Copyright © 2011 Victor W. Wong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. G. C. Gurtner, S. Werner, Y. Barrandon, and M. T. Longaker, “Wound repair and regeneration,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7193, pp. 314–321, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
2. T. A. Wynn, “Common and unique mechanisms regulate fibrosis in various fibroproliferative diseases,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 524–529, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
3. R. A. F. Clark, K. Ghosh, and M. G. Tonnesen, “Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1018–1029, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
4. A. J. Singer and R. A. F. Clark, “Cutaneous wound healing,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 10, pp. 738–746, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
5. A. Ghahary and A. Ghaffari, “Role of keratinocyte-fibroblast cross-talk in development of hypertrophic scar,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 15, supplement 1, pp. S46–S53, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
6. A. M. Chioni and R. Grose, “Organotypic modelling as a means of investigating epithelial-stromal interactions during tumourigenesis,” Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair, vol. 1, no. 1, article 8, 2008.
7. M. W. Carlson, A. Alt-Holland, C. Egles, and J. A. Garlick, “Three-dimensional tissue models of normal and diseased skin,” in Current Protocols in Cell Biology, chapter 19:unit 19 19, 2008.
8. J. A. Garlick, “Engineering skin to study human disease—tissue models for cancer biology and wound repair,” Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol. 103, pp. 207–239, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
9. N. B. Menke, J. W. Cain, and J. W. Cain, “An in silico approach to the analysis of acute wound healing,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
10. A. Naegel, S. Hansen, D. Neumann, C.-M. Lehr, U. F. Schaefer, G. Wittum, and M. Heisig, “In-silico model of skin penetration based on experimentally determined input parameters—part II: mathematical modelling of in-vitro diffusion experiments. Identification of critical input parameters,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 368–379, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
11. N. Y. K. Li, K. Verdolini, G. Clermont, Q. Mi, E. N. Rubinstein, P. A. Hebda, and Y. Vodovotz, “A patient-specific in silico model of inflammation and healing tested in acute vocal fold injury,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 7, article e2789, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
12. S. Akaishi, M. Akimoto, R. Ogawa, and H. Hyakusoku, “The relationship between keloid growth pattern and stretching tension: visual analysis using the finite element method,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 445–451, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
13. F. J. Vermolen and E. Javierre, “Computer simulations from a finite-element model for wound contraction and closure,” Journal of Tissue Viability, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 43–53, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
14. C. Beyer, G. Schett, O. Distler, and J. H. W. Distler, “Animal models of systemic sclerosis: prospects and limitations,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 2831–2844, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
15. M. L. C. Ramos, A. Gragnani, and L. M. Ferreira, “Is there an ideal animal model to study hypertrophic scarring?” Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 363–368, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
16. H. Mukhtar and D. R. Bickers, “Environmental skin cancer: mechanisms, models and human relevance,” Cancer Research, vol. 53, no. 14, pp. 3439–3442, 1993. View at Scopus
17. N. Harunari, K. Q. Zhu, and K. Q. Zhu, “Histology of the thick scar on the female, red Duroc pig: final similarities to human hypertrophic scar,” Burns, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 669–677, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
18. M. L. C. Ramos, A. Gragnani, and L. M. Ferreira, “Is there an ideal animal model to study hypertrophic scarring?” Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 363–368, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
19. Y. Xie, K. Q. Zhu, H. Deubner, D. A. Emerson, G. J. Carrougher, N. S. Gibran, and L. H. Engrav, “The microvasculature in cutaneous wound healing in the female red duroc pig is similar to that in human hypertrophic scars and different from that in the female yorkshire pig,” Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 500–506, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
20. K. Q. Zhu, G. J. Carrougher, N. S. Gibran, F. F. Isik, and L. H. Engrav, “Review of the female Duroc/Yorkshire pig model of human fibroproliferative scarring,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 15, supplement 1, pp. S32–S39, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
21. M. A. Bedell, N. A. Jenkins, and N. G. Copeland, “Mouse models of human disease—part I: techniques and resources for genetic analysis in mice,” Genes and Development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1997. View at Scopus
22. M. A. Bedell, D. A. Largaespada, N. A. Jenkins, and N. G. Copeland, “Mouse models of human disease—part II: recent progress and future directions,” Genes and Development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–43, 1997. View at Scopus
23. A. Scheid, M. Meuli, M. Gassmann, and R. H. Wenger, “Genetically modified mouse models in studies on cutaneous wound healing,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 687–704, 2000. View at Scopus
24. R. Grose and S. Werner, “Wound-healing studies in transgenic and knockout mice,” Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 147–166, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
25. R. M. Porter, “Mouse models for human hair loss disorders,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 125–131, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
26. R. Paus, S. Müller-Röver, and S. Müller-Röver, “A comprehensive guide for the recognition and classification of distinct stages of hair follicle morphogenesis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 523–532, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
27. P. Sundberg, “Skin and adnexa of the laboratory mouse,” in The Laboratory Mouse, H. Hedrich and G. Bullock, Eds., pp. 195–206, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2004.
28. L. Azzi, M. El-Alfy, C. Martel, and F. Labrie, “Gender differences in mouse skin morphology and specific effects of sex steroids and dehydroepiandrosterone,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
29. S. Aarabi, K. A. Bhatt, and K. A. Bhatt, “Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis,” FASEB Journal, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 3250–3261, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
30. S. C. Rizzi, Z. Upton, K. Bott, and T. R. Dargaville, “Recent advances in dermal wound healing: biomedical device approaches,” Expert Review of Medical Devices, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 143–154, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
31. R. D. Galiano, J. Michaels V, M. Dobryansky, J. P. Levine, and G. C. Gurtner, “Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 485–492, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
32. S. El-Ftesi, E. I. Chang, M. T. Longaker, and G. C. Gurtner, “Aging and diabetes impair the neovascular potential of adipose-derived stromal cells,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 475–485, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
33. D. J. Ceradini, A. R. Kulkarni, and A. R. Kulkarni, “Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 858–864, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
34. E. I. Chang, S. A. Loh, and S. A. Loh, “Age decreases endothelial progenitor cell recruitment through decreases in hypoxia-inducible factor 1α stabilization during ischemia,” Circulation, vol. 116, no. 24, pp. 2818–2829, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
35. D. J. Ceradini, D. Yao, R. H. Grogan, M. J. Callaghan, D. Edelstein, M. Brownlee, and G. C. Gurtner, “Decreasing intracellular superoxide corrects defective ischemia-induced new vessel formation in diabetic mice,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 16, pp. 10930–10938, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
36. M. Reddy, S. S. Gill, and P. A. Rochon, “Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 296, no. 8, pp. 974–984, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
37. R. R. Reid, A. C. Sull, J. E. Mogford, N. Roy, and T. A. Mustoe, “A novel murine model of cyclical cutaneous ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 172–180, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
38. Y. Saito, M. Hasegawa, and M. Hasegawa, “The loss of MCP-1 attenuates cutaneous ischemia-reperfusion injury in a mouse model of pressure ulcer,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 128, no. 7, pp. 1838–1851, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
39. E. Wassermann, M. Van Griensven, K. Gstaltner, W. Oehlinger, K. Schrei, and H. Redl, “A chronic pressure ulcer model in the nude mouse,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 480–484, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
40. R. Salcido, A. Popescu, and C. Ahn, “Animal models in pressure ulcer research,” Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 2007. View at Scopus
41. T. A. Wynn, “Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
42. Y. Zhang and A. C. Gilliam, “Animal models for scleroderma: an update,” Current Rheumatology Reports, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 150–162, 2002. View at Scopus
43. A. M. Ferreira, S. Takagawa, R. Fresco, X. Zhu, J. Varga, and L. A. DiPietro, “Diminished induction of skin fibrosis in mice with MCP-1 deficiency,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 1900–1908, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
44. V. Rogai, R. J. Lories, S. Guiducci, F. P. Luyten, and M. Matucci Cerinic, “Animal models in systemic sclerosis,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 941–946, 2008. View at Scopus
45. Y. Nishikori, E. Kakizoe, Y. Kobayashi, K. Shimoura, H. Okunishi, and S. Dekio, “Skin mast cell promotion of matrix remodeling in burn wound healing in mice: relevance of chymase,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 290, no. 10, pp. 553–560, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
46. X. Zhang, X. Wei, and X. Wei, “Association of increasing burn severity in mice with delayed mobilization of circulating angiogenic cells,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 259–266, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
47. S. Xavier, E. Piek, and E. Piek, “Amelioration of radiation-induced fibrosis. Inhibition of transforming growth factor-β signaling by halofuginone,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 15, pp. 15167–15176, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
48. S. Kumar, A. Kolozsvary, R. Kohl, M. Lu, S. Brown, and J. H. Kim, “Radiation-induced skin injury in the animal model of scleroderma: implications for post-radiotherapy fibrosis,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, article 40, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
49. R. C. Wray, “Force required for wound closure and scar appearance,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 380–382, 1983. View at Scopus
50. R. Ogawa, “Keloid and hypertrophic scarring may result from a mechanoreceptor or mechanosensitive nociceptor disorder,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 493–500, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
51. H.-A. Lehr, M. Leunig, M. D. Menger, D. Nolte, and K. Messmer, “Dorsal skinfold chamber technique for intravital microscopy in nude mice,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 1055–1062, 1993. View at Scopus
52. C. K. Lam, T. Yoo, B. Hiner, Z. Liu, and J. Grutzendler, “Embolus extravasation is an alternative mechanism for cerebral microvascular recanalization,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7297, pp. 478–482, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
53. H. Sorg, C. Krueger, and B. Vollmar, “Intravital insights in skin wound healing using the mouse dorsal skin fold chamber,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 211, no. 6, pp. 810–818, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
54. H. Sorg, C. Krueger, T. Schulz, M. D. Menger, F. Schmitz, and B. Vollmar, “Effects of erythropoietin in skin wound healing are dose related,” FASEB Journal, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 3049–3058, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
55. S. Ichioka, T. C. Minh, M. Shibata, T. Nakatsuka, N. Sekiya, J. Ando, and K. Har II, “In vivo model for visualizing flap microcirculation of ischemia-reperfusion,” Microsurgery, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 304–310, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
56. S. O. Park, M. Wankhede, and M. Wankhede, “Real-time imaging of de novo arteriovenous malformation in a mouse model of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 11, pp. 3487–3496, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
57. M. Sodicoff and R. Binhammer, “The time of origin of the parabiotic anastomosis,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 625–629, 1964.
58. D. G. Fleming, L. Caldwell, and R. Jacobs, “Determination of rate of cross circulation in parabiotic rats with P32-labeled erythrocytes,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 753–756, 1958.
59. C. Hamou, M. J. Callaghan, and H. Thangarajah, “Mesenchymal stem cells can participate in ischemic neovascularization,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 123, no. 2, supplement, pp. 45S–55S, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
60. G. Song, D. T. Nguyen, and D. T. Nguyen, “Use of the parabiotic model in studies of cutaneous wound healing to define the participation of circulating cells,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 426–435, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
61. G. Pietramaggiori, S. S. Scherer, M. Alperovich, B. Chen, D. P. Orgill, and A. J. Wagers, “Improved cutaneous healing in diabetic mice exposed to healthy peripheral circulation,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 129, no. 9, pp. 2265–2274, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
62. R. B. S. Harris, “Parabiosis between db/db and ob/ob or db/+ mice,” Endocrinology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 138–145, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
63. I. Boban, T. Barisic-Dujmovic, and S. H. Clark, “Parabiosis and transplantation models show no evidence of circulating dermal fibroblast progenitors in bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 230–237, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
64. Z. Deyl, G. M. Butenko, J. Hausmann, M. Horakova, and K. Macek, “Increased glycation and pigmentation of collagen in aged and young parabiotic rats and mice,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
65. J. Michaels, S. S. Churgin, K. M. Blechman, M. R. Greives, S. Aarabi, R. D. Galiano, and G. C. Gurtner, “db/db mice exhibit severe wound-healing impairments compared with other murine diabetic strains in a silicone-splinted excisional wound model,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 665–670, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
66. J. Jacobi, J. J. Jang, U. Sundram, H. Dayoub, L. F. Fajardo, and J. P. Cooke, “Nicotine accelerates angiogenesis and wound healing in genetically diabetic mice,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 97–104, 2002.
67. L. Liu, G. P. Marti, and G. P. Marti, “Age-dependent impairment of HIF-1α expression in diabetic mice: correction with electroporation-facilitated gene therapy increases wound healing, angiogenesis, and circulating angiogenic cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 319–327, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
68. A. Agah, T. R. Kyriakides, N. Letrondo, B. Björkblom, and P. Bornstein, “Thrombospondin 2 levels are increased in aged mice: consequences for cutaneous wound healing and angiogenesis,” Matrix Biology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 539–547, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
69. V. B. Holcomb, V. A. Keck, J. C. Barrett, J. Hong, S. K. Libutti, and N. P. Núñez, “Obesity impairs wound healing in ovariectomized female mice,” In Vivo, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 515–518, 2009.
70. D. J. Geer, D. D. Swartz, and S. T. Andreadis, “In vivo model of wound healing based on transplanted tissue-engineered skin,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 10, no. 7-8, pp. 1006–1017, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
71. S. Guerret, E. Govignon, D. J. Hartmann, and V. Ronfard, “Long-term remodeling of a bilayered living human skin equivalent (Apligraf) grafted onto nude mice: immunolocalization of human cells and characterization of extracellular matrix,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
72. M. Demarchez, P. Sengel, and M. Prunieras, “Wound healing of human skin transplanted onto the nude mouse. I. An immunohistological study of the reepithelialization process,” Developmental Biology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 1986.
73. M. J. Escámez, M. García, F. Larcher, A. Meana, E. Muñoz, J. L. Jorcano, and M. Del Río, “An in vivo model of wound healing in genetically modified skin-humanized mice,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 1182–1191, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
74. P. Rossio-Pasquier, D. Casanova, A. Jomard, and M. Démarchez, “Wound healing of human skin transplanted onto the nude mouse after a superficial excisional injury: human dermal reconstruction is achieved in several steps by two different fibroblast subpopulations,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 291, no. 11, pp. 591–599, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar