- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 793487, 1 page
Erratum to “Flagellar Motility of Trypanosoma cruzi Epimastigotes”
1Departamento de Biomedicina Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, 07000 México, DF, Mexico
2Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, UNAM, 04510 México, DF, Mexico
3Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, 68120 Oaxaca, Mexico
4Unidad Monterrey, Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados del IPN, 66600 Monterrey, Mexico
5FES Iztacala, UBIMED, UNAM, Estodo de México, 54090 México, DF, Mexico
Received 16 February 2012; Accepted 20 March 2012
Copyright © 2012 G. Ballesteros-Rodea et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The authors would like to make the following changes.
(1) In the Results Section 3.3. Vectorial Analysis of Parasites Trajectories, third paragraph, the sentence: this behavior was clearly observed when speed and rotational angle were analyzed together (Figure 7) should be replaced by the following sentence: this behavior was clearly observed in the parasite trajectories, like the one pictured in Figure 7.
(2) The legend of Figure 7, Figure 7: Analysis of parasite trajectory. The trajectory of free-swimming epimastigotes was determined using the speed and rotational angle results form a 10-second recording. The histogram is representative of the average behavior of 20 randomly selected epimastigotes, should be replaced by Figure 7: Analysis of a single parasite trajectory. The trajectory of a typical free-swimming epimastigote was recorded for 10 seconds.
(3) Figure 7 that is in the original paper should be replaced by the following figure.