muscle EC-coupling [30, 37, 38, 43–45]. S100A1 binds to RyR1 and potentiates its open probability, which might be regulated by three identified S100A1 binding sites at the RyR1 . Interestingly, one of the binding site overlaps with a Ca2+-dependent CaM binding domain. In saponin skinned muscle fibers, addition of recombinant S100A1 protein enhanced SR Ca2+ release and isometric force development in a dose-dependent manner both in fast- and slow-twitch skeletal muscle fibers  and maximal effects were seen at nanomolar S100A1 protein concentrations. However, S100A1 neither activated RyR1 in its closed state nor initiated SR Ca2+ release at diastolic Ca2+ concentrations in the presence of physiologic Mg2+ concentrations. In contrast to cardiac myocytes, S100A1 neither enhanced SR Ca2+ load nor altered Ca2+ sensitivity of skeletal muscle myofilaments indicating that S100A1 action in skeletal muscle might be limited to SR Ca2+ release sites and eventually mitochondria .
In S100A1 deficient skeletal muscle fibers Wright et al. most recently found that voltage-induced SR Ca2+ release is decreased resulting in diminished global Ca2+ transients and contractile force development . The same study revealed that viral-based S100A1 gene delivery can rescue the phenotype providing ultimate evidence for the hypothesis that S100A1 plays a significant physiological role in skeletal muscle EC-coupling. At a molecular level, the authors further showed that S100A1 and CaM can compete for the same binding site at the RyR1 in a Ca2+-dependent manner and identified RyR1 residues 3416–3427 as the putative common binding domain .
Interestingly, this interaction involves the hydrophobic pocket of S100A1, which is exposed in its Ca2+ activated state. At this point it is interesting to note that the S100A1/RyR1 binding domain is involved in the intersubunit interactions of the RyR1 as well as close in space to distal parts of the channel, so that the authors developed a model where S100A1 proteins might be involved in linking one or two subunits of the RyR tetramer. Recently another interesting study by the same group showed that decreased SR Ca2+ release in S100A1 KO fibres is responsible for the suppression of the temporally delayed component of intramembrane charge movement, Qgamma, which might operate as an indicator of optimized local Ca2+ release at the triad junction in skeletal muscle [44, 45]. In regard of the previously discussed importance of S100A1 in cardiac muscle, it is tempting to speculate that S100A1 plays a key role in skeletal muscle physiology.
Taken together, these data indicate that S100A1 plays a significant role in skeletal muscle EC coupling through modulation of RyR1 function, but not through modulation of SR Ca2+ load. Further studies are necessary to determine the impact of S100A1 in skeletal muscle disease to determine the pathophysiological role a therapeutic potential of S100A1 in skeletal muscle disorders like congential myopathies.
5. S100A1 in Diseased Myocardium
The discovery of altered S100A1 protein abundance in failing human myocardium finally raised the question for a therapeutic potential of S100A1 since progressively diminished S100A1 mRNA and protein levels characterize failing human myocardium . A recent proof of concept study employing both cardiac S100A1 transgenic and knockout mouse models has provided evidence that diminished S100A1 protein levels critically contribute to progressive contractile dysfunction in postischemic heart failure (HF) and death . The same study indicated that preserved cardiomyocyte S100A1 protein levels could actually prevent development of postischemic HF and cardiac death. In line with S100A1 molecular actions in isolated cardiomyocytes, remote myocardium from infarcted S100A1-overexpressing hearts showed preserved SR Ca2+ handling while S100A1 deficiency resulted in abnormal SR Ca2+ content and fluxes. In addition, S100A1 knock-out mice subjected to transaortic constriction showed accelerated deterioration of cardiac performance and transition to heart failure . Therefore, normal S100A1 cardiac expression levels appear to be essential to cope with increased workload due to ischemic loss of myocardium or chronically elevated afterload.
Abnormal cardiomyocyte S100A1 protein levels have further been recapitulated in vitro by chronic stimulation with different hypertrophic stimuli like phenylephrine and endothelin-1 . In light of the low abundance of S100A1 in neonatal and developing hearts, downregulation of S100A1 in the course of cardiac hypertrophy could therefore be considered as a part of fetal gene reprogramming.
The binding of S100A1 to the sarcomere could contribute to an altered diastolic function in diseased myocardium. Reduced binding of S100A1 to titin in this context could theoretically contribute to an increased precontractile titin-based passive tension. Interestingly, the myofilament relaxation seems to be dependent on the intracellular ATP-balance . Because S100A1 deficiency reduced intracellular ATP-levels in cardiac myocytes (see above), it is tempting to speculate that lower ATP-levels due to S100A1 deficiency contribute to impaired diastolic function in cardiac disease. Moreover, it has been shown that S100A1 affects microtubules stability in the presence of Ca2+ . Given the fact that recent work has shown that microtubules increase viscosity in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure , further studies are needed to clarify the impact of altered S100A1 protein expression on diastolic function in cardiac diseases.
6. Therapeutic Implications and Clinical Perspectives
Owing to the pathophysiological relevance of altered S100A1 expression in cardiac disease and therapeutics effectiveness in clinically relevant experimental acute and chronic HF animal models, S100A1 might be considered as a future prototype of a novel class of Ca2+-dependent inotropes. Intracoronary S100A1 adenoviral and adeno-associated viral gene delivery restored abnormal S100A1 expression in failing hearts thereby improving cardiac performance and reversing cardiac hypertrophy in vivo [15, 18, 32, 33]. So far, both RyR2 and SERCA have been considered as major therapeutic S100A1 targets in failing myocardium given normalization of dysfunctional Ca2+ cycling via restored SR Ca2+ content, improved systolic SR Ca2+ release, as well as decreased diastolic SR Ca2+ leakage. Because S100A1 augments both SR Ca2+ load and fractional SR Ca2+ release, it is tempting to speculate that S100A1 promotes inotropic SR Ca2+ handling but potentially limits Ca2+ triggered arrhythmias by stabilizing the RyR2 during diastole. This notion is based on the observation that S100A1 gene delivery to normal and failing cardiomyocytes can prevent -AR triggered proarrhythmic SR Ca2+ leak and diastolic Ca2+ waves. Accordingly, S100A1 knock-out mice display enhanced proarrhythmic susceptibility in response to sympathetic stimulation  and prevention of this effect might actually contribute to improved postMI survival in S100A1 transgenic mice . These findings might further substantiate the clinical relevance of S100A1-mediated regulation of SR Ca2+ handling through balanced modulation both of RyR2 and SERCA2. Moreover, S100A1 gene delivery in diseased myocardium exerts robust antihypertrophic effects in vivo and prevents progressive left ventrical chamber dilatation, potentially reflecting abrogated wall stress and interrupted sympathetic overdrive. Finally, S100A1 gene therapy also restored defective energy and sodium homeostasis which are closely linked to Ca2+ handling abnormalities  clearly warranting father investigation of the underlying molecular mechanisms.
From a clinical point of view, it is important to point out that viral-based S100A1 gene therapy has proven its therapeutic effectiveness both in an experimental postischemic large-animal HF model  and human failing ventricular cardiomyocytes (Most P, unpublished observation). Retroinfusion-facilitated delivery of AAV9-S100A1 gene via the anterior coronary vein 2 weeks postMI restored left ventricular performance and prevented transition to contractile failure as seen in control groups. In line with sustained improvement of cardiac performance, S100A1 gene therapy reversed cardiac remodeling and sympathetic overdrive . Moreover, another proof of concept study provided evidence that S100A1 gene therapy normalized abnormal contractility and SR Ca2+ handling in failing human cardiomyocytes and restored a positive force-frequency response in these cells (Most P, unpublished observations). These translational studies might actually pave the way for novel S100A1-based clinical therapies including S100A1 gene therapy of human HF. However before S100A1 HF gene therapy can become a clinical reality, careful evaluation of its safety profile as well as effects on cardiac energetics, arrhythmias and compatibility with established pharmacological therapies needs to be conducted in large-animal models. Importantly, a recent study actually provided first evidence that S100A1 gene therapy neither interferes with sympathetic stimulation nor -blocker treatment .
To improve human health, scientific discoveries must be translated into practical applications. Such discoveries typically begin with clinical observations further requiring basic research at “the bench” to uncover molecular mechanisms and proof of pathophysiological relevance before progressing to the clinical level, or the patient’s “bedside.” The clinical discovery of altered S100A1 protein abundance in failing human myocardium  ignited a challenging search for its pathophysiological relevance and potential therapeutic impact. Now, almost a decade later, ample evidence indicates that S100A1 functions as a Ca2+-dependent molecular inotrope in cardiomyocytes with unique therapeutic properties. S100A1 targets several key regulators of SR, myofilament, and mitochondrial function thereby enhancing cardiomyocyte performance. In addition, several lines of evidence indicates that S100A1 plays a significant role in skeletal muscle function but its pathophysiological relevance and therapeutic potential in skeletal muscle disorders have not been fully explored yet. Dysregulation of cardiomyocyte S100A1 protein expression, however, accelerates development of cardiac hypertrophy, progression towards HF and cardiac death. Translational studies provided evidence for long-term rescue of cardiac performance and reversed remodeling in several small and large HF animal models. Importantly, S100A1 therapeutic actions extend to human failing myocardium showing restored contractile performance based on improved SR Ca2+ handling in S100A1-treated human failing cardiomyocytes . Due to these findings, S100A1-based HF therapies further progress to the clinical level moving forward towards first clinical safety trials. One could therefore speculate that S100A1 gene therapy might be applicable both to acute and chronic cardiac dysfunction potentially benefiting patients with acute cardiac decompensation as chronic HF. In theory, S100A1 gene therapy for HF may offer a promising and novel mode of action that will not only promote beneficial cardiomyocyte EC Ca2+ handling but also potentially limit arrhythmias through stabilization of RyR and decrease in diastolic Ca2+ leak. Moreover, the impact of S100A1 on the sarcomere and the mitochondria function completes the unique therapeutic potential of S100A1.
However, development of S100A1-based therapeutic will presumably not replace currently established drug regimens but rather complement and add on to these therapeutic strategies. Nevertheless, S100A1 might facilitate a clinical revival of inotropic therapeutic interventions by targeting defective Ca2+ cycling and providing future cardiologists with a novel weapon to combat heart failure.
The first and the second authors contributed equally to this article. This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (R01 HL092130-01 and HL 092130-02S1 to P. Most), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (562/1-1 to P. Most and VO1659/1-1 to M. Voelkers) and Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (01GUO572 to P. Most).
- D. M. Bers, “Cardiac excitation-contraction coupling,” Nature, vol. 415, no. 6868, pp. 198–205, 2002.
- P. Most, A. Remppis, S. T. Pleger, H. A. Katus, and W. J. Koch, “S100A1: a novel inotropic regulator of cardiac performance. Transition from molecular physiology to pathophysiological relevance,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. R568–R577, 2007.
- C. Kraus, D. Rohde, C. Weidenhammer, et al., “S100A1 in cardiovascular health and disease: closing the gap between basic science and clinical therapy,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 445–455, 2009.
- I. Marenholz, C. W. Heizmann, and G. Fritz, “S100 proteins in mouse and man: from evolution to function and pathology (including an update of the nomenclature),” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 322, no. 4, pp. 1111–1122, 2004.
- R. Donato, “Intracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 540–551, 2003.
- D. B. Zimmer, P. Wright Sadosky, and D. J. Weber, “Molecular mechanisms of S100-target protein interactions,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 552–559, 2003.
- N. T. Wright, K. M. Varney, K. C. Ellis, et al., “The three-dimensional solution structure of -bound S100A1 as determined by NMR spectroscopy,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 353, no. 2, pp. 410–426, 2005.
- H. Haimoto and K. Kato, “S100a0 () protein in cardiac muscle. Isolation from human cardiac muscle and ultrastructural localization,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 171, no. 1-2, pp. 409–415, 1988.
- K. Kato, S. Kimura, H. Haimoto, and F. Suzuki, “S100a0 () protein: distribution in muscle tissues of various animals and purification from human pectoral muscle,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1555–1560, 1986.
- K. Kato and S. Kimura, “S100a0 () protein is mainly located in the heart and striated muscles,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 842, no. 2-3, pp. 146–150, 1985.
- P. Ehlermann, A. Remppis, O. Guddat, et al., “Right ventricular upregulation of the binding protein S100A1 in chronic pulmonary hypertension,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1500, no. 2, pp. 249–255, 2000.
- A. I. Su, T. Wiltshire, S. Batalov, et al., “A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 16, pp. 6062–6067, 2004.
- O. Shmueli, S. Horn-Saban, V. Chalifa-Caspi, et al., “GeneNote: whole genome expression profiles in normal human tissues,” Comptes Rendus Biologies, vol. 326, no. 10-11, pp. 1067–1072, 2003.
- R. Kiewitz, G. E. Lyons, B. W. Schäfer, and C. W. Heizmann, “Transcriptional regulation of S100A1 and expression during mouse heart development,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1498, no. 2-3, pp. 207–219, 2000.
- S. T. Pleger, P. Most, M. Boucher, et al., “Stable myocardial-specific AAV6-S100A1 gene therapy results in chronic functional heart failure rescue,” Circulation, vol. 115, no. 19, pp. 2506–2515, 2007.
- R. Kiewitz, C. Acklin, B. W. Schäfer, et al., “-dependent interaction of S100A1 with the sarcoplasmic reticulum -ATPase2a and phospholamban in the human heart,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 550–557, 2003.
- P. Most, J. Bernotat, P. Ehlermann, et al., “S100A1: a regulator of myocardial contractility,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 24, pp. 13889–13894, 2001.
- P. Most, S. T. Pleger, M. Völkers, et al., “Cardiac adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery rescues failing myocardium,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 1550–1563, 2004.
- P. Most, A. Remppis, S. T. Pleger, et al., “Transgenic overexpression of the -binding protein S100A1 in the heart leads to increased in vivo myocardial contractile performance,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 36, pp. 33809–33817, 2003.
- S. Kettlewell, P. Most, S. Currie, W. J. Koch, and G. L. Smith, “S100A1 increases the gain of excitation-contraction coupling in isolated rabbit ventricular cardiomyocytes,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 900–910, 2005.
- P. Most, M. Boerries, C. Eicher, et al., “Distinct subcellular location of the -binding protein S100A1 differentially modulates -cycling in ventricular rat cardiomyocytes,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 421–431, 2005.
- M. Boerries, P. Most, J. R. Gledhill, et al., “-dependent interaction of S100A1 with ,-ATPase leads to an increased ATP content in cardiomyocytes,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 4365–4373, 2007.
- G. Gutierrez-Cruz, A. H. Van Heerden, and K. Wang, “Modular motif, structural folds and affinity profiles of the PEVK segment of human fetal skeletal muscle titin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 10, pp. 7442–7449, 2001.
- R. Yamasaki, M. Berri, Y. Wu, et al., “Titin-actin interaction in mouse myocardium: passive tension modulation and its regulation by calcium/S100A1,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 2297–2313, 2001.
- G. Goch, S. Vdovenko, H. Kozłsowska, and A. Bierzyñski, “Affinity of S100A1 protein for calcium increases dramatically upon glutathionylation,” FEBS Journal, vol. 272, no. 10, pp. 2557–2565, 2005.
- L. Zhukova, I. Zhukov, W. Bal, and A. Wyslouch-Cieszynska, “Redox modifications of the C-terminal cysteine residue cause structural changes in S100A1 and S100B proteins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1742, no. 1–3, pp. 191–201, 2004.
- M. Völkers, C. M. Loughrey, N. MacQuaide, et al., “S100A1 decreases calcium spark frequency and alters their spatial characteristics in permeabilized adult ventricular cardiomyocytes,” Cell Calcium, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2007.
- P. Most, M. Boerries, C. Eicher, et al., “Extracellular S100A1 protein inhibits apoptosis in ventricular cardiomyocytes via activation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 48, pp. 48404–48412, 2003.
- P. Most and W. J. Koch, “S100A1: a calcium-modulating inotropic prototype for future clinical heart failure therapy,” Future Cardiology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2007.
- P. Most, A. Remppis, C. Weber, et al., “The C terminus (amino acids 75-94) and the linker region (amino acids 42-54) of the -binding protein S100A1 differentially enhance sarcoplasmic release in murine skinned skeletal muscle fibers,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 29, pp. 26356–26364, 2003.
- P. Most, H. Seifert, E. Gao, et al., “Cardiac S100A1 protein levels determine contractile performance and propensity toward heart failure after myocardial infarction,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 1258–1268, 2006.
- S. T. Pleger, P. Most, B. Heidt, et al., “S100A1 gene transfer in myocardium,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 418–422, 2006.
- S. T. Pleger, A. Remppis, B. Heidt, et al., “S100A1 gene therapy preserves in vivo cardiac function after myocardial infarction,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1120–1129, 2005.
- A. Remppis, P. Most, E. Löffler, et al., “The small EF-hand binding protein S100A1 increases contractility and cycling in rat cardiac myocytes,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 97, supplement 1, pp. I56–I62, 2002.
- A. Remppis, S. T. Pleger, P. Most, et al., “S100A1 gene transfer: a strategy to strengthen engineered cardiac grafts,” Journal of Gene Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 387–394, 2004.
- X.-J. Du, T. J. Cole, N. Tenis, et al., “Impaired cardiac contractility response to hemodynamic stress in S100A1-deficient mice,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 2821–2829, 2002.
- B. L. Prosser, N. T. Wright, E. O. Hernandez-Ochoa, et al., “S100A1 binds to the calmodulin-binding site of ryanodine receptor and modulates skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 8, pp. 5046–5057, 2008.
- N. T. Wright, B. L. Prosser, K. M. Varney, D. B. Zimmer, M. F. Schneider, and D. J. Weber, “S100A1 and calmodulin compete for the same binding site on ryanodine receptor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 39, pp. 26676–26683, 2008.
- S. Treves, E. Scutari, M. Robert, et al., “Interaction of S100A1 with the release channel (ryanodine receptor) of skeletal muscle,” Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 38, pp. 11496–11503, 1997.
- J. Heierhorst, B. Kobe, S. C. Feil, et al., “/S100 regulation of giant protein kinases,” Nature, vol. 380, no. 6575, pp. 636–639, 1996.
- J. Heierhorst, X. Tang, J. Lei, et al., “Substrate specificity and inhibitor sensitivity of /S100-dependent twitchin kinases,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 242, no. 3, pp. 454–459, 1996.
- N. T. Wright, B. R. Cannon, D. B. Zimmer, and D. J. Weber, “S100A1: structure, function, and therapeutic potential,” Current Chemical Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 138–145, 2009.
- E. O. Hernandez-Ochoa, B. L. Prosser, N. T. Wright, M. Contreras, D. J. Weber, and M. F. Schneider, “Augmentation of Cav1 channel current and action potential duration after uptake of S100A1 in sympathetic ganglion neurons,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 297, no. 4, pp. C955–C970, 2009.
- B. L. Prosser, E. O. Hernandez-Ochoa, D. B. Zimmer, and M. F. Schneider, “The Q component of intra-membrane charge movement is present in mammalian muscle fibres, but suppressed in the absence of S100A1,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 587, no. 18, pp. 4523–4541, 2009.
- B. L. Prosser, E. O. Hernandez-Ochoa, D. B. Zimmer, and M. F. Schneider, “Simultaneous recording of intramembrane charge movement components and calcium release in wild-type and muscle fibres,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 587, no. 18, pp. 4543–4559, 2009.
- A. Remppis, T. Greten, B. W. Schäfer, et al., “Altered expression of the -binding protein S100A1 in human cardiomyopathy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1313, no. 3, pp. 253–257, 1996.
- R. Stehle, M. Krüger, and G. Pfitzer, “Does cross-bridge activation determine the time course of myofibrillar relaxation?” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 538, pp. 469–479, 2003.
- G. Sorci, A. L. Agneletti, and R. Donato, “Effects of S100A1 and S100B on microtubule stability. An in vitro study using triton-cytoskeletons from astrocyte and myoblast cell lines,” Neuroscience, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 773–783, 2000.
- S. Nishimura, S. Nagai, M. Katoh, et al., “Microtubules modulate the stiffness of cardiomyocytes against shear stress,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 2006.
- G. E. Ackermann, A. A. Domenighetti, A. Deten, et al., “S100A1 deficiency results in prolonged ventricular repolarization in response to sympathetic activation,” General Physiology and Biophysics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 127–142, 2008.
- M. Volkers, et al., “S100A1 prevents arrythmogenic diastolic sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium leak in ventricular cardiomyocytes,” Circulation, vol. 118, p. S_527, 2008.
- S. Pleger, et al., “Retroinfusion-facilitated inotropic AAV-S100A9 gene therapy restores global cardiac function in a clinically relevant pig heart failure model,” Circulation, vol. 118, p. S_792, 2008.