205818.fig.002a
(a)
205818.fig.002b
(b)
205818.fig.002c
(c)
205818.fig.002d
(d)
205818.fig.002e
(e)
205818.fig.002f
(f)
Figure 2: The correlations between SUV max (FDG (a), MET (b), and FLT (c)) and Ki-67 index were determined. Analysis indicates a more significant correlation between the Ki-67 index and FLT SUV max ( 𝑟 = 0 . 7 2 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 1 ) than between the index and FDG SUV max ( 𝑟 = 0 . 1 6 , 𝑃 = 0 . 2 4 ) or MET SUV max ( 𝑟 = 0 . 3 2 , 𝑃 = 0 . 0 2 ). The correlations between T / N ratio (FDG (d), MET (e) and FLT (f)) and Ki-67 index were determined. Analysis indicates a more significant correlation between the Ki-67 index and FLT T / N ratio ( 𝑟 = 0 . 6 3 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 1 ) than between the index and FDG T / N ratio ( 𝑟 = 0 . 3 3 , 𝑃 = 0 . 0 2 ) or MET T / N ratio ( 𝑟 = 0 . 3 9 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ).