Research Article

An Integrative Approach to Infer Regulation Programs in a Transcription Regulatory Module Network

Table 2

Top twenty regulator-module interactions as given by the weighted rank aggregation method. *Records represent true positives at the 𝑃 value threshold of 0.05.

RankRegulator-module 𝑃 valueRanks from individual algorithms
LIMMALeMoNeInferelator

1HAP4-7* 1 . 6 7 𝑒 3 0 5092
2GAT1-11* 4 . 2 4 𝑒 0 5 34728
3MET28-11* 5 . 9 2 𝑒 1 0 272416
4HAP4-30 5 . 3 3 𝑒 0 2 23332
5MET32-11* 1 . 2 1 𝑒 1 3 2307
6DAL80-51* 0 . 0 0 𝑒 + 0 0 4210281
7DAL81-6 6 . 6 7 𝑒 0 1 21141193
8PDR3-13 3 . 9 0 𝑒 0 1 12810281
9PHD1-36* 5 . 2 0 𝑒 0 3 33425
10IME4-46 1 . 0 0 𝑒 + 0 0 4812906
11TOS8-24* 1 . 4 5 𝑒 0 2 494111
12GAL80-41* 7 . 4 5 𝑒 0 9 71071052
13DAL81-55 4 . 1 7 𝑒 0 1 1416285
14MET32-40* 1 . 0 0 𝑒 0 2 52532937
15CUP2-10* 1 . 1 2 𝑒 0 2 5533218
16YAP5-51 1 . 0 0 𝑒 + 0 0 3774640
17XBP1-10* 1 . 0 8 𝑒 0 2 595602
18YAP6-25 8 . 6 3 𝑒 0 2 26265444
19UGA3-40 1 . 0 0 𝑒 + 0 0 223393
20UGA3-11 2 . 3 5 𝑒 0 1 650959