About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 180453, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/180453
Research Article

A Posteriori Comparison of Natural and Surgical Destabilization Models of Canine Osteoarthritis

1Osteoarthritis Research Unit, Université de Montréal Hospital Centre, Notre-Dame Hospital, 1560 Sherbrooke St. East, Montreal, QC, Canada H2L 4M1
2GREPAQ, Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (FVM), Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada J2S 7C6
3Department of Clinical Sciences, FVM, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada J2S 7C6
4Hôpital Vétérinaire Rive-Sud, 7415 Taschereau, Brossard, QC, Canada J4Y 1A2
5Clinique Vétérinaire Languedocia, 395 Ruc Maurice Béjart, 34080 Montpellier, France

Received 5 July 2013; Accepted 10 September 2013

Academic Editor: Oreste Gualillo

Copyright © 2013 Maxim Moreau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

For many years Canis familiaris, the domestic dog, has drawn particular interest as a model of osteoarthritis (OA). Here, we optimized the dog model of experimental OA induced by cranial cruciate ligament sectioning. The usefulness of noninvasive complementary outcome measures, such as gait analysis for the limb function and magnetic resonance imaging for structural changes, was demonstrated in this model. Relationships were established between the functional impairment and the severity of structural changes including the measurement of cartilage thinning. In the dog model of naturally occurring OA, excellent test-retest reliability was denoted for the measurement of the limb function. A criterion to identify clinically meaningful responders to therapy was determined for privately owned dogs undergoing clinical trials. In addition, the recording of accelerometer-based duration of locomotor activity showed strong and complementary agreement with the biomechanical limb function. The translation potential of these models to the human OA condition is underlined. A preclinical testing protocol which combines the dog model of experimental OA induced by cranial cruciate ligament transection and the Dog model of naturally occurring OA offers the opportunity to further investigate the structural and functional benefits of disease-modifying strategies. Ultimately, a better prediction of outcomes for human clinical trials would be brought.

1. Introduction

Biomedical research is the broad area of science that investigates the biological processes and the causes of diseases mainly through experimentation and testing. Enticing this vision, the use of animal models is required to advance medical knowledge and overall health benefits. In the field of rheumatic diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA), animal models contribute to the understanding of the basic biology of OA and help to develop potent therapeutic approaches for the benefits of human medicine [1]. Unfortunately, a consensus regarding the ideal animal model for studying OA has not been established [24]. Actually, there is a need to optimize current models of OA and to propose avenues to enhance preclinical drug development.

The canine stifle is similar to a human’s knee, sharing anatomical components and histological aspects [5]. To give a deep insight in the OA mechanisms, the dogs have been subjected to several approaches over the years to induce the structural changes of OA, including cartilage scarification (or groove model) [6], transarticular impact [7], tibial osteotomy [8], and meniscal lesions [9]. Another well-described dog model of OA is the cranial (or anterior) cruciate ligament (CCL) transection. Surgical CCL transection (CCLT) alters the amount and distribution of biomechanical forces. Over days to months, the joint features structural changes that mimic OA, including synovitis, osteophyte growth, cartilage depletion, and bone marrow lesions (BMLs) development [10].

The conventional scientific outputs (i.e., joint structural changes) of the experimental dog model of OA induced by CCLT have been recently coupled to peak vertical force (PVF) measurement using kinetic gait analysis to document concomitant potential benefits on the pain-related functional impairment [1113]. The first aim of this study was to optimize the experimental CCLT-induced dog OA model by further exploring the translational relationship between the level of structural changes and the limb disability.

Developmental arthropathies and joint trauma predispose dog to structural changes of OA, which like in human beings lead to crippling pain and disability [1416]. The potential of pharmaceutical as well as complementary and alternative medicines has been tested in different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in naturally occurring OA dogs using PVF as an outcome measure of pain-related functional impairment [1720]. Naturally occurring models of OA have been proposed even to accelerate the development of human therapeutics [10]. As a second aim, this study would characterize different outcome measures in a manner to optimize the use of naturally occurring OA dogs in research and to improve the quality of RCT in this translational natural model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Dog Model of Experimental OA
2.1.1. Specific Research Objectives

The evolution of the PVF measurement and its relationship with the progression of structural changes evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (i.e., cartilage volume loss, focal changes of the articular cartilage, BMLs, osteophytes, joint effusion size, and meniscal lesions) was documented over a period of 26 weeks in CCL-deficient dogs. In addition, the relationship between PVF recording and the macroscopic measurements of cartilage thinning performed at eight weeks following CCLT was documented cross-sectionally. Such relationship served to determine the level of in vivo structural changes to be predicted based on a given PVF measurement. To this end, data were selected from previous studies involving PVF measurement and structural changes on MRI (internal data, 2005) [2123] and macroscopic measurement of cartilage thinning (internal data 2005, 2007) [11, 12] (Figure 1(a)).

fig1
Figure 1: Schematic view of the data reported in (a) the dog model of experimental osteoarthritis and (b) the dog model of naturally occurring osteoarthritis. PVF (peak vertical force), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), macro (macroscopic structural measurement of cartilage thinning), CCLT (cranial cruciate ligament transection). Numbers of dogs are specified in parenthesis.

All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. All dogs were acclimated, housed, and then subjected to surgical CCLT of the right knee under preemptive (transdermal fentanyl 50 or 75 μg/h; Janssen Ortho, Markham, ON, Canada) and multimodal (intra-articular block combined with opioid administration) analgesia as previously described [11]. Food was given once daily and removed overnight. Body weight was monitored weekly and was kept constant throughout the study duration. Throughout the study, all dogs were actively exercised in exterior runs (1.35 m × 9.15 m) for a 2-hour period, 5 days a week, under the supervision of an animal care technician.

2.1.2. Peak Vertical Force Measurement

Recognized as a reference method of functional outcome in dog [2426], the PVF measurement was done at the trot (1.9–2.2 meter/second) using a floor mat-based plantar force measurement system (Walkway with four Matscan sensors 3150; Tekscan Inc., Boston, MA, USA), as previously described [11]. Data were acquired at four successive time points (Figure 1(a)). For the CCL-deficient hind limb, the first stride PVF was acquired. Data from the first five valid trials were averaged and expressed as a percentage of body weight (% BW) and used to describe the change over time in PVF measurement.

2.1.3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Structural changes were evaluated at four successive time points (Figure 1(a)) using MRI scans (Echospeed LX; General Electric Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) and settings as previously described [21]. Previous publications detailed the quantification of cartilage volume (mm3) [21] and the scoring system used for focal changes of the articular cartilage (0–4, maximum score of 44) [21], BMLs (0–3, maximum score of 27) [23], osteophytes (0–3, maximum score of 45) [22], joint effusion size (0–3) [22], and meniscal lesions (0–3, maximum score of 6) [27]. Cartilage volume and structural changes were evaluated using the following sequences: (1) three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled sequence (SPGR) with fat suppression, (2) T1-weighted three-dimensional fast gradient recalled echo (T1w-GRE), and (3) T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence with fat saturation (T2w-FS). Bone marrow lesions were scored independently in T1w-GRE and T2w-FS sequences as ill-defined areas of hypointensity or hyperintensity, respectively. Evaluation of cartilage volume and structural changes was for the entire (global) joint, except otherwise stated.

2.1.4. Macroscopic Measurement of Cartilage Thinning

Cartilage thinning was quantified at eight weeks following CCLT (Figure 1(a)) using a dissecting microscope (Stereozoom; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) as previously described [28]. Macroscopic measurement of cartilage thinning (mm2) was for the medial and lateral femoral condyles and medial and lateral tibial plateaus.

2.2. Dog Model of Naturally Occurring OA
2.2.1. Specific Research Objectives

The repeatability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC) of PVF measured in privately owned dogs affected by naturally occurring OA were defined over a four-week period. Moreover, the PVF measurement was tested for its relationship with accelerometer-based duration of daily locomotor activity. The goal of testing such relationship was to determine the level of PVF measurement exceeding the MDC to be predicted based on a change in daily locomotor activity, which would represent a practical outcome of animal welfare determinant at home [29]. To this end, data were selected from previous studies involving PVF measurement (40 placebo-treated dogs followed up over four weeks) [17, 19, 30] or PVF measurement coupled to daily locomotor activity recording over six weeks (33 dogs, from which 14 were placebo-treated) (internal data, 2007) [17] (Figure 1(b)). All studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. All owners gave informed consent for their participation in each RCT.

2.2.2. Naturally Occurring OA Dogs

Seventy-three privately owned adult dogs weighing more than 20 kg having radiographic evidence of OA exclusively at the hip and/or stifle joints were considered, as previously described [17, 19, 30]. All dogs had OA-related hind limb disability according to orthopedic examinations and PVF measurements. Specific washout periods were respected for eventual OA treatment (including pharmaceuticals, natural health products, and therapeutic diets).

2.2.3. Peak Vertical Force Measurement

The PVF measurement was done at the trot (1.9–2.2 meter/second) using a force platform (Model OR6-6, Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA), as previously described [17, 19, 29, 30]. Measurements were done at different time points (Figure 1(b)). Averaged data from the first five valid trials were expressed as % BW. In each dog, the hind limb with the lowest PVF measurement was used for statistical analyses purpose.

2.2.4. Daily Locomotor Activity Recording

Accelerometer-based daily locomotor activity recording was done using Actical system (Bio-Lynx Scientific Equipment Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada) as previously described [17]. Collar-mounted accelerometers were worn by 33 dogs for six weeks, 24 hour/day (Figure 1(b)). The duration of motion was continuously monitored as counts every two minutes, giving 720 counts per day. Daily duration of active period was referred to the time spent (expressed in minutes) when the count exceeded 30 in terms of intensity. This cut-off value was based on internal data (2004) in comparison to video-analysis and was previously used to discern movement in active (intensity > 30) from inactive (intensity < 30) period [17]. Data used were the area under the curve (AUC) which represents the integral of the daily duration of active period over six weeks and the mean of the first three days, and of the last seven days, which defined Baseline and week six data, respectively [31].

2.3. Statistical Analyses

To describe the evolution of limb function in CCL-deficient dogs, a Friedman test was used using Dunn’s tests for post hoc analyses. To describe the relationship between the limb function with MRI structural changes, data were analyzed with Spearman correlation test and presented as Spearman coefficient (). This coefficient shows by its magnitude the strength of the linear association. An close to one (or minus one) indicates a strong positive (negative) linear correlation. To describe the relationship between the limb function (explanatory variable) with macroscopic measurement of cartilage thinning (response variable), data were analyzed with mixed linear model using studies as random effect. Random-effect models attempt to generalize findings beyond the included studies by assuming that the selected studies are random samples from a larger population. Such models incorporate a component of between-study variation into the uncertainty of the estimates [32]. The general equation of the linear regression was , where refers to the slope and refers to the -intercept (i.e., the value of when = zero). To describe the natural fluctuation in limb function of placebo-treated (negative control) privately-owned dogs, absolute reliability (test-retest) was calculated using intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) and related 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Two-way random single measures model (ICC 2.1) was used. An ICC close to one indicates “excellent” reliability [33]. The SEM quantifies the precision of individual PVF measurement and defines the boundaries around which a subject’s value is expected to lie according to a given confident interval [34]. The SEM at 95% CI was calculated as follows: where SD referred to the within-subject standard deviation [35]. The MDC in PVF measurement that can be recorded confidently (95% CI) between test sessions is referred to as the MDC95 and was calculated as follows: The MDC95 can be interpreted as the magnitude of change, below which there is more than a 95% chance that change has occurred as a result of measurement error [36]. Outside this change, value does reflect a real alteration in the functional impairment toward improvement or worsening in privately-owned dog with naturally occurring OA. To describe the relationship between the limb function (response variable) with daily locomotor activity recording (explanatory variable), data were analyzed with mixed linear model using study arms (placebo or tested agent) as fixed factor and studies as random factor. All analyses were performed with SPSS, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values are presented as mean (standard deviation). Significant level was set at .

3. Results

3.1. Dog Model of Experimental OA
3.1.1. Measurement of the PVF

Peak vertical force measurement changed over time () following CCLT (Figure 2(a)). Based on medians, there was a significant decrease at week four and at week eight when compared to Baseline. Then, PVF increased at week 26, reaching values significantly different than week four only. The individual changes over time involved different degrees of functional impairment characterized by a decrease in PVF measurement from Baseline reaching a nadir (at week four) followed by a phase of remission (from week four to week 26, Figure 2(a)).

fig2
Figure 2: (a) Averaged peak vertical force values measured before (Baseline) and four, eight, and 26 weeks after cranial cruciate ligament transection in dogs. At each time point, group values are presented as mean (standard deviation) (median). Dunn’s test identified which medians were significantly different. (b) Individual peak vertical force values measured before (Baseline) and four, eight, and 26 weeks after cranial cruciate ligament transection in dogs. Dotted lines identify dogs having the highest limb disability at week four and the highest levels of focal changes of the articular cartilage.
3.1.2. Relationship between PVF and Structural Changes on MRI

During the phase of functional impairment nadir (from Baseline to week four), the decrease in PVF measurement did not correlate in a significant manner with the development of structural changes as evaluated using MRI (Table 1). Of note, the dogs having the more severe limb disability at week four (Figure 2(b)) were those with the highest level of focal changes of the articular cartilage.

tab1
Table 1: Correlation analyses of the change in peak vertical force measurement and magnetic resonance imaging over the different phases of functional impairment before (Baseline) and following cranial cruciate ligament transection in five dogs.

The increase in PVF measured during the phase of remission (from week four to week 26) correlated inversely with the score for osteophytes, joint effusion, hypointense BMLs (Figure 3) and focal changes of the articular cartilage (Table 1). These negative correlations mean an abrogated remission in the presence of severe chondral and subchondral lesions and MRI-scored joint effusion.

180453.fig.003
Figure 3: Significant correlation ) for the differences of hypointense bone marrow lesions on T1-weighted three-dimensional fast gradient recalled echo images (T1w-GRE) scores during the remission phase (week 26 minus week four), with the concurrent difference in peak vertical force measurement. Linear regression trend is illustrated.

The measurement of PVF did not correlate with cartilage volume loss, hyperintense BMLs, or meniscal tears. Only a trend was seen for a positive correlation with medial cartilage volume loss (the more PVF remission was, the more cartilage volume loss was) and medial tears score of the meniscus (Table 1).

3.1.3. Relationship with Macroscopic Measurement of Cartilage Thinning

Twenty-five dogs undergoing PVF measurement before and after CCLT were used. At Baseline, PVF measurement was 70.4 (10.9)% BW and was 26.6 (12.4)% BW and 33.9 (15.8)% BW at week four and eight, respectively. The PVF measured at week eight did not demonstrate significant relationship with cartilage thinning observed on the lateral condyle and plateau and medial plateau (Table 2). However, a significant relationship was observed with the severity of the thinning at the medial condyle, which means higher PVF value in the presence of more severe cartilage thinning. According to the regression parameters (see Table 2), for a group of CCL-deficient dogs weighing 25.0 (2.3) kg, a PVF measured at week eight of 33.9 (15.8)% BW is expected to correspond to an extent of cartilage thinning on the medial condyle of 27.3 mm2 (95% CI: 10.4–44.2).

tab2
Table 2: Regression analyses between the recording of the peak vertical force and macroscopic measurement of cartilage thinning at eight weeks following cranial cruciate ligament transection in 25 dogs.
3.2. Dog Model of Naturally Occurring OA
3.2.1. Characteristics of PVF Measurement

Forty privately owned dogs affected by OA who received a placebo (negative control) served to determine the test-retest reliability of PVF measurement over a period of four weeks (Table 3). Standard error of measurement was determined and served for the calculation of MDC95. The MDC95 was consistent with an increase or a decline in the magnitude of 2.0% BW across this group of OA dogs. When expressed relatively to Baseline value, the MDC95 represented 3.6%. Figure 4 presents individual changes in PVF measured from Baseline to week four. According to the MDC95, 22 dogs had clinically meaningful changes, which were positive in five dogs and negative in 17 others.

tab3
Table 3: Characteristics of peak vertical force measurement in 40 privately owned dogs affected by naturally occurring osteoarthritis.
180453.fig.004
Figure 4: Individual changes in peak vertical force measured at week four in 40 privately owned dogs receiving a placebo in randomized controlled trials. Changes were the difference between week four versus Baseline. Grey zone represents a decrease in peak vertical force measurement compared to Baseline. Dashed lines represent the MDC95. Peak vertical force data are expressed in % BW (body weight) and presented as mean (standard deviation) (minimal value to maximal value).
3.2.2. Relationship with Daily Locomotor Activity Recording

Thirty-three privately-owned dogs affected by OA that had PVF measurement and daily locomotor activity recorded over a six-week period were used. The PVF measurement in OA dogs demonstrated a significant relationship with the integral (AUC) of the daily duration of active period recorded during the 26-week period (), which means a higher PVF in the presence of higher locomotor activity. The change in the PVF measurement demonstrated a significant relationship with the change in daily duration of active period (, (95% CI: 0.01–0.05), (95% CI: 0.4–5.1)) regardless of the study arms (i.e., placebo or tested agents). According to the regression parameters, for an increase in daily duration of active period by 54 minutes in OA dogs, the change in PVF measurement was predicted to be 4.4% BW (95% CI: 2.1–6.8). This by far exceeds the previously defined MDC95 (i.e., 2.0% BW), meaning a significant positive effect in PVF measurement (limb function) related to the increase in locomotor activity.

4. Discussion

4.1. Dog Model of Experimental OA

The CCLT dog model of OA involves structural changes that mimic those encountered in human OA [2, 10, 37]. This model was further optimized keeping in mind the three Rs’ principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement [38]. The present study demonstrated the usefulness of complementary outcome measures. Hence, PVF measurement, which echoes pain-related functional impairment, can be successfully combined to the common structural outcomes in the CCLT dog model of OA. To maximize the information gained from CCL-deficient dogs, researchers can document in a noninvasive manner the pain-related disability, which comprises a phase of functional impairment with a nadir preceding a remission process. At the preclinical stage of drug development, such information has a clinically meaningful potential for disease-modifying compounds proposed to confer pain and functional improvement in addition to structural benefits. As PVF measurement data were detailed, power and sample size can be determined a priori, again supporting the principle of reduction by providing statistical estimates. The principle of refinement is also addressed by documenting individual variability (per dog data) that occurs over an extended duration [39].

Anterior cruciate ligament (human counterpart of CCL) transection leads to rotational and translational changes that induce mechanical stresses on articular surfaces unaccustomed for such loading solicitation [4044]. This phenomenon generates loss of tissue integrity, involving abnormal architecture and components known as structural changes. Using MRI, which is a non-invasive imaging technique, the present study supports the use of the CCLT dog model of OA for its potential to corroborate the relationship between structural changes and clinical signs observed in human. Hence, a recent systematic review indicated that OA knee pain is associated with BMLs and effusion/synovitis [45]. In line with findings observed in humans [46, 47], severe limb impairment was denoted in dogs with the highest level of focal changes of the articular cartilage during the phase of limb disability (from Baseline to week four). When BMLs evolved minimally, these manifestations were concomitant to lesser limb disability (Figure 3). Such benefits are in accordance with the report of Zhang et al. [48] who observed a fluctuation of pain when BMLs were modulated. We also observed that CCL-deficient dogs had better limb functional remission when osteophyte growth and joint effusion size were minimal. These findings were suggestive of higher pain in the presence of osteophyte and effusion/synovitis as reported in human [45, 49, 50]. In face of the present results, we propose to integrate the pain-related functional impairment to the presence of severe chondral and subchondral lesions. We suggest that a more unstable joint (i.e., devoid of adaptive neuromuscular strategies to palliate for the excessive displacement) could be responsible for the more severe chondral and subchondral changes observed. As an attempt to restore limb function, marked expressions of secondary strategies, such as osteophytes growth and joint effusion, are suggested to develop for providing stability and cushioning, in a manner to minimize the deleterious knee joint load in CCL-deficient dogs.

Although we did not reach statistically significant levels, our findings are suggestive of a role of mechanical environment in cartilage volume loss and meniscus insult in CCL-deficient dogs. Hence, we found a trend to have more severe cartilage loss and meniscal tears in the medial part of the joint in dogs having recovered well their limb function (i.e., with the highest PVF measurement). In addition, the extent of medial cartilage thinning was greater in dogs having the highest limb function at eight weeks following CCLT. Those findings were in line with those of Smith jr. et al. [13], which reported a link between the level of knee joint chondropathy and increasing limb function in this model. Furthermore, meniscal lesions have been linked with the progression of OA cartilage loss in humans [51, 52] while a strong relationship exists between high joint loading and meniscal lesions [53]. These findings are of major importance, not only because of their correspondence to findings in human knee OA, but also because the presence of meniscal lesions has an impact on the response to disease-modifying OA drug (DMOAD) treatment in human knee OA [46, 51], a finding that likely also applies to the CCLT dog model of OA.

Despite its burgeoning importance, translation of DMOAD therapies from the laboratory into clinical practice has slowed. Differences between the OA models studied preclinically and the disease evaluated in human clinical trials contribute to this failure [54]. First, a general concern is the use of quadruped animals as knee models for the bipedal human, particularly given their range of motion differences noted in a study comparing large animal (cow, sheep, goat, dog, pig, and rabbit) to human cadaveric knees [55]. The disappearance of many of the observed differences in the cruciate and meniscal anatomy after normalization with the tibial plateau width suggested an overall conservation of relative size among species for the cruciates and menisci [55]. This anatomical and biomechanical analogy, while reviewing the different OA animal models, led Gregory et al. [3] to state that the canine model is probably the closest to a gold-standard animal model for OA currently available. The present study adds the structure-function relationship translated from the dog CCLT model to the human pain OA condition.

Second, most animal models of OA induce disease through chemical insult or surgical or mechanical disruption of joint biomechanics in young individuals rather than the spontaneous development of the disease. This instability-induced joint disease in animals best models the structural changes that develops in humans after an injurious event, known as posttraumatic OA [54]. The poor translational predictability to therapy response is particularly high with the rodent preclinical models. Studies in genetically modified mice suggest that post-traumatic OA has a distinct molecular pathophysiology compared with that of spontaneous OA, which might explain the poor translation from preclinical to clinical OA therapeutic trials [54]. On the contrary, molecular changes observed in a past study with the canine CCLT model suggest that dog cartilage responds to post-traumatic OA and degenerative conditions by regulating the same genes in a similar direction as that observed for chondrocytes in post-traumatic and late human OA [56]. Finally, the recent finding about the DMOAD effects of strontium ranelate [57] late in the CCLT dog model of OA being confirmed in a Phase III clinical trial in knee OA patients [58] is of the utmost importance in the context of this publication. Previously, many DMOADs have demonstrated efficacy in the dog OA model, including the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor doxycycline [59, 60], the viscosupplementation via local hyaluronan [61, 62], the antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonate [11, 63] and calcitonin [64], the anti-inflammatory properties of diacerhein [65], licofelone [28], and NSAIDs (such as carprofen). All these products but calcitonin (probably related to a deficient formulation) demonstrated similar efficacy in human OA [51, 6673]. To the best of authors’ knowledge, no other preclinical animal OA model presents a better translational predictability record, partly because species differences with respect to the relative contribution of various mediators, receptors, or enzymes to the pathology and xenobiotics metabolism are common.

In accordance with the three Rs’ principles, the predictive character of the cartilage thinning based upon PVF measurement opens the idea of limiting the requirement of post-mortem analysis for future research aimed to gain insight in joint cartilage integrity in this model. Based on the regression parameters, the limb disability observed at eight weeks following CCLT predicted an extent of macroscopic lesions surface by 27.3 mm2. This level of lesions represents 12% of the total surface of the medial condyle when based on MRI cartilage surface mapping in dogs of similar BW (ArthroVision, personal communication, 2013). As the characterization of full-thickness cartilage thinning in end-stage OA in humans was shown to range between 10 and 23% at this joint compartment [74], the translational potential (macroscopical structural argument) of this model to human OA is further supported.

It should be pointed out that the statistical method used to correlate structural changes on MRI with PVF measurement does not pinpoint the sequence of events and did not take into account the potential role of confounding factors, interrelationship, and dependency. Findings of the pilot study reported herein will help to promote future research of a more mechanistic (structure-function) approach based on a higher sample size. The complementary outcome measures proposed herein to optimize the use of the dog in OA research are not restricted to the CCLT model. Other experimental avenues should be explored for their potential to induce structural changes in close relationship with functional impairment.

4.2. Dog Model of Naturally Occurring OA

The recent interest in natural models of OA [10] puts more emphasis on the need to improve the rigor of RCT using functional outcome measures, such as PVF, in naturally occurring OA dogs. This study optimized the use of naturally occurring OA dogs in research by characterizing the PVF measurement with regards to the high value of this outcome to address pain/biomechanics-related joint alterations in the dog. Here test-retest PVF measurement values demonstrated excellent between-session reliability with an ICC of 91 (95% CI: 80–95) in placebo-treated dogs followed up over a four-week period. The SEM provides an absolute index of reliability and refers to the precision of individual measurements. Determining magnitude of an intervention benefit is a critical methodological step in the design of a clinical trial. For the PVF, the MDC95 indicated that a change of at least 2.0% BW needs to occur to be confident, at the 95% level, that a change in PVF measurement reflects a real change and not a difference that is within what might be reasonably expected given the measurement error (noise). As PVF measurement characteristics were provided, such as standard deviation, SEM, and the MCD95, such data should help researchers to estimate power and sample size, thus contributing to the principle of refinement.

Randomized controlled trials in naturally occurring OA dogs usually focus on testing mean changes across groups of treated (test article) and control (placebo-treated) animals. This practice often obscures the individual change, which may be very informative in clinical studies [75]. Moreover, reporting the percentages of subjects who met the MDC95 requirements provides additional insightful interpretations other than considering only the overall mean change scores [76]. Accordingly, researchers have a tool to distinguish improved (or worsened) dogs by using the proposed MDC95 value as a cutoff. Of note, the level of 2.0% BW was in line with the improvement observed following therapeutic modalities in previous clinical RCT in OA dogs [1720, 30, 7780].

The results of the current study show that different levels of change in limb function reflected by PVF measurement were observed in privately-owned dogs afflicted by OA (Figure 4). Among the 40 dogs evaluated, 22 (55%) had clinically meaningful changes, which were positive (placebo effect) in five (12.5%) or negative (nocebo effect) in 17 (42.5%) dogs. The high proportion of dogs having a worsening of their condition contributes mainly to the overall decrease in PVF recording by −1.5 (3.1)% BW. A phenomenon known as the maturation effect may be suggested as being involved in changes exceeding the measurement error.

In a recent multicenter RCT in naturally occurring OA, an arbitrary cut-off value (i.e., 2.8% BW or ≥5% of Baseline measurement) was used to distinguish clinically meaningful responders from measurement error [81]. Of note, the global rate of responders reported according to this value was 20.7% whereas it was higher in our study (55%) by applying the MDC95 (calculated to be 2.0% BW or ≥3.6% of Baseline measurement). The latter finding is important, as applying the higher arbitrary cut-off value rather than the MDC95 proposed herein would lead to a high false negative rate of responders (being indeed considered as nonresponders). This type II error overestimates the required sample size and leads to an unnecessary high number of dogs affected by OA to be recruited in the RCT. It should be noted that the low placebo responder’s rate (12.5% in the current study, 12.1% [81]) observed according to the objective PVF measurement again contributes to a judicious use of privately owned dogs in RCT. This is a huge advantage compared to subjective assessment completed by either veterinarians or owners, for whom the placebo responder’s rate was oscillating between 25 and 44.8% [81, 82].

As previously demonstrated in naturally occurring OA dogs [17, 29, 31, 77] the usefulness of continuous monitoring of daily locomotor activity recording was sustained in the current study. Particularly, we denoted that continuous activity recording showed strong similarities with PVF measurement, being sensitive to functional improvement. This tool is therefore highly recommended to be used as a complement to punctual PVF measurement in a way to improve the detection of therapeutic benefits in OA dogs. In addition, the present results support the relevance of naturally occurring OA dogs for their potential to respond similarly to the human OA condition. This was illustrated in recent studies in which an anti-inflammatory drug, licofelone, was tested positively both in the dog model of experimental OA [28] naturally occurring OA [30] as well as in a clinical Phase III study in patients with knee OA [51]. Similar concordance in efficacy was observed with doxycycline [59, 60, 71].

Hence, dogs with the most severe limb impairment were those with the lowest degree of daily activity. This was in line with findings in human OA reporting lower physical activity in more afflicted patients [83]. Present data also give a first impression of potential benefits of an increase by 54 minutes in daily life activity being mirrored confidently with an increase in PVF that exceeded the measurement error. This was recently supported in dogs with hip OA, showing a better condition when more than an hour of exercise was performed daily [84]. Human data are also in accordance with this finding as physical activity programs are supported to reduce pain, to improve physical performance, and to delay disability among persons with knee OA [8587].

4.3. Conclusion

Biomedical research and testing often faces criticism and protestation against the use of dogs for research purposes. As for any animal experiments, the three Rs’ principles must apply. In addition, findings from ideal animal models have to be rapidly translated to human characteristic with the ultimate hope to better predict outcomes for human clinical trials. With this idea in mind, we present an optimization of the outcomes gained from the dog model of OA induced by CCLT. The relationship between structural changes and functional impairment denoted strong similarities with the human OA condition. This adds to the recognized anatomical and biomechanical, genomic, molecular, histological, and macroscopical structural similarities to human OA, as well as to the access of yet validated and performing functional and imaging outcome measures, as reported in the present paper.

Regarding the dog model of naturally occurring OA, the present analysis provides compelling evidence to better interpret complementary outcome measures assessing the OA condition. The PVF measurement data particularly is robust, precise, and reliable for determining whether a change has taken place as a result of an intervention. Moreover, the data support the huge interest and applicability of monitoring the level of daily locomotor activity in clinical RCT with privately-owned OA dogs. Such natural model of OA in dog represents a spontaneous model of the disease, different and complementary to the post-traumatic OA model. At the difference of the standardized preclinical CCLT dog model, the conditions are close to those of a population pharmacological study integrating, in addition to the previously listed advantages, the genomics and environmental (such as the physical activity and the nutrition) influences of the disease.

Preclinical testing protocol combining the dog model of OA induced by CCLT and the dog model of naturally occurring OA could better predict outcomes for human clinical trials in a close future, as is supported by the high translational pharmacological responsiveness.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the research.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Dr. Jean-Pierre Raynauld, M.D., for his valuable and insightful comments throughout the writing process of the paper. M. Maxim Moreau received a doctoral scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research—Strategic Training Program (MENTOR) and a doctoral scholarship from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé. This work was supported in part by an ongoing New Opportunities Fund Grant (no. 9483) and a Leader Opportunity Fund Grant (no. 24601) from the Canada Foundation for Innovation (Eric Troncy) for the pain/function equipment, by the Osteoarthritis Chair of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Université de Montréal, and a Discovery Grant (no. 327158-2008) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Eric Troncy) for the bioanalyses and salaries.

References

  1. J.-P. Pelletier, C. Boileau, R. D. Altman, and J. Martel-Pelletier, “Experimental models of osteoarthritis: usefulness in the development of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs/agents,” Therapy, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 621–634, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Lampropoulou-Adamidou, P. Lelovas, E. V. Karadimas, et al., “Useful animal models for the research of osteoarthritis,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. H. Gregory, N. Capito, K. Kuroki, A. M. Stoker, J. L. Cook, and S. L. Sherman, “A review of translational animal models for knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis, vol. 2012, Article ID 764621, 14 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. U. G. Longo, M. Loppini, C. Fumo, et al., “Osteoarthritis: new insights in animal models,” The Open Orthopaedics Journal, vol. 6, pp. 558–563, 2012.
  5. H. De Rooster, T. De Bruin, and H. Van Bree, “Morphologic and functional features of the canine cruciate ligaments,” Veterinary Surgery, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 769–780, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. N. Frost-Christensen, S. C. Mastbergen, M. E. Vianen et al., “Degeneration, inflammation, regeneration, and pain/disability in dogs following destabilization or articular cartilage grooving of the stifle joint,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1327–1335, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Lahm, M. Uhl, M. Edlich, C. Erggelet, J. Haberstroh, and P. C. Kreuz, “An experimental canine model for subchondral lesions of the knee joint,” Knee, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. E. Panula, H. J. Helminen, and I. Kiviranta, “Slowly progressive osteoarthritis after tibial valgus osteotomy in young beagle dogs,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 343, pp. 192–202, 1997. View at Scopus
  9. H. Troyer, “Experimental models of osteoarthritis: a review,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 362–374, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. P. Pelletier, C. Boileau, R. D. Altman, and J. Martel-Pelletier, “Animal models of osteoarthritis,” in Rheumatology, M. C. Hochberg, et al., Ed., pp. 1731–1739, Mosby; Elsevier, 5th edition, 2010.
  11. M. Moreau, P. Rialland, J.-P. Pelletier et al., “Tiludronate treatment improves structural changes and symptoms of osteoarthritis in the canine anterior cruciate ligament model,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 13, no. 3, article R98, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Boileau, J. Martel-Pelletier, J. Caron et al., “Oral treatment with a Brachystemma calycinum D don plant extract reduces disease symptoms and the development of cartilage lesions in experimental dog osteoarthritis: inhibition of protease-activated receptor 2,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1179–1184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. N. Smith Jr., S. L. Myers, K. D. Brandt, E. A. Mickler, and M. E. Albrecht, “Effect of intraarticular hyaluronan injection on vertical ground reaction force and progression of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament transection,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 325–334, 2005. View at Scopus
  14. S. A. Johnston, “Overview of pain in the lame patient,” Veterinary Clinics of North America, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39–53, 2001. View at Scopus
  15. S. A. Martinez, “Congenital conditions that lead to osteoarthritis in the dog,” The Veterinary Clinics of North America, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 735–758, 1997. View at Scopus
  16. S. A. Martinez and G. S. Coronado, “Acquired conditions that lead to osteoarthritis in the dog,” The Veterinary Clinics of North America, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 759–775, 1997. View at Scopus
  17. M. Moreau, B. Lussier, J. P. Pelletier, et al., “Brachystemma calycinum D. don effectively reduces the locomotor disability in dogs with naturally occurring osteoarthritis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 646191, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. D. J. Imhoff, W. J. Gordon-Evans, R. B. Evans, A. L. Johnson, D. J. Griffon, and K. S. Swanson, “Evaluation of S-adenosyl l-methionine in a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial for treatment of presumptive osteoarthritis in the dog,” Veterinary Surgery, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 228–232, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Moreau, J. Dupuis, N. H. Bonneau, and M. Desnoyers, “Clinical evaluation of a nutraceutical, carprofen and meloxicam for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis,” Veterinary Record, vol. 152, no. 11, pp. 323–329, 2003. View at Scopus
  20. S. C. Budsberg, S. A. Johnston, P. D. Schwarz, C. E. DeCamp, and R. Claxton, “Efficacy of etodolac for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip joints in dogs,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 206–210, 1999. View at Scopus
  21. C. Boileau, J. Martel-Pelletier, F. Abram et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately assess the long-term progression of knee structural changes in experimental dog osteoarthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 926–932, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M.-A. D'Anjou, M. Moreau, É. Troncy et al., “Osteophytosis, subchondral bone sclerosis, joint effusion and soft tissue thickening in canine experimental stifle osteoarthritis: comparison between 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging and computed radiography,” Veterinary Surgery, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 166–177, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M.-A. d'Anjou, E. Troncy, M. Moreau et al., “Temporal assessment of bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in a canine model of knee osteoarthritis: impact of sequence selection,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1307–1311, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. L. Aragon, E. H. Hofmeister, and S. C. Budsberg, “Systematic review of clinical trials of treatments for osteoarthritis in dogs,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 230, no. 4, pp. 514–521, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. M. Quinn, N. S. Keuler, Y. Lu, M. L. E. Faria, P. Muir, and M. D. Markel, “Evaluation of agreement between numerical rating scales, visual analogue scoring scales, and force plate gait analysis in dogs,” Veterinary Surgery, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 360–367, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. M. McLaughlin, “Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs,” Veterinary Clinics of North America, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 193–201, 2001. View at Scopus
  27. L. Blond, D. E. Thrall, S. C. Roe, N. Chailleux, and I. D. Robertson, “Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for meniscal tears in dogs affected with naturally occuring cranial cruciate ligament rupture,” Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 425–431, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Moreau, C. Boileau, J. Martel-Pelletier, J. Brunet, S. Laufer, and J.-P. Pelletier, “Licofelone reduces progression of structural changes in a canine model of osteoarthritis under curative conditions: effect on protease expression and activity,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1176–1182, 2006. View at Scopus
  29. P. Rialland, S. Bichot, M. Moreau, et al., “Clinical validity of outcome pain measures in naturally occurring canine osteoarthritis,” BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 8, no. 1, article 162, 2012.
  30. M. Moreau, B. Lussier, M. Doucet, G. Vincent, J. Martel-Pelletier, and J.-P. Pelletier, “Efficacy of licofelone in dogs with clinical osteoarthritis,” Veterinary Record, vol. 160, no. 17, pp. 584–588, 2007. View at Scopus
  31. D. C. Brown, R. C. Boston, and J. T. Farrar, “Use of an activity monitor to detect response to treatment in dogs with osteoarthritis,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. W.-L. Cheung, R. C. M. Ho, Y. Lim, and A. Mak, “Conducting a meta-analysis: basics and good practices,” International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Atkinson and A. M. Nevill, “Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine,” Sports Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 217–238, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. P. Weir, “Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM,” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 231–240, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Measurement error,” British Medical Journal, vol. 313, no. 7059, article 744, 1996. View at Scopus
  36. F. M. Kovacs, V. Abraira, A. Royuela et al., “Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 9, article 43, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. D. Brandt, “Transection of the anterior cruciate ligament in the dog: a model of osteoarthritis,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 22–32, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. M. Russell, “The development of the three Rs concept,” Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 298–304, 1995. View at Scopus
  39. A. Manciocco, F. Chiarotti, A. Vitale, G. Calamandrei, G. Laviola, and E. Alleva, “The application of Russell and Burch 3R principle in rodent models of neurodegenerative disease: the case of Parkinson's disease,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. P. Andriacchi, S. Koo, and S. F. Scanlan, “Gait mechanics influence healthy cartilage morphology and osteoarthritis of the knee,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 95–101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. P. Andriacchi, P. L. Briant, S. L. Bevill, and S. Koo, “Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 442, pp. 39–44, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. P. Andriacchi and A. Mündermann, “The role of ambulatory mechanics in the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 514–518, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. P. Andriacchi, A. Mündermann, R. L. Smith, E. J. Alexander, C. O. Dyrby, and S. Koo, “A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 447–457, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Tashman, W. Anderst, P. Kolowich, S. Havstad, and S. Arnoczky, “Kinematics of the ACL-deficient canine knee during gait: serial changes over two years,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 931–941, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. E. Yusuf, M. C. Kortekaas, I. Watt, T. W. J. Huizinga, and M. Kloppenburg, “Do knee abnormalities visualised on MRI explain knee pain in knee osteoarthritis? a systematic Review,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. M. Wildi, J.-P. Raynauld, J. Martel-Pelletier et al., “Chondroitin sulphate reduces both cartilage volume loss and bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis patients starting as early as 6 months after initiation of therapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study using MRI,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 982–989, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. Anandacoomarasamy, G. Smith, S. Leibman et al., “Cartilage defects are associated with physical disability in obese adults,” Rheumatology, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1290–1293, 2009. View at Scopus
  48. Y. Zhang, M. Nevitt, J. Niu et al., “Fluctuation of knee pain and changes in bone marrow lesions, effusions, and synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 691–699, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. G. Zhai, F. Cicuttini, C. Ding, F. Scott, P. Garnero, and G. Jones, “Correlates of knee pain in younger subjects,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. L. Torres, D. D. Dunlop, C. Peterfy et al., “The relationship between specific tissue lesions and pain severity in persons with knee osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1033–1040, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J.-P. Raynauld, J. Martel-Pelletier, P. Bias et al., “Protective effects of licofelone, a 5-lipoxygenase and cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, versus naproxen on cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis: a first multicentre clinical trial using quantitative MRI,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 938–947, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M.-J. Berthiaume, J.-P. Raynauld, J. Martel-Pelletier et al., “Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 556–563, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. L. Davies-Tuck, A. E. Wluka, A. J. Teichtahl et al., “Association between meniscal tears and the peak external knee adduction moment and foot rotation during level walking in postmenopausal women without knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 10, no. 3, article R58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. C. B. Little and D. J. Hunter, “Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: from mouse models to clinical trials,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 9, pp. 485–497, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. B. L. Proffen, M. McElfresh, B. C. Fleming, and M. M. Murray, “A comparative anatomical study of the human knee and six animal species,” Knee, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 493–499, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. H. Lorenz, W. Wenz, M. Ivancic, E. Steck, and W. Richter, “Early and stable upregulation of collagen type II, collagen type I and YKL40 expression levels in cartilage during early experimental osteoarthritis occurs independent of joint location and histological grading,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. R156–R165, 2005. View at Scopus
  57. J. P. Pelletier, M. Kapoor, H. Fahmi, et al., “Strontium ranelate reduces the progression of experimental dog osteoarthritis by inhibiting the expression of key proteases in cartilage and of IL-1beta in the synovium,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 250–257, 2013.
  58. J. Y. Reginster, J. Badurski, N. Bellamy, et al., “Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2013.
  59. S. Jauernig, A. Schweighauser, M. Reist, B. Von Rechenberg, P. Schawalder, and D. Spreng, “The effects of doxycycline on nitric oxide and stromelysin production in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture,” Veterinary Surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 132–139, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. P. Yu Jr., G. N. Smith Jr., K. D. Brandt, S. L. Myers, B. L. O'Connor, and D. A. Brandt, “Reduction of the severity of canine osteoarthritis by prophylactic treatment with oral doxycycline,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1150–1159, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. K. W. Marshall, V. Manolopoulos, K. Mancer, J. Staples, and A. Damyanovich, “Amelioration of disease severity by intraarticular hylan therapy in bilateral canine osteoarthritis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 416–425, 2000. View at Scopus
  62. W. Wenz, S. J. Breusch, J. Graf, and U. Stratmann, “Ultrastructural findings after intra-articular application of hyaluronan in a canine model of arthropathy,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 604–612, 2000. View at Scopus
  63. S. L. Myers, K. D. Brandt, D. B. Burr, B. L. O'Connor, and M. Albrecht, “Effects of a bisphosphonate on bone histomorphometry and dynamics in the canine cruciate deficiency model of osteoarthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2645–2653, 1999. View at Scopus
  64. D. H. Manicourt, R. D. Altman, J. M. Williams, et al., “Treatment with calcitonin suppresses the responses of bone, cartilage, and synovium in the early stages of canine experimental osteoarthritis and significantly reduces the severity of the cartilage lesions,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1159–1167, 1999.
  65. G. N. Smith, Jr, S. L. Myers, K. D. Brandt, E. A. Mickler, and M. E. Albrecht, “Diacerhein treatment reduces the severity of osteoarthritis in the canine cruciate-deficiency model of osteoarthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 545–554, 1999.
  66. B. A. McArthur, C. J. Dy, P. D. Fabricant, and A. G. Valle, “Long term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of hyaluronic acid injection in patients with painful osteoarthritis of the knee,” Patient Preference and Adherence, vol. 6, pp. 905–910, 2012.
  67. E. Nüesch, A. W. Rutjes, S. Trelle, S. Reichenbach, and P. Jüni, “Doxycycline for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD007323, 2009. View at Scopus
  68. R. C. Hamdy and D. N. Daley, “Oral calcitonin,” International Journal of Women's Health, vol. 4, pp. 471–479, 2012.
  69. J. Iwamoto, T. Takeda, Y. Sato, and H. Matsumoto, “Effects of risedronate on osteoarthritis of the knee,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 164–170, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. E. M. Bartels, H. Bliddal, P. K. Schøndorff, R. D. Altman, W. Zhang, and R. Christensen, “Symptomatic efficacy and safety of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 289–296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. K. D. Brandt, S. A. Mazzuca, B. P. Katz et al., “Effects of doxycycline on progression of osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 2015–2025, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. N. Bellamy, J. Campbell, V. Robinson, T. Gee, R. Bourne, and G. Wells, “Viscosupplementation for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD005321, 2005. View at Scopus
  73. M. Dougados, M. Nguyen, L. Berdah, et al., “Evaluation of the structure-modifying effects of diacerein in hip osteoarthritis: ECHODIAH, a three-year, placebo-controlled trial. Evaluation of the chondromodulating effect of diacerein in OA of the Hip,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2539–2547, 2001.
  74. W. C. Bae, M. M. Payanal, A. C. Chen et al., “Topographic patterns of cartilage lesions in knee osteoarthritis,” Cartilage, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. L. Tesio, “Outcome measurement in behavioural sciences: a view on how to shift attention from means to individuals and why,” International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. S. Schmitt and R. P. Di Fabio, “Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1008–1018, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. P. Rialland, S. Bichot, B. Lussier, et al., “Effect of a green-lipped mussel-enriched diet on pain behaviours and functioning in dogs with clinical osteoarthritis,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 2013.
  78. M. Moreau, E. Troncy, J. R. Del Castillo, C. Bedard, D. Gauvin, and B. Lussier, “Effects of feeding a high omega-3 fatty acids diet in dogs with naturally occurring osteoarthritis,” Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 830–837, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. A. Hielm-Bjorkman, R. M. Tulamo, H. Salonen, and M. Raekallio, “Evaluating complementary therapies for canine osteoarthritis—Part II: a homeopathic combination preparation (Zeel),” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 465–471, 2009.
  80. M. Moreau, J. Dupuis, N. H. Bonneau, and M. Lécuyer, “Clinical evaluation of a powder of quality elk velvet antler for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dogs,” Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2004. View at Scopus
  81. M. G. Conzemius and R. B. Evans, “Caregiver placebo effect for dogs with lameness from osteoarthritis,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 241, no. 10, pp. 1314–1319, 2012.
  82. B. KuKanich, “Outpatient oral analgesics in dogs and cats beyond nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs,” Veterinary Clinics of North America, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1109–1125, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. J. N. Farr, S. B. Going, T. G. Lohman et al., “Physical activity levels in patients with early knee osteoarthritis measured by accelerometry,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 1229–1236, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. L. M. Greene, D. J. Marcellin-Little, and B. D. Lascelles, “Associations among exercise duration, lameness severity, and hip joint range of motion in Labrador Retrievers with hip dysplasia,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 242, no. 11, pp. 1528–1533, 2013.
  85. B. W. J. H. Penninx, W. J. Rejeski, J. Pandya et al., “Exercise and depressive symptoms: a comparison of aerobic and resistance exercise effects on emotional and physical function in older persons with high and low depressive symptomatology,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. P124–P132, 2002. View at Scopus
  86. B. W. J. H. Penninx, S. P. Messier, W. J. Rejeski et al., “Physical exercise and the prevention of disability in activities of daily living in older persons with osteoarthritis,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 161, no. 19, pp. 2309–2316, 2001. View at Scopus
  87. W. H. Ettinger Jr., R. Burns, S. P. Messier et al., “A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: the Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST),” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 277, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 1997. View at Scopus