Research Article
Ocular Dominance and Visual Function Testing
Table 2
Summary of relative frequencies of ocular dominance obtained by different authors with different methods.
| Author (year) | Method used | | Mean/range of age | Right dominance (%) | Left dominance (%) | Uncertain (%) |
| Porac and Coren (1976) [1] | Hole-in-card test | — | — | 65 | 33 | 2 |
| Newman et al. (1985) [19] | Hole-in-card test | 298 | 7–11 | 65.6 | 34.4 | — |
| Rombouts et al. (1996) [6] | fMRI | 26 | 23.3 ± 3.5 | 53.8 | 30.8 | 15.4 |
|
Pointer (2001) [12] | Hole-in-card test | 200 | 13.1 ± 2.4 | 69.5 | 30.5 | — | 200 | 45.1 ± 13.8 | 76 | 24 | — |
|
Cheng et al. (2004) [20] | Hole-in-card test | 50 | 30.3 ± 9.5 | 63.6 | 36.4 | — | Convergence near-point test | 43.6 | 32.7 | 23.6 |
| Handa et al. (2004) [21] | Hole-in-card test | 20 | 60 | 75 | 25 | — |
| Ehrenstein et al. (2005) [22] | Hole-in-card test | 103 | 24.1 ± 4.5 | 68 | 32 | — |
| Shneor and Hochstein (2006) [5] | Hole-in-card test | 21 | 19–57 | 61.9 | 39.1 | — |
| Chia et al. (2007) [23] | Hole-in-card test | 543 | 12–13 | 58 | 30 | 12 |
|
Seijas et al. (2007) [24] | Hole-in-card test | 26 | 26 ± 2 | 50 | 50 | — | 25 | 43.7 ± 5.9 | 60 | 40 | — | Finger pointing | | | 46.2 | 30.8 | 23 | | | 40 | 48 | 12 | Kaleidoscope | | | 69.2 | 30.8 | — | | | 60 | 40 | — | Convergence near-point test | | | 33.3 | 37.5 | 29.2 | | | 36 | 24 | 40 | Distance stereo | | | 7.7 | 15.4 | 76.9 | | | 4 | 4 | 92 | Haidinger test | | | 38.5 | 23 | 38.5 | | | 24 | 16 | 60 |
|
Rice et al. (2008) [25] | Hole-in-card test | 46 | 42.5/(18–78) | 60.9 | 39.1 | — | Convergence near-point test | 37.0 | 41.3 | 21.7 |
| Mean values | 50.7 | 31.5 | 17.8 |
|
|