About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 541872, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/541872
Review Article

PET/CT Imaging in Mouse Models of Myocardial Ischemia

1Department of Biomorphological and Functional Sciences and Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages of National Council of Research, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
2CEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate scarl, Via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy
3Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular and Immunological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy

Received 4 November 2011; Revised 16 December 2011; Accepted 30 December 2011

Academic Editor: Andrea Vecchione

Copyright © 2012 Sara Gargiulo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. A. Recchia and V. Lionetti, “Animal models of dilated cardiomyopathy for translational research,” Veterinary Research Communications, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Kumar, T. A. Hacker, J. Buck et al., “Distinct mouse coronary anatomy and myocardial infarction consequent to ligation,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 41–44, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. M. Nilles and B. London, “Knockin animal models of inherited arrhythmogenic diseases: what have we learned from them?” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1117–1125, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Ciszek, D. Skubiszewska, and A. Ratajska, “The anatomy of the cardiac veins in mice,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Wessels and D. Sedmera, “Developmental anatomy of the heart: a tale of mice and man,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 15, pp. 165–176, 2004. View at Scopus
  6. F. L. Meijler, “Atrioventricular conduction versus heart size from mouse to whale,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 5, no. 2 I, pp. 363–365, 1985. View at Scopus
  7. R. H. Hastings and D. Summers-Torres, “Direct laryngoscopy in mice,” Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 33–35, 1999. View at Scopus
  8. R. H. Brown, D. M. Walters, R. S. Greenberg, and W. Mitzner, “A method of endotracheal intubation and pulmonary functional assessment for repeated studies in mice,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 2362–2365, 1999. View at Scopus
  9. A. Vergari, A. Polito, M. Musumeci, S. Palazzesi, and G. Marano, “Video-assisted orotracheal intubation in mice,” Laboratory Animals, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 204–206, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Winning, H. Huwer, J. Redjai et al., “Noninvasive mechanical ventilation of mice by using a balloon-tipped cannula,” Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 39–41, 2004. View at Scopus
  11. E. N. Spoelstra, C. Ince, A. Koeman et al., “A novel and simple method for endotracheal intubation of mice,” Laboratory Animals, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 128–135, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O. Moldestad, P. Karlsen, S. Molden, and J. F. Storm, “Tracheotomy improves experiment success rate in mice during urethane anesthesia and stereotaxic surgery,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. O. Tarnavski, J. R. McMullen, M. Schinke, Q. Nie, S. Kong, and S. Izumo, “Mouse cardiac surgery: comprehensive techniques for the generation of mouse models of human diseases and their application for genomic studies,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 16, pp. 349–360, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. A. Gorog, M. Tanno, A. M. N. Kabir et al., “Varying susceptibility to myocardial infarction among C57BL/6 mice of different genetic background,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 705–708, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Takagawa, Y. Zhang, M. L. Wong et al., “Myocardial infarct size measurement in the mouse chronic infarction model: comparison of area- and length-based approaches,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 2104–2111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. O. Nossuli, V. Lakshminakayanan, G. Baumgarten et al., “A chronic mouse model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion: essential in cytokine studies,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 278, no. 4, pp. H1049–H1055, 2000. View at Scopus
  17. L. A. Green, S. S. Gambhir, A. Srinivasan et al., “Noninvasive methods for quantitating blood time-activity curves from mouse PET images obtained with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 729–734, 1998. View at Scopus
  18. H. M. Wu, G. Sui, C. C. Lee et al., “In vivo quantitation of glucose metabolism in mice using small-animal PET and a microfluidic device,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 837–845, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. S. Yu, H. D. Lin, S. C. Huang, M. E. Phelps, and H. M. Wu, “Quantification of cerebral glucose metabolic rate in mice using 18F-FDG and small-animal PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 966–973, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. C. Kreissl, H. M. Wu, D. B. Stout et al., “Noninvasive measurement of cardiovascular function in mice with high-temporal-resolution small-animal PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 974–980, 2006. View at Scopus
  21. Y. H. D. Fang and R. F. Muzic Jr., “Spillover and partial-volume correction for image-derived input functions for small-animal 18F-FDG PET studies,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 606–614, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. W. Locke, S. S. Berr, and B. K. Kundu, “Image-derived input function from cardiac gated maximum a posteriori reconstructed PET images in mice,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 342–347, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. K. Su, S. L. Jae, C. I. Ki et al., “Kinetic modeling of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine for quantitative cell proliferation imaging in subcutaneous tumor models in mice,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 2057–2066, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Moerman, D. de Naeyer, P. Boon, and F. de Vos, “P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: kinetic modeling of 11C-desmethylloperamide in mice using a 18F-FDG μPET scan to determine the input function,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 1, pp. 12–21, 2011.
  25. W. P. Segars, B. M. W. Tsui, E. C. Frey, G. A. Johnson, and S. S. Berr, “Development of a 4-digital mouse phantom for molecular imaging research,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 149–159, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Domenichelli, D. D'Ambrosio, S. Trespidi et al., “Quantitative cardiac dynamic imaging of small animal PET images using cluster analysis,” in Proceedings of the Computers in Cardiology (CAR '08), pp. 337–340, Bologna, Italy, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Kim, P. Herrero, T. Sharp et al., “Minimally invasive method of determining blood input function from PET images in rodents,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 330–336, 2006. View at Scopus
  28. A. Saraste, S. G. Nekolla, and M. Schwaiger, “Cardiovascular molecular imaging: an overview,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 643–652, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Nahrendorf, C. Badea, L. W. Hedlund et al., “High-resolution imaging of murine myocardial infarction with delayed-enhancement cine micro-CT,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 292, no. 6, pp. H3172–H3178, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Vogel-Claussen, C. E. Rochitte, K. C. Wu et al., “Delayed enhancement MR imaging: utility in myocardial assessment,” Radiographics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 795–810, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Wollenweber, C. Zach, C. Rischpler et al., “Myocardial Perfusion Imaging is Feasible for Infarct Size Quantification in Mice Using a Clinical Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography System Equipped with Pinhole Collimators,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 427–434, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Stegger, A. N. Hoffmeier, K. P. Schäfers et al., “Accurate noninvasive measurement of infarct size in mice with high-resolution PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1837–1844, 2006. View at Scopus
  33. A. Cuocolo, W. Acampa, M. Imbriaco, N. De Luca, G. L. Iovino, and M. Salvatore, “The many ways to myocardial perfusion imaging,” Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 4–18, 2005. View at Scopus
  34. M. Inubushi, M. C. Jordan, K. P. Roos et al., “Nitrogen-13 ammonia cardiac positron emission tomography in mice: effects of clonidine-induced changes in cardiac work on myocardial perfusion,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 110–116, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Ghesani, E. G. DePuey, and A. Rozanski, “Role of F-18 FDG positron emission tomography (PET) in the assessment of myocardial viability,” Echocardiography, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 165–177, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Higuchi, F. M. Bengel, S. Seidl et al., “Assessment of αvβ3 integrin expression after myocardial infarction by positron emission tomography,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 395–403, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Münch, N. T. B. Nguyen, S. Nekolla et al., “Evaluation of sympathetic nerve terminals with [11C]epinephrine and [11C]hydroxyephedrine and positron emission tomography,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 516–523, 2000. View at Scopus
  38. P. M. Bloomfield, S. Rajeswaran, T. J. Spinks et al., “The design and physical characteristics of a small animal positron emission tomograph,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1105–1126, 1995. View at Scopus
  39. Y. Wang, J. Seidel, B. M. W. Tsui, J. J. Vaquero, and M. G. Pomper, “Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1891–1900, 2006. View at Scopus
  40. M. Larobina, A. Brunetti, and M. Salvatore, “Small animal PET: a review of commercially available imaging systems,” Current Medical Imaging Reviews, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. P. Schäfers, A. J. Reader, M. Kriens, C. Knoess, O. Schober, and M. Schäfers, “Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 996–1004, 2005. View at Scopus
  42. A. Chatziioannou, J. Qi, A. Moore et al., “Comparison of 3-D maximum a posteriori and filtered backprojection algorithms for high-resolution animal imaging with microPET,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 507–512, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. L. Chow, F. R. Rannou, and A. F. Chatziioannou, “Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1837–1850, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. M. Boone, O. Velazquez, and S. R. Cherry, “Small-animal X-ray dose from micro-CT,” Molecular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 149–158, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. I. J. Hildebrandt, H. Su, and W. A. Weber, “Anesthesia and other considerations for in vivo imaging of small animals,” ILAR Journal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2008. View at Scopus
  46. B. J. Fueger, J. Czernin, I. Hildebrandt et al., “Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 999–1006, 2006. View at Scopus
  47. M. C. Kreissl, D. B. Stout, K. P. Wong, et al., “Influence of dietary state and insulin on myocardial, skeletal muscle and brain [18F]- fluorodeoxyglucose kinetics in mice,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1–22, 2011.
  48. T. Higuchi, S. G. Nekolla, A. Jankaukas et al., “Characterization of normal and infarcted rat myocardium using a combination of small-animal PET and clinical MRI,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 288–294, 2007. View at Scopus
  49. G. Münch, N. T. B. Nguyen, S. Nekolla et al., “Evaluation of sympathetic nerve terminals with [11C]epinephrine and [11C]hydroxyephedrine and positron emission tomography,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 516–523, 2000. View at Scopus
  50. M. V. Simões, S. Egert, S. Ziegler et al., “Delayed response of insulin-stimulated fluorine-18 deoxyglucose uptake in glucose transporter-4-null mice hearts,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1690–1697, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. H. Lee, B. H. Ko, J. Y. Paik et al., “Effects of anesthetic agents and fasting duration on 18F-FDG biodistribution and insulin levels in tumor-bearing mice,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1531–1536, 2005. View at Scopus
  52. S. K. Woo, T. S. Lee, K. M. Kim et al., “Anesthesia condition for 18F-FDG imaging of lung metastasis tumors using small animal PET,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 143–150, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. Kober, I. Iltis, P. J. Cozzone, and M. Bernard, “Myocardial blood flow mapping in mice using high-resolution spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging: influence of ketamine/xylazine and isoflurane anesthesia,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 601–606, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. H. Toyama, M. Ichise, J. S. Liow et al., “Evaluation of anesthesia effects on [18F]FDG uptake in mouse brain and heart using small animal PET,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. H. Ko, J. Y. Paik, K. H. Jung et al., “Effects of anesthetic agents on cellular 123I-MIBG transport and in vivo 123I-MIBG biodistribution,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 554–561, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. K. Miyashita, N. Takahashi, T. Oka et al., “SUV correction for injection errors in FDG-PET examination,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 607–613, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. G. Porenta, W. Kuhle, J. Czernin et al., “Semiquantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow and viability using polar map displays of cardiac PET images,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1628–1636, 1992. View at Scopus
  58. C. Nanni, C. Pettinato, V. Ambrosini et al., “Retro-orbital injection is an effective route for radiopharmaceutical administration in mice during small-animal PET studies,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 547–553, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. T. M. Bateman, G. V. Heller, A. I. McGhie et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. U. K. Sampson, S. Dorbala, A. Limaye, R. Kwong, and M. F. Di Carli, “Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1052–1058, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. G. Nekolla, C. Miethaner, N. Nguyen, S. I. Ziegler, and M. Schwaiger, “Reproducibility of polar map generation and assessment of defect severity and extent assessment in myocardial perfusion imaging using positron emission tomography,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1313–1321, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H. Zaidi, Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging, Springer, 2006.
  63. G. S. Lin, H. H. Hines, G. Grant, K. Taylor, and C. Ryals, “Automated quantification of myocardial ischemia and wall motion defects by use of cardiac SPECT polar mapping and 4-dimensional surface rendering,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2006. View at Scopus
  64. M. C. Wu, D. W. Gao, R. E. Sievers, R. J. Lee, B. H. Hasegawa, and M. W. Dae, “Pinhole single-photon emission computed tomography for myocardial perfusion imaging of mice,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 576–582, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. T. Kudo, K. Fukuchi, A. J. Annala et al., “Noninvasive measurement of myocardial activity concentrations and perfusion defect sizes in rats with a new small-animal positron emission tomograph,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 118–123, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. P. D. Acton, D. Thomas, and R. Zhou, “Quantitative imaging of myocardial infarct in rats with high resolution pinhole SPECT,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 429–434, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. M. K. O'Connor, T. Hammell, and R. J. Gibbons, “In vitro validation of a simple tomographic technique for estimation of percentage myocardium at risk using methoxyisobutyl isonitrile technetium 99m (sestamibi),” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 69–76, 1990. View at Scopus