About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 592364, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/592364
Research Article

Criminal Genomic Pragmatism: Prisoners' Representations of DNA Technology and Biosecurity

1Department of Sociology, Research Center for the Social Sciences (CICS), Institute for Social Sciences, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Public Health of the University of Porto (ISPUP), University of Porto Medical School, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal

Received 1 March 2012; Accepted 12 April 2012

Academic Editor: Carlos Ramos

Copyright © 2012 Helena Machado and Susana Silva. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Lynch, “God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science,” Endeavour, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Bhati, Quantifying the Specific Deterrent Effects of DNA Databases, Justice Policy Center, The Urban Institute, 2010, http://www.urban.org/uploadedpdf/412058_dna_databases.pdf.
  3. M. Briody, The Effects of DNA Evidence on the Criminal Justice Process, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, 2004.
  4. D. B. Wilson, D. McClure, and D. Weisburd, “Does forensic DNA help to solve crime? The benefit of sophisticated answers to naive questions,” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 458–469, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. McCartney, “Forensic DNA sampling and the England and Wales National DNA database: a sceptical approach,” Critical Criminology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 157–178, 2004.
  6. B. L. Garrett, “The substance of false confessions,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1051–1119, 2010. View at Scopus
  7. E. Beauregard and M. Bouchard, “Cleaning up your act: forensic awareness as a detection avoidance strategy,” Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1160–1166, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. McCartney, R. Williams, and T. Wilson, The Future of Forensic Bioinformation, Leeds, 2010.
  9. T. Duster, “Explaining differential trust of DNA forensic technology: grounded assessment or inexplicable paranoia?” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 293–300, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Machado and B. Prainsack, Tracing Technologies: Prisoners’ Views in the Era of CSI, Ashgate, UK, 2012.
  11. H. Machado, F. Santos, and S. Silva, “Prisoners' expectations of the national forensic DNA database: surveillance and reconfiguration of individual rights,” Forensic Science International, vol. 210, no. 1–3, pp. 139–143, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Prainsack, “Partners in crime: the use of forensic DNA technologies in Austria,” in Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of DNA Profiling and Databasing, R. Hindmarsh and B. Prainsack, Eds., pp. 153–174, Cambrige University Press, Cambrige, UK, 2010.
  13. F. Lentzos, “Rationality, risk and response: a research agenda for biosecurity,” BioSocieties, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 453–464, 2006.
  14. H. Machado, M. I. Cunha, D. Miranda, and F. Santos, “Stained Bodies: prisoners’ perceptions of the DNA database for criminal investigation purposes and their perspectives of social reintegration,” 2011, http://dnadatabase.ces.uc.pt/list_documents.php.
  15. DGSP, Existing Inmates on 31 December, According to Education, Sex and Nationality, 2009, http://www.dgsp.mj.pt/backoffice/uploads/anuais/20100302020332RecExist_Inst-Sex-Nac.pdf.
  16. J. Hamel, S. Dufour, and D. Fortin, Case Study Methods, Sage, London, UK, 1993.
  17. R. Williams and P. Johnson, ““Wonderment and dread”: representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases,” New Genetics and Society, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 205–223, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Prainsack and M. Kitzberger, “DNA behind bars: other ways of knowing forensic DNA technologies,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 51–79, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus