Research Article

Production of Chemoenzymatic Catalyzed Monoepoxide Biolubricant: Optimization and Physicochemical Characteristics

Table 2

D-optimal design arrangement and responses for MEOA.

Run no.H2O2 (X1)Catalysta (X2)Timeb (X3)Y1, yield (%)Y2,  OOC (%)RCO (%)Y3, IV (mg/g)X (%)SE

12080876.576.1768.4037.8176.370.89
217.580788.575.4860.7558.9562.53 0.97
317.5100872.147.5483.5932.2279.521.05
42080672.286.470.9540.9873.95 0.95
520120754.715.9465.8564.3259.121.11
620120660.287.8887.3630.8780.38 1.08
715120873.575.4860.7553.2466.16 0.91
82080781.425.3759.5356.3264.200.92
915100775.685.0255.6574.6452.56 1.05
1018.75100785.285.7163.3049.1768.750.92
1120100781.146.0567.0642.7272.85 0.92
1215120670.784.5750.6676.4851.390.98
1315100665.933.6540.4696.4338.71 1.00
1415120782.144.91 54.4366.6557.640.94
1517.5120859.286.7474.7236.3776.63 0.97
1620100672.856.5172.1739.7674.730.90
171580877.144.3448.1183.8546.71 1.03
1817.5100680.853.77 41.7987.09 44.65 0.93

Notes: OOC, oxirane oxygen content; RCO, relative percentage conversion to oxirane; IV, iodine value; X, conversion to double bond; SE, oxirane oxygen selectivity.
aCatalyst Novozym 435 (mg).
bMonoepoxidation time (h).