Research Article

Comparison of Acute Recoil between Bioabsorbable Poly-L-lactic Acid XINSORB Stent and Metallic Stent in Porcine Model

Table 1

Angiographic parameters related with acute stent recoil assessment.

ParametersXINSORB ( 𝑁 = 8 )EXCEL ( 𝑁 = 8 ) 𝑃 value

Diameter of vessel segment chosen for deployment (mm) 2 . 7 8 ± 0 . 0 3 2 . 8 0 ± 0 . 0 3 0.18
Stent to artery ratio 1 . 0 9 ± 0 . 0 6 1 . 1 1 ± 0 . 0 2 0.47
Mean diameter of the inflated balloon (X, mm) 3 . 0 2 ± 0 . 1 3 3 . 0 6 ± 0 . 1 1 0.62
Mean lumen diameter of stent (Y, mm) 3 . 0 0 ± 0 . 2 0 3 . 1 4 ± 0 . 0 5 0.17
Mean lumen diameter of stent at 24 hours follow-up (mm) 3 . 0 0 ± 0 . 1 9 3 . 1 2 ± 0 . 0 8 0.23
Acute absolute recoil (X−Y, mm) 0 . 0 2 ± 0 . 1 3 0 . 0 8 ± 0 . 0 8 0.19
Acute percent recoil ((X−Y)/X, %) 0 . 6 6 ± 4 . 3 2 1 . 4 0 ± 3 . 8 3 0.45