Research Article

The Potential of Cellulosic Ethanol Production from Grasses in Thailand

Table 3

Ethanol production from grasses by SSCF process.

GrassesEthanol % of the theoretical values
g/Lg/g substrate

Sri Lanka1.14 ± 0.09a0.14 ± 0.01a32.72 ± 2.69a
Ratchaburi1.10 ± 0.10a0.14 ± 0.01a30.95 ± 2.81a,b
α-cellulose + xylan1.06 ± 0.30a,b0.13 ± 0.04a,b23.01 ± 6.47b
Dwarf napier0.98 ± 0.16a,b0.12 ± 0.02a,b30.60 ± 4.90a,b
Napier0.97 ± 0.31a,b0.12 ± 0.04a,b30.30 ± 9.78a,b
Bana0.87 ± 0.14a,b0.11 ± 0.02a,b27.28 ± 4.56a,b
Prachuap Khiri Khan0.80 ± 0.12b0.10 ± 0.01b23.31 ± 3.48b
King napier0.40 ± 0.13c0.05 ± 0.02c13.93 ± 4.53c
Atratum0.36 ± 0.05c0.05 ± 0.01c11.64 ± 1.60c
Ruzi0.30 ± 0.06c0.04 ± 0.01c 9.56 ± 1.79c
Pangola0.21 ± 0.05c0.03 ± 0.01c 6.80 ± 1.58c
Purple guinea0.18 ± 0.07c0.02 ± 0.01c 6.08 ± 2.49c

Grasses (1.2 g) were pretreated with alkaline peroxide (7.5% (v/v) H2O2; pH 11.5; 35°C, 24 h). SSCF process was performed using cellulase and xylanase (72 and 1440 U, resp.) from T. reesei for hydrolysis and S. cerevisiae and P. stipitis for cofermentation at 35°C for 7 days. Positive control was 0.6 g of α-cellulose mixed with 0.6 g of xylan. Values not sharing a common superscript (a, b, c, and d) differ significantly (Duncan’s Multiple Range Test).