Research Article
Prognostic Value of Combined Aquaporin 3 and Aquaporin 5 Overexpression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Table 1
Association of AQP3 and AQP5 expression with clinicopathological features of 130 hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
| Clinicopathological features | Case | AQP3-high (n, %) | P | AQP5-high (n, %) | P | AQP3-high/AQP5-high (n, %) | P |
| Age (years) | | | | | | | | ≤50 | 72 | 47 (65.28) | NS | 40 (55.56) | NS | 30 (41.67) | NS | >50 | 58 | 35 (60.34) | 33 (56.90) | 22 (37.93) | Gender | | | | | | | | Male | 96 | 62 (64.58) | NS | 54 (56.25) | NS | 40 (41.67) | NS | Female | 34 | 20 (58.82) | 19 (55.88) | 12 (35.29) | Serum AFP | | | | | | | | Positive | 72 | 64 (88.89) | 0.002 | 43 (59.72) | NS | 45 (62.50) | 0.008 | Negative | 58 | 18 (31.03) | 30 (51.72) | 10 (17.24) | Tumor stage | | | | | | | | T1 | 23 | 0 (0) | 0.005 | 0 (0) | 0.008 | 0 (0) | 0.006 | T2 | 40 | 21 (52.50) | 17 (42.50) | 10 (25.00) | T3 | 52 | 46 (88.46) | 40 (76.92) | 27 (51.92) | T4 | 15 | 15 (100.00) | 15 (100.00) | 15 (100.00) | Tumor grade | | | | | | | | G1 | 31 | 20 (64.52) | NS | 13 (41.94) | 0.009 | 3 (9.68) | 0.006 | G2 | 76 | 49 (64.47) | 40 (52.63) | 29 (38.16) | G3 | 23 | 13 (56.52) | 20 (86.96) | 20 (86.96) | Growth pattern | | | | | | | | Trabecular | 101 | 63 (62.38) | NS | 54 (52.47) | NS | 40 (39.60) | NS | Nontrabecular | 29 | 19 (65.52) | 19 (65.52) | 12 (41.38) | Cirrhosis | | | | | | | | Yes | 86 | 46 (53.49) | NS | 47 (54.65) | NS | 34 (39.53) | NS | No | 44 | 26 (59.09) | 26 (59.09) | 18 (40.91) | Underlying liver disease | | | | | | | | Alcoholic | 25 | 15 (60.00) | NS | 15 (60.00) | NS | 7 (28.0) | NS | Hepatitis B | 49 | 28 (57.14) | 28 (57.14) | 18 (36.73) | Hepatitis C | 35 | 27 (77.14) | 18 (51.43) | 15 (42.86) | Unknown | 21 | 12 (57.14) | 12 (57.14) | 12 (57.14) |
|
|
Note: “NS” refers to that the differences among groups have no statistical significance.
|