About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 206918, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/206918
Review Article

Overview of Plant-Made Vaccine Antigens against Malaria

Laboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Instituto Investigaciones Biotecnológicas-Instituto Tecnológico Chascomús, Camino de Circunvalación km 8.2, 7130 Buenos Aires, Argentina

Received 17 March 2012; Revised 22 May 2012; Accepted 23 May 2012

Academic Editor: Diego Gomez-Casati

Copyright © 2012 Marina Clemente and Mariana G. Corigliano. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper is an overview of vaccine antigens against malaria produced in plants. Plant-based expression systems represent an interesting production platform due to their reduced manufacturing costs and high scalability. At present, different Plasmodium antigens and expression strategies have been optimized in plants. Furthermore, malaria antigens are one of the few examples of eukaryotic proteins with vaccine value expressed in plants, making plant-derived malaria antigens an interesting model to analyze. Up to now, malaria antigen expression in plants has allowed the complete synthesis of these vaccine antigens, which have been able to induce an active immune response in mice. Therefore, plant production platforms offer wonderful prospects for improving the access to malaria vaccines.

1. Introduction

Malaria is a major global health problem caused by parasites of the genus Plasmodium. This disease is responsible for the death of over one million people annually, and approximately three billon people are at risk of infection by both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasites [1, 2]. About 90% of the disease burden occurs in the most poverty-stricken sub-Saharan African countries. However, countries of Asia, Latin America, Middle East, and Europe are also affected [3]. Among the species of Plasmodium known to cause disease in humans: P. falciparum and P. vivax have received special attention for vaccine development. P. falciparum is responsible for most malaria-induced deaths and has therefore been the focus of the greater part of research [4]. On the other hand, P. vivax is often the most prevalent malaria infection in tropical and subtropical areas [5, 6].

Vaccination against malaria is considered the most efficient method to prevent this infectious disease [7]. However, although several vaccines are under development, a completely effective vaccine against malaria is not yet available. In particular, RTS,S, a potential vaccine targeting the preerythrocytic stage of the parasite, has shown the most promising results so far [8]. However, this vaccine is not fully effective, and thus more efficacious, second-generation vaccines are needed. In this sense, good progress is being made in the development of potential vaccines directed to the asexual blood and sexual stages of the parasite [9, 10]. In the first case, vaccines are designed either to stop invasion of erythrocytes or to kill intraerythrocytic parasites [8]. In the second case, vaccines aim to prevent mosquitoes from becoming infected by preventing parasite fertilization and/or by inhibiting early development in the insect vector. This is referred to as transmission-blocking (TB) immunity and is mediated by specific antibodies and other factors ingested during the blood meal, which inhibit parasite development in the mosquito [11, 12]. These antibodies recognize proteins expressed on either gametocytes or parasite stages that develop in the mosquito midgut and are considered to be potential malaria vaccine candidates [13]. This interruption of parasite transmission from patients to mosquitoes provides the basis for the feasibility of TB vaccines (TBV) of stopping transmission from infected to noninfected people [10]. These findings have stimulated research into the human immune mechanisms involved in protection against infection and disease [14, 15] and into the blockage of parasite transmission from the host to the mosquito [13, 16].

Most of the vaccines available today belong to one of three categories: attenuated microbes, a killed version of the original pathogen, or protein subunits [17]. Each of them has its own associated advantages and disadvantages in terms of safety, immunogenicity, and general feasibility in terms of the ability to develop in to a commercial product. The disadvantages of live, attenuated vaccines in primates and humans include their side effects and risks for breakthrough infection. In contrast, recombinant subunit vaccine approaches offer one of the safest alternatives [18, 19].

Since a malaria vaccine based on attenuated parasites is not feasible in humans, several antigens from malaria parasites are being expressed in different heterologous expression systems like bacteria, yeast, insects, and mammalian cells [2, 8, 2023]. However, the high costs estimated for a successful immunization strategy and scalable methods for vaccine production, distribution and delivery, together with the lack of infrastructure in malaria-endemic areas, are the main challenges in the development of a subunit malaria vaccine [20]. In this context, the capacity of transgenic plants to produce properly folded proteins at low costs makes them attractive expression systems [24, 25].

Plant-based expression systems represent an interesting production platform due to their reduced manufacturing costs and high scalability. In addition, plants have the ability to generate complex recombinant proteins with desired structures, maintaining biological functions and offering greater safety because plants do not harbor mammalian pathogens or microbial toxins [22, 2629]. However, plantexpression systems have been poorly explored for development of vaccines against human parasite pathogens. In fact, only few antigens from Plasmodium ssp. and Toxoplasma gondii have been expressed in plants [25, 3039]. At present, whereas T. gondii antigen expression in plants is just beginning, different Plasmodium antigens and expression strategies have been optimized in plants. Furthermore, malaria antigens are one of the few examples of eukaryotic proteins with vaccine value expressed in plants, making plant-derived malaria antigens an interesting model to analyze. For this reason, this paper is an overview of vaccine antigens against malaria produced in plants.

2. Plant-Made Vaccines

In the last twenty years, plants have been used as bioreactors for the biosynthesis of products with biotechnological interest, such as subunit vaccines [40, 41]. An increasing number of antigens derived from either viruses or bacteria have been expressed using transgenic and transient expression in whole plants or plant cell cultures [42]. Among them, mucosal vaccines for diarrheal diseases, hepatitis B and rabies, as well as injectable vaccines for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, H1N1 and H5N1 strains of influenza A virus, and Newcastle disease have been assayed [43]. Many of these antigens have demonstrated efficacy and safety in animal models and preclinical studies [42]. In fact, Dow AgroSciences [44] obtained the first commercial plant-made vaccine approved for Newcastle illness in chicken. This vaccine was developed and purified from tobacco cell cultures [44].

In addition to their use as bioreactors, plants can be used as potential delivery systems for oral vaccines [43]. In particular, plant tissues provide protection and prevent degradation of the antigen when it passes through the gut [45, 46]. It has been demonstrated that plant-made vaccines applied to mucosal surfaces in the absence of adjuvant are able to induce a protective immune response, suggesting that some phytochemicals could synergistically affect the immunogenicity of plant-expressed antigens acting as endogenous adjuvants [4753]. In addition, plants are known for their natural immune-stimulating or antimicrobial activity due to secondary metabolites as lectins, saponins, alkaloids, phenolic compounds, and flavonoids [54]. Moreover, some commonly occurring plant components, such as unmethylated CpGs motifs of DNA, carotenoids and immunogenic proteins, have adjuvant properties [55, 56]. Hence, it might be assumed that plants can be used in the short term as oral or injectable vaccine producers and as a source of endogenous adjuvants as well.

3. Plant-Made Antigens against the Asexual Blood Stage of Plasmodium

A small number of merozoite surface proteins have been analyzed as vaccines against the asexual bloodstage of Plasmodium by inducing an immune response that either blocks invasion of erythrocytes or inhibits its subsequent multiplication [5759]. Apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1), merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1), and erythrocyte surface antigens are under clinical trials [11, 6064]. Some of them have been expressed in plants, and their immunogenicity assayed (Table 1) [25, 33, 35, 36, 39, 65].

tab1
Table 1: Malaria vaccine antigens expressed in plants.

The 19-kDa C-terminal fragment of P. falciparum merozoite surface protein 1 (PfMSP119) was the first malaria antigen expressed in plants by stable transformation, with a very low expression level (~0.0035% of the total soluble protein (TSP)) [30]. Afterwards, a plant-codon-optimized version of the 42 kDa C-terminal fragment of PfMSP1 (PfMSP142) was designed and synthesized, and expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana seeds [35]. Also, for protein-stable accumulation, the plant-optimized PfMSP142 gene was fused to the phaseolin peptide signal [66] or to the lysine-rich protein [35]. These strategies resulted in a substantial improvement of PfMSP142 expression (approximately 5% of TSP) [35].

Plant codon optimization has also been implemented to improve the expression level of Plasmodium yoelii merozoite surface protein 4/5 (PyMSP4/5) [25], another important vaccine candidate with high effectiveness in protecting mice against a lethal challenge [67, 68]. In this case, this optimized PyMSP4/5 version was expressed in transgenic tobacco plants and its expression level was six-fold higher than that obtained with the native protein [25]. In general, rare codons, AU-rich destabilizing sequences and putative polyadenylation and splicing signals may contribute to rapid mRNA decay, thus limiting the expression of foreign genes in plants. In the plant codon-optimized PyMSP4/5 antigen, the A+T content is reduced from 67% to 53%, and the AT-rich regions are disrupted, allowing the reduced A+T gene version to be more efficient in antigen production than the native version [25]. Codon optimization has also been implemented in protozoan parasite T. gondii antigens expressed in plants [31]. In this last case, the A+T content (54%) in the optimized T. gondii SAG1 version is increased, negatively affecting SAG1 expression [31]. These results, together with the results obtained in Plasmodium, support the idea that a high A+T content is correlated with a low protein expression.

More recently, Webster et al. [33] have expressed the plant codon-optimized PyMSP4/5 in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves, using the deconstructed tobacco mosaic virus-based transient expression system, magnICON, from ICON Genetics (Germany) [69] and found expression levels of up to 10% TSP (~1-2 mg/g of fresh weight) [33]. The use of magnICON has also been found to increase the expression level of the plant codon-optimized P. yoelii MSP119 (PyMSP119) to at least 23% TSP (~3-4 mg/g of fresh weight) [65]. All together, these results show that not only codon optimization but also the viral provector system improves the expression level of plant-made malaria antigens [33, 65]. Indeed, plant codon optimization combined with the magnICON expression system has been shown to allow an increase of up to 100 fold with respect to the transgenic tobacco system [25, 33].

Studies on the immunogenicity of these plant-made malaria antigens have shown that PyMSP4 and PyMSP119 expressed in plants are able to elicit an immune response by intraperitoneal (i.p.) or oral vaccination in a murine model [25, 33, 36, 39, 65]. These findings provide a rationale for the development of a plant-made oral vaccine against malaria. The report by Wang et al. [25] was the first to demonstrate the immunogenic properties of PyMSP4/5. First they found that oral immunization with E. coli-produced PyMSP4/5 in the presence of the cholera toxin B subunit of Vibrio cholera (CTB) induced a significant increase in the systemic-specific antibodies and a partial protection against a lethal challenge with P. yoelii [24]. Then, they found that oral immunization of mice using plant-made malaria antigens elicited an effective immunity against this parasite [25].

They demonstrated that oral immunization using plant-made malaria antigens elicited an effective immunity against this parasite [25]. However, immunization with plant-made antigens elicited a lower immune response than E. coli-made antigen immunization. Thus, Webster et al. [33] proposed increasing the antigen dose using the magnICON system [33]. This strategy allowed them to increase the antigen dose orally administered. However, a higher antigen dose (leaf powder containing 100 μg of PyMSP4/5) was not enough to induce a protective response against P. yoelli [33].

Thus, they hypothesized that the presence of dimeric antigen forms produced in E. coli enhances its immunogenicity, while the presence of monomeric forms in the plant-made antigen would explain its inability to induce protection. Similar results were obtained by Ma et al. [65]: although the plant-made PyMSP119 was immunogenic when delivered i.p. with Freund’s adjuvant or orally without any adjuvant, the specific antibody titers were lower than those induced with the same dose as that of E. coli-made antigens [65]. Like that observed in PyMSP4/5, the higher proportion of dimers and multimers contained in E. coli-made PyMSP119 suggests that the multimers are more stable and immunogenic [65]. In case that this hypothesis is demonstrated, further innovations will be required to induce a protective immunity.

Finally, P. falciparum apical membrane antigen-1 (PfAMA1) and PfMSP1, both fused to CTB, have been expressed in transplastomic plants [36]. This strategy allowed accumulating CTB-PfAMA1 and CTB-PfMSP1 fusion proteins up to 13.1% and 10.1% of TSP in tobacco plants. In addition, since the expression of antigenic proteins in tobacco plants is not suitable for oral delivery in humans, Davoodi-Semiromi et al. [36] expressed these same chimeric proteins in lettuce chloroplasts and found that the expression levels of these malaria antigens fused to CTB in lettuce were up to 7.3% and 6.1% of TSP, sufficient for oral delivery evaluation [36, 39]. These authors combined two attractive strategies to improve the level of expression: plastid expression and chimeric protein production. While many chloroplasts in each cell and multiple copies of the plastid genome per cell make the high level of protein expression possible [20, 23], the carrier proteins contribute to a higher stability of the target protein in plants [43]. The levels of dual cholera-malaria vaccine antigens were ~50 fold higher in tobacco and ~30 fold higher in lettuce than other malaria antigens expressed in tobacco transgenic lines [36]. On the other hand, the lettuce chloroplast transformation opens the possibility of producing a green vaccine that could be orally administered without cold chain requirements. Indeed, Davoodi-Semiromi et al. [36] also found that subcutaneous and oral vaccination with candidate PfAMA1 and PfMSP1 genes fused to CTB are highly immunogenic in mice. Moreover, they also showed a significant parasitic inhibition, providing evidence that the antibodies generated from immunized mice are effective in preventing parasite invasion of red blood cells [36].

Several reports have assessed plant production of chimeric proteins as potential vaccines [36, 43]. The expression of chimeric proteins carrying epitopes from different pathogens, linkers, or adjuvant sequences would allow increasing the immunogenicity of the recombinant antigen [43]. In addition, a great number of models have demonstrated the feasibility to elicit broad cellular and humoral immune responses using such a type of molecules [43]. In particular, Davoodi-Semiromi et al. [36] demonstrated that CTB-PfAMA1 and CTB-PfMSP1 are able to elicit a humoral response by mucosal routes. However, they did not evaluate the cellular immune response. In addition, it is necessary to identify new, safe, and nontoxic adjuvants, particularly for those capable of strongly boosting cellular immune responses. In this context, leaves have a large number of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which have been demonstrated to have adjuvant properties in other organisms [70, 71]. Indeed, plants expressing HSP90 are able to induce in vitro B-cell proliferation from naïve mice, suggesting that these proteins could be excellent carriers of interesting vaccine antigens and peptides expressed in plants [72].

Other edible plant species has been explored to produce malaria antigens [39]. Brassica napus has been used to express P. vivax MSP1 (PvMSP1) and the P. vivax circumsporozoite protein (PvCSP), and to synthesize a chimeric recombinant gene containing PvMSP-1, a Pro-Gly linker motif, and PvCSP [39]. Oral immunization of mice with plant-made MLC chimeric recombinant protein successfully induced antigen-specific IgG1 production [39]. Additionally, the Th1-related cytokines IL-12, TNF, and IFN- 𝛾 were significantly increased in the spleens of BALB/c mice, supporting the idea that oral vaccines could be developed based on the use of food plant platforms for the production and delivery of vaccine antigens, contributing to a substantial cost reduction [22].

4. Plant-Made Antigens against Sexual Blood Stage of Plasmodium

As mentioned above, an alternative strategy to develop an efficient malaria vaccine is to obtain vaccines directed against proteins found in the sexual stages of P. falciparum parasites present in the Anopheles mosquito midgut, known as transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs). A positive aspect of this type of TBV is that they attack the parasite at a vulnerable stage of its life cycle, when it has to transfer from one host to another and when its numbers are very small [73]. Clinical trials have been conducted with vaccines based on the ookinete antigens of P. falciparum and P. vivax with induction of TB antibodies [10, 74].

Farrance et al. [38] used the transient N. benthamiana expression system to express the P. falciparum gamete surface antigen P230 (Pfs230) (Table 1). They demonstrated that antibodies against this protein block the progression of the parasite’s life cycle in the mosquito and thus block the transmission to the human host [8, 75]. Pfs230 is present on the surface of P. falciparum gametocytes and gametes and is expressed during human infection [8, 75]. The N-terminal region of Pfs230 spanning aminoacids 444 to 730 was fused to the ER retention sequence (KDEL) and produced using plant-based transient-expression system by agroinfiltration [38]. The recombinant protein was expressed in approximately 800 mg/kg in whole fresh leaf tissue, being 100% soluble [38]. This plant-made Pfs230 elicited high titers of anti-Pfs230 antibodies when administered to rabbits in the presence of complete/incomplete Freund’s adjuvant. Furthermore, the antibodies generated combined with this adjuvant were shown to bind specifically to the native protein in P. falciparum on the surface of gametes/zygotes, resulting in significant TB activity (TBA) [38].

Farrance et al. [37] also expressed an ookinete antigen present in the sexual form of the parasite—Pfs25—using the transient N. benthamiana expression system (Table 1). Pf25 is able to induce TB antibodies and is present in the zygote and ookinete stages but is not expressed during human infection [8]. In order to evaluate the role of the Lichenase molecule (LicKM) as a carrier [54] and the effects of N-glycosylation on the generation of a functional immune response, Farrance et al. [37] obtained four constructs carrying the recombinant Pfs25 protein for transient expression in plants. Independently of the protein versions evaluated, Pfs25 expression levels were between 0.25 and 0.4 mg/g of fresh leaf tissue [37]. Also, these authors observed that this recombinant protein with N-glycans had the lowest titers, while the Pfs25 lacking glycans (Pfs25-LG) showed the highest IgG titers in mice immunized intramuscularly (i.m.). However, the fusion to LicKM elicited a higher titer than that of the Pfs25 lacking glycans alone. The authors concluded that nonglycosylated antigens generated high antibody titers and enhanced TBA. In addition, they were able to eliminate the negative effect of the presence of glycans on the Pfs25 protein’s ability to induce a functional immune response when Pfs25 was fused to LicKM [38]. Glycosylation of some antigens can affect their immunogenicity [37]. According to this, the plant-produced nonglycosylated and glycosylated versions determined that the nonglycosylated antigens generated higher antibodies titers and enhanced TBA [37]. Since glycosylation does not occur in chloroplasts and the natural pathogen organism (Plasmodium) does not glycosylate the target proteins, these results support the idea that the chloroplast would be the best compartment to express this group of proteins, where the glycosylation may affect their antigenicity.

Conclusion

Development of an effective malaria vaccine has been a great challenge for medical science. Up to now, malaria antigen expression in plants has allowed the complete synthesis of these vaccine antigens, which have been able to induce an active immune response in mice. Therefore, plant production platforms offer wonderful prospects for improving the access to malaria vaccines. Indeed, plant-derived multiantigen malaria vaccines could be formulated through mixing transgenic plant materials or polycistronic operons in chloroplasts expressing several malaria antigens. In addition, efficient malaria antigen expression in the lettuce chloroplast for oral immunization is a significant advancement that allows the oral delivery of subunit vaccines combined with a potent mucosal adjuvant. However, the local immune response induced by plant-made malaria antigens has not been analyzed yet. Indeed, most of these published reports are centered in the systemic humoral response. In this sense, further research is needed to understand the mucosal and systemic cellular immune response elicited by plant-made malaria antigens orally delivered.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina) to M. Clemente (PICT 0691) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina) to M. Clemente (PIP 0168). M. Clemente is research member from CONICET and M. G. Corigliano research fellow from CONICET.

References

  1. A. V. S. Hill, “Vaccines against malaria,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, vol. 366, pp. 2806–2814, 2011.
  2. L. Schwartz, G. V. Brown, B. Genton, and V. S. Moorthy, “A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table,” Malaria Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 11, 2012.
  3. 2012, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs094/es/index.html.
  4. M. H. Rodríguez-López, “Avances en el desarrollo de vacunas contra la malaria,” Revista Biomédica, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 2008.
  5. R. N. Price, E. Tjitra, C. A. Guerra, S. Yeung, N. J. White, and N. M. Anstey, “Vivax malaria: neglected and not benign,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 79–87, 2007. View at Scopus
  6. R. N. Price, N. M. Douglas, and N. M. Anstey, “New developments in Plasmodium vivax malaria: severe disease and the rise of chloroquine resistance,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 430–435, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/soa_parasitic/en/index.html.
  8. B. M. Greenwood and G. A. T. Targett, “Malaria vaccines and the new malaria agenda,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1600–1607, 2011.
  9. R. F. Anders, C. G. Adda, M. Foley, and R. S. Norton, “Recombinant protein vaccines against the asexual blood-stages of Plasmodium falciparum,” Human Vaccines, vol. 6, no. 1, 2010. View at Scopus
  10. M. Arévalo-Herrera, Y. Solarte, C. Marin, et al., “Malaria transmission blocking immunity and sexual stage vaccines for interrupting malaria transmission in Latin America,” Memórias Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 202–211, 2011.
  11. B. M. Greenwood, K. Bojang, C. J. M. Whitty, and G. A. T. Targett, “Malaria,” Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9469, pp. 1487–1498, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. M. Greenwood, D. A. Fidock, D. E. Kyle et al., “Malaria: progress, perils, and prospects for eradication,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 1266–1276, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. A. Smith, N. Chitnis, O. J. T. Briët, and M. Tanner, “Uses of mosquito-stage transmission-blocking vaccines against Plasmodium falciparum,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 190–196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. P. Girard, Z. H. Reed, M. Friede, and M. P. Kieny, “A review of human vaccine research and development: malaria,” Vaccine, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1567–1580, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. A. Targett and B. M. Greenwood, “Malaria vaccines and their potential role in the elimination of malaria,” Malaria Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, article S10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. H. Reed, M. Friede, and M. P. Kieny, “Malaria vaccine development: progress and challenges,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 231–245, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. V. Hill, “Vaccines against malaria,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 366, no. 1579, pp. 2806–2814, 2011.
  18. E. Jongert, C. W. Roberts, N. Gargano, E. Förster-Wald, and E. Petersen, “Vaccines against Toxoplasma gondii: challenges and opportunities,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 252–266, 2009. View at Scopus
  19. E. A. Innes, P. M. Bartley, M. Rocchi et al., “Developing vaccines to control protozoan parasites in ruminants: dead or alive?” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 180, no. 1-2, pp. 155–163, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Daniell, N. D. Singh, H. Mason, and S. J. Streatfield, “Plant-made vaccine antigens and biopharmaceuticals,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 669–679, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Tiwari, P. C. Verma, P. K. Singh, and R. Tuli, “Plants as bioreactors for the production of vaccine antigens,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 449–467, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Davoodi-Semiromi, N. Samson, and H. Daniell, “The green vaccine: a global strategy to combat infectious and outoimmune diseases,” Human Vaccines, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 488–493, 2009. View at Scopus
  23. A. G. Lössl and M. T. Waheed, “Chloroplast-derived vaccines against human diseases: achievements, challenges and scopes,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 527–539, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Wang, L. Kedzierski, S. L. Wesselingh, and R. L. Coppel, “Oral immunization with a recombinant malaria protein induces conformational antibodies and protects mice against lethal malaria,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 2356–2364, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Wang, D. E. Webster, A. E. Campbell, I. B. Dry, S. L. Wesselingh, and R. L. Coppel, “Immunogenicity of Plasmodium yoelii merozoite surface protein 4/5 produced in transgenic plants,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 103–110, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. H. Seon, S. Szarka, and M. M. Moloney, “A unique strategy for recovering recombinant proteins from molecular farming: affinity capture on engineered oilbodies,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, pp. 95–101, 2002.
  27. T. J. Menkhaus, Y. Bai, C. Zhang, Z. L. Nikolov, and C. E. Glatz, “Considerations for the recovery of recombinant proteins from plants,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1001–1014, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. Yusibov and S. Rabindran, “Recent progress in the development of plant-derived vaccines,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1173–1183, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. A. Goldstein and J. A. Thomas, “Biopharmaceuticals derived from genetically modified plants,” QJM, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 705–716, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Ghosh, P. Malhotra, P. V. Lalitha, S. Guha-Mukherjee, and V. S. Chauhan, “Expression of Plasmodium falciparum C-terminal region of merozoite surface protein ( PfMSP1 19 ), a potential malaria vaccine candidate, in tobacco,” Plant Science, vol. 162, pp. 335–343, 2002.
  31. M. Clemente, R. Curilovic, A. Sassone, A. Zelada, S. O. Angel, and A. N. Mentaberry, “Production of the main surface antigen of Toxoplasma gondii in tobacco leaves and analysis of its antigenicity and immunogenicity,” Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2005. View at Scopus
  32. G. Ferraro, M. L. Becher, S. O. Angel, A. Zelada, A. N. Mentaberry, and M. Clemente, “Efficient expression of a Toxoplasma gondii dense granule Gra4 antigen in tobacco leaves,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 118–122, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. E. Webster, L. Wang, M. Mulcair et al., “Production and characterization of an orally immunogenic Plasmodium antigen in plants using a virus-based expression system,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 846–855, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Laguía-Becher, V. Martín, M. Kraemer et al., “Effect of codon optimization and subcellular targeting on Toxoplasma gondii antigen SAG1 expression in tobacco leaves to use in subcutaneous and oral immunization in mice,” BMC Biotechnology, vol. 10, article 52, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. O. S. Lau, D. W. K. Ng, W. W. Chan, S. P. Chang, and S. S. Sun, “Production of the 42-kDa fragment of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1, a leading malaria vaccine antigen, in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 994–1004, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Davoodi-Semiromi, M. Schreiber, S. Nalapalli et al., “Chloroplast-derived vaccine antigens confer dual immunity against cholera and malaria by oral or injectable delivery,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 223–242, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. E. Farrance, J. A. Chichester, K. Musiychuk et al., “Antibodies to plant-produced Plasmodium falciparum sexual stage protein Pfs25 exhibit transmission blocking activity,” Human Vaccines, vol. 7, pp. 191–198, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. C. E. Farrance, A. Rhee, R. M. Jones et al., “A plant-produced Pfs230 vaccine candidate blocks transmission of Plasmodium falciparum,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1351–1357, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Lee, H. H. Kim, K. Mi Choi et al., “Murine immune responses to a Plasmodium vivax-derived chimeric recombinant protein expressed in Brassica napus,” Malaria Journal, vol. 10, article 106, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. M. Drake and H. Thangaraj, “Molecular farming, patents and access to medicines,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 811–819, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. A. Penney, D. R. Thomas, S. S. Deen, and A. M. Walmsley, “Plant-made vaccines in support of the Millennium Development Goals,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 789–798, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. V. Yusibov, S. J. Streatfield, and N. Kushnir, “Clinical development of plant-produced recombinant pharmaceuticals: vaccines, antibodies and beyond,” Human Vaccines, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 313–321, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Paul and J. K. C. Ma, “Plant-made immunogens and effective delivery strategies,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 821–833, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. http://www.dowagro.com/.
  45. S. J. Streatfield, “Mucosal immunization using recombinant plant-based oral vaccines,” Methods, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 150–157, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. A. Hayden, S. J. Streatfield, and B. J. Lamphear, “Bioencapsulation of the hepatitis B surface antigen and its use as an effective oral immunogen,” Vaccine, vol. 30, no. 19, pp. 2937–2942, 2012.
  47. J. Kapusta, A. Modelska, M. Figlerowicz et al., “A plant-derived edible vaccine against hepatitis B virus,” FASEB Journal, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 1796–1799, 1999. View at Scopus
  48. X. L. Jiang, Z. M. He, Z. Q. Peng, Y. Qi, Q. Chen, and S. Y. Yu, “Cholera toxin B protein in transgenic tomato fruit induces systemic immune response in mice,” Transgenic Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 169–175, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. Guetard, R. Greco, M. Cervantes Gonzalez et al., “Immunogenicity and tolerance following HIV-1/HBV plant-based oral vaccine administration,” Vaccine, vol. 26, no. 35, pp. 4477–4485, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Kostrzak, M. Cervantes Gonzalez, D. Guetard et al., “Oral administration of low doses of plant-based HBsAg induced antigen-specific IgAs and IgGs in mice, without increasing levels of regulatory T cells,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 35, pp. 4798–4807, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. A. Pasquevich, A. E. Ibañez, L. M. Coria et al., “An oral vaccine based on U-Omp19 induces protection against B. abortus mucosal challenge by inducing an adaptive IL-17 immune response in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e16203, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. T. Pniewski, J. Kapusta, P. Bociag et al., “Low-dose oral immunization with lyophilized tissue of herbicide-resistant lettuce expressing hepatitis B surface antigen for prototype plant-derived vaccine tablet formulation,” Journal of Applied Genetics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 125–136, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. E. Soria-Guerra, L. Moreno-Fierros, and S. Rosales-Mendoza, “Two decades of plant-based candidate vaccines: a review of the chimeric protein approaches,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1367–1382, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Granell, A. Fernándezdel-Carmen, and D. Orzáez, “In planta production of plant-derived and non-plant-derived adjuvants,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 843–858, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Y. Wang, C. G. Kelly, M. Singh et al., “Stimulation of Th1-polarizing cytokines, C-C chemokines, maturation of dendritic cells, and adjuvant function by the peptide binding fragment of heat shock protein 70,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 2422–2429, 2002. View at Scopus
  56. P. V. Licciardi and J. R. Underwood, “Plant-derived medicines: a novel class of immunological adjuvants,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 390–398, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. P. D. Crompton, S. K. Pierce, and L. H. Miller, “Advances and challenges in malaria vaccine development,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 12, pp. 4168–4178, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. D. Ellis, I. Sagara, O. Doumbo, and Y. Wu, “Blood stage vaccines for Plasmodium falciparum: current status and the way forward,” Human Vaccines, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 627–634, 2010. View at Scopus
  59. A. L. Goodman and S. J. Draper, “Blood-stage malaria vaccines—recent progress and future challenges,” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 189–211, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. B. Maher, “Malaria vaccine gets shot in the arm from tests,” Nature, vol. 456, no. 7223, pp. 680–681, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. J. Blackman and A. A. Holder, “Secondary processing of the Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1) by a calcium-dependent membrane-bound serine protease: shedding of MSP133 as a noncovalently associated complex with other fragments of the MSP1,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 307–315, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Kumar, A. Yadava, D. B. Keister et al., “Immunogenicity and in vivo efficacy of recombinant Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 in Aotus monkeys,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 325–332, 1995. View at Scopus
  63. S. P. Chang, S. E. Case, W. L. Gosnell et al., “A recombinant baculovirus 42-kilodalton C-terminal fragment of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1 protects Aotus monkeys against malaria,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 253–261, 1996. View at Scopus
  64. C. A. Darko, E. Angov, W. E. Collins et al., “The clinical-grade 42-kilodalton fragment of merozoite surface protein 1 of Plasmodium falciparum strain FVO expressed in Escherichia coli protects Aotus nancymai against challenge with homologous erythrocytic-stage parasites,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 287–297, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. Ma, L. Wang, D. E. Webster, A. E. Campbell, and R. L. Coppel, “Production, characterisation and immunogenicity of a plant-made Plasmodium antigen-the 19 kDa C-terminal fragment of Plasmodium yoelii merozoite surface protein 1,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 151–161, 2011.
  66. L. Frigerio, M. De Virgilio, A. Prada, F. Faoro, and A. Vitale, “Sorting of phaseolin to the vacuole is saturable and requires a short C-terminal peptide,” Plant Cell, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1031–1042, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. Kedzierski, C. G. Black, and R. L. Coppel, “Immunization with recombinant Plasmodium yoelii merozoite surface protein 4/5 protects mice against lethal challenge,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 6034–6037, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. L. Kedzierski, C. G. Black, A. W. Stowers, M. W. Goschnick, D. C. Kaslow, and R. L. Coppel, “Comparison of the protective efficacy of yeast-derived and Escherichia coli-derived recombinant merozoite surface protein 4/5 against lethal challenge by Plasmodium yoelii,” Vaccine, vol. 19, no. 32, pp. 4661–4668, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. Y. Gleba, V. Klimyuk, and S. Marillonnet, “Magnifection—a new platform for expressing recombinant vaccines in plants,” Vaccine, vol. 23, no. 17-18, pp. 2042–2048, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. K. Suzue and R. A. Young, “Adjuvant-free hsp70 fusion protein system elicits humoral and cellular immune responses to HIV-1 p24,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 873–879, 1996. View at Scopus
  71. P. C. Echeverria, N. de Miguel, M. Costas, and S. O. Angel, “Potent antigen-specific immunity to Toxoplasma gondii in adjuvant-free vaccination system using Rop2-Leishmania infantum Hsp83 fusion protein,” Vaccine, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 4102–4110, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. G. Corigliano, A. Maglioco, M. L. Becher et al., “Plant Hsp90 proteins interact with B-cells and stimulate their proliferation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e21231, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. R. E. Sinden, A. Talman, S. R. Marques, M. N. Wass, and M. J. E. Sternberg, “The flagellum in malarial parasites,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 491–500, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. Y. Wu, R. D. Ellis, D. Shaffer et al., “Phase 1 trial of malaria transmission blocking vaccine candidates Pfs25 and Pvs 25 formulated with montanide ISA 51,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 7, Article ID e2636, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. G. Pradel, “Proteins of the malaria parasite sexual stages: expression, function and potential for transmission blocking strategies,” Parasitology, vol. 134, no. 14, pp. 1911–1929, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus