About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 238474, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/238474
Research Article

A Simple and Fast Method for the Production and Characterization of Methylic and Ethylic Biodiesels from Tucum Oil via an Alkaline Route

1Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
2Departamento de Quıímica Analítica, Instituto de Química, UNESP, 14800-900 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
3Laboratório de energias Renováveis e Meio ambiente do Pontal (LERMAP), UFU, 38302-000 Ituiutaba, MG, Brazil

Received 31 August 2010; Revised 6 February 2011; Accepted 9 March 2011

Academic Editor: Stanley Brul

Copyright © 2011 Marcelo Firmino de Oliveira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A simple, fast, and complete route for the production of methylic and ethylic biodiesel from tucum oil is described. Aliquots of the oil obtained directly from pressed tucum (pulp and almonds) were treated with potassium methoxide or ethoxide at 40°C for 40 min. The biodiesel form was removed from the reactor and washed with 0.1 M HCl aqueous solution. A simple distillation at 100°C was carried out in order to remove water and alcohol species from the biodiesel. The oxidative stability index was obtained for the tucum oil as well as the methylic and ethylic biodiesel at 6.13, 2.90, and 2.80 h, for storage times higher than 8 days. Quality control of the original oil and of the methylic and ethylic biodiesels, such as the amount of glycerin produced during the transesterification process, was accomplished by the TLC, GC-MS, and FT-IR techniques. The results obtained in this study indicate a potential biofuel production by simple treatment of tucum, an important Amazonian fruit.

1. Introduction

The search for alternative fuels to replace oil-derived energy sources has received increased attention worldwide over the last decades, more specifically since the oil crisis in the 20th century. Fossil fuels constitute a finite energy source, and they emit a large amount of pollutants [1]. Interesting alternatives have been presented as possible substitutes for fossil fuels, such as fuel ethanol [1] and biofuels from animal and plant oils. Nowadays, these oils appear as a promising replacement for diesel oil, and special attention has been devoted to biodiesel [2]. This biofuel consists of monoalkylesthers of long chain fatty acids, derived from plant or animal oils [2]. A schematic diagram for the production of biodiesel from triacylglycerols is shown in Figure 1.

238474.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of triacylglycerol transesterification by alcoholysis, in the presence of catalysts.

Biodiesel production offers several advantages, since this fuel is renewable and environmentally friendly, can be mixed with diesel, not to mention its numerous animal [37] and plant sources [814].

Of all the reported sources of plant oils for biodiesel production, tucum (Astrocaryum vulgate Mart) must be highlighted [15]. The fruit of tucum trees is extensively used by Amazonian communities for the production of food and cosmetics [1517] among other applications.

The oil is commonly extracted from tucum by pressing the entire fruit (pulp and almonds together). Some scientific studies about its use as a biofuel have been reported [16, 17]. In terms of chemical composition, the tucum oil is rich in betacarotene [16] and contains oleic and palmitic acids as the major fatty acids, apart from a small level of linoleic acid [15]. This oil is considered an important raw material for the production of oleochemicals, and it is stable to oxidative deterioration.

Despite its interesting advantages from an oleochemical view point, application of tucum oil as a raw material for biodiesel production has not been extensively reported. In this context, Lima et al. [18] studied the production of biodiesel from tucum by transesterification with anhydrous ethanol and methanol, using NaOH as catalyst. The authors concluded that the properties of the two types of biodiesel (ethanolic and methanolic) were very similar to those of oil-derived diesel.

In this context, research on biodiesel production from tucum fruit is justified, once this constitutes an important motivational factor for Amazonian rural communities. In this way, the Amazonian rural population could obtain their own biofuel in a sustainable fashion. Therefore, the aim of this work was to develop a simple, fast and efficient alkaline (KOH) route for the production of methylic and ethylic biodiesels from tucum oil, extracted from Amazonian trees by local communities in a sustainable way, in order to provide a local biofuel production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biodiesel Production

The tucum oil was obtained by pressing the entire fruit (pulp and almonds) in a conventional mechanic press. The obtained oil was filtered through a glass tube of 1 cm diameter filed with cotton. Potassium methoxide and potassium ethoxide were prepared using potassium hydroxide P.A., and methanol P.A., and ethanol P.A. purchased from Sinth, respectively, following a similar experimental process described in the literature [18]. The methoxide form was obtained after adding 9.5 g of KOH at 120 mL of methanol under stirring until the complete dissolution (exothermic reaction). The ethoxide form also was obtained after adding 9.5 g of KOH at 150 mL of ethanol under stirring until the complete dissolution.

Each aliquot the of oil-alcohol-KOH mixture (methylic or ethylic form) was kept under stirring at 40°C for 40 min. The transesterification process was monitored by thin layer chromatography: the development of separation in hexane/ethyl acetate 95%/5% solution can exhibit a decrease of oil band and increase of biodiesel bands through the time.

After the decantation step, each biodiesel form was separated from glycerin and washed with HCl 0.1 M solution. A simple distillation at 100°C was performed, in order to remove both water and alcohol from the biodiesel samples.

2.2. Oxidative Stability Studies

The importance of this study consists of finding out up to which time point there is no formation of secondary compounds of oxidation, and to establish when the onset of increasing oxidation rate, peroxide index, oxygen absorption, and formation of volatile substances take place.

The oxidative stability measurements were carried out using a 873 Rancimat equipment from Metrohm. The tucum oil and the methylic and ethylic biodiesel samples were submitted to an air gas flow of 10 L/h, under a continuous heating at 110°C ± 0.3°C.

2.3. GC-MS Analysis

The chromatographic analysis of the biodiesel samples such as the original oil and of the glycerin obtained during the transesterification process was carried out using an HP gas chromatograph, model CG 5890, series II, equipped with an HP1 column (100% dimethyl polysiloxane) with 30 m length and 0.2 mm internal diameter. The mobile phase consisted of H2 and N2 (30 L/min) and air (300 L/min). An injection volume of 0.5 μL was used in all the measurements. An injector temperature of 200°C was employed, and analysis was accomplished by using a temperature ramp from 80 to 200°C. The mass spectra of the main chromatographic peaks monitored in a mass spectrometer HP model 5988A, which was coupled to the chromatograph.

2.4. FT-IR Analysis

The spectroscopic measurements for all the studied species were recorded on an infrared spectrophotometer from Perkin Elmer, model 1430, in the spectral work range from 4500 to 450 cm−1.

3. Results and Discussion

The methylic route was more efficient for biodiesel production (75.1%) than the ethylic route (66.7%). Both results allowed us to propose this methodology as an alternative route for biodiesel production. The presence of Lauric, Miristic, Palmitic, and Oleic fatty acids as the major components of the tucum oil, detected retention times range from 12 to 23 min, was confirmed by GC-MS, as indicated in Figure 2, in good agreement with previous works reported in the literature [1518].

238474.fig.002
Figure 2: Chromatogram with mass spectrum identification obtained for the free fatty acids of tucum oil-identification of its major oleochemical components.

Biodiesel production was also confirmed by the FT-IR technique. In this case, it is possible to check the location of the bands of the carbonyls of the oils in relation to the ones of the biodiesel. The main difference observed between the infrared spectrum of tucum oil and those of its biodiesels was a small displacement of the C=O stretching band of the biodiesel samples to lower energy (1747–1740 cm−1), which can be explained in terms of the substitution of glycerol by the methoxilic radical [18].

The studies of oxidative stability index indicated loss of chemical stability for the biodiesels in relation to the original oil, as indicated in Figure 3. The results about stability index and storage time are reported in Table 1. While it was possible to observe a stability time of 6.13 h for the oil samples, only 2.90 h and 2.80 h were observed for the methylic and ethylic biodiesels. According to Brazilian laws, for example [19], the indexes obtained for biodiesels in this work are under the recommended values (6 h at 110°C). The oil form is more stable because it is rich in carotenoids.

tab1
Table 1: Oxidative stability index and storage time studies obtained for the tucum oil and the methylic and ethylic biodiesels.
fig3
Figure 3: oxidative stability index measurements for: (a) tucum oil, (b) methylic biodiesel, and (c) ethylic biodiesel.

The storage time differs from the oxidative stability index values once no induced oxidation was provided or accelerated. It consists in the storage time at 20°C. In this case, it was possible to observe a storage time of 35 days for the tucum oil, which is possible due to the presence of water and the high acidity of the sample.

4. Conclusions

The proposed methodology successfully produced methylic and ethylic biodiesel from the tucum oil using KOH as reagent for alkoxide production. In spite of being used in several ways by local Amazonian communities, the tucum oil can also be converted into its biodiesel form, consisting of an interesting self-production route for biofuel and thus contributing to sustainable exploitation of this species. The oxidative stability indexes and storage time make this oil a good precursor for local biodiesel production, even though further studies are needed to establish its application in diesel engines, for example.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the financial support of CAPES, CNPq, FINEP, and FAPEMIG.

References

  1. M. F. de Oliveira, A. A. Saczk, L. L. Okumura, and N. R. Stradiotto, “Analytical methods employed at quality control of fuel ethanol,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 4852–4859, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. C. C. Oliveira, P. A. Z. Suarez, and W. L. P. Santos, “Biodiesel: possibilidades e desafios,” Quimica Nova na Escola, vol. 28, pp. 3–8, 2008.
  3. O. Andersen and J. E. Weinbach, “Residual animal fat and fish for biodiesel production. Potentials in Norway,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. Liang, N. Sarkany, Y. Cui, and J. W. Blackburn, “Batch stage study of lipid production from crude glycerol derived from yellow grease or animal fats through microalgal fermentation,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 17, pp. 6745–6750, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. C. L. Bianchi, D. C. Boffito, C. Pirola, and V. Ragaini, “Low temperature de-acidification process of animal fat as a pre-step to biodiesel production,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 134, no. 1-2, pp. 179–183, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. Rivera, G. Villanueva, and G. Sandoval, “Producción de biodiesel a partir de residuos grasos animales por vía enzimática,” Grasas y Aceites, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 468–474, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Öner and Ş. Altun, “Biodiesel production from inedible animal tallow and an experimental investigation of its use as alternative fuel in a direct injection diesel engine,” Applied Energy, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 2114–2120, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. C. Om Tapanes, D. A. Gomes Aranda, J. W. de Mesquita Carneiro, and O. A. Ceva Antunes, “Transesterification of Jatropha curcas oil glycerides: theoretical and experimental studies of biodiesel reaction,” Fuel, vol. 87, no. 10-11, pp. 2286–2295, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. da Silva, F. de Castillos, J. V. Oliveira, and L. C. Filho, “Continuous production of soybean biodiesel with compressed ethanol in a microtube reactor,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 91, pp. 1274–1281, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Joshi, B. R. Moser, S. N. Shah, A. Mandalika, and T. Walker, “Improvement of fuel properties of cottonseed oil methyl esters with commercial additives,” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 802–809, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. A. Melero, L. F. Bautista, G. Morales, J. Iglesias, and R. Sánchez-Vázquez, “Biodiesel production from crude palm oil using sulfonic acid-modified mesostructured catalysts,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 323–331, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Zhang, S. Chen, R. Yang, and Y. Yan, “Biodiesel production from vegetable oil using heterogenous acid and alkali catalyst,” Fuel, vol. 89, pp. 2939–2944, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Peri and L. Baldi, “Vegetable oil market and biofuel policy: an asymmetric cointegration approach,” Energy Economics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 687–693, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Demirbas, “New biorenewable fuels from vegetable oils,” Energy Sources Part A, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 628–636, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. O. J. Oboh, “The oleochemical potential of tucum (Astrocaryum vulgare Mart) pulp oil and stearin,” Rivista Italiana delle Sostanze Grasse, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2009. View at Scopus
  16. D. B. Rodriguez-Amaya, J. Amaya-Farfan, and M. Kimura, “Carotenoid composition of Brazilian fruits and vegetables,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 744, pp. 409–416, 2007. View at Scopus
  17. F. O. J. Oboh and R. A. Oderinde, “Analysis of the pulp and pulp oil of the tucum (Astrocaryum vulgare Mart) fruit,” Food Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 277–287, 1988. View at Scopus
  18. J. R. D. O. Lima, R. B. da Silva, E. Miranda de Moura, and C. V. Rodarte de Moura, “Biodiesel of tucum oil, synthesized by methanolic and ethanolic routes,” Fuel, vol. 87, no. 8-9, pp. 1718–1723, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. EN 14112:2003, “Fat and Oil Derivatives—Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME),” Determination of oxidation stability (accelerated oxidation test), 2003.